Abstract
The field of structural health monitoring (SHM) applies damage detection techniques to provide timely in-situ system condition assessment. Previously, researchers have suggested a fundamental axiom for SHM that states, “damage will increase the complexity of a system.” One way this increased complexity can manifest itself is in the increased complexity of sensor data recorded from the structure when damage occurs. The question then becomes how to best quantify the increase in complexity of those data. Information complexity is one such approach and within this framework various information entropy quantities have been proposed as measures of complexity. The literature has shown that there are multiple information entropy measures, including; Shannon Entropy, Rényi Entropy, Permutation Entropy, Sample Entropy, Approximate Entropy, and Spectral Entropy. With multiple measures proposed to quantify information entropy; a study to compare the relative effectiveness of these entropy measures in the context of SHM is needed. Therefore, the objective of this paper is to compare the effectiveness of entropy-based methods in distinguishing between “Healthy” and “Unhealthy” labeled datasets. The labeled datasets considered in this study were obtained from a 4DOF impact oscillator, a rotating machine with a damaged bearing, and an impact oscillator excited by a rotating machine. Furthermore, two methods were used in this study to classify the results from the different entropy measures; Naïve-Bayes classification, and K-means clustering. Effectiveness of a given entropy measure is determined by the number of misclassifications produced when compared to the true labels. The analysis showed that entropy measures obtained from data corresponding to sensors closer to the damage source had fewer misclassifications for the datasets tested. For the datasets considered in this study, the researchers concluded that each dataset had a different most effective entropy measure. The study would need to be expanded to include other classification methods and other datasets to define more precisely which entropy measure is the most effective in identifying the increase in complexity associated with damage and, hence, distinguishing between healthy and damaged data.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Farrar, C.R., Worden, K.: An Introduction of Structural Health Monitoring CISM Courses and Lectures, pp. 1–17. Springer, New York (2011)
Doebling, S.W., Farrar, C.R., Prime, M.B., Shevitz, D.W.: Damage Identification and Health Monitoring of Structural and Mechanical Systems from Changes in Their Vibration Characteristics: A Literature Review LA-13070-MS, Los Alamos. United States Department of Energy, Washington, DC (1996)
Farrar, C.R., Worden, K.: Structural Health Monitoring. Chichester, Wiley (2012)
Llyod, S.: Measures of complexity: a Nonexhaustive list. IEEE Control. Syst. Mag. 21(4), 7–8 (2001)
Min, B.-K., Chang, S.H.: System complexity measure in the aspect of operational difficulty. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 38(5), 1035–1040 (1991)
Shannon, C.E.: A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27(3), 379–423 (1948)
Bao, Y., Li, H.: Application of Information Fusion and Shannon Entropy in Structural Damage Detection. SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring, San Diego (2007)
Chai, M., Zhang, Z., Duan, Q.: A new qualitative acoustic emission parameter based on Shannon’s entropy for damage monitoring. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 100, 617–629 (2017)
Amiri, M., Modarres, M., Droguett, E. L.: AE entropy for detection of fatigue crack initiation and growth. In: 2015 IEEE Conference on Prognostics and Health Management (PHM), Austin, TX, pp. 1–8 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPHM.2015.7245038
Camerena-Martinez, D., Valtierra-Rodriguez, M., Amezquiita-Sanchez, J.P., Granados-Lieberman, D., Romero-Troncoso, R.J., Garcia-Perez, A.: Shannon entropy and K-means method for automatic diagnosis of broken rotor bars in induction motors using vibration signals. Shock Vib. 2016, (2016)
Reyni, A.: On measures of entropy and information. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. 547–561 (1961)
Powell, G.E., Percival, I.C.: A spectral entropy method for distinguishing regular and irregular motion of Hamiltonian systems. J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 12, 2053–2071 (1979)
Ceravolo, R., Lenticchia, E., Miraglia, G.: Use of spectral entropy for damage detection in masonry buildings in the presence of mild seismicity. In: International Conference on Experimental Mechanics, Brussels, Belgium, 2018
Pan, Y.N., Chen, J., Li, X.L.: Spectral entropy: a complementary index for rolling element bearing performance degradation assessment. J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 223, 1223–1231 (2009)
Yu, H., Li, H., Xu, B.: Rolling bearing degradation state identification based on LCD relative spectral entropy. J. Fail. Anal. Prev. 16, 655–666 (2016)
West, B. M., Locke, W. R., Andrews, T. C., Scheinker, A., Farrar, C. R.: Applying concepts of complexity to structural health monitoring. In: IMAC 2019 (2019)
Castro, E., Moreno-Garcia, P., Gallego, A.M.N.: Damage detection in CFRP plates using spectral entropy. Shock Vib. 2014, (2014)
Pincus, S.M.: Approximate entropy as a measure of system complexity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 88(6), 2297–2301 (1991)
Yan, R., Gao, R.X.: Approximate entropy as a diagnostic tool for machine health monitoring. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 21, 824–839 (2005)
Richman, J.S., Randall, M.J.: Physiological time-series analysis using approximate entropy and sample entropy. Am. J. Physiol. 278, (2000)
Lin, T.-K., Liang, J.-C.: Application of multi-scale (cross-) sample entropy for structural health monitoring. Smart Mater. Struct. 24(8), (2015)
Zhou, J., Yang, J.: Analysis on non-linear characteristics of bridge health monitoring based on time-delayed transfer entropy and mutual information. In: Fifth International Joint Conference on INC, IMS, and IDC (2009)
Zhao, L.-Y., Wang, L., Yan, R.-Q.: Rolling bearing fault diagnosis based on wavelet packet decomposition and multi-scale permutation entropy. Entropy. 17, 6447–6461 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3390/e17096447
Bandt, C., Pompe, B.: Permutation entropy: a natural complexity measure for time series. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88(17), (2002)
Bishop, C.M.: Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer, New York (2006)
Farrar, C.R., Worden, K., Todd, M.D., Park, G., Nicholas, J., Adams, D.E., Bement, M.T., Farinholt, K.: Nonlinear System Identification for Damage Detection. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos (2007)
Figueiredo, E., Park, G., Figueiras, J., Farrar, C.R., Worden, K.: Structural health monitoring algorithm comparisons using standard data sets. Los Alamos National Labs Report. LA-14393, (March 2009)
Worden, K., Manson, G.: The application of machine learning to structural health monitoring. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 365(1851), (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Donajkowski, H. et al. (2020). Comparison of Complexity Measures for Structural Health Monitoring. In: Mao, Z. (eds) Model Validation and Uncertainty Quantification, Volume 3. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47638-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47638-0_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-48778-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-47638-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)