Abstract
In the present power scenario, the power quality is most significant in the field of grid-connected and load-connected inverter. A number of techniques were proposed in the field of renewable energy for improving the efficiency and quality of the power. In this article, the time response of the controller was analysed and verified for load-connected multilevel inverter. There are different types of controllers in use, such as Proportional (P), Proportional Integral (PI), Proportional Integral Derivative (PID), Integer Order PID (IOPID), etc. Out of those controllers classic PI controller is most efficient in the speed of response, that’s why the classic PI controller is compared with proposed Fractional Order Proportional Integral Derivative controller (FOPID). Based on the results, FOPID has more speed of response. The outputs of the multilevel inverter are to be improved by minimizing the rise time, settling time and steady-state error of the inverter. The Simulink model was built to control the motor speed and it will going to be applied for grid in the future.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Abbreviations
- DC:
-
Direct Current
- FOPID:
-
Fractional-order Proportional Integral Derivatives
- HPWM:
-
Hybrid Pulse Width Modulation
- IOPID:
-
Integer-order Proportional Integral Derivatives
- MLI:
-
Multilevel Inverter
- MOSFET:
-
Metal-oxide Semiconductor Field Effect Transistor
- PI:
-
Proportional Integral
- PID:
-
Proportional Integral Derivatives
- PV:
-
Photo-voltaic
- RPM:
-
Revolution Per Minute
- RPWM:
-
Random Pulse Width Modulation
- SPWM:
-
Single Pulse Width Modulation
- THD:
-
Total Harmonic Distortion
- VCO:
-
Voltage-controlled Oscillator
References
Smriti Rao K, Mishra R (2014) Comparative study of P, PI and PID controller for speed control of VSI-fed induction motor. Int J Eng Dev Res 2(2):2321–9939
Tepljakov A, Alagoz BB, Yeroglu C, Gonzalez E, Nia SHH, Petlenkov E (2018) FOPID controllers and their industrial applications: a survey of recent results. 3rd IFAC conference on advances in proportional-integral-derivative control, Ghent, Belgium, May 9–11, 2018
Venkateswara rao R, Ramash Kumar K, Narasimha Raju VSN (2017) Design of PI controller for seven level symmetrical MLI with minimal quantity of switches plus Snubber circuit. Int J Eng Trends Technol 47(8):445–452
Ahamed M, Sheir A, Orabi M (2017) Real time solution and implementation of selective harmonic elimination of seven-level multi level inverter. IEEE J Emerg Sel Top Power Electron 5(4):1700–1709
Salam MA, Aziz A, Alwaeli AHA, Kazem HA (2013) Optimal sizing of photovoltaic systems using HOMER for Sohar, Oman. Int J Renew Energy Res 3(2)
George DS, Baiju MR. Random PWM scheme for 3-level inverter using offset time randomization. IECON 2011 – 37th annual conference of the IEEE industrial electronics society
Kulkarni A, John V (2013) Mitigation of lower order harmonics in a grid connected single phase PV inverter. IEEE Trans Power Electron 28(11):5024–5037
Ramanathan T, Ramesh R, Subramaniam CK, Ganesan K. Pseudorandom carrier based subharmonic PWM for cascaded multilevel inverters. IEEE international symposium on circuits and systems (ISCAS)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
S, C., S, D. (2020). PV-Based Multilevel Inverter-Fed Three-Phase Induction Motor with Improved Time and Speed of Response. In: Kumar, L., Jayashree, L., Manimegalai, R. (eds) Proceedings of International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Smart Grid and Smart City Applications. AISGSC 2019 2019. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24051-6_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24051-6_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-24050-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-24051-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)