Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On the Conceptualization and Measurement of Flow

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Flow Research

Abstract

This chapter introduces in chronological order the three main measurement methods—the Flow Questionnaire, the Experience Sampling Method, and the standardized scales of the componential approach—that researchers developed and used in conducting research on the flow state. Each measurement method and underlying conceptualization is explained, and its strengths and limitations are then discussed in relation to the other measurement methods and associated conceptualizations. The analysis reveals that, although the concept of flow remained stable since its inception, the models of flow that researchers developed in conjunction with the measurement methods changed substantially over time. Moreover, the findings obtained by applying the various measurement methods led to corroborations and disconfirmations of the underlying models, and hence provided indications on how to interpret and possibly modify flow theory. The chapter then analyzes the emerging process approach, which conceptualizes and measures flow as a dynamic path rather than an object, and highlights its potential for integrating flow and creativity within the same conceptual framework. The final section outlines new directions for developing more valid and useful measurement methods that can help to advance the understanding of flow, its antecedents, and its consequences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The separation of quotes was suggested by Antonella Delle Fave in 1997 (personal communication).

References

  • Asakawa, K. (2004). Flow experience and autotelic personality in Japanese college students: How do they experience challenges in daily life? Journal of Happiness Studies, 5, 123–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64, 359–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, A. B. (2008). The work-related flow inventory: Construction and initial validation of the WOLF. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72, 400–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumann, N., Lürig, C., & Engeser, S. (2016). Flow and enjoyment beyond skill-demand balance: The role of game pacing curves and personality. Motivation and Emotion, 40(4), 507–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beer, N., & Moneta, G. B. (2010). Construct and concurrent validity of the positive metacognitions and positive meta-emotions questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 977–982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bledow, R., Rosing, K., & Frese, M. (2013). A dynamic perspective on affect and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 432–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bricteux, C., Navarro, J., & Ceja, L. (2016). Interest as a moderator in the relationship between challenge/skills balance and flow at work: An analysis at within-individual level. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18, 861–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryk, A., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carli, M., Delle Fave, A., & Massimini, F. (1988). The quality of experience in the flow channels: Comparison of Italian and U.S. students. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. S. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness (pp. 266–306). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceja, L., & Navarro, J. (2009). Dynamics of flow: A nonlinear perspective. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10, 665–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceja, L., & Navarro, J. (2011). Dynamic patterns of flow in the workplace: Characterizing within-individual variability using a complexity science approach. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 627–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceja, L., & Navarro, J. (2012). ‘Suddenly I get into the zone’: Examining discontinuities and nonlinear changes in flow experiences at work. Human Relations, 65, 1101–1127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conti, R. (2001). Time flies: Investigating the connection between intrinsic motivation and the experience of time. Journal of Personality, 69, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975/2000). Beyond boredom and anxiety: Experiencing flow in work and play (1/2). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1978). Attention and the holistic approach to behavior. In K. S. Pope & J. L. Singer (Eds.), The stream of consciousness (pp. 335–356). New York: Plenum Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997a). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997b). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., Abuhamdeh, S., & Nakamura, J. (2005). Flow. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 598–608). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, I. (1988). Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. W. (1984). Being adolescent. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (1987). Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 175, 526–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., Larson, R., & Prescott, S. (1977). The ecology of adolescent activity and experience. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 6, 281–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., & LeFevre, J. (1989). Optimal experience in work and leisure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 815–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G. A. (2004). Creativity is forever (5th ed.). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delle Fave, A., & Bassi, M. (2000). The quality of experience in adolescents’ daily life: Developmental perspectives. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 126, 347–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delle Fave, A., & Massimini, F. (2004). The cross-cultural investigation of optimal experience. Ricerche di Psicologia, 1, 79–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delle Fave, A., & Massimini, F. (2005). The investigation of optimal experience and apathy: Developmental and psychosocial implications. European Psychologist, 10, 264–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, G. D., Voelkl, J. E., & Morris, C. (1994). Measurements and analysis issues with explanation of variance in daily experience using the Flow model. Journal of Leisure Research, 26, 337–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engeser, S., & Rheinberg, F. (2008). Flow, moderators of challenge-skill-balance and performance. Motivation and Emotion, 32, 158–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, D. H., Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Gardner, H. (1994). Changing the world: A framework for the study of creativity. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, F. L., Su, R. C., & Yu, S. C. (2009). EGameFlow: A scale to measure learners’ enjoyment of e-learning games. Computers and Education, 52, 101–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullagar, C., & Kelloway, E. K. (2013). Work-related flow. In A. B. Bakker & K. Daniels (Eds.), A day in the life of a happy worker (pp. 41–57). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getzels, J. W., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). From problem solving to problem finding. In I. A. Taylor & J. W. Getzels (Eds.), Perspectives in creativity (pp. 90–116). Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getzels, J. W., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1976). The creative vision: A longitudinal study of problem finding in art. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghani, J., & Deshpande, S. P. (1994). Task characteristics and the experience of optimal flow in human-computer interaction. The Journal of Psychology, 128, 381–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, H. (1995). Multilevel statistical models. New York: Halsted.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haworth, J., & Evans, S. (1995). Challenge, skill and positive subjective states in the daily life of a sample of YTS students. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 68, 109–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hektner, J., Schmidt, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2007). Experience sampling method. Measuring the quality of everyday life. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heutte, J., Fenouillet, F., Boniwell, I., Martin-Krumm, C., Csikszentmihalyi, M., (2014). Optimal learning experience in digital environments: Theoretical concepts, measure and modelisation. Symposium Digital Learning in 21st Century Universities, Georgia Institute of Technology (Georgia Tech), Atlanta, GA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heutte, J., Fenouillet, F., Boniwell, I., Martin-Krumm, C., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2016a). The EduFlow model: A contribution toward the study of optimal learning environments. In L. Harmat, F. Ørsted Andersen, F. Ullén, J. Wright, & G. Sadlo (Eds.), The flow experience: Empirical research and applications (pp. 105–123). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heutte, J., Fenouillet, F., Boniwell, I., Martin-Krumm, C., & Csikszentmihalyi, M., (2016b). Proposal for a conceptual evolution of the flow in education (EduFlow) model. European Conference on Positive Psychology (ECPP), Angers, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (2009). Flow online: Lessons learned and future prospects. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 23, 23–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S. A., & Marsh, H. W. (1996). Development and validation of a scale to measure optimal experience: The flow state scale. Journal of Sport & Experience Psychology, 18, 17–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S. A., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Flow in sports: The keys to optimal experiences and performances. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S. A., & Eklund, R. C. (2002). Assessing flow in physical activity: The flow state scale-2 and dispositional flow scale-2. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 24, 133–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S. A., & Eklund, R. C. (2004). The flow scale manual. Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D. A., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. (2004). A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method. Science, 306, 1776–1780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawabata, M., Mallett, C. J., & Jackson, S. A. (2008). The flow state scale-2 and dispositional flow scale-2: Examination of factorial validity and reliability for Japanese adults. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 9, 465–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, J., & Bless, H. (2008). Flow and regulatory compatibility: An experimental approach to the flow model of intrinsic motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 196–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, R., & Delespaul, P. A. E. G. (1992). Analysing experience sampling data: A guidebook for the perplexed. In M. deVries (Ed.), The experience of psychopathology: Investigating mental disorders in their natural settings (pp. 58–78). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. (1964). Religions, values and peak-experiences. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massimini, F., & Carli, M. (1988). The systematic assessment of flow in daily experience. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. S. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness (pp. 266–287). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Massimini, F., Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Carli, M. (1987). The monitoring of optimal experience: A tool for psychiatric rehabilitation. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, 175, 545–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, A., Yiend, J., & Lawrence, A. D. (2004). Individual differences in the modulation of fear-related brain activation by attentional control. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1683–1694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moneta, G. B. (1990). A modeling approach to the study of subjective experience: Everyday life variations as a function of perceived challenges and skills in the activity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moneta, G. B. (2004a). The flow experience across cultures. Journal of Happiness Studies, 5, 115–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moneta, G. B. (2004b). The flow model of state intrinsic motivation in Chinese: Cultural and personal moderators. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2, 181–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moneta, G. B. (2010). Flow in work as a function of trait intrinsic motivation, opportunity for creativity in the job, and work engagement. In S. Albrecht (Ed.), The handbook of employee engagement: Perspectives, issues, research and practice (pp. 262–269). Edward-Elgar Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moneta, G. B. (2012). Opportunity for creativity in the job as a moderator of the relation between trait intrinsic motivation and flow in work. Motivation and Emotion, 36, 491–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moneta, G. B. (2017). Validation of the short flow in work scale (SFWS). Personality and Individual Differences, 109, 83–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moneta, G. B., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). The effect of perceived challenges and skills on the quality of subjective experience. Journal of Personality, 64, 275–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moneta, G. B., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Models of concentration in natural environments: A comparative approach based on streams of experiential data. Social Behavior and Personality, 27, 603–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosing, M. A., Magnusson, P. K. E., Pedersen, N. L., Nakamura, J., Madison, G., & Ullén, F. (2012). Heritability of proneness for psychological flow experiences. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 699–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navarro, J., & Ceja, L. (2011). Dinámicas complejas en el flujo: Diferencias entre trabajo y no trabajo [Complex dynamics of flow: Differences between work and non-work activities]. Revista de Psicología Social, 26, 443–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novak, T. P., Hoffman, D. L., & Yung, Y. F. (2000). Measuring the customer experience in online environments: A structural modeling approach. Marketing Science, 19, 22–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palermo, G., & Moneta, G. B. (2016). Cognitive processes underlying creativity at work. In G. B. Moneta & J. Rogaten (Eds.), Psychology of creativity: Cognitive, emotional, and social processes (pp. 21–48). New York: Nova Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfister, R. (2002). Flow im Alltag: Untersuchungen zum Quadrantenmodell des Flow-Erlebens und zum Konzept der autotelischen Perso ¨nlichkeit mit der Experience Sampling Method (ESM) [Flow in everyday life: Studies on the quadrant model of flow experiencing and on the concept of the autotelic personality with the experience sampling method (ESM)]. Bern: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Privette, G. (1983). Peak experience, peak performance, and flow: A comparative analysis of positive human experiences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 1361–1368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rheinberg, F. (2008). Intrinsic motivation and flow-experience. In H. Heckhausen & J. Heckhausen (Eds.), Motivation and action (pp. 323–348). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rheinberg, F., Manig, Y., Kliegl, R., Engeser, S., & Vollmeyer, R. (2007). Flow bei der Arbeit, doch Glück in der Freizeit: Zielausrichtung, Flow und Glücksgefühle [Flow during work but happiness during leisure time: goals, flow-experience, and happiness]. Zeitschrift für Organisationspsychologie, 51, 105–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, R., Kinney, D. K., Benet, M., & Merzel, A. P. (1988). Assessing everyday creativity: Characteristics of the lifetime creativity scales and validation with three large samples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 476–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (1995). Insight for creativity, expression for impact. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 377–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. (2002). The Measurement of burnout and engagement: A confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiefele, U., & Raabe, A. (2011). Skill-demands compatibility as a determinant of flow experience in an inductive reasoning task. Psychological Reports, 109, 428–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schüler, J. (2010). Achievement incentives determine the effects of achievement-motive incongruence on flow experience. Motivation und Emotion, 34, 2–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swann, C., Keegan, R. J., Piggott, D., & Crust, L. (2012). A systematic review of the experience, occurrence, and controllability of flow states in elite sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13, 807–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. E., & Moneta, G. B. (2016). The flow metacognitions questionnaire (FMQ): A two factor model of flow metacognitions. Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 225–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Psychology, London Metropolitan University, London, UK

    Giovanni B. Moneta

Authors
  1. Giovanni B. Moneta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanni B. Moneta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany

    Corinna Peifer

  2. Department of Psychology, University of Trier, Trier, Germany

    Stefan Engeser

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Moneta, G.B. (2021). On the Conceptualization and Measurement of Flow. In: Peifer, C., Engeser, S. (eds) Advances in Flow Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53468-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation