Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Understanding Students with Additional Needs as Learners pp 131–156Cite as

Understanding and Mapping Digital Literacy for Students with Disability

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Digital literacy capability is important for all students, particularly for those with disability, as it can enable access to learning. The challenges in understanding what this capability means for students with disability, and how their learning in this area progresses, has created difficulties for teachers in supporting these students to become digitally literate. To address this challenge, this study sought to define the construct of digital literacy for students with primarily intellectual disability, with the aim of developing an assessment of digital literacy capability. By incorporating the knowledge of those with subject matter expertise, such as experienced specialist teachers, and the assessment data from 1,413 students with disability, the study applied partial credit item response modelling (Masters, Psychometrica 47:149–174, 1982) to develop a progression of digital literacy for these students. The strong evidence drawn from reliability indices, item and person fit statistics, and differential item functioning support multiple arguments for validity. The results may assist teachers to understand the digital literacy capability of students with disability and what they are likely to be ready to learn next, for the purpose of targeting teaching for learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aesaert, K., van Braak, J., van Nijlen, D., & Vanderlinde, R. (2015). Primary school pupils’ ICT competences: Extensive model and scale development. Computers & Education, 81, 326–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aesaert, K., van Nijlen, D., Vanderlinde, R., & van Braak, J. (2014). Direct measures of digital information processing and communication skills in primary education: Using item response theory for the development and validation of an ICT competence scale. Computers and Education, 76, 168–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.03.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ala-Mutka, K., Punie, Y., & Redecker, C. (2011). Digital competence for lifelong learning: Policy brief JRC48708-2008. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Retrieved from: http://ftp.jrc.es/EURdoc/JRC48708.TN.pdf.

  • Alper, M., & Goggin, G. (2017). Digital technology and rights in the lives of children with disabilities. New Media & Society, 19(5), 726–740. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816686323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2004). Children with disabilities in Australia (AIHW cat. no. DIS 38). Retrieved from http://www.aihw.gov.au/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=6442455787.

  • Aviram, A., & Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2006). Towards a theory of digital literacy: Three scenarios for the next steps. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 1, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blitz, M. (2014). Understanding Heidegger on technology. The New Atlantis, 41, 63–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Calvani, A., Fini, A., & Ranieri, M. (2009). Assessing digital competence in secondary education. Issues, models and instruments. In M. Leaning (Ed.), Issues in information and media literacy: Education, practice and pedagogy (Vol. 2, pp. 153–172). Santa Rosa, CA: Informing Science Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartelli, A. (2010). Theory and practice in digital competence assessment. International Journal of Digital Literacy and Digital Competence, 3. https://doi.org/10.4018/jdldc.2010070101.

  • Cihak, D. F., Wright, R., Smith, C. C., McMahon, D., & Kraiss, K. (2015). Incorporating functional digital literacy skills as part of the curriculum for high school students with intellectual disability. Education & Training in Autism & Developmental Disabilities, 50(2), 155–171. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/24827532.

  • Coiro, J., Knobel, M., Lankshear, C., & Leu, D. J. (2008). Central issues in new literacies and new literacies research. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, & D. J. Leu (Eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coles-Janess, B., & Griffin, P. (2009). Mapping transitions in interpersonal learning for students with additional needs. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 33(2), 141–150. https://doi.org/10.1375/ajse.33.2.141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, N., Desforges, C., Jessel, J., Somekh, B., Taylor, C., & Vaughn, G. (1997). Can quality in learning be enhanced through the use of IT? In B. Somekh & N. Davis (Eds.), Using IT effectively in teaching and learning: Studies in pre-service and in-service teacher education (pp. 14–27). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education Employment and Workplace Relations. (2012). Report on the review of the disability standards for education 2005. Retrieved from http://foi.deewr.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/report_on_the_review_of_disability_standards_for_education_2005.pdf.

  • Dreyfus, H. L., & Spinosa, C. (2003). Further reflections on Heidegger, technology, and the everyday. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 23(5), 339–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467603259868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, S. E., & Dreyfus, H. L. (1980). A five-stage model of the mental activities involved in directed skill acquisition. Berkeley, CA: University of California Berkeley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2004). Digital literacy: A conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13, 93–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, S. B., Sporte, S. E., & Bender Sebring, P. (2013). The use of technology in Chicago Public Schools 2011 (Research brief). Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED542564.pdf.

  • Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fajardo-Flores, S. B., Michel-García, A., & Pulido, J. R. G. (2008). Information technology literacy of blind elementary school students. A Mexican perspective. International Journal of Learning, 15(6), 103–109. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9494/CGP/v15i06/45825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farnsworth Jr, C. R., & Luckner, J. L. (2008). The impact of assistive technology on curriculum accommodation for a braille-reading student. Re:View, 39(4), 171–187. Retrieved from https://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/A184643651/AONE?u=googlescholar&sid=AONE&xid=9f9743af.

  • Ferrari, A. (2012). Digital competence in practice: An analysis of frameworks. JRC technical reports. Report EUR 25351 EN. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari, A. (2013). DIGCOMP: A framework for developing and understanding digital competence in Europe. JRC scientific and policy reports. Report EUR 26035 EN. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Schulz, W., Friedman, T., & Gebhardt, E. (2014). Preparing for life in a digital age: The IEA international computer and information literacy study international report. Melbourne, Australia: Springer Open.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilster, P. (1997). Digital literacy. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, P. (2014). Assessment for teaching. Port Melbourne, Australia: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, P. (2007). The comfort of competence and the uncertainty of assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 33(1), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2007.01.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, P., Gillis, S., & Calvitto, L. (2004). Connecting competence and quality: Scored assessment in year 12 VET. A report to the New South Wales Department of Education. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/238777724_Connecting_Competence_and_Quality_Scored_Assessment_in_Year_12_VET.

  • Hall, T. E., Cohen, N., Vue, G., & Ganley, P. (2015). Addressing learning disabilities with UDL and technology: Strategic reader. Learning Disability Quarterly, 38(2), 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948714544375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harman, G. (2010). Technology, objects and things in Heidegger. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(1), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bep021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. New York, NY: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology, and other essays. New York, NY: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitchcock, C., & Stahl, S. (2003). Assistive technology, universal design, universal design for learning: Improved learning opportunities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 18(4), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340301800404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilomäki, L., Paavola, S., Lakkala, M., & Kantosalo, A. (2016). Digital competence – An emergent boundary concept for policy and educational research. Education & Information Technologies, 21, 655–679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-014-9346-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Innovation & Business Skills Australia. (2013). Digital literacy and e-skills: Participation in the digital economy. Melbourne: Innovation and business skills Australia. Retrieved from: https://www.ibsa.org.au/sites/default/files/media/Digital%20Literacy%20and%20E-skills.pdf.

  • Iordache, C., Baelden, D., & Mariën, I. (2016). Reconsidering digital skills: A theoretical questioning of the skills that define e-inclusion. Brussels: Belgian Science Policy. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3229.4007.

  • Israel, M., Marino, M., Delisio, L., & Serianni, B. (2014). Supporting content learning through technology for K-12 students with disabilities (Document No. IC-10). Gainesville, FL: University of Florida, Collaboration for Effective Educator, Development, Accountability, and Reform Center. Retrieved from: http://ceedar.education.ufl.edu/tools/innovation-configurations/.

  • Janssen, J., Stoyanov, S., Ferrari, A., Punie, Y., Pannekeet, K., & Sloep, P. (2013). Experts’ views on digital competence: Commonalities and differences. Computers & Education, 68, 473–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.06.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, S. M. (2009). Use of assistive technology by students with visual impairments: Findings from a national survey. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 103(8), 470–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, V. F. (2010). Effects of supported electronic text and explicit instruction on science comprehension by students with autism spectrum disorder (Doctoral dissertation). Charlotte, NC: University of North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubiszyn, T., & Borich, G. (1993). Educational testing and measurement. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2015). Digital literacy and digital literacies: Policy, pedagogy and research considerations for education. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 10(Jubileumsnummer), 8–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmud, R., & Ismail, M. (2010). Impact of training and experience in using ICT on in-service teachers’ basic ICT literacy. Malaysian Journal of Educational Technology, 10(2), 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A. (2006). Literacies for the digital age: Preview of part I. In A. Martin & D. Madigan (Eds.), Digital literacies for learning (pp. 3–25). London, UK: Facet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A. (2008). Digital literacy and the “digital society”. In C. Lankshear & M. Knoebel (Eds.), Digital literacy: Concepts, policies and practices (pp. 151–176). New York, NY: Peter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, G. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrica, 47(2), 149–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, N. K., & Bouck, E. C. (2014). The impact of text-to-speech on expository reading for adolescents with LD. Journal of Special Education Technology, 29(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264341402900102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Council on Disability. (2011). The power of digital inclusion: Technology’s impact on employment and opportunities for people with disabilities. Washington, DC: National Council on Disability.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley, P., Jenkins, S., Wesley, B., Donehower, C., Rabuck, D., & Lewis, M. E. B. (2013). Effectiveness of using iPads to build math fluency. Paper presented at the Council for Exceptional Children Annual Meeting, San Antonio, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2015). Students, computers and learning: Making the connection. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264239555-en.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peréz, B. (2004). Literacy, diversity, and programmatic responses. In B. Peréz, T. L. McCarty, L. J. Watahomigie, M. E. Torres-Guzman, T. T. Dien, J.-M. Chang, H. E. Smith, A. D. de Silva, & A. Nordlander (Eds.), Sociocultural contexts of language and literacy (2nd ed., pp. 3–24). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prestridge, S. (2013). The beliefs behind the teacher that influences their ICT practices. Computers & Education, 58(1), 449–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, E., & Griffin, P. (2009). Profiling transitions in emotional development for students with additional learning needs. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 33(2), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1375/ajse.33.2.151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreuer, N. A. D. (2014). Accessibility to information and communications technology for the social participation of youths with disabilities: A two-way street. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 32(1), 76–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scribner, S., & Cole, M. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Selber, S. A. (2004). Multiliteracies for a digital age. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selfe, C. L. (1999). Technology and literacy in the twenty-first century. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N., & Husen, O. (2010). The educational benefits of technological competence: An investigation of students’ perceptions. Evaluation & Research in Education, 23(2), 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500790.2010.483515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siddiq, F., Scherer, R., & Tondeur, J. (2016). Teachers’ emphasis on developing students’ digital information and communication skills (TEDDICS): A new construct in 21st century education. Computers and Education, 92-93, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Søby, M. (2003). Digital competence: From ICT skills to digital “bildung”. Oslo, Norway: ITU, University of Oslo. Retrieved from http://folk.uio.no/mortenso/Dig.comp.html.

  • Søby, M. (2015). Digital competence – A password to a new interdisciplinary field. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 9 ER(Jubileumsnummer). Retrieved from http://www.idunn.no/ts/dk/2015/Jubileumsnummer/digital_competence_-_a_password_to_a_new_interdisciplinary.

  • Stevenson, I. (2008). Tool, tutor, environment or resource: Exploring metaphors for digital technology and pedagogy using activity theory. Computers & Education, 51(2), 836–853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Street, B. (1995). Social literacies: Critical approaches to literacy in development, ethnography and education. London, UK: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tour, E. (2015). Digital mindsets: Teachers’ technology use in personal life and teaching. Language Learning & Technology, 19(3), 124–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organisation. (2006). ICTs in education for people with special needs: Specialized training course. Moscow, Russia: UNESCO Institute for Information Technologies in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organisation. (2011). UNESCO ICT competency framework for teachers (2nd ed.). Paris, France: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verillon, P., & Rabardel, P. (1995). Cognition and artifacts: A contribution to the study of thought in relation to instrumented activity. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 10(1), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03172796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1929/1993). Defect and compensation (R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton, Trans.). In The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, The fundamentals of defectology (Abnormal psychology and learning disabilities) (Vol. 2, pp. 54–62). New York, NY: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, P., & Kop, R. (2009). Heidegger, digital technology, and postmodern education: From being in cyberspace to meeting on MySpace. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467609336305.

  • White, E. H. (2019). Digital literacy for students with disability: Recognising ability and supporting learning through assessment, evidence, and expertise (Doctoral thesis). Melbourne, Australia: The University of Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, E. H., Woods, K., & Poed, S. (2017). The assessment and development of digital literacy in students with vision impairment and additional learning needs: Preliminary findings from a current PhD study. Paper presented at the proceedings from the 9th international council on the education of people with vision impairment European conference, Bruges, Belgium. Retrieved from http://www.icevi-europe.org/files/2017/empowered-by-dialogue/icevi-europe-2017-proceedings.pdf.

  • White, G. K. (2013). Digital fluency: Skills necessary for learning in the digital age. Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research. Retrieved from https://rd.acer.edu.au/article/digital-fluency-for-the-digital-age.

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations (E. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford, UK: Blackwells.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, E. W., & Smith, E. V., Jr. (2007a). Instrument development tools and activities for measure validation using Rasch models: Part I –Instrument development tools. In E. V. Smith & R. M. Smith (Eds.), Rasch measurement: Advanced and specialized applications (pp. 202–242). Maple Grove, MN: JAM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, E. W., & Smith, E. V., Jr. (2007b). Instrument development tools and activities for measure validation using Rasch models: Part II – Validation activities. In E. V. Smith & R. M. Smith (Eds.), Rasch measurement: Advanced and specialized applications (pp. 243–290). Maple Grove, MN: JAM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, K. (2010). The design and validation of measures of communication and literacy to support the instruction of students with learning disabilities (Doctoral thesis). Melbourne, Australia: University of Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, B. D., Linacre, J. M., Gustafson, J.-E., & Martin-Lof, P. (1994). Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8(3), 370. Retrieved from http://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt83b.htm.

  • Wright, B. D., & Stone, M. H. (1999). Measurement essentials (2nd ed.). Wilmington, DE: Wide Range.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Melbourne Graduate School of Education, Melbourne, Australia

    Emily H. White

  2. Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority/Melbourne Graduate School of Education, Melbourne, Australia

    Masa Pavlovic

  3. Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia

    Shiralee Poed

Authors
  1. Emily H. White
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Masa Pavlovic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shiralee Poed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emily H. White .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Melbourne Graduate School of Education, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia

    Patrick Griffin

  2. Assessment Research Centre, Melbourne Graduate School of Education, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia

    Kerry Woods

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

White, E.H., Pavlovic, M., Poed, S. (2020). Understanding and Mapping Digital Literacy for Students with Disability. In: Griffin, P., Woods, K. (eds) Understanding Students with Additional Needs as Learners. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56596-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56596-1_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-56595-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-56596-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation