Skip to main content

The Spiritual Well-Being Scale (SWBS): Cross-Cultural Assessment Across 5 Continents, 10 Languages, and 300 Studies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Assessing Spirituality in a Diverse World

Abstract

The Spiritual Well-Being Scale (SWBS) was created in 1982 as a subjective measure of quality of life. It has been used in approximately 300 studies, 200 theses and dissertations, and 35 professional presentations. It has contributed to research in psychology and healthcare globally, and has been translated into over 10 languages—a summary of which is presented in this chapter. Development of the SWBS was based on the observation that people make meaning out of the ambiguity of life by defining goals or values toward which to strive—whether physical, personal, secular, or religious. Because not all things for which people strive are identifiably religious, the word “spiritual” came into use to refer to strivings-in-general. “Spirituality” referred to the achievement of a state of being, or the motivation to be, “spiritual.” SWB is related to, but does not equal, spiritual or spirituality. Because SWB is typically described in two ways, the SWBS has two subscales that yield outcome measures of perceived well-being in two senses: (1) The religious well-being (RWB) subscale reflects SWB in traditionally religious language, because many people explain what SWB means to them in such terms; (2) The existential well-being (EWB) subscale reflects SWB in a-religious, existential language because many people describe their SWB in such terms. RWB and EWB subscale scores can be combined into total SWB, if a combined score is meaningful for the population studied. The present chapter summarizes SWBS research and translations, critiques the SWBS and some of its uses, and suggests future uses and improvements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Spiritual Well-Being Scale (SWBS) ©1982 Craig W. Ellison & Raymond F. Paloutzian, © 2011 Raymond F. Paloutzian. All rights reserved to the English SWBS and its translations. Do not duplicate without permission of copyright holder or www.lifeadvance.com.

References

  • Agilkaya-Sahin, Z., Öztürk, E., & Agilkaya A. B. (2015). Do cultural differences affect the image of god? The case of Turkish Muslim in Turkey and Germany. Paper presented at the Congress of the International Association for the Psychology of Religion, Istanbul, Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amer, M. M. (2021, this volume). Measures of Muslim religiousness constructs and a multidimensional scale. In A. L. Ai, P. Wink, P. F. Paloutzian, & K. Harris (Eds.), Assessing spirituality in a diversified world. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amiri, P., Abbasi, M., Gharibzadeh, S., Asghari-Jafarabadi, M., Zarghani, H. J., & Azizi, F. (2015). Development and psychometric evaluation of spiritual health questionnaire for Iranian population. Journal of Medical Ethics, 8, 25–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anglin, D. M., Gariel, K. O. S., & Kaslow, N. J. (2005). Suicide acceptability and religious well-being: A comparative analysis in African American suicide attempters and non-attempters. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 33, 140–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F. (1991). Meanings in life. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beit-Hallahmi, B. (2014). Resisting the match between religion and “spirituality”. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 4(1), 2–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beit-Hallahmi, B. (2015). Psychological perspectives on religion and religiosity. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biglari Abhari, M., Fisher, J. W., Kheiltash, A., & Nojomi, M. (2018). Validation of the Persian version of spiritual well-being questionnaires. Iran Journal of Medical Sciences, 43(3), 276–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botvar, P. K. (2010). Endringer i nordmenns religiøse liv [the religious lives of Norwegians]. In P. K. Botvar & U. Schmidt (Eds.), Religion i dagens Norge: mellom sekularisering og sakralisering [Religion in today’s Norway] (pp. 9–23). Oslo, Norway: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botvar, P. K., & Schmidt, U. (2010). Religion i dagens Norge: mellom sekularisering og sakralisering [Religion in today`s Norway]. Oslo, Norway: Universitetsforl.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bredle, J. M., Salsman, J. M., Debb, S. M., Arnold, B. J., & Cella, D. (2011). Spiritual well-being as a component of health-related quality of life: the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy—Spiritual Well-Being Scale (FACIT-Sp). Religion, 2, 77–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinkman, D. D. (1989). An evaluation of the spiritual well-being scale: Reliability and measurement. Portland, OR: Western Conservative Baptist Seminary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, K. C. (1997). A Spanish translation of the spiritual well-being scale: Preliminary validation [dissertation]. Newberg, OR: George Fox University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bufford, R. K., Paloutzian, R. F., & Ellison, C. W. (1991). Norms for the spiritual well-being scale. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 19, 56–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Büssing, A. (2012). Measures. In M. Cobb, C. M. Puchalski, & B. Rumbold (Eds.), Oxford textbook of spirituality in healthcare (pp. 323–331). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A. (1976). Subjective measures of well-being. American Psychologist, 31, 117–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, L., Emblen, J. D., Van Hofwegen, L., Sawatzky, R., & Meyerhoff, H. (2004). An integrative review of the concept of spirituality in the health sciences. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 26, 405–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J. (1999). Spirituality and resiliency: Finding an emotional anchor for children at risk. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Education, Cleveland State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, M., Puchalski, C. M., & Rumbold, B. (Eds.). (2012). Oxford textbook of spirituality in healthcare. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, C. L., & Holzemer, W. L. (1999). Spirituality, psychological well-being, and HIV symptoms for African-Americans living with HIV disease. The Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care, 10(1), 42–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Compton, M. T., & Furman, A. C. (2005). Inverse correlations between symptom scores and spiritual well-being among African American patients with first-episode schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 193(5), 346–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotton, S., Kudel, I., Roberts, Y. H., Palleria, H., Tsevat, J., Succop, P., & Yi, M. S. (2009). Spiritual well-being and mental health outcomes in adolescents with or without inflammatory bowel disease. Journal of Adolescent Health, 44(5), 485–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotton, S., Larkin, E., Hoopes, A., Cromer, B. A., & Rosenthal, S. L. (2005). The impact of adolescent spirituality on depressive symptoms and health risk behaviors. Journal of Adolescent Health, 36(6), 529–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culliford, L. (2005). Healing from within: Spirituality and mental health. Retrieved 28 September, 2014, from www.rcpsych.ac.uk/pdf/CullifordJohnsonHealing

  • Daalemann, T. P., & Frey, B. B. (2004). The spirituality index of well-being: A new instrument for health related quality of life research. Annals of Family Medicine, 2, 499–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daalemann, T. P., Frey, B. B., Wallace, D., & Studenski, S. A. (2002). Spirituality index of well-being scale: Development and testing of a new measure. Journal of Family Practice, 51, 952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalmida, S. G., Holstad, M. M., Diiorio, C., & Laderman, G. (2009). Spiritual well-being, depressive symptoms, and immune status among women living with HIV/AIDS. Journal of Women’s Health, 49(2-3), 119–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2008). Happiness: Unlocking the mysteries of psychological wealth. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Douchand Brown, S. E. (2009). Health promotion behaviors among African American women [dissertation]. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dow, K. H. (Ed.). (2006). Nursing care of women with cancer. St. Louis, MO: Mosby Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, K. S. (2008). Development and psychometric testing of a new geriatric spiritual well-being scale. International Journal of Older People Nursing, 3(3), 161–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, K. A., Lawler, K. A., Jobe, R. L., Younger, J. W., Piferi, R. L., & Jones, W. H. (2005). Spirituality predicts health and cardiovascular responses to stress in young adult women. Journal of Religion and Health, 44(2), 161–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekşi, H., & Kardaş, S. (2017). Spiritual well-being: Scale development and validation. Spiritual Psychology and Counseling, 2, 73–88. https://doi.org/10.12738/spc.2017.1.0022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, C. W. (1983). Spiritual well-being: Conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 11, 330–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, C. W., & Smith, J. (1991). Toward an integrative measure of health and well-being. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 19, 35–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emmons, R. A. (1999). The psychology of ultimate concerns: Motivation and spirituality in personality. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farhangi, A. K., & Rastgar, A. (2006). Providing incentive based model to explain spirituality and spirituality staff. Daneshvar Raftar, 13, 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehring, R. J., Brennan, P. F., & Keller, M. L. (1987). Psychological and spiritual well-being in college students. Research in Nursing and Health, 10(6), 391–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankl, V. (1963). Man’s search for meaning. New York, NY: Washington Square Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganje-Fling, M., Veach, P. M., Kuang, H., & Houg, B. (2000). Effects of childhood sexual abuse on client spiritual well-being. Counseling and Values, 44, 84–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garssen, B., Visser, A., & de Meeezenbroek, E. J. (2016). Examining whether spirituality predicts subjective well-being: How to avoid tautology. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 8(2), 141–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genia, V. (2001). Evaluation of the spiritual well-being scale in a sample of college. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 11(1), 25–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, R., & Fisher, J. W. (2003). Domains of spiritual well-being and development and validation of the spiritual well-being questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1975–1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, R., & Fisher, J. W. (2005). The spiritual well-being questionnaire: Testing for model applicability, measurement and structural equivalencies and latent mean differences across gender. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 1383–1393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, P. C. (2013). Measurement assessment and issues in the psychology of religion and spirituality. In R. F. Paloutzian & C. L. Park (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (2nd ed., pp. 48–74). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, P. C., & Hood, R. W., Jr., Eds. (1999). Measures of religiosity. Birmingham, AL: Religious Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, P. C., & Kilian, M. K. (2004). Assessing clinically significant religious impairment in clients: Applications from measures in the psychology of religion and spirituality. Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 6(2), 149–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, R. W., Jr. (2003). Spirituality and religion. In A. L. Greil & D. Bromley (Eds.), Religion: Critical approaches to drawing boundaries between sacred and secular (Vol. 10, pp. 241–265). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hungelmann, J., Kenkel-Rossi, E., Klassen, L., & Stollenwerk, R. (1996). Focus on spiritual well-being: Harmonious interconnectedness of mind-body-spirit-use of the JAREL spiritual well-being scale. Geriatric Nursing, 17(6), 262–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kardaş, S. (2019). Erratum: Correcting the name of the spiritual well-being scale as the three-factor spiritual well-being scale. Spiritual Psychology and Counseling, 4(1), 85. https://doi.org/10.12738/spc.2019.4.1.0068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaslow, N. J., Thompson, M. P., Okun, A., et al. (2002). Risk and protective factors for suicidal behavior in abused African American women. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 311–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, E., W., Jr. (1995). Spirituality and religion in counseling and psychotherapy: Diversity in theory and practice. Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, L. A. (2005). Attachment, evolution, and the psychology of religion. New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kocot, T., & Goodman, L. A. (2003). The roles of coping and social support in battered women’s mental health. Violence Against Women, 9, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, H. G. (2009). Research on religion, spirituality, and mental health: A review. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 54, 283–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuebler, K. K., Heidrich, D. E., & Esper, P. (2007). Palliative and end-of-life care: Clinical practice guidelines (2nd ed.). St. Louis, MO: Saunders Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvande, M. N., Klöckner, C. A., Moksnes, U. K., & Espnes, G. A. (2015). Do optimism and pessimism mediate the relationship between religious coping and existential well-being? Examining mechanisms in a Norwegian population sample. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 25(2), 130–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landis, B. J. (1996). Uncertainty, spiritual well-being, and psychosocial adjustment to chronic illness. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 17(3), 217–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledbetter, M. F., Smith, L. A., Fischer, J. D., & Vosler-Hunter, W. L. (1991). An evaluation of the research and clinical usefulness of the spiritual well-being scale. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 19(1), 49–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledbetter, M. F., Smith, L. A., Fischer, J. D., Vosler-Hunter, W. L., & Chew, G. P. (1991). An evaluation of the construct validity of the spiritual well-being scale: A confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 19(1), 94–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, H.-R., & Bauer-Wu, S. M. (2003). Psycho-spiritual well-being in patients with advanced cancer: An integrative review of the literature. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 44(1), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02768.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malinakova, K., Kopcakova, J., Kolarcik, P., Geckova, A. M., Solcova, I. P., Husek, V., & Tavel, P. (2017). The spiritual well-being scale: Psychometric evaluation of the shortened version in czech adolescents. Journal of Religion and Health, 56(2), 697–705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-016-0318-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marques, L. F., Sarriera, C., & Dell’aglio, D. D. (2009). Adaptation and validation of spiritual well-being scale. Avaliação Psicológica, 8(2), 179–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York, NY: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, K. S., & Hooker, S. A. (2013). Religion, spirituality, and health. In R. F. Paloutzian & C. L. Park (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, L. A., Kaslow, N. J., Thompson, M. P., & Jurkovic, G. J. (2005). Protective factors against suicide attempt risk among African American women experiencing intimate partner violence. American Journal of Community Psychology, 36, 109–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meezenbroek, E. D., Garssen, B., van den Berg, M., van Dierendonck, D., Visser, A., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2012). Measuring spirituality as a universal human experience: A review of spirituality questionnaires. Journal of Religion and Health, 51(2), 336–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-010-9376-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mela, M. A., Marcoux, E., Baetz, M., Griffin, R., Angelski, C., & Deqiang, G. (2008). The effect of religiosity and spirituality on psychological well-being among forensic psychiatric patients in Canada. Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 11(5), 517–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, M. D., Hargrove, G. L., Collins, M. H., Thomson, M. P., Reddick, T. L., & Kaslow, N. J. (2006). Coping variables that mediate the relation between intimate partner violence and mental health outcomes among low-income, African American women. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(12), 1503–1520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moberg, D. O. (1979). The development of social indicators of spiritual well-being for quality of life research. In D. O. Moberg (Ed.), Spiritual well-being: Sociological perspectives. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musa, A. S. (2015). Spiritual beliefs and practices, religiosity, and spiritual well-being among Jordanian Arab Muslim University students in Jordan. Journal of Spirituality in Mental Health, 17, 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/19349637.2014.957609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musa, A. S. (2016). Factor structure of the spiritual well-being scale: Cross-cultural comparisons between Jordanian Arab and Malaysian Muslim University students in Jordan. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 27(2), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043659614537305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musa, A. S. (2017). Spiritual care intervention and spiritual well-being: Jordanian Muslim Nurses’ perspectives. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 35(1), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898010116644388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musa, A. S., & Pevalin, D. J. (2012). An Arabic version of the spiritual well-being scale. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 22(2), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2011.638592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musa, A. S., & Pevalin, D. J. (2014). Psychometric evaluation of the Arabic version of the Spiritual Well-Being Scale on a sample of Jordanian Arab Christians. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 42, 293–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musa, A. S., Pevalin, D. J., & Al Khalaileh, M. A. (2017). Spiritual well-being, depression, and stress among hemodialysis patients in Jordan. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 36(4), 354–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musa, A. S., Pevalin, D. J., & Shahin, F. I. (2016). Impact of spiritual well-being, spiritual perspective, and religiosity on the self-rated health of Jordanian Arab Christians. Journal of Transcutlural Nursing, 27(6), 550–557. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043659615587590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, D., & Diener, E. (1995). Who is happy? Psychological Science, 6, 10–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paloutzian, R. F. (2006). Psychology, the human sciences, and religion. In P. Clayton & Z. Simpson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of religion and science (pp. 237–252). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paloutzian, R. F. (2016). The spiritual well-being scale: Portuguese translation and SWBS use. Horizonte – Journal of Theology and Religious Studies, 14(41), 76–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paloutzian, R. F. (2017a). Invitation to the psychology of religion (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paloutzian, R. F. (2017b). Psychology of religion in global perspective: Logic, approach, concepts. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 27(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2017.1241529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paloutzian, R. F., Bufford, R. K., & Wildman, A. J. (2012). Spiritual well-being scale: Mental and physical health relationships. In M. Cobb, C. Puchalski, & B. Rumbold (Eds.), Oxford textbook of spirituality in healthcare (pp. 353–358). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Paloutzian, R. F., & Ellison, C. W. (1979). Spiritual well-being, loneliness, and perceived quality of life. Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York, September 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paloutzian, R. F., & Ellison, C. W. (1982). Loneliness, spiritual well-being and the quality of life. In L. A. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy (pp. 224–237). New York, NY: Wiley-Interscience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paloutzian, R. F., & Mukai, K. J. (2017). Believing, remembering, and imagining: The roots and fruits of meanings made and remade. In H.-F. Angel, L. Oviedo, R. F. Paloutzian, A. L. C. Runihov, & R. J. Seitz (Eds.), Processes of believing: The acquisition, maintenance, and change in creditions (pp. 39–49). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Paloutzian, R. F., & Park, C. L. (Eds.). (2005). Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality. New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paloutzian, R. F., & Park, C. L. (Eds.). (2013a). Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paloutzian, R. F., & Park, C. L. (2013b). Recent progress and core issues in the science of the psychology of religion and spirituality. In R. F. Paloutzian & C. L. Park (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (2nd ed., pp. 3–22). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paloutzian, R. F., & Park, C. L. (2014). Religiousness and spirituality: The psychology of multilevel meaning making behavior. Religion, Brain, and Behavior, 4, 49–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paloutzian, R. F., & Park, C. L. (2021). The psychology of religion and spirituality: How big the tent? Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 12, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/rel0000218

  • Paranjape, A., & Kaslow, N. (2010). Family violence exposure and health outcomes among older African American women: Does spirituality and social support play a protective role? Journal of Women’s Health, 19, 1899–1904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pargament, K. I. (2007). Spiritually integrated psychotherapy: Understanding and addressing the sacred. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pargament, K. I. (2013). Searching for the sacred: Toward a nonreductionistic theory of spirituality. In K. I. Pargament, J. J. Exline, & J. W. Jones (Eds.), APA handbook of psychology, religion, and spirituality: Research and theory (Vol. 1, pp. 257–273). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pargament, K. I., Mahoney, A., Exline, J. J., Jones, J. W., & Shafranske, E. P. (2013). Envisioning an integrative paradigm for the psychology of religion and spirituality. In K. I. Pargament, J. J. Exline, & J. W. Jones (Eds.), APA handbook of psychology, religion, and spirituality: Research and theory (Vol. 1, pp. 3–19). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Park, C. L. (2010). Making sense of the meaning literature: an integrative review of meaning making and its effects on adjustment to stressful life events. Psychological Bulletin, 136(2), 257–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, C. L. (2013). Religion and meaning. In R. F. Paloutzian & C. L. Park (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterman, A. H., Fitchett, G., Brady, M. J., Hernandez, L., & Cella, D. (2002). Measuring spiritual well-being in people with cancer: the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy – spiritual well-being scale (FACIT-Sp). Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 24, 49–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, K. D., Mock, K. S., Bopp, C. M., Dudgeon, W. A., & Hand, G. A. (2006). Spiritual well-being, sleep disturbance, and mental and physical health status in HIV-infected individuals. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 27(2), 125–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piedmont, R. L. (2001). Spiritual transcendence and the scientific study of spirituality. Journal of Rehabilitation, 67, 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piedmont, R. L., & Wilkins, T. A. (2013). The role of personality in understanding religious and spiritual constructs. In R. F. Paloutzian & C. L. Park (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (2nd ed., pp. 292–331). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putri, I. P. (2016). The relationship between spiritual well-being with depression levels of the elderly in sasana tresna werdha ciracas. Thesis. Depok: Faculty of Nursing Studies Extension Study Program, Universitas Indonesia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putri, I. P., & Rekawati, E. (2017). Spiritual well-being as a factor that affecting the depression in the elderly. UI Proceedings of Health and Medicine, 2, 146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, L. (1995). The spiritual dimension: Its importance to patients’ health, wellbeing and quality of life and its implications for nursing practice. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 32(5), 457–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, E. L., Agresti, A. A., & Fitchett, G. (1998). Factor analysis of the spiritual well-being scale and its clinical utility with psychiatric inpatients. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 37, 314–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spilka, B. (1993). Spirituality: Problems and directions in operationalizing a fuzzy concept. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, August, Toronto, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streib, H., & Hood, R. W., Jr. (Eds.). (2016). Semantics and psychology of spirituality: A cross-cultural analysis. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taliaferro, L. A., Rienzo, B. A., Pigg, R. M., Jr., Miller, M. D., & Dodd, V. J. (2009). Spiritual well-being and suicidal ideation among college students. Journal of American College Health, 58(1), 83–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, W., & Kao, C. (2017). Psychometric testing of the spiritual well-being scale–mandarin version in Taiwanese cancer patients. Palliative & Supportive Care, 15(3), 336–347. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147895151600081X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanyi, R. A., & Werner, J. S. (2007). Spirituality in African American and Caucasian women with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis treatment. Health Care for Women International, 28(2), 141–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taves, A. (2020). Psychology of religion approaches to the study of religious experience. In: P. Moser & C. Meister (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to religious experience (pp. 25–54). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topper, C. (2003). Spirituality in pastoral counseling and the community helping professions. New York, NY: Haworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsuang, M. T., Williams, W. M., Simpson, J. C., & Lyons, M. J. (2002). Pilot study of spirituality and mental health in twins. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159(3), 486–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unterrainer, H. F. (2017). Functional and dysfunctional religious/spiritual beliefs in psychotic disorders. In H.-F. Angel, L. Oviedo, R. F. Paloutzian, A. L. C. Runihov, & R. J. Seitz (Eds.), Processes of believing: The acquisition, maintenance, and change in creditions (pp. 167–180). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Unterrainer, H. F., Ladenhauf, K. H., Moazedi, M. L., Wallner-Liebmann, S. J., & Fink, A. (2010). Dimensions of religious/spiritual well-being and their relation to personality and psychological wellbeing. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(3), 192–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unterrainer, H. F., Nelson, O., Collicutt, J., & Fink, A. (2012). The English version of the multidimensional inventory for religious/spiritual well-being (MI-RSWB-E): First results from British college students. Religion, 3(3), 588–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vella-Brodrick, D. A., & Allen, F. C. L. (1995). Development and psychometric validation of the mental, physical, and spiritual well-being scale. Psychological Reports, 77(2), 659–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westera, D. A. (2017). Spirituality in nursing practice: The basics and beyond. New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M. G., Ihm, E., Maul, A., & Taves, A. (2021). Survey item validation. In: S. Engler & M. Stausberg (Eds.) The Routledge handbook on methods in religious studies, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • You, S., & Yoo, J. E. (2015). Evaluation of the spiritual well-being scale in a sample of Korean adults. Journal of Religion and Health, 55(4), 1289–1299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raymond F. Paloutzian .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Adapted from Paloutzian (2016).

Appendix A: Spiritual Well-Being Scale

For each of the following statements circle the choice that best indicates the extent of your agreement or disagreement as it describes your personal experience:

SA = Strongly Agree

D = Disagree

MA = Moderately Agree

MD = Moderately Disagree

A = Agree

SD = Strongly Disagree

1.

I don’t find much satisfaction in private prayer with God.

SA

MA

A

D

MD

SD

2.

I don’t know who I am, where I came from, or where I’m going.

SA

MA

A

D

MD

SD

3.

I believe that God loves me and cares about me.

SA

MA

A

D

MD

SD

4.

I feel that life is a positive experience.

SA

MA

A

D

MD

SD

5.

I believe that God is impersonal and not interested in my daily situations.

SA

MA

A

D

MD

SD

6.

I feel unsettled about my future.

SA

MA

A

D

MD

SD

7.

I have a personally meaningful relationship with God.

SA

MA

A

D

MD

SD

8.

I feel very fulfilled and satisfied with life.

SA

MA

A

D

MD

SD

9.

I don’t get much personal strength and support from my God

SA

MA

A

D

MD

SD

10.

I feel a sense of well-being about the direction my life is headed in.

SA

MA

A

D

MD

SD

11.

I believe that God is concerned about my problems.

SA

MA

A

D

MD

SD

12.

I don’t enjoy much about life.

SA

MA

A

D

MD

SD

13.

I don’t have a personally satisfying relationship with God.

SA

MA

A

D

MD

SD

14.

I feel good about my future.

SA

MA

A

D

MD

SD

15.

My relationship with God helps me not to feel lonely.

SA

MA

A

D

MD

SD

16.

I feel that life is full of conflict and unhappiness.

SA

MA

A

D

MD

SD

17.

I feel most fulfilled when I’m in close communion with God.

SA

MA

A

D

MD

SD

18.

Life doesn’t have much meaning.

SA

MA

A

D

MD

SD

19.

My relation with God contributes to my sense of well-being.

SA

MA

A

D

MD

SD

20.

I believe there is some real purpose for my life.

SA

MA

A

D

MD

SD

  1. SWB Scale (SWBS) © 1982 by Craig W. Ellison and Raymond F. Paloutzian; 2011 R. F. Paloutzian. All rights reserved to the English SWBS and its translations. Not to be duplicated unless expressed written permission is granted by the copyright holder or www.lifeadvance.com

Appendix B: Methods of Translation

Adapted from Paloutzian (2016).

Essential in making a good translation of a psychological scale is to follow certain well-established procedures. Three procedures have been especially successful in producing a translated scale useful for research purposes. After the initial translation is made, it is subject to standard statistical procedures in order to assess reliability, validity, and factor structure.

1.1 Back-Translation

The first method makes use of a back-translation. The researcher begins by having a qualified individual who is competent in both languages translate the original into the second language. Then a second qualified person, equally competent in both languages, begins with the translated version and translates it back into the original language. Then the original and the back-translated version are compared. If they are equivalent, then the translated version is considered satisfactory; if not, then the procedure is repeated until satisfactory results are obtained.

1.2 Translation by Committee

A second method is to have the translation made by a small committee of qualified people, all of whom are competent in both languages. There are two variations of this procedure. In the first procedure, each individual makes a translated version of the scale independently. The committee then meets and all versions are examined and compared by all on the committee, and discrepancies among the translations are discussed and weighed until consensus is reached on a final version. In the second procedure, the committee meets as a whole and its members collaborate via discussion as the make one translation of the scale; differences in opinion about the wording of specific items are worked out in the discussion until consensus is reached.

1.3 Committee Plus Back-Translation

A third method is an extension of the translation-by-committee method noted above. This third method has the same two variations in procedure as noted above. But in both cases, the final agreed-upon version of the translated scale is given to another person, not part of the translating team, who makes a back-translation of it into the original language. Then the original and the back-translated version are compared. If they are equivalent, then the translated version is considered satisfactory; if not, then the procedure is repeated until satisfactory results are obtained.

1.4 Translate Meanings, Not Words

The most important thing in translating a scale is not that the exact words be translated literally, but that the meaning of each item be translated so that what a subject understands it to be asking is the psychological equivalent in the new language to what it is in the original language. This means that sometimes a literal exact translation may not work, but a translation with modifications of words or phrases may work well. These things are found out by testing the translated instrument, beginning with its individual items (Wolf, Ihm, Maul, & Taves, 2021; Taves, 2020), in its cross-cultural context. In the hypothetical “perfect” translation, a score on the translated scale and the equivalent score on the original scale would represent the exact same meaning in the minds of the subjects. Such an outcome is an ideal scenario; well-done translations approximate it as much as possible.

Appendix C: Additional Resources on SWBS Translations

  • Chaves, E. D. C. L. (2008). Revisão do diagnóstico de enfermagem angústia spiritual. Doctoral dissertation, Universidade de São Paulo.

  • Chequini, M. C. M. (2009). Resiliência e espiritualidade em pacientes oncológicos: uma abordagem junguiana. Doctoral dissertation, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo.

  • Esperandio, M. R. G., & Marques, L. (2015). The psychology of religion in Brazil. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 25(4), 255-257.

  • Kemenkes, R. I. (2014). Profil kesehatan Indonesia Tahun 2014. Diambil kembali dari: http://www.depkes.go.id/resources/download/pusdatin/profil-kesehatan-indonesia/profil-kesehatan-indonesia-2014.pdf. (Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia. [2014]. Health Profile Indonesia year 2014.)

  • Kvande, M. N., Klöckner, C. A., & Nielsen, M. E. (2015). Church Attendance and Religious Experience:Differential Associations to Well-Being for Norwegian Women and Men? SAGE Open, 5(4), 2158244015612876. doi:10.1177/2158244015612876

  • Liu, Y.-H. (2010). Spiritual well-being and acculturative stress among older Chinese immigrants in the United States. Gerontology Program, California State University, Long Beach, California, USA.

  • Malinakova, K., Kopcakova, K., Madarasova Geckova, A., van Dijk, J. P., Furstova, J., Kalman, M., Tavel, P., & Reijneveld, S. A. (2018). “I am spiritual, but not religious”: Does one without the other protect against adolescent health-risk behaviour? International Journal of Public Health: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-018-1116-4

  • Malinakova, K., Madarasova Geckova, A., van Dijk, J. P., Kalman, M., Tavel, P., & Reijneveld, S. A. (2018). Adolescent religious attendance and spirituality: Are they associated with leisure-time choices? PLoS ONE 13(6), 1-14: e0198314. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198314

  • Marques, L. F. (2000). A saúde e o bem-estar espiritual em adultos porto-alegrenses. Doctoral dissertation, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul.

  • Martinez, E. Z., Almeida, R. G. D. S., Garcia, F. R., & Carvalho, A. C. D. D. (2013). Notes on the Portuguese-language version of the Spiritual Well-Being Scale. Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria, 62(1), 76-80.

  • Paloutzian, R. F. (2016). The Spiritual Well-Being Scale: Portuguese translation and SWBS use. Horizonte – Revisita de Estudos de Teologia e Ciencias da Religiao (Horizonte -- Journal of Theology and Religious Studies), 14 (41), 76-86.

  • Promkaewngam, S., Pothi ban, L., Srisuphan, W., & Khanokporn, S. (2014). Development of the Spiritual Well-being Scale for Thai Buddhist Adults with Chronic Illness. Pacific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research, 18(4), 320-332.

  • Silva, L. A. C. D. (2016). Espiritualidades e bem-estar espiritual no processo formativo de estudante de psicologia do Recife–PE à luz da abordagem integral/transpessoal. Master Dissertation, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco.

  • Silva, L. H. P., Penha, R. M., & Silva, M. J. P. (2012). Relação entre crenças espirituais/religiosas e bem-estar espiritual da equipe de enfermagem. Northeast Network Nursing Journal, 13(3).

  • Silva, R. D. P., Souza, P. D., Nogueira, D. A., Moreira, D. D. S., & Chaves, E. D. C. L. (2013). Relationship between spiritual well-being, sociodemographic characteristics and use of alcohol and other drugs by students. Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria, 62(3), 191-198.

  • Tang W-R. (2008). Spiritual assessment and care of cancer patients. School of Nursing, Chang Gung University, Taiwan, R.O.C.

  • Velasco, L., Rioux, L. (2009). Adaptation et validation en langue franc¸aise d’une e´chelle de bien-eˆtre spiritual. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 41 (2), 102–108. DOI: 10.1037/a0012555.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Paloutzian, R.F. et al. (2021). The Spiritual Well-Being Scale (SWBS): Cross-Cultural Assessment Across 5 Continents, 10 Languages, and 300 Studies. In: Ai, A.L., Wink, P., Paloutzian, R.F., Harris, K.A. (eds) Assessing Spirituality in a Diverse World. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52140-0_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52140-0_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-52139-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-52140-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics