Abstract
Racial majority and minority groups in the United States often differ in the extent to which they believe that racial bias—including stereotyping, expressions of prejudice, and discrimination— has and continues to influence the opportunities and outcomes of individuals and communities across a wide variety of domains. Communication and dialogue between members of different racial groups is often considered an effective method to combat bias. Through dialogue, members of groups in conflict can learn about relevant issues, seek to understand each other’s perspectives and work together toward productive solutions. However, for a variety of reasons, people from different racial groups are often reluctant to initiate interracial dialogue to discuss racial bias, and often these discussions end with each “side” feeling unheard, misunderstood, rejected, and unlikely to make future attempts to engage. This conflict is present within a variety of organizations that seek to understand and address the challenges and opportunities associated with a diverse workplace. In this chapter, four scholars—a Black woman, a White woman, a Black man, and a White man—team up to discuss insights from their experiences in communicating research about the existence and nature of racial bias to various audiences in the United States. We conclude that various aspects of our own identities (race, gender, professional status) and motivational states (expectations, enthusiasm, uncertainty, threat) intersect with the identities and motivational states of our audiences to influence what we communicate and how we do so. We recommend that researchers and practitioners consider these intersections in their efforts to develop more effective confrontation strategies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Apfelbaum, E. P., Sommers, S. R., & Norton, M. I. (2008). Seeing race and seeming racist? Evaluating strategic colorblindness in social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(4), 918–932. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0011990
Ayoub, P., & Rose, D. (2016). The scholarly importance of studying issues related to one’sown identity (essay). Retrieved April 14, 2020, from Inside Higher Ed website:https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2016/04/14/scholarly-importance-studying-issues-related-ones-own-identity-essay
Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2003). Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. National Bureau of Economic Research.
Blanton, H., Jaccard, J., Klick, J., Mellers, B., Mitchell, G., & Tetlock, P. E. (2009). Strong claims and weak evidence: Reassessing the predictive validity of the IAT. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(3), 567–582. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014665
Cashin, S. (2017). Loving: Interracial intimacy in America and the threat to White supremacy. Boston: Beacon Press.
Correll, J., Park, B., Judd, C. M., & Wittenbrink, B. (2002). The police officer’s dilemma: Using ethnicity to disambiguate potentially threatening individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1314–1329. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1314
Craig, M. A., & Richeson, J. A. (2014). More diverse yet less tolerant? How the increasingly diverse racial landscape affects White Americans’ racial attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(6), 750–761. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214524993
Crocker, J., Voelkl, K., Testa, M., & Major, B. (1991). Social stigma: The affective consequences of attributional ambiguity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(2), 218–228. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.2.218
Diangelo, R. (2018). White fragility: Why it’s so hard for White People to talk about racism. Boston: Beacon Press.
Eberhardt, J. L., Goff, P. A., Purdie, V. J., & Davies, P. G. (2004). Seeing black: Race, crime, and visual processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(6), 876–893. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.6.876
Frantz, C. M., Cuddy, A. J. C., Burnett, M., Ray, H., & Hart, A. (2004). A threat in the computer: The race implicit association test as a stereotype threat experience. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30 (12), 1611–1624. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204266650
Gawronski, B., & De Houwer, J. (2014). Implicit measures in social and personality psychology. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (2nd ed., pp. 283–310). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://login.ezproxy.library.tufts.edu/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/1701494239?accountid=14434
Gervais, S. J., & Hillard, A. L. (2014). Confronting sexism as persuasion: Effects of a confrontation’s recipient, source, message, and context. Journal of Social Issues, 70(4), 653–667. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12084
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464–1480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464
Guthrie, R. V. (2004). Even the rat was white: A historical view of psychology (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education. Retrieved from https://login.ezproxy.library.tufts.edu/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/621095602?accountid=14434
Howell, J. L., Redford, L., Pogge, G., & Ratliff, K. A. (2017). Defensive responding to IAT feedback. Social Cognition, 35(5), 520–562. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2017.35.5.520
Jost, J. T., Pelham, B. W., Sheldon, O., & Sullivan, B. N. (2003). Social inequality and the reduction of ideological dissonance on behalf of the system:Evidence of enhanced system justification among the disadvantaged. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33(1), 13–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.127
Juvonen, J., Kogachi, K., & Graham, S. (2018). When and how do students benefit from ethnic diversity in middle school? Child Development, 89(4), 1268–1282. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12834
Kaiser, C. R., & Miller, C. T. (2001). Stop complaining! The social costs of making attributions to discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(2), 254–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201272010
Kaiser, C. R., & Miller, C. T. (2003). Derogating the victim: The interpersonal consequences of blaming events on discrimination. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6(3), 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302030063001
Kawakami, K., Amodio, D. M., & Hugenberg, K. (2017). Intergroup perception and cognition: An integrative framework for understanding the causes and consequences of social categorization. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (1st ed., Vol. 55, pp. 1–80). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2016.10.001
Lowery, B. S., Unzueta, M. M., Knowles, E. D., & Goff, P. A. (2006). Concern for the in-group and opposition to affirmative action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(6), 961–974. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.6.961
Maddox, K. B., & Sommers, S. R. (2017). Implicit Bias in Daily Perceptions and Legal Judgments. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 50(3), 723–735. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.si.unav.es:2048/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,url&db=edb&AN=122797890&lang=es&site=eds-live&scope=site
Maseko, S. (2020). A reflection on the politics of knowledge production at South African Universities: When Black identity meets legacies of institutional racism. In Y. G. Acar, S. M. Moss, Ö. M. Uluğ (Eds.), Researching peace, conflict and power in the field: Methodological challenges and opportunities (pp. 301–319). Peace Psychology Book Series. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Monteith, M. J., Devine, P. G., & Zuwerink, J. R. (1993). Self-directed versus other-directed affect as a consequence of prejudice-related discrepancies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(2), 198–210.
Norton, M. I., & Sommers, S. R. (2011). Whites see racism as a zero-sum game that they are now losing. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 215–218.https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611406922
Petty, R. E., Fleming, M. a., Priester, J. R., & Feinstein, A. H. (2001). Individual versus group interest violation: Surprise as a determinant of argument scrutiny andpersuasion. Social Cognition, 19(4), 418–442. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.19.4.418.20758
Phillips, K. W. (2014). How diversity makes us smarter. Scientific American. Retrieved from https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-diversity-makes-us-smarter/
Phillips, K. W., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (2006). Surface-level diversity and decision-making in groups: When does deep-level similarity help? Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 9(4), 467–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430206067557
Plaut, V. C., Garnett, F. G., Buffardi, L. E., & Sanchez-Burks, J. (2011). “What about me?” Perceptions of exclusion and Whites’ reactions to multiculturalism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 337–353. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022832
Schultz, J. R., & Maddox, K. B. (2013). Shooting the messenger to spite the message? Exploring reactions to claims of racial bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(3), 346–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212475223
Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., van Laar, C., & Levin, S. (2004). Social dominance theory: Its agenda and method. Political Psychology, 25(6), 845–880. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00401.x
Sommers, S. R. (2006). On racial diversity and group decision making: Identifying multiple effects of racial composition on jury deliberations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(4), 597–612. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.597
Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 797–811. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797
Swim, J. K., Gervais, S. J., Pearson, N., & Stangor, C. (2009). Managing the message: Using social influence and attitude change strategies to confront interpersonal discrimination. In F. Butera & J. M. Levine (Eds.), Coping with minority status: Responses to exclusion and inclusion (pp. 55–81). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804465.004
Taylor, L. K., Nillson, M., Forero, P. & Restrepo, M. A. (2020). Conducting field research amid violence: Experiences from Colombia. In Y. G. Acar, S. M. Moss, Ö. M. Uluğ (Eds.), Researching peace, conflict and power in the field: Methodological challenges and opportunities (pp. 9–28). Peace Psychology Book Series. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Thomas, K. M. (2012). Diversity Resistance in Organizations. New York: Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203809761
Thomas, K. M., & Plaut, V. C. (2012). The many faces of diversity resistance in the workplace. In K. M. Thomas (Ed.), Diversity Resistance in Organizations (pp. 1–22). New York: Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203809761
Word, C. O., Zanna, M. P., & Cooper, J. (1974). The nonverbal mediation of self-fulfilling prophecies in interracial interaction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10(2), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(74)90059-6
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Maddox, K.B., Crittle, C.S., Sommers, S.R., Tropp, L.R. (2020). Confronting Conflicting Attitudes About Racial Bias in the United States: How Communicator Identities Shape Audience Reception. In: Acar, Y.G., Moss, S.M., Uluğ, Ö.M. (eds) Researching Peace, Conflict, and Power in the Field. Peace Psychology Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44113-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44113-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44112-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-44113-5
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)