Abstract
The emergence of New Public Management (NPM) and its reframing of the role of government contributed to the interest in identity within organization studies, management, and public administration from the 1990s onward. To date, more attention has been paid to how these changes have affected the identity of those targeted by public services than those involved in policy or service delivery. And yet, this trend has also had complex implications for public servants, and their understanding of themselves at work (self-identity), by introducing assumptions, priorities, values, and practices largely drawn from the private sector and at odds with a traditional public service ethos. Such macro-level changes have created potential contradictions for public servant identity but also arguably introduced a range of new resources that could be mobilized in their identity work – the processes with which individuals construct, maintain, or change a sense of self-understanding. This chapter explores these issues focusing on three main points: evidence about the extent and nature of identity-related change at an individual level; the interaction with professional and occupational identity; and how individuals construct the identities of the organizations in which they work. These themes can be used to inform future research on the evolution of public servant identity in the context of the current shift to New Public Governance (NPG).
References
Balfour, D.L., and J.W. Grubbs. 2000. Character, corrosion and the civil servant: The human consequences of globalization and the new public management. Administrative Theory & Praxis 22 (5): 570–584.
Berg, A.M. 2006. Transforming public services – Transforming the public servant? International Journal of Public Sector Management 19 (6): 556–568.
Bland, J.T. 2018. Frontline participatory behavior in networks: Identity work and the corresponding behavioral determinations. Public Organization Review 18 (4): 461–485.
Bourgault, J., and K. van Dorpe. 2013. Managerial reforms, public service bargains and top civil servant identity. International Review of Administrative Sciences 79 (1): 49–70.
Caron, D.J., and D. Giauque. 2006. Civil servant identity at the crossroads: New challenges for public administration. International Journal of Public Sector Management 19 (6): 543–555.
Croft, C., G. Currie, and A. Lockett. 2015. Broken ‘two-way windows’? An exploration of professional hybrids. Public Administration 93 (2): 380–394.
Davies, A., and R. Thomas. 2003. Talking cop: Discourses of change and policing identities. Public Administration 81 (4): 681–699.
———. 2008. Dixon of dock green got shot’: Policing identity work and organizational change. Public Administration 86 (3): 627–642.
Dickinson, H., C. Needham, C. Mangan, and H. Sullivan. 2019. Introduction: Imagining the future public service workforce. In Reimagining the future public service workforce, Springer Briefs in Political Science, ed. H. Dickinson, C. Needham, C. Mangan, and H. Sullivan. Singapore: Springer.
Douglas, M., ed. 1982. Essays in the sociology of perception. London: Routledge.
Du Gay, P. 1996. Organizing identity: Entrepreneurial governance and public management. In Questions of cultural identity, ed. S. Hall and P. du Gay, 151–169. London: SAGE.
———. 2008. ‘Without affection or enthusiasm’: Problems of involvement and attachment in ‘responsive’ public management. Organization 15 (3): 335–353.
Fountain, J.E. 2001. Paradoxes of public sector customer service. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration 14 (1): 55–73.
Fry, B. and Nigro, L.G. (1996). Max Weber and US Public Administration: the administrator as neutral public servant. Journal of Management History 2 (1): 37–46.
Halford, S., and P. Leonard. 1999. New identities? Professionalism, managerialism and the construction of self. In Professionals and the new managerialism in the public sector, ed. M. Exworthy and S. Halford, 102–120. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Hatch, M.J., and M. Schultz. 1997. Relations between organizational culture, identity and image. European Journal of Marketing 31 (5–6): 356–365.
Hood, C. 2000. Paradoxes of public-sector managerialism, old public management and public service bargains. International Public Management Journal 3 (1): 1–22.
Iedema, R., P. Degeling, J. Braithwaite, and L. White. 2003. ‘It’s an interesting conversation I’m hearing’: The doctor as manager. Organization Studies 25 (1): 15–33.
Llewellyn, S. 2001. ‘Two-way windows’: Clinicians as medical managers. Organization Studies 22 (4): 593–623.
Llewellyn, N. 2004. In search of modernization: The negotiation of social identity in organizational reform. Organization Studies 35 (6): 947–968.
Lok, J. 2010. Institutional logics as identity projects. Academy of Management Journal 53 (6): 1305–1335.
McGivern, G., G. Currie, E. Ferlie, L. Fitzgerald, and J. Waring. 2015. Hybrid manager-professionals’ identity work: The maintenance and hybridization of medical professionalism in managerial contexts. Public Administration 93 (2): 412–432.
Meyer, R.E., and G. Hammerschmid. 2006a. Public management reform: An identity project. Public Policy and Administration 21 (1): 99–115.
———. 2006b. Changing institutional logics and executive identities – A managerial challenge to public administration in Austria. American Behavioral Scientist 49 (7): 560–568.
Meyer, R.E., I. Egger-Peitler, M.A. Höllerer, and G. Hammerschmid. 2014. Of bureaucrats and passionate public managers: Institutional logics, executive identities, and public service motivation. Public Administration 92 (4): 861–885.
Noveck, B.S. and Glover, R. 2019. Today’s Problems, Yesterday’s Toolkit: Restoring Trust in Government by Reinventing how the Public Service Works. ANZSOG research paper. ANZSOG (Australian and New Zealand School of Government), https://www.anzsog.edu.au/preview-documents/publications-and-brochures/5425-today-sproblems-yesterday-s-toolkit/file.
Osborne, S.P., ed. 2010. The new public governance: Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance. London/New York: Routledge.
Reissner, S.C. 2019. ‘We are this hybrid’: Members’ search for organizational identity in an institutionalized public-private partnership. Public Administration 97 (1): 48–63.
Rondeaux, G. 2006. Modernizing public administration: The impact on organizational identities. International Journal of Public Sector Management 19 (6): 569–584.
Skålén, P. 2004. New public management reform and the construction of organizational identities. International Journal of Public Sector Management 17 (3): 251–263.
Spyridonidis, D., J. Hendry, and J. Barlow. 2015. Understanding hybrid roles: The roles of identity processes amongst physicians. Public Administration 93 (2): 395–411.
Thomas, R., and A. Davies. 2005. Theorizing the micro-politics of resistance: New public management and managerial identities in the UK public services. Organization Studies 26 (5): 683–706.
Tomlinson, F. 2008. Positioning acts and identity effects: Constructing identities for organizations in partnership. International Journal of Public Administration 31 (9): 1003–1023.
Van Bockel, J., and M. Noordegraaf. 2006. Identifying identities: Performance-driven, but professional public managers. International Journal of Public Sector Management 19 (6): 585–597.
van der Wal, Z. 2017. The 21st century public manager. London: Palgrave.
Witman, Y., G.A.C. Smid, P.L. Meurs, and D.L. Willems. 2010. Doctor in the lead: Balancing between two worlds. Organization 18 (4): 477–495.
Further Reading
On Public Servant Identity
Horton, S. 2006. New public management: Its impact on public servant’s identity: An introduction to this symposium. International Journal of Public Sector Management 19 (6): 533–543.
Lipsky, M. 2010. Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service. 30th Anniversary edition. New York: SAGE.
McInnes, P., N. Beech, and R. MacIntosh. 2008. Introduction: Exploring the impacts and processes of identity change. International Journal of Public Administration 31 (9): 953–956.
Needham, C., and C. Mangan. 2016. The twenty-first-century public servant: Working at three boundaries of public and private. Public Money & Management 36: 265–272.
Steen, T., and C. Schott. 2019. Public sector employees in a challenging work environment. Public Administration 97 (1): 3–10.
Valenzuela, F. 2019. Affect, diversity, and the problem of consolation in the critique of public servant identity. In Diversity, affect and embodiment in organizing, ed. M. Fotaki and A. Pullen. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave.
On Identity in Organizations Generally
Alvesson, M., K.L. Ashcraft, and R. Thomas. 2008. Identity matters: Reflections on the construction of identity scholarship in organization studies. Organization 15 (1): 5–28.
Ashforth, B.E., and B.S. Schinoff. 2016. Identity under construction: How individuals come to define themselves in organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 3: 111–137.
Brown, A.D. 2015. Identity and identity work in organizations. International Journal of Management Reviews 17: 20–40.
Caza, B.B., H. Vough, and H. Puranik. 2018. Identity work in organizations and occupations: Definitions, theories and pathways forward. Journal of Organizational Behavior 39: 889–910.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Ainsworth, S., Ghin, P. (2021). Public Servants in Reflection. In: Sullivan, H., Dickinson, H., Henderson, H. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of the Public Servant. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29980-4_88
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29980-4_88
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-29979-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-29980-4
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences