Skip to main content

Bourdieu, Giddens and Foucault Through the Metric/Nonmetric Distinction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 585 Accesses

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Relational Sociology ((PSRS))

Abstract

The metric/nonmetric distinction not only provides a solution to the problem of structure and agency (diagnosed as case of forced perspective) but also help in bringing a renewed unity in the field of sociological theory. This chapter uses the distinction to organize the ideas of Pierre Bourdieu, Anthony Giddens and Michel Foucault along a single continuum. Bourdieu’s concepts (field, habitus, capital, practice) illuminate the nonmetric aspects of social reality while missing the metric ones. Giddens offers the opposite image: his structuration theory sheds light on the metric aspects of social reality (notably through the concept of time-space distanciation), but leaves the nonmetric aspects in the dark. Foucault falls in-between the two: his analysis of power mixes nonmetric elements with metric ones, although he fails to formulate the relation between them in the form of one distinction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agamben, G. (1998). Homo Sacer. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, L. (2011). On Critique. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (1999). The Sociology of Critical Capacity. European Journal of Social Theory, 2(3), 359–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (2006). On Justification. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline for a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Homo Academicus. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1990). The Logic of Practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1992). The Rules of Art. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1998a). La Domination Masculine. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1998b). Practical Reason. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLanda, M. (2002). Intensive Science and Virtual Philosophy. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dépelteau, F. (2008). Relational Thinking: A Critique of Co-deterministic Theories of Structure and Agency. Sociological Theory, 26(1), 51–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and Punish. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1980). The History of Sexuality (Vol. 1: An Introduction). New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1986). The Use of Pleasure, the History of Sexuality (Vol. 2). New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2000). Power. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2003). Society Must Be Defended. New York: Picador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2007). Security, Territory, Population. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1979). Central Problems in Social Theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1981). A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1992). The Transformation of Intimacy. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1993). New Rules of Sociological Method (2nd ed.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (2000). Runaway World. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guy, J.-S. (2018a). Are Value-Neutrality and Value-Engagement Properties of Social Actors or Social Moments? Canadian Review of Sociology, 55(2), 305–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guy, J.-S. (2018b). Bourdieu in Hyperspace: From Social Topology to the Space of Flows. International Review of Sociology, 29 (3): 510-523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guy, J.-S. (2019). Problems and Differentiation: A Deleuze-Luhmann Encounter. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 26(1), 29–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, T. (2011). Biopolitics, an Advanced Introduction. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (2013). Introduction to Systems Theory. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1958). From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Sébastien Guy .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Guy, JS. (2019). Bourdieu, Giddens and Foucault Through the Metric/Nonmetric Distinction. In: Theory Beyond Structure and Agency. Palgrave Studies in Relational Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18983-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18983-9_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-18982-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-18983-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics