Skip to main content

What Drives the Level of Non-financial Assurance in PIEs? Empirical Evidence on the European Firms Listed on Forbes 2000

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Accounting, Accountability and Society

Part of the book series: CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance ((CSEG))

Abstract

Since December 2017, all the European members have transposed the Directive 2014/95/EU into their legal systems. The aim of the directive was to promote the harmonization of non-financial information through the definition of guidelines aimed at regulating its content. In accordance with the principle of gold plating, the transposition of the directive into national legal systems has been characterized by the prediction of different constraints. In particular, the Member States have provided for different rules on the activity of external assurance. This phenomenon represents one of the most difficult for an effective non-financial reporting harmonization in Europe. The provision of a third-party assurance is one of the most important drivers to achieve legitimization by the stakeholder. In particular, previous studies have shown that non-financial information presents a physiological gap in credibility toward stakeholders. This credibility gap stems from the risk of greenwashing; that is, the attitude of management to report false or untruthful information of a non-financial type in order to pursue utilitarian benefits. Also, from the investor’s point of view, the third-party external assurance could be useful to evaluate the firm’s performance before investing. In particular, it shows that assurance of sustainability reporting is comparable, in terms of its effects on stakeholders, to the financial statement certification process. According to previous studies, the aim of this paper is to evaluate the quality of the third-party external assurance of the non-financial information produced by the European PIE in 2017. Our findings will provide further information regarding the effective level of harmonization of non-financial reporting in Europe after the implementation of the Directive 2014/95/EU. Also, we evaluate how the legal provision of a third-party external assurance impacted the choice of firms to adopt this kind of legitimization strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literature

  • AccountAbility. (2008). AA1000 Assurance standard 2008. Available at: http://www.accountability.org/images/content/0/5/056/AA1000AS%202008.pdf. Accessed June 18 2019.

  • Ackers, B., & Eccles, N. S. (2015). Mandatory corporate social responsibility assurance practices: The case of king III in South Africa. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28(4), 515–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andon, P., Free, C., & O’Dwyer, B. (2015). Annexing new audit spaces: challenges and adaptations. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28(8), 1400–1430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, S., Delvaille, P., & McLeay, S. (1995). The measurement of harmonisation and the comparability of financial statement items: Within-country and between-country effects. Accounting and Business Research, 25(98), 67–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagnoli, M., & Watts, S. G. (2017). Voluntary assurance of voluntary CSR disclosure. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 26(1), 205–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrow, M. (2009). Statistics for economics, accounting and business studies. Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beddewela, E., & Fairbrass, J. (2016). Seeking legitimacy through CSR: Institutional pressures and corporate responses of multinationals in Sri Lanka. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(3), 503–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bebbington, J., Kirk, E. A., & Larrinaga, C. (2012). The production of normativity: A comparison of reporting regimes in Spain and the UK. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37(2), 78–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boiral, O., Heras-Saizarbitoria, I., Brotherton, M. C., & Bernard, J. (2019). Ethical issues in the assurance of sustainability reports: Perspectives from assurance providers. Journal of Business Ethics, 159(4), 1111–1125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braam, G. J., de Weerd, L. U., Hauck, M., & Huijbregts, M. A. (2016). Determinants of corporate environmental reporting: The importance of environmental performance and assurance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 129, 724–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, H. S., de Jong, M., & Levy, D. L. (2009). Building institutions based on information disclosure: Lessons from GRI’s sustainability reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(6), 571–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canibano, L., & Mora, A. (2000). Evaluating the statistical significance of de facto accounting harmonization: A study of European global players. European Accounting Review, 9(3), 349–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, R. J., & Grenier, J. H. (2014). Understanding and contributing to the enigma of corporate social responsibility (CSR) assurance in the United States. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 34(1), 97–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chauvey, J. N., Giordano-Spring, S., Cho, C. H., & Patten, D. M. (2015). The normativity and legitimacy of CSR disclosure: Evidence from France. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(4), 789–803.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. R., & Simnett, R. (2014). CSR and assurance services: A research agenda. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 34(1), 59–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • CSR Europe and GRI. (2017). Member State Implementation of Directive 2014/95/EU. Available at: https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/NFRpublication%20online_version.pdf. Accessed June 18 2019.

  • De Moor, P., & Beelde, I. D. (2005). Environmental auditing and the role of the accountancy profession: A literature review. Environmental Management, 36(2), 205–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Villiers, C., Rinaldi, L., & Unerman, J. (2014). Integrated Reporting: Insights, gaps and an agenda for future research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(7), 1042–1067.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deegan, C. (2002). Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures–a theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilla, W. N., Janvrin, D., Perkins, J. D., & Raschke, R. L. (2015). Integrated reporting: The influence of non-financial assurance report level and format on investor judgments. Working paper: Iowa. Google Scholar.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American sociological review, 147–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumay, J., Bernardi, C., Guthrie, J., & La Torre, M. (2017). Barriers to implementing the international integrated reporting framework: A contemporary academic perspective. Meditari Accountancy Research, 25(4), 461–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumay, J., La Torre, M., & Farneti, F. (2019). Developing trust through stewardship: Implications for intellectual capital, integrated reporting, and the EU Directive 2014/95/EU. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 20(1), 11–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumitru, M., Dyduch, J., Gușe, R. G., & Krasodomska, J. (2017). Corporate reporting practices in Poland and Romania—An ex-ante study to the new non-financial reporting European directive. Accounting in Europe, 14(3), 279–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, R. G., Krzus, M. P., & Watson, L. A. (2012). Integrated reporting requires integrated assurance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farooq, M. B., & De Villiers, C. (2017). The market for sustainability assurance services: A comprehensive literature review and future avenues for research. Pacific Accounting Review, 29(1), 79–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Feijoo, B., Romero, S., & Ruiz, S. (2014). Effect of stakeholders’ pressure on transparency of sustainability reports within the GRI framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(1), 53–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flasher, R., Luchs, C. K., & Souza, J. L. (2018). Sustainability assurance provider participation in standard setting. Research in Accounting Regulation, 30(1), 20–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuhrmann, S., Ott, C., Looks, E., & Guenther, T. W. (2017). The contents of assurance statements for sustainability reports and information asymmetry. Accounting and Business Research, 47(4), 369–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gianfelici, C., Casadei, A., & Cembali, F. (2018). The relevance of nationality and industry for stakeholder salience: An investigation through integrated reports. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(2), 541–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillet-Monjarret, C. (2015). Assurance of sustainability information: A study of media pressure. Accounting in Europe, 12(1), 87–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gürtürk, A., & Hahn, R. (2016). An empirical assessment of assurance statements in sustainability reports: Smoke screens or enlightening information? Journal of Cleaner Production, 136, 30–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, J., & Parker, L. D. (1989). Corporate social reporting: A rebuttal of legitimacy theory. Accounting and Business Research, 19(76), 343–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haniffa, R. M., & Cooke, T. E. (2002). Culture, corporate governance and disclosure in Malaysian corporations. Abacus, 38(3), 317–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan, M., Maijoor, S., Mock, T. J., Roebuck, P., Simnett, R., & Vanstraelen, A. (2005). The different types of assurance services and levels of assurance provided. International Journal of Auditing, 9(2), 91–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, D., & Davis, D. (2004). The voluntary choice of an auditor of any level of quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 23(2), 37–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. W., & Jones, T. M. (1992). Stakeholder-agency theory. Journal of Management Studies, 29(2), 131–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husted, B. W., & de Jesus Salazar, J. (2006). Taking Friedman seriously: Maximizing profits and social performance. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 75–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). (2013). ISAE 3000 (Revised). Assurance engagements other than audits or reviews of historical financial information international framework for assurance engagements ISAE 3402, assurance reports on controls at a service organization exposure draft of proposed. Available at: www.ifac.org/sites/default/files/publications/exposure-drafts/IAASB_ISAE_3000_ED.pdf.

  • Jo, H., & Na, H. (2012). Does CSR reduce firm risk? Evidence from controversial industry sectors. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(4), 441–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. J., & Solomon, J. F. (2010, March). Social and environmental report assurance: Some interview evidence. In Accounting forum (Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 20–31). Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Torre, M., Sabelfeld, S., Blomkvist, M., Tarquinio, L., & Dumay, J. (2018). Harmonising non-financial reporting regulation in Europe. Meditari Accountancy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalnins, A. (2018). Multicollinearity: How common factors cause type 1 errors in multivariate regression. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8), 2362–2385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolk, A., & Perego, P. (2010). Determinants of the adoption of sustainability assurance statements: An international investigation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(3), 182–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • KPMG. (2017). The road ahead. The KPMG survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Torre, M., Sabelfeld, S., Blomkvist, M., Tarquinio, L., & Dumay, J. (2018). Harmonising non-financial reporting regulation in Europe: Practical forces and projections for future research. Meditari Accountancy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindorff, M., Jonson, E. P., & McGuire, L. (2012). Strategic corporate social responsibility in controversial industry sectors: The social value of harm minimisation. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(4), 457–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lock, I., & Seele, P. (2015). Analyzing sector-specific CSR reporting: Social and environmental disclosure to investors in the chemicals and banking and insurance industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(2), 113–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luque-Vílchez, M., & Larrinaga, C. (2016). Reporting models do not translate well: Failing to regulate CSR reporting in Spain. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 36(1), 56–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manes-Rossi, F., Tiron-Tudor, A., Nicolò, G., & Zanellato, G. (2018). Ensuring More Sustainable Reporting in Europe Using Non-Financial Disclosure—De Facto and De Jure Evidence. Sustainability, 10(4), 1162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Ferrero, J., & García-Sánchez, I. M. (2017). Coercive, normative and mimetic isomorphism as determinants of the voluntary assurance of sustainability reports. International Business Review, 26(1), 102–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Ferrero, J., & García-Sánchez, I. M. (2018). The level of sustainability assurance: The effects of brand reputation and industry specialisation of assurance providers. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(4), 971–990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matuszak, Ł., & Różańska, E. (2017). CSR disclosure in Polish-listed companies in the light of Directive 2014/95/EU requirements: Empirical evidence. Sustainability, 9(12), 2304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelon, G., Pilonato, S., & Ricceri, F. (2015). CSR reporting practices and the quality of disclosure: An empirical analysis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 33, 59–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mock, T. J., Strohm, C., & Swartz, K. M. (2007). An examination of worldwide assured sustainability reporting. Australian Accounting Review, 17(41), 67–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moroney, R., Windsor, C., & Aw, Y. T. (2012). Evidence of assurance enhancing the quality of voluntary environmental disclosures: An empirical analysis. Accounting & Finance, 52(3), 903–939.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Dwyer, B., & Owen, D. L. (2005). Assurance statement practice in environmental, social and sustainability reporting: A critical evaluation. The British Accounting Review, 37(2), 205–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, J., & Brorson, T. (2005). Experiences of and views on third-party assurance of corporate environmental and sustainability reports. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13(10–11), 1095–1106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perego, P. (2009). Causes and consequences of choosing different assurance providers: An international study of sustainability reporting. International Journal of Management, 26(3), 412–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perego, P., & Kolk, A. (2012). Multinationals’ accountability on sustainability: The evolution of third-party assurance of sustainability reports. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(2), 173–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pflugrath, G., Roebuck, P., & Simnett, R. (2011). Impact of assurance and assurer’s professional affiliation on financial analysts’ assessment of credibility of corporate social responsibility information. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(3), 239–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruhnke, K., & Gabriel, A. (2013). Determinants of voluntary assurance on sustainability reports: An empirical analysis. Journal of Business Economics, 83(9), 1063–1091.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seguí-Mas, E., Bollas-Araya, H. M., & Polo-Garrido, F. (2015). Sustainability assurance on the biggest cooperatives of the world: An analysis of their adoption and quality. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 86(2), 363–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siano, A., Vollero, A., Conte, F., & Amabile, S. (2017). “More than words”: Expanding the taxonomy of greenwashing after the Volkswagen scandal. Journal of Business Research, 71, 27–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sierra, L., Zorio, A., & García-Benau, M. A. (2013). Sustainable development and assurance of corporate social responsibility reports published by Ibex-35 companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20(6), 359–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sierra-Garcia, L., Garcia-Benau, M. A., & Bollas-Araya, H. M. (2018). Empirical Analysis of Non-Financial Reporting by Spanish Companies. Administrative Sciences, 8(3), 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simnett, R. (2012). Assurance of sustainability reports: Revision of ISAE 3000 and associated research opportunities. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 3(1), 89–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simnett, R., & Huggins, A. L. (2015). Integrated reporting and assurance: Where can research add value? Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 6(1), 29–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simnett, R., Vanstraelen, A., & Chua, W. F. (2009). Assurance on sustainability reports: An international comparison. The Accounting Review, 84(3), 937–967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simnett, R., Zhou, S., & Hoang, H. (2016a). Assurance and other credibility enhancing mechanisms for integrated reporting. In Integrated Reporting (pp. 269–286). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simnett, R., Carson, E., & Vanstraelen, A. (2016b). International archival auditing and assurance research: Trends, methodological issues, and opportunities. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 35(3), 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soh, D. S., & Martinov‐Bennie, N. (2018). Factors associated with internal audit’s involvement in environmental and social assurance and consulting. International Journal of Auditing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steurer, R., Martinuzzi, A., & Margula, S. (2012). Public policies on CSR in Europe: Themes, instruments, and regional differences. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 19(4), 206–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarquinio, L. (2018). Corporate Responsibility Reporting e Assurance Esterna.: Profili teorici, criticità e prospettive (Vol. 10). G Giappichelli Editore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velte, P., & Stawinoga, M. (2017a). Empirical research on corporate social responsibility assurance (CSRA): A literature review. Journal of Business Economics, 87(8), 1017–1066.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velte, P., & Stawinoga, M. (2017b). Integrated reporting: The current state of empirical research, limitations and future research implications. Journal of Management Control, 28(3), 275–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venturelli, A., & Caputo, F. (2017). Informativa non finanziaria e regulation: tendenze evolutive e relative implicazioni alla luce dell’emanazione del D. Lgs 254/16. McGraw-Hill education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venturelli, A., Caputo, F., Cosma, S., Leopizzi, R., & Pizzi, S. (2017). Directive 2014/95/EU: Are Italian companies already compliant? Sustainability, 9(8), 1385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venturelli, A., Caputo, F., Leopizzi, R., & Pizzi, S. (2018). The state of art of corporate social disclosure before the introduction of non financial reporting directive: A cross country analysis, Social responsibility journal, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vijiyarani, S., & Suganya, E. (2015). Research issues in web mining. International Journal of Computer-Aided Technologies (IJCAx), 2, 55–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollero, A., Conte, F., Siano, A., & Covucci, C. (2018) Corporate social responsibility information and involvement strategies in controversial industries. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vormedal, I., & Ruud, A. (2009). Sustainability reporting in Norway—An assessment of performance in the context of legal demands and socio-political drivers. Business Strategy and the Environment, 18(4), 207–222.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simone Pizzi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Venturelli, A., Pizzi, S. (2020). What Drives the Level of Non-financial Assurance in PIEs? Empirical Evidence on the European Firms Listed on Forbes 2000. In: Del Baldo, M., Dillard, J., Baldarelli, MG., Ciambotti, M. (eds) Accounting, Accountability and Society. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41142-8_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics