Abstract
The aim of this paper is to study scientific observation from a broad perspective, taking into account history, practice and philosophical reflexivity. I shall draw on a series of new approaches variously termed: historical epistemology, history of philosophy of science, science studies, etc. Such approaches were undoubtedly sparked by the difficulties that philosophy of science encountered: if the idea of a neutral language of observation has been abandoned, debate remains as to the character and degree of the theory-ladenness of facts. Two case studies will be considered: observation in the birth of modern science and observation in the life sciences. These will enable us to follow the evolution of the related concepts of accuracy, exactness and precision, as features that render an observation scientific. On closer inspection it appears that these concepts are not given spontaneously; they had to be constructed, and this process was intimately bound up with the development of knowledge.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
For a view stressing the independence of theory and observation, see Kosso (1992).
- 2.
On the contrast between the analytic tradition and historical epistemology, see Brenner (2014).
- 3.
- 4.
For an overview of rational criteria or epistemic values, see Brenner (2011).
- 5.
For more on Mach’s Historical Approach, see Brenner (2019).
References
Bernard, C. (1966). Introduction à l’étude de la médecine expérimentale (1865). Paris: Garnier-Flammarion. English translation by Henry Copley Greene (1957). An introduction to the study of experimental medicine. New York: Dover.
Brenner, A. (2011). Raison scientifique et valeurs humaines: Essai sur les critères du choix objectif. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Brenner, A. (2014). Epistemology historicized: The French tradition. In M. C. Galavotti, D. Dieks, W. J. Gonzalez, S. Hartmann, T. Uebel, & M. Weber (Eds.), New directions in the philosophy of science (pp. 727–736). Dordrecht: Springer.
Brenner, A. (2019). Mach, Duhem and the historical method in the philosophy of science. In F. Staedler (Ed.), Ernst Mach: Life, work, influence (pp. 637–650). Dordrecht: Springer.
Cohen, F. (2010). How modern science came into the world. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Copernicus N. ([1992] 2015). De revolutionibus orbium cœlestium. Paris: Les Belles Lettres (Latin original and French translation). English translation by Edward Rosen, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
D’Alembert, J. Le Rond ([1779] 1821). Éloges. In Œuvres (Vol. II, pp. 351–440). Paris: Belin.
Daston, L., & Lunbeck, E. (2011). Histories of scientific observation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Galilei, G. ([1610] 1992). Sidereus nuncius, edited by I. Pantin. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Galilei, G. ([1632] 1899–1909). Dialogo sopra i due massimi sistemi del mondo. In A. Favaro (Ed.), Le Opere (Vol. VII). Florence: G. Barbera. English translation by Drake Stillman (1967), Dialogue concerning the two chief world systems. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Galilei, G. ([1638] 1899–1909). Discorsi e dimostrazioni matematiche intorno a due nuove scienze. In A. Favaro (Ed.), Le Opere (Vol. VIII). English translation by Drake Stillman (1974), Two new sciences. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
Gingras, Y. (2012). Review of histories of scientific observation by Lorraine Daston & Elizabeth Lunbeck. Isis, 103(1), 157–158.
Hübener, W., & Meier-Oeser, S. (1989). Praecisio. In J. Ritter et al. (Eds.), Historisches wörterbuch der philosophie (Vol. VII, pp. 1211–1218). Basel: Schwabe.
Kosso, P. (1992). Reading the book of nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lloyd, G. (1979). Magic, reason and experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mach, E. ([1883] 1974). The science of mechanics (T. J. McCormack, Trans.). Chicago: Open Court.
Mach, E. ([1886] 1986). Die Principien der Wärmelehre. English translation by T. J. McCormack, Principles of the theory of heat. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Neurath, O. (1983). Philosophical Papers 1913–1946 (R. Cohen & M. Neurath, eds.). Dordrecht: Reidel.
Newton, I. ([1687] 1972). Philosophiae naturalis principia mathematica (I. A. Koyré & I. B. Cohen, eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. English translation by I. B. Cohen & A. Whitman (1999). The principia: Mathematical principles of natural philosophy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Oresme, N. ([1377] 1968). Le livre du ciel et du monde (A. D. Menut, ed.). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Peirce, C. S. (1998). Issues of pragmaticism. In N. Houser et al. (Eds.), The essential Peirce (Vol. II). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Pomata, G. (2011). Observation rising: Birth of an epistemic genre 1500–1650. In L. Daston & E. Lunbeck (Eds.), Histories of scientific observation (pp. 39–80). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Salter, A. (2012). Review of Histories of scientific observation by Lorraine Daston and Elizabeth Lunbeck. HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science, 2(1), 196–200.
Sextus Empiricus. (1933). Outlines of pyrrhonism (R. G. Bury, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brenner, A. (2021). Language, History and the Making of Accurate Observations. In: Gonzalez, W.J. (eds) Language and Scientific Research. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60537-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60537-7_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-60536-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-60537-7
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)