Skip to main content

Modeling Physical Damages Using the Industry Foundation Classes – A Software Evaluation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 6263 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 98))

Abstract

Bridges are designed to last for more than 50 years and consume up to 50% of their life cycle costs during their operation phase. Several inspections and maintenance actions take place within this period, during which bridge and damage information is collected, digitized and exchanged between different actors. Currently, the inspection and maintenance practice relies on paper based data collection and exchange, which is time consuming and error prone. A way of storing and exchanging damage data in a digital format would lower the costs for inspection and maintenance as well as support future needs, i.e. immediate simulations, automated maintenance planning and mixed reality supported inspections and maintenance. For this purpose, the paper presents and tests concepts for modeling damage information by the means of the Industry Foundation Classes (IFC) without extending or changing the existing IFC Schema. First, multiple use cases and related requirements for damage information are defined. This information is used to develop multiple concepts to model damage information by using existing IFC entities. The implementation and tests of the concepts will show that the IFC provide several meaningful ways to model damage information. However, existing IFC software does not fully support the concepts of IFC, particularly when visualizing specific entities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Schach, R., Otto, J., Häupel, H., Fritzsche, M.: Lebenszykluskosten von Brücken. Bauingenieur 81, 7–14 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wettlauf gegen den Verfall. http://www.welt.de/politik/interaktiv/bruecken/deutschlands-bruecken-wettlauf-gegen-den-verfall.html. Accessed 27 Sept 2018

  3. Hammad, A., Zhang, C., Hu, Y., Mozaffari, E.: Mobile model-based bridge lifecycle management system. Comput.-Aided Civil Infrastruct. Eng. 7, 530–547 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Borrmann, A., König, M., Koch, C., Beetz, J.: Building Information Modeling, 2nd edn. Springer, Cham (2018)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Marzouk, M.M., Hisham, M.: Bridge information modeling in sustainable bridge management. In: Chong, W.K.O., Hermreck, C. (eds.) ICSDC 2011, pp. 457–466. American Society of Civil Engineers (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. McGuire, B., Atadero, R., Clevenger, C., Ozbek, M.: Bridge information modeling for inspection and evaluation. J. Bridge Eng. 21(4), 4015076 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sacks, R., Kedar, A., Borrmann, A., Ma, L., Singer, D., Kattel, U.: See bridge information delivery manual (IDM) for next generation bridge inspection. In: University of Huddersfield (ed.) International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, vol. 33 (2016). http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/31380/1/2%20Sacks-2016-SeeBridge%20Information%20Delivery%20Manu.pdf

  8. Lee, D.-Y., Chi, H.-L., Wang, J., Wang, X., Park, C.-S.: A linked data system framework for sharing construction defect information using ontologies and BIM environments. Autom. Constr. 68, 102–113 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jeong, S., Zhang, Y., O’Connor, S., Lynch, J.P., Sohn, H., Law, K.H.: A NoSQL data management infrastructure for bridge monitoring. Smart Struct. Syst. 4, 669–690 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sung, Y.-C., Chen, C.-C., Chang, K.-C.: Extended bridge inspection module of a life-cycle based bridge management system. In: ICCCBE2016 Organizing Committee (ed.) 16th International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering (2016). http://www.see.eng.osaka-u.ac.jp/seeit/icccbe2016/Proceedings/Full_Papers/215-092.pdf. Accessed 3 Sept 2018

  11. Hamdan, A.-H., Scherer, J.R.: A generic model for the digitalization of structural damage. In: Caspeele, R., Taerwe, L., Frangopol, D.M. (eds.) Life Cycle Analysis and Assessment in Civil Engineering, vol. v.5. Chapman and Hall/CRC (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ma, L., Sacks, R., Zeibak-Shini, R.: Information modeling of earthquake-damaged reinforced concrete structures. Adv. Eng. Inform. 3, 396–407 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Torok, M.M., Golparvar-Fard, M., Kochersberger, K.B.: Image-based automated 3D crack detection for post-disaster building assessment. J. Comput. Civil Eng. 28(5), A4014004 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Artus, M., Koch, C.: State of the art in damage information modeling for bridges. In: Geyer, P., Allacker, K., Schevenels, M., de Troyer, F., Pauwels, P. (eds.) EG-ICE 2019, vol. 2394, CEUR Workshop Proceedings (2019). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2394/paper18.pdf. Accessed 17 Sept 2019

  15. IFC4 Add2. https://standards.buildingsmart.org/IFC/RELEASE/IFC4/ADD2_TC1/HTML/. 1 June 2018

  16. Hüthwohl, P., Brilakis, I., Borrmann, A., Sacks, R.: Integrating RC bridge defect information into bim models. J. Comput. Civil Eng. 32, 1–14 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Revit. https://www.autodesk.de/products/revit/overview. Accessed 14 Oct 2019

  18. Java IFC Viewer. http://www.apstex.com. Accessed 14 Oct 2019

  19. xBIM XbimWindowsUI. https://github.com/xBimTeam/XbimWindowsUI. Accessed 15 Oct 2019

  20. DESITE MD/ DESITE MD PRO. https://www.ceapoint.com/desite-md-md-pro/. Accessed 14 Oct 2019

  21. BIM Vision. https://bimvision.eu/en/download/. Accessed 14 Oct 2019

  22. usBIM.viewer+. https://www.accasoftware.com/en/downloadfreeware?prog=usbim_viewer. Accessed 14 Oct 2019

  23. Solibri Model Viewer. https://www.idc.ch/solibri/produkte/solibri-model-viewer/. Accessed 14 Oct 2019

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the “Thüringer Landesamt für Bau und Verkehr” for their support with knowledge from practice in bridge inspection and statistical data about bridges in federal state of Thuringia in Germany. Further, we thank Mr. Mohamed Said Helmy Alabassy for creating the IFC test files during his student project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mathias Artus .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Artus, M., Koch, C. (2021). Modeling Physical Damages Using the Industry Foundation Classes – A Software Evaluation. In: Toledo Santos, E., Scheer, S. (eds) Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering. ICCCBE 2020. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 98. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51295-8_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51295-8_36

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-51294-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-51295-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics