Skip to main content

A Survey of Semidefinite Programming Approaches to the Generalized Problem of Moments and Their Error Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Association for Women in Mathematics Series ((AWMS,volume 20))

Abstract

The generalized problem of moments is a conic linear optimization problem over the convex cone of positive Borel measures with given support. It has a large variety of applications, including global optimization of polynomials and rational functions, option pricing in finance, constructing quadrature schemes for numerical integration, and distributionally robust optimization. A usual solution approach, due to J.B. Lasserre, is to approximate the convex cone of positive Borel measures by finite dimensional outer and inner conic approximations. We will review some results on these approximations, with a special focus on the convergence rate of the hierarchies of upper and lower bounds for the general problem of moments that are obtained from these inner and outer approximations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

eBook
USD   19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We only deal with the GPM in a restricted setting; more general versions of the problem are studied in, e.g., [54].

  2. 2.

    Formally, we consider the usual Borel σ-algebra, say \(\mathcal {B}\), on \(\mathbb {R}^n\), i.e., the smallest (or coarsest) σ-algebra that contains the open sets in \(\mathbb {R}^n\). A positive, finite Borel measure μ is a nonnegative-valued set function on \(\mathcal {B}\), that is countably additive for disjoint sets in \(\mathcal {B}\). The support of μ is the set, denoted Supp(μ), and defined as the smallest closed set S such that \(\mu (\mathbb {R}^n\setminus S) = 0.\)

  3. 3.

    This result is of independent interest in the study of simulated annealing algorithms.

References

  1. Akhiezer, N.I. The Classical Moment Problem. Hafner, New York (1965)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Barvinok, A. A Course in Convexity. Graduate Study in Mathematics, Volume 54, AMS, Providence, Rhode Island (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bayer, C., and Teichmann, J. The proof of Tchakaloff’s theorem. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 134:3035–3040 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Ben Tal, A., and Nemirovski, A. Lectures on Modern Convex Optimization: Analysis, Algorithms, and Engineering Applications. MPS/SIAM Series on Optimization, 2, SIAM (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Castella, M. Rational optimization for nonlinear reconstruction with approximate 0 penalization. Preprint version available at arXiv:1808.00724 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cools, R. An encyclopaedia of cubature formulas, J. Complexity, 19, 445–453 (2003).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Curto, R.E., and Fialkow, L.A. Solution of the truncated complex moment problem for flat data, Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society 119 (568) (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Dai, F., and Xu, Y. Approximation Theory and Harmonic Analysis on Spheres and Balls, Springer, New York (2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. De Klerk, E., Hess, R., and Laurent, M. Improved convergence rates for Lasserre-type hierarchies of upper bounds for box-constrained polynomial optimization. SIAM Journal on Optimization 27(1), 347–367 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. De Klerk, E. The complexity of optimizing over a simplex, hypercube or sphere: a short survey. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 16(2), 111–125 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. De Klerk, E., Lasserre, J.B., Laurent, M., and Sun, S. Bound-constrained polynomial optimization using only elementary calculations. Mathematics of Operations Research, 42(3), 834–853 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. De Klerk, E., Laurent, M. Error bounds for some semidefinite programming approaches to polynomial minimization on the hypercube. SIAM Journal on Optimization 20(6), 3104–3120 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. De Klerk, E., Laurent, M. Comparison of Lasserre’s measure-based bounds for polynomial optimization to bounds obtained by simulated annealing. Mathematics of Operations Research, to appear. Preprint version available at http://arxiv.org/abs/1703.00744 (2017)

  14. De Klerk, E., Laurent, M. Worst-case examples for Lasserre’s measure–based hierarchy for polynomial optimization on the hypercube. Mathematics of Operations Research, to appear. Preprint version available at http://arxiv.org/abs/1804.05524 (2018)

  15. de Klerk, E., Laurent, M. Convergence analysis of a Lasserre hierarchy of upper bounds for polynomial minimization on the sphere. arXiv:1904.08828 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  16. De Klerk, E., Laurent, M., and Parrilo, P. On the equivalence of algebraic approaches to the miniization of forms on the simplex. In D. Henrion and A. Garulli (eds), Positive Polynomials in Control, 121–133, Springer (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. De Klerk, E., Laurent, M., and Parrilo, P. A PTAS for the minimization of polynomials of fixed degree over the simplex. Theoretical Computer Science, 361(2-3), 210–225 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. De Klerk, E., Laurent, M., Sun, Z. Convergence analysis for Lasserre’s measure-based hierarchy of upper bounds for polynomial optimization. Mathematical Programming Series A 162(1), 363–392 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. De Klerk, E., Laurent, M., Sun, Z., and Vera, J. On the convergence rate of grid search for polynomial optimization over the simplex. Optimization Letters, 11(3), 597–608 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. De Klerk, E., Postek, K., and Kuhn, D. Distributionally robust optimization with polynomial densities: theory, models and algorithms. Preprint version available at arXiv:1805.03588 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Doherty, A.C., Wehner, S. Convergence of SDP hierarchies for polynomial optimization on the hypersphere. arXiv:1210.5048v2 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dunkl, C.F., and Xu., Y. Orthogonal Polynomials of Several Variables, Cambridge University Press (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fang, K., Fawzi, H. The sum-of-squares hierarchy on the sphere, and applications in quantum information theory. Preprint (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Faybusovich, L. Global optimization of homogeneous polynomials on the simplex and on the sphere. In C. Floudas and P. Pardalos (eds), Frontiers in Global Optimization, Kluwer (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Folland, G.B. How to integrate a polynomial over a sphere? The American Mathematical Monthly, 108(5), 446–448 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Henrion, D., Lasserre, J.B., and Loefberg, J. GloptiPoly 3: moments, optimization and semidefinite programming. Optimization Methods and Software, 24(4-5), 761–779 (2009). Software download: www.laas.fr/$sim$henrion/software/gloptipoly3

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Josz, C., Henrion, D. Strong duality in Lasserre’s hierarchy for polynomial optimization. Optim. Letters, 10, 3–10 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Kalai. A. T., and Vempala, S. Simulated annealing for convex optimization. Mathematics of Operations Research, 31(2), 253–266 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Kemperman, J.H.B. The general moment problem, a geometric approach. The Annals of Mathematics Statistics, 39, 93–122 (1968)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Landau, H. Moments in Mathematics, Proc. Sympos. Appl. Math., 37 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lasserre, J.B. Global optimization with polynomials and the problem of moments. SIAM J. Optim. 11, 796–817 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Lasserre, J.B. A semidefinite programming approach to the generalized problem of moments. Mathematical Programming Series B 112, 65–92 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Lasserre, J.B. Moments, Positive Polynomials and Their Applications. Imperial College Press (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lasserre, J.B. Introduction to Polynomial and Semi-Algebraic Optimization. Cambridge University Press (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lasserre, J.B. A new look at nonnegativity on closed sets and polynomial optimization. SIAM Journal on Optimization 21(3), 864–885 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Lasserre, J.B. The moment-SOS hierarchy. Proc. Int. Cong. of Math. ? 2018, Rio de Janeiro, 3, 3761–3784 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Laurent, M. Sums of squares, moment matrices and optimization over polynomials. In Emerging Applications of Algebraic Geometry, Vol. 149 of IMA Volumes in Mathematics and its Applications, M. Putinar and S. Sullivant (eds.), Springer, 157–270 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Laurent, M. Optimization over polynomials: Selected topics. In Chapter 16 (Control Theory and Optimization) of Proc. Int. Cong. of Math. 2014. Jang, S. Y., Kim, Y. R., Lee, D-W. & Yie, I. (eds.). Seoul: Kyung Moon SA Co. Ltd., p. 843–869 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Martinez, A., Piazzon, F., Sommariva, A., and Vianello, M. Quadrature-based polynomial optimization. Optim. Lett. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-019-01416-x

  40. Motzkin, T.S., Sraus, E.G. Maxima for graphs and a new proof of a theorem of Túran. Canadian J. Math., 17, 533–540 (1965)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  41. Nesterov, Yu. Random walk in a simplex and quadratic optimization over convex polytopes. CORE Discussion Paper 2003/71, CORE-UCL, Louvain-La-Neuve (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Nie, J. Optimality conditions and finite convergence of Lasserre’s hierarchy. Mathematical Programming, Ser. A,146(1-2), 97–121 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. Nie, J., and Schweighofer, M. On the complexity of Putinar’s positivstellensatz Journal of Complexity 23, 135–150 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  44. Piazzon, F., Vianello, M. Markov inequalities, Dubiner distance, norming meshes and polynomial optimization on convex bodies. Preprint at Optimization Online (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Putinar, M. Positive polynomials on compact semi-algebraic sets. Ind. Univ. Math. J. 42, 969–984 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  46. Putinar, M. A note on Tchakaloff’s theorem. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 125(8), 2409–2414 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  47. Reznick, B. Some concrete aspects of Hilbert’s 17th Problem. In Real algebraic geometry and ordered structures (Baton Rouge, LA, 1996), pages 251–272. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Rogosinski, W.W. Moments of non-negative mass, Proceedings of the Royal Society A 245, 1–27 (1958)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  49. Ryu, E.K. and Boyd, S.P. Extensions of Gauss Quadrature Via Linear Programming. Foundations of Computational Mathematics 15(4), 953–971 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  50. Schmüdgen, K. The K-moment problem for compact semi-algebraic sets. Math. Ann., 289, 203–206 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  51. Schmüdgen, K. The Moment Problem. Springer (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Schweighofer, M. On the complexity of Schmüdgen’s Positivstellensatz, Journal of Complexity 20(4), 529–543 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  53. Schwartz, R.E. The 5 electron case of Thomson’s problem. Exp. Math 22(2), 157–186 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  54. Shapiro, A. On duality theory of conic linear problems, Semi-Infinite Programming: Recent Advances (M,Á. Goberna and M.A. López, eds.), Springer, 135–165 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Slot, L., Laurent, M. Improved convergence analysis of Lasserre’s measure-based upper bounds for polynomial minimization on compact sets. arXiv:1905.08142 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Tao, T. An Epsilon of Room, I: Real Analysis: pages from year three of a mathematical blog. AMS, Graduate Studies in Mathematics Volume: 117 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Trefethen, L.N. Cubature, approximation, and isotropy in the hypercube. SIAM Review, 59(3), 469–491 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  58. Tchakaloff, V. Formules de cubature mécanique à coefficients non négatifs, Bull. Sci. Math., 81, 123–134 (1957)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement 813211 (POEMA).

The authors would like to thank Fernando Mario de Oliveira Filho for insightful discussions on the duality theory of the GPM.

Note Added in Proof Some of the above mentioned questions have been recently addressed. In particular, the results in Table 2 for the inner approximation bounds have been sharpened. Namely, the convergence rate in O(1∕r 2) has been extended for the sphere in [15] and for the hypercube equipped with more measures in [55]. A sharper rate in \(O(\log ^2r/r^2)\) for convex bodies and in \(O(\log r/r)\) for compact sets with an interior condition is shown in [55]. In addition, the convergence rate O(1∕r 2) is shown in [23] for the outer approximation bounds in the case of the unit sphere.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monique Laurent .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Association for Women in Mathematics and the Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Klerk, E.d., Laurent, M. (2019). A Survey of Semidefinite Programming Approaches to the Generalized Problem of Moments and Their Error Analysis. In: Araujo, C., Benkart, G., Praeger, C., Tanbay, B. (eds) World Women in Mathematics 2018. Association for Women in Mathematics Series, vol 20. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21170-7_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics