Skip to main content

Fake News Classification of Social Media Through Sentiment Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Big Data – BigData 2020 (BIGDATA 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12402))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The impacts of the Internet and the ability for information to flow in real-time to all corners of the globe has brought many benefits to society. However, this capability has downsides. Information can be inexact, misleading or indeed downright and deliberately false. Fake news has now entered the common vernacular. In this work, we consider fake news with specific regard to social media. We hypothesise that fake news typically deals with emotive topics that are deliberated targeted to cause a reaction and encourages the spread of information. As such, we explore sentiment analysis of real and fake news as reported in social networks (Twitter). Specifically, we develop an AWS-based Cloud platform utilising news contained in the untrustworthy resource FakeNewsNet and a more trusted resource CredBank. We train algorithms using Naive Bayes, Decision Tree and Bi-LSTM for sentiment classification and feature selection. We show how social media sentiment can be used to improve the accuracy in identification of fake news from real news.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Shu, K., Sliva, A., Wang, S., Tang, J., Liu, H.: Fake news detection on social media. ACM SIGKDD Explor. Newslett. 19(1), 22–36 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3137597.3137600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Naradhipa, A.R., Purwarianti, A.: Sentiment classification for Indonesian message in social media. In: 2012 International Conference on Cloud Computing and Social Networking (ICCCSN) (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/icccsn.2012.6215730

  3. Bertrand, K., Bialik, M., Virdee, K., Gros, A., Bar-Yam, Y.: Sentiment in New York City: A High Resolution Spatial and Temporal View (2019). https://arxiv.org/abs/1308.5010. Accessed 21 Nov 2019

  4. Buntain, C., Golbeck, J.: Automatically identifying fake news in popular twitter threads. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Smart Cloud (Smartcloud) (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/smartcloud.2017.40

  5. Shu, K., Mahudeswaran, D., Wang, S., Lee, D., Liu, H.: FakeNewsNet: a data repository with news content, social context and spatialtemporal information for studying fake news on social media (2019). https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.01286. Accessed 21 Nov 2019

  6. Go, A., Bhayani, R., Huang, L.: Twitter Sentiment Classification using Distant Supervision [Ebook], 1st edn. Stanford (2009). https://cs.stanford.edu/people/alecmgo/papers/TwitterDistantSupervision09.pdf

  7. Tang, D., Wei, F., Yang, N., Zhou, M., Liu, T., Qin, B.: Learning sentiment-specific word embedding for twitter sentiment classification. In: Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) (2014). https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/p14-1146

  8. What Is Amazon SageMaker? - Amazon SageMaker. (2019). https://docs.aws.amazon.com/sagemaker/latest/dg/whatis.html. Accessed 21 Nov 2019

  9. Allcott, H., Gentzkow, M.: Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. J. Econ. Perspect. 31(2), 211–236 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mills, A., Pitt, C., Ferguson, S.: The relationship between fake news and advertising. J. Advertising Res. 59(1), 3–8 (2019). https://doi.org/10.2501/jar-2019-007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pennington, J.: GloVe: Global Vectors for Word Representation (2019). https://nlp.stanford.edu/projects/glove/. Accessed 21 Nov 2019

  12. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., Courville, A.: Deep Learning, 1st edn. pp. 373–375. Cambridge (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mohs, R., Wescourt, K., Atkinson, R.: Effects of short-term memory contents on short-and long-term memory searches. Memory Cognit. 1(4), 443–448 (1973). https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03208906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Makarenkov, V., Rokach, L., Shapira, B.: Choosing the right word: using bidirectional LSTM tagger for writing support systems. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 84, 1–10 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2019.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yildirim, Ö.: A novel wavelet sequence based on deep bidirectional LSTM network model for ECG signal classification. Comput. Biol. Med. 96, 189–202 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.03.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kingma, D., Ba, J.: Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization (2019). https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6980v8. Accessed 21 Nov 2019

  17. Poernomo, A., Kang, D.: Biased dropout and crossmap dropout: learning towards effective dropout regularization in convolutional neural network. Neural Netw. 104, 60–67 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2018.03.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mitra, T., Gilbert, E.: Credbank: a large-scale social media corpus with associated credibility annotations. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Caruana, R., Niculescu-Mizil, A.: An empirical comparison of supervised learning algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning - ICML 2006 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1145/1143844.1143865

  20. Li, Z., Fan, Y., Jiang, B., Lei, T., Liu, W.: A survey on sentiment analysis and opinion mining for social multimedia. Multimed. Tools Appl. 78(6), 6939–6967 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-6445-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang, W.: Liar, Liar Pants on Fire: A New Benchmark Dataset for Fake News Detection (2019). https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.00648. Accessed 21 Nov 2019

  22. Sulaiman, M., Labadin, J.: Feature selection based on mutual information. In: 2015 9th International Conference on IT in Asia (CITA) (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/cita.2015.7349827

  23. Sha, L., Chang, B., Sui, Z., Li, S.: Reading and thinking: re-read LSTM unit for textual entailment recognition. In: COLING (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard O. Sinnott .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ding, L., Ding, L., Sinnott, R.O. (2020). Fake News Classification of Social Media Through Sentiment Analysis. In: Nepal, S., Cao, W., Nasridinov, A., Bhuiyan, M.Z.A., Guo, X., Zhang, LJ. (eds) Big Data – BigData 2020. BIGDATA 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12402. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59612-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59612-5_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-59611-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-59612-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics