Skip to main content

Autobidding with Constraints

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Web and Internet Economics (WINE 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11920))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Autobidding is becoming increasingly important in the domain of online advertising, and has become a critical tool used by many advertisers for optimizing their ad campaigns. We formulate fundamental questions around the problem of bidding for performance under very general affine cost constraints. We design optimal single-agent bidding strategies for the general bidding problem, in multi-slot truthful auctions. The novel contribution is to show a strong connection between bidding and auction design, in that the bidding formula is optimal if and only if the underlying auction is truthful.

Next, we move from the single-agent view to a full-system view: What happens when all advertisers adopt optimal autobidding? We prove that in general settings, there exists an equilibrium between the bidding agents for all the advertisers. As our main result, we prove a Price of Anarchy bound: For any number of general affine constraints, the total value (conversions) obtained by the advertisers in the bidding-agent equilibrium is no less than 1/2 of what we could generate via a centralized ad allocation scheme, one which does not consider any auction incentives or provide any per-advertiser guarantee.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agrawal, S., Devanur, N.R.: Fast algorithms for online stochastic convex programming. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA 2015, San Diego, CA, USA, 4–6 January 2015, pp. 1405–1424 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611973730.93

  2. Arora, S., Hazan, E., Kale, S.: The multiplicative weights update method: a meta-algorithm and applications. Theory Comput. 8(1), 121–164 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Azar, Y., Feldman, M., Gravin, N., Roytman, A.: Liquid price of anarchy. In: Bilò, V., Flammini, M. (eds.) SAGT 2017. LNCS, vol. 10504, pp. 3–15. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66700-3_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Buchbinder, N., Jain, K., Naor, J.S.: Online primal-dual algorithms for maximizing ad-auctions revenue. In: Arge, L., Hoffmann, M., Welzl, E. (eds.) ESA 2007. LNCS, vol. 4698, pp. 253–264. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75520-3_24

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Google Ads Help Center: About automated bidding. https://support.google.com/google-ads/answer/2979071. Accessed 12 Feb 2019

  6. Google Ads Help Center: About universal app campaigns. https://support.google.com/google-ads/answer/6247380. Accessed Feb 13 2019

  7. Charles, D.X., Chakrabarty, D., Chickering, M., Devanur, N.R., Wang, L.: Budget smoothing for internet ad auctions: a game theoretic approach. In: Proceedings of the Fourteenth ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, EC 2013, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 16–20 June 2013, pp. 163–180 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chen, P., et al.: Ad serving using a compact allocation plan. In: Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, EC 2012, Valencia, Spain, 4–8 June 2012, pp. 319–336 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, Y., Berkhin, P., Anderson, B., Devanur, N.R.: Real-time bidding algorithms for performance-based display ad allocation. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Diego, CA, USA, 21–24 August 2011, pp. 1307–1315 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Devanur, N.R., Jain, K., Sivan, B., Wilkens, C.A.: Near optimal online algorithms and fast approximation algorithms for resource allocation problems. J. ACM 66(1), 7:1–7:41 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3284177

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Dobzinski, S., Leme, R.P.: Efficiency guarantees in auctions with budgets. In: Esparza, J., Fraigniaud, P., Husfeldt, T., Koutsoupias, E. (eds.) ICALP 2014, Part I. LNCS, vol. 8572, pp. 392–404. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43948-7_33

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Feldman, J., Korula, N., Mirrokni, V., Muthukrishnan, S., Pál, M.: Online ad assignment with free disposal. In: Leonardi, S. (ed.) WINE 2009. LNCS, vol. 5929, pp. 374–385. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10841-9_34

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Feldman, J., Muthukrishnan, S., Pál, M., Stein, C.: Budget optimization in search-based advertising auctions. In: Proceedings 8th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC-2007), San Diego, California, USA, 11–15 June 2007, pp. 40–49 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ghosh, A., Rubinstein, B.I.P., Vassilvitskii, S., Zinkevich, M.: Adaptive bidding for display advertising. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2009, Madrid, Spain, 20–24 April 2009, pp. 251–260 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Karande, C., Mehta, A., Srikant, R.: Optimizing budget constrained spend in search advertising. In: Sixth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, WSDM 2013, Rome, Italy, 4–8 February 2013, pp. 697–706 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mehta, A.: Online matching and ad allocation. Found. Trends® Theor. Comput. Sci. 8(4), 265–368 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mehta, A., Saberi, A., Vazirani, U., Vazirani, V.: Adwords and generalized online matching. J. ACM 54(5), 22 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Plotkin, S.A., Shmoys, D.B., Tardos, É.: Fast approximation algorithms for fractional packing and covering problems. In: 32nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, San Juan, Puerto Rico, 1–4 October 1991, pp. 495–504 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ren, K., Zhang, W., Chang, K., Rong, Y., Yu, Y., Wang, J.: Bidding machine: learning to bid for directly optimizing profits in display advertising. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 30(4), 645–659 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang, W., Yuan, S., Wang, J.: Optimal real-time bidding for display advertising. In: The 20th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD 2014, New York, NY, USA, 24–27 August 2014, pp. 1077–1086 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashwinkumar Badanidiyuru .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Aggarwal, G., Badanidiyuru, A., Mehta, A. (2019). Autobidding with Constraints. In: Caragiannis, I., Mirrokni, V., Nikolova, E. (eds) Web and Internet Economics. WINE 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11920. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35389-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35389-6_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-35388-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-35389-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics