Skip to main content

Overview of CLEF HIPE 2020: Named Entity Recognition and Linking on Historical Newspapers

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Experimental IR Meets Multilinguality, Multimodality, and Interaction (CLEF 2020)

Abstract

This paper presents an overview of the first edition of HIPE (Identifying Historical People, Places and other Entities), a pioneering shared task dedicated to the evaluation of named entity processing on historical newspapers in French, German and English. Since its introduction some twenty years ago, named entity (NE) processing has become an essential component of virtually any text mining application and has undergone major changes. Recently, two main trends characterise its developments: the adoption of deep learning architectures and the consideration of textual material originating from historical and cultural heritage collections. While the former opens up new opportunities, the latter introduces new challenges with heterogeneous, historical and noisy inputs. In this context, the objective of HIPE, run as part of the CLEF 2020 conference, is threefold: strengthening the robustness of existing approaches on non-standard inputs, enabling performance comparison of NE processing on historical texts, and, in the long run, fostering efficient semantic indexing of historical documents. Tasks, corpora, and results of 13 participating teams are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://impresso.github.io/CLEF-HIPE-2020/.

  2. 2.

    muc, ace, conll, kbp, ester, harem, quaero, germeval, etc.

  3. 3.

    https://impresso-project.ch/.

  4. 4.

    For space reasons, the discussion of related work is included in the extended version of this overview  [12].

  5. 5.

    From the Swiss National Library, the Luxembourgish National Library, and the Library of Congress (Chronicling America project), respectively. Original collections correspond to 4 Swiss and Luxembourgish titles, and a dozen for English. More details on original sources can be found in [12].

  6. 6.

    https://www.newseye.eu/.

  7. 7.

    The November 2019 dump used for annotation is available at https://files.ifi.uzh.ch/cl/impresso/clef-hipe.

  8. 8.

    https://universaldependencies.org/format.html.

  9. 9.

    https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode.

  10. 10.

    https://zenodo.org/deposit/3706857.

  11. 11.

    https://github.com/impresso/CLEF-HIPE-2020/tree/master/data.

  12. 12.

    https://github.com/flairNLP/flair.

  13. 13.

    https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode.

  14. 14.

    https://files.ifi.uzh.ch/cl/siclemat/impresso/clef-hipe-2020/flair/.

  15. 15.

    https://github.com/flairNLP/flair.

  16. 16.

    True positive, False positive, False negative.

  17. 17.

    https://github.com/impresso/CLEF-HIPE-2020-scorer.

  18. 18.

    https://github.com/jcklie/wikimapper.

  19. 19.

    https://huggingface.co/dbmdz.

  20. 20.

    https://github.com/eldams/mXS.

  21. 21.

    https://github.com/kermitt2/delft.

  22. 22.

    https://github.com/kermitt2/entity-fishing.

  23. 23.

    [38] for French, [32] for German.

  24. 24.

    SEM [10] is a CRF-based tool using Wapiti [28] as its linear CRF implementation.

  25. 25.

    https://www.elastic.co/.

  26. 26.

    https://impresso.github.io/CLEF-HIPE-2020/.

References

  1. Akbik, A., Bergmann, T., Blythe, D., Rasul, K., Schweter, S., Vollgraf, R.: FLAIR: an easy-to-use framework for state-of-the-art NLP. In: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (demonstrations), pp. 54–59. Association for Computational Linguistics, Minneapolis, Minnesota, June 2019. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/N19-4010

  2. Akbik, A., Blythe, D., Vollgraf, R.: Contextual string embeddings for sequence labeling. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp. 1638–1649. Association for Computational Linguistics, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA, August 2018. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/C18-1139

  3. Bojanowski, P., Grave, E., Joulin, A., Mikolov, T.: Enriching word vectors with subword information. Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguist. 5, 135–146 (2017). https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/Q17-1010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bollmann, M.: A large-scale comparison of historical text normalization systems. In: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), pp. 3885–3898. Association for Computational Linguistics, Minneapolis, Minnesota (2019). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N19-1389

  5. Borin, L., Kokkinakis, D., Olsson, L.J.: Naming the past: named entity and animacy recognition in 19th century Swedish literature. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Language Technology for Cultural Heritage Data (LaT-eCH 2007), pp. 1–8 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cappellato, L., Eickhoff, C., Ferro, N., Névéol, A. (eds.): CLEF 2020 Working Notes. In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings Working Notes of CLEF 2020 - Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chiron, G., Doucet, A., Coustaty, M., Visani, M., Moreux, J.P.: Impact of OCR errors on the use of digital libraries: towards a better access to information. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries JCDL 2017, pp. 249–252. IEEE Press, Piscataway (2017), http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3200334.3200364

  8. Chiu, J.P., Nichols, E.: Named entity recognition with bidirectional LSTM-CNNs. Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguist. 4, 357–370 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Devlin, J., Chang, M.W., Lee, K., Toutanova, K.: BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. CoRR abs/1810.04805 (2018). http://arxiv.org/abs/1810.04805

  10. Dupont, Y., Dinarelli, M., Tellier, I., Lautier, C.: Structured named entity recognition by cascading CRFs. In: Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics (CICling) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ehrmann, M., Colavizza, G., Rochat, Y., Kaplan, F.: Diachronic evaluation of NER systems on old newspapers. In: Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Natural Language Processing KONVENS 2016, pp. 97–107. Bochumer Linguistische Arbeitsberichte (2016). https://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/221391?ln=en

  12. Ehrmann, M., Romanello, M., Flückiger, A., Clematide, S.: Extended overview of CLEF HIPE 2020: named entity processing on historical newspapers. In: Cappellato, L., Eickhoff, C., Ferro, N., Névéol, A. (eds.) CLEF 2020 Working Notes. Working Notes of CLEF 2020 - Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum CEUR-WS (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ehrmann, M., Romanello, M., Flückiger, A., Clematide, S.: HIPE - shared task participation guidelines (v1.1) (2020). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3677171

  14. Ehrmann, M., Romanello, M., Flückiger, A., Clematide, S.: Impresso named entity annotation guidelines (2020). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3604227

  15. El Vaigh, C.B., Goasdoué, F., Gravier, G., Sébillot, P.: Using knowledge base semantics in context-aware entity linking. In: 2019 Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Document Engineering DocEng 2019, pp. 1–10. Association for Computing Machinery, Berlin, Germany, September 2019. https://doi.org/10.1145/3342558.3345393

  16. Galibert, O., Rosset, S., Grouin, C., Zweigenbaum, P., Quintard, L.: Extended named entity annotation on OCRed documents : from corpus constitution to evaluation campaign. In: Proceedings of the Eighth conference on International Language Resources and Evaluation, pp. 3126–3131. Istanbul, Turkey (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ganea, O.E., Hofmann, T.: Deep joint entity disambiguation with local neural attention. In: Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 2619–2629 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Grishman, R., Sundheim, B.: Design of the MUC-6 evaluation. In: Proceedings of the Sixth Conference on Message Understanding Conference (MUC-6), Columbia, Maryland (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hoffart, J., et al.: Robust disambiguation of named entities in text. In: EMNLP (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hooland, S.V., Wilde, M.D., Verborgh, R., Steiner, T., Van de Walle, R.: Exploring entity recognition and disambiguation for cultural heritage collections. Digit. Sch. Humanit. 30(2), 262–279 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqt067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. van Hulst, J.M., Hasibi, F., Dercksen, K., Balog, K., de Vries, A.P.: REL: an entity linker standing on the shoulders of giants. In: Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval SIGIR 2020. ACM (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kaplan, F., di Lenardo, I.: Big data of the past. Front. Digit. Humanit. 4 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3389/fdigh.2017.00012

  23. Klie, J.C., Bugert, M., Boullosa, B., de Castilho, R.E., Gurevych, I.: The inception platform: machine-assisted and knowledge-oriented interactive annotation. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations, pp. 5–9 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kolitsas, N., Ganea, O.E., Hofmann, T.: End-to-end neural entity linking. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, pp. 519–529. Association for Computational Linguistics, Brussels, Belgium, October 2018. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/K18-1050

  25. Krippendorff, K.: Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (1980)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Labusch, K., Neudecker, C., Zellhöfer, D.: BERT for named entity recognition in contemporary and historic german. In: Preliminary proceedings of the 15th Conference on Natural Language Processing (KONVENS 2019): Long Papers, pp. 1–9. German Society for Computational Linguistics & Language Technology, Erlangen, Germany (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lample, G., Ballesteros, M., Subramanian, S., Kawakami, K., Dyer, C.: Neural architectures for named entity recognition, March 2016. arXiv:1603.01360. http://arxiv.org/abs/1603.01360

  28. Lavergne, T., Cappé, O., Yvon, F.: Practical very large scale CRFs. In: Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 504–513. Association for Computational Linguistics (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Linhares Pontes, E., Hamdi, A., Sidere, N., Doucet, A.: Impact of OCR quality on named entity linking. In: Jatowt, A., Maeda, A., Syn, S.Y. (eds.) ICADL 2019. LNCS, vol. 11853, pp. 102–115. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34058-2_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Makhoul, J., Kubala, F., Schwartz, R., Weischedel, R.: Performance measures for information extraction. In: Proceedings of DARPA Broadcast News Workshop, pp. 249–252 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Martin, L., et al.: Camembert: a tasty french language model (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  32. May, P.: German ELMo model (2019). https://github.com/t-systems-on-site-services-gmbh/german-elmo-model

  33. Nadeau, D., Sekine, S.: A survey of named entity recognition and classification. Lingvisticae Investigationes 30(1), 3–26 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Neudecker, C., Antonacopoulos, A.: Making Europe’s historical newspapers searchable. In: 2016 12th IAPR Workshop on Document Analysis Systems (DAS), pp. 405–410. IEEE, Santorini, Greece, April 2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/DAS.2016.83

  35. Nguyen, D.B., Hoffart, J., Theobald, M., Weikum, G.: Aida-light: high-throughput named-entity disambiguation. In: LDOW (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Nouvel, D., Antoine, J.-Y., Friburger, N.: Pattern mining for named entity recognition. In: Vetulani, Z., Mariani, J. (eds.) LTC 2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8387, pp. 226–237. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08958-4_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  37. Okazaki, N.: CRFsuite: a fast implementation of Conditional Random Fields (CRFs) (2007). http://www.chokkan.org/software/crfsuite/

  38. Ortiz Suárez, P.J., Dupont, Y., Muller, B., Romary, L., Sagot, B.: Establishing a new state-of-the-art for French named entity recognition. In: Proceedings of the 12th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, pp. 4631–4638. European Language Resources Association, Marseille, France, May 2020. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/2020.lrec-1.569

  39. Pennington, J., Socher, R., Manning, C.D.: Glove: global vectors for word representation. EMNLP 14, 1532–43 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Peters, M., et al.: Deep Contextualized Word Representations. In: Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers). pp. 2227–2237. Association for Computational Linguistics, New Orleans, Louisiana (2018). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N18-1202

  41. Piotrowski, M.: Natural language processing for historical texts. Synth. Lect. Hum. Lang. Technol. 5(2), 1–157 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Plank, B.: What to do about non-standard (or non-canonical) language in NLP. In: Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Natural Language Processing KONVENS 2016. Bochumer Linguistische Arbeitsberichte (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Rao, D., McNamee, P., Dredze, M.: Entity linking: finding extracted entities in a knowledge base. In: Poibeau, T., Saggion, H., Piskorski, J., Yangarber, R. (eds.) Multi-source, Multilingual Information Extraction and Summarization, pp. 93–115. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28569-1_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  44. Rosset, S., Grouin, C., Fort, K., Galibert, O., Kahn, J., Zweigenbaum, P.: Structured named entities in two distinct press corpora: contemporary broadcast news and old newspapers. In: Proceedings of the 6th Linguistic Annotation Workshop, pp. 40–48. Association for Computational Linguistics (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Rosset, S., Grouin, C., Zweigenbaum, P.: Entités nommées structurées : guide d’annotation Quaero. NOTES et DOCUMENTS 2011–04, LIMSI-CNRS (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Smith, D.A., Cordell, R.: A research agenda for historical and multilingual optical character recognition. Technical report (2018). http://hdl.handle.net/2047/D20297452

  47. Sporleder, C.: Natural language processing for cultural heritage domains. Lang. Linguist. Compass 4(9), 750–768 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00230.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. van Strien, D., Beelen, K., Ardanuy, M.C., Hosseini, K., McGillivray, B., Colavizza, G.: Assessing the impact of OCR quality on downstream NLP tasks. In: ICAART 2020 - Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence. SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications, January 2020. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.52068

  49. van Strien, D., Beelen, K., Ardanuy, M., Hosseini, K., McGillivray, B., Colavizza, G.: Assessing the impact of OCR quality on downstream NLP tasks. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence, pp. 484–496. SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications, Valletta, Malta (2020). https://doi.org/10.5220/0009169004840496

  50. Terras, M.: The rise of digitization. In: Rikowski, R. (ed.) Digitisation Perspectives, pp. 3–20. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-299-3_1

  51. Vaswani, A., et al.: Attention is all you need. CoRR abs/1706.03762 (2017). http://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762

  52. Vilain, M., Su, J., Lubar, S.: Entity extraction is a boring solved problem: or is it? In: Human Language Technologies 2007: The Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics; Companion Volume, Short Papers, NAACL-Short 2007, Rochester, New York, pp. 181–184. Association for Computational Linguistics (2007). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1614108.1614154

Download references

Acknowledgements

This HIPE evaluation lab would not have been possible without the interest and commitment of many. We express our warmest thanks to: the Swiss newspapers NZZ and Le Temps, and the Swiss and Luxembourg national libraries for sharing part of their data in the frame of the impresso project; Camille Watter and Gerold Schneider for their commitment and hard work with the construction of the data set; the inception project team for its valuable and efficient support with the annotation tool; Richard Eckart de Castillo, Clemens Neudecker, Sophie Rosset and David Smith for their encouragement and guidance as part of the HIPE advisory board; and, finally, the 13 teams who embarked in this first HIPE edition, for their patience and scientific involvement. HIPE is part of the research activities of the project “impresso – Media Monitoring of the Past”, for which we also gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Swiss National Science Foundation under grant number CR-SII5_173719.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maud Ehrmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ehrmann, M., Romanello, M., Flückiger, A., Clematide, S. (2020). Overview of CLEF HIPE 2020: Named Entity Recognition and Linking on Historical Newspapers. In: Arampatzis, A., et al. Experimental IR Meets Multilinguality, Multimodality, and Interaction. CLEF 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12260. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58219-7_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58219-7_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-58218-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-58219-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics