Skip to main content

HACT-Net: A Hierarchical Cell-to-Tissue Graph Neural Network for Histopathological Image Classification

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Uncertainty for Safe Utilization of Machine Learning in Medical Imaging, and Graphs in Biomedical Image Analysis (UNSURE 2020, GRAIL 2020)

Abstract

Cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic response prediction are heavily influenced by the relationship between the histopathological structures and the function of the tissue. Recent approaches acknowledging the structure-function relationship, have linked the structural and spatial patterns of cell organization in tissue via cell-graphs to tumor grades. Though cell organization is imperative, it is insufficient to entirely represent the histopathological structure. We propose a novel hierarchical cell-to-tissue-graph (HACT) representation to improve the structural depiction of the tissue. It consists of a low-level cell-graph, capturing cell morphology and interactions, a high-level tissue-graph, capturing morphology and spatial distribution of tissue parts, and cells-to-tissue hierarchies, encoding the relative spatial distribution of the cells with respect to the tissue distribution. Further, a hierarchical graph neural network (HACT-Net) is proposed to efficiently map the HACT representations to histopathological breast cancer subtypes. We assess the methodology on a large set of annotated tissue regions of interest from H&E stained breast carcinoma whole-slides. Upon evaluation, the proposed method outperformed recent convolutional neural network and graph neural network approaches for breast cancer multi-class subtyping. The proposed entity-based topological analysis is more in line with the pathological diagnostic procedure of the tissue. It provides more command over the tissue modeling, therefore encourages the further inclusion of pathological priors into task-specific tissue representation.

P. Pati and G. Jaume—The authors contributed equally to this work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Currently pending approval for releasing the dataset to the research community.

References

  1. Achanta, R., et al.: Slic superpixels compared to state-of-the-art superpixel methods. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 34, 2274–2282 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aresta, G., et al.: BACH: grand challenge on breast cancer histology images. Med. Image Anal. 56, 122–139 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bankhead, P., et al.: QuPath: open source software for digital pathology image analysis. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–7 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bejnordi, B., et al.: Using deep convolutional neural networks to identify and classify tumor-associated stroma in diagnostic breast biopsies. Mod. Pathol. 31, 1502–1512 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, R.J., et al.: Pathomic fusion: an integrated framework for fusing histopathology and genomic features for cancer diagnosis and prognosis. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.08937 (2019)

  6. Elmore, J.G., et al.: Diagnostic concordance among pathologists interpreting breast biopsy specimens. JAMA 313, 1122–1132 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gadiya, S., et al.: Histographs: graphs in histopathology. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.05020 (2019)

  8. Gilmer, J., et al.: Neural message passing for quantum chemistry. ICML 70, 1263–1272 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Graham, S., et al.: Hover-Net: simultaneous segmentation and classification of nuclei in multi-tissue histology images. Med. Image Anal. 58, 101563 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gunduz, C., et al.: The cell graphs of cancer. Bioinformatics 20(Suppl 1), i145–i151 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hamilton, W., et al.: Inductive representation learning on large graphs. In: NeurIPS, pp. 1024–1034 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jaume, G., et al.: Towards explainable graph representations in digital pathology. In: ICML, Workshop on Computational Biology (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kingma, D., Ba, J.: Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. In: ICLR (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kipf, T., Welling, M.: Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. In: ICLR (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kumar, N., et al.: A dataset and a technique for generalized nuclear segmentation for computational pathology. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 36, 1550–1560 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Litjens, G., et al.: A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis. Med. Image Anal. 42, 60–88 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Macenko, M., et al.: A method for normalizing histology slides for quantitative analysis. In: IEEE ISBI, pp. 1107–1110 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mercan, C., et al.: From patch-level to ROI-level deep feature representations for breast histopathology classification. In: SPIE 10956 Medical Imaging: Digital Pathology, vol. 109560H (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Myers, D.J., Walls, A.L.: Atypical breast hyperplasia. In: StatPearls (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Paszke, A., et al.: PyTorch: an imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. In: NeurIPS, pp. 8024–8035 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Potjer, F.: Region adjacency graphs and connected morphological operators. In: Maragos, P., Schafer, R.W., Butt, M.A. (eds.) Mathematical Morphology and its Applications to Image and Signal Processing. Computational Imaging and Vision, vol. 5, pp. 111–118. Springer, Heidelberg (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0469-2_13

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Sharma, H., et al.: Cell nuclei attributed relational graphs for efficient representation and classification of gastric cancer in digital histopathology. In: SPIE 9791 Medical Imaging: Digital Pathology, vol. 97910X (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Siegel, R.L., et al.: Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J. Clin. 66, 7–30 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sirinukunwattana, K., Alham, N.K., Verrill, C., Rittscher, J.: Improving whole slide segmentation through visual context - a systematic study. In: Frangi, A.F., Schnabel, J.A., Davatzikos, C., Alberola-López, C., Fichtinger, G. (eds.) MICCAI 2018. LNCS, vol. 11071, pp. 192–200. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00934-2_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Velickovic, P., et al.: Graph attention networks. In: International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wang, J.O.: Weakly supervised prostate TMA classification via graph convolutional networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.13328 (2019)

  27. Wang, M., et al.: Deep graph library: towards efficient and scalable deep learning on graphs. CoRR, vol. abs/1909.01315 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Xu, K., et al.: How powerful are graph neural networks? In: ICLR (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhou, Y., et al.: CGC-net: cell graph convolutional network for grading of colorectal cancer histology images. In: Proceedings of the IEEE ICCV Workshops (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pushpak Pati .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pati, P. et al. (2020). HACT-Net: A Hierarchical Cell-to-Tissue Graph Neural Network for Histopathological Image Classification. In: Sudre, C.H., et al. Uncertainty for Safe Utilization of Machine Learning in Medical Imaging, and Graphs in Biomedical Image Analysis. UNSURE GRAIL 2020 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12443. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60365-6_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60365-6_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-60364-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-60365-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics