Abstract
Patient casemix is a system of defining groups of patients. For reimbursement purposes, these groups should be clinically meaningful and share similar resource usage during their hospital stay. In the UK National Health Service (NHS) these groups are known as health resource groups (HRGs), and are predominantly derived based on expert advice and checked for homogeneity afterwards, typically using length of stay (LOS) to assess similarity in resource consumption. LOS does not fully capture the actual resource usage of patients, and assurances on the accuracy of HRG as a basis of payment rate derivation are therefore difficult to give. Also, with complex patient groups such as those encountered in burn care, expert advice will often reflect average patients only, therefore not capturing the complexity and severity of many patients’ injury profile. The data-driven development of a grouper may support the identification of features and segments that more accurately account for patient complexity and resource use. In this paper, we describe the development of such a grouper using established techniques for dimensionality reduction and cluster analysis. We argue that a data-driven approach minimises bias in feature selection. Using a registry of patients from 23 burn services in England and Wales, we demonstrate a reduction of within cluster cost-variation in the identified groups, when compared to the original casemix.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Hopfe, M., Stucki, G., Marshall, R., Twomey, C.D., Üstün, T.B., Prodinger, B.: Capturing patients’ needs in casemix: a systematic literature review on the value of adding functioning information in reimbursement systems. BMC Health Serv. Res. 16(1), 40 (2015)
Jegers, M., Kesteloot, K., De Graeve, D., Gilles, W.: A typology for provider payment systems in health care. Health Pol. (New York) 60(3), 255–273 (2002)
Mathauer, I., Wittenbecher, F.: Hospital payment systems based on diagnosis-related groups: experiences in low- and middle-income countries. Bull. World Health Organ. 91(10), 746–756A (2013)
Fischer, W.: The DRG Family: State of affairs (2007)
Street, A., Kobel, C., Renaud, T., Thuilliez, J.: How well do diagnosis- related groups explain variations in costs or length of stay among patients and across hospitals? methods for analysing routine patient data. Health Econ. 21, 6–18 (2012)
Sembiring, R.W., Zain, J.M., Embong, A.: Dimension reduction of health data clustering. Int. J. New Comput. Archit. Appl. 1(3), 1041–1050 (2011)
National Burn Care Review Committee, National Burn Care Review Committee Report Standards and Strategy for Burn Care A Review of Burn Care in The British Isles Contents (2001)
Pedregosa, F., et al.: Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 12, 2825–2830 (2011)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Onah, C.N., Allmendinger, R., Handl, J., Yiapanis, P., Dunn, K.W. (2019). A Clustering-Based Patient Grouper for Burn Care. In: Yin, H., Camacho, D., Tino, P., Tallón-Ballesteros, A., Menezes, R., Allmendinger, R. (eds) Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning – IDEAL 2019. IDEAL 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11872. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33617-2_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33617-2_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-33616-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-33617-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)