Skip to main content

Antecedents of the Barriers Toward the Adoption of Unified Payment Interface

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Re-imagining Diffusion and Adoption of Information Technology and Systems: A Continuing Conversation (TDIT 2020)

Abstract

This study examines the influence of factors related to consumer resistance on the intention to continue using the Unified Payment Interface (UPI) for electronic payments. UPI facilitates advanced, peer-to-peer, immediate payment with seamless interoperability among banks in India. The study extends the innovation resistance theory by including two behavioral measures - privacy concerns and visibility - and two moderators - security concerns and word of mouth (WOM). It used cross-sectional data collected from 714 UPI users aged between 16 and 55 years to test the proposed research model. The findings suggest that privacy concerns and usage barrier are the two crucial factors to be addressed for breaking down consumer resistance towards continuing usage of UPI. The other significant factors are image barrier and visibility. In addition, security concerns and WOM are found to partially moderate the influences on the associations between the key variables and continuing usage of UPI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Khanra, S., Dhir, A., Mäntymäki, M.: Big data analytics and enterprises: a bibliometric synthesis of the literature. Enterp. Inf. Syst. 14(6), 737–768 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2020.1734241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. National Payments Corporation of India. https://www.npci.org.in/product-overview/upi-product-overview. Accessed 10 Oct 2020

  3. Business Standards Report. http://tiny.cc/Asthana. Accessed 10 Oct 2020

  4. FIS Flavours of fast Report. http://tiny.cc/FIS2015. Accessed 10 Oct 10 Oct 2020

  5. Deloitte Report. http://tiny.cc/deloittepayment. Accessed 10 Oct 2020

  6. Harvard Business Review Note. http://tiny.cc/HBRspl. Accessed 10 Oct 2020

  7. Inc 42 Report. http://tiny.cc/inc42. Accessed 10 Oct 2020

  8. Livemint Repor. http://tiny.cc/bhimreferral. Accessed 10 Oct 2020

  9. The Economic Times Report. http://tiny.cc/demonitization. Accessed 10 Oct 2020

  10. Livemint Report. http://tiny.cc/nilekani. Accessed 10 Oct 2020

  11. The Economic Times Report. http://tiny.cc/bhakta. Accessed 10 Oct 2020

  12. The Wire Report. http://tiny.cc/thewire. Accessed 10 Oct 2020

  13. The Economic Times Report. http://tiny.cc/25bn. Accessed 10 Oct 2020

  14. Financial Express Report. http://tiny.cc/finxp. Accessed 10 Oct 2020

  15. Woodside, A.G.: Theory of rejecting superior, new technologies. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 11(3/4), 25–43 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1108/08858629610125450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ram, S., Sheth, J.N.: Consumer resistance to innovations: the marketing problem and its solutions. J. Consum. Mark. 6(2), 5–14 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1108/eum0000000002542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Johnson, V.L., Kiser, A., Washington, R., Torres, R.: Limitations to the rapid adoption of M-payment services: understanding the impact of privacy risk on M-Payment services. Comput. Hum. Behav. 79, 111–122 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Matemba, E.D., Li, G.: Consumers’ willingness to adopt and use WeChat wallet: an empirical study in South Africa. Technol. Soc. 53, 55–68 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2017.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Su, P., Wang, L., Yan, J.: How users’ Internet experience affects the adoption of mobile payment: a mediation model. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 30(2), 186–197 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2017.1297788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Carton, F., Hedman, J., Damsgaard, J., Tan, K.T., McCarthy, J.B.: Framework for mobile payments integration. Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Eval. 15(1), 14–25 (2012). http://cora.ucc.ie/handle/10468/2910

  21. Mangin, J.P.L.: The moderating role of risk, security and trust applied to the TAM model in the offer of banking financial services in Canada. J. Internet Bank. Commerc. 19(2) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yoon, H.S., Occeña, L.U.I.S.: Impacts of customers’ perceptions on internet banking use with a smart phone. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 54(3), 1–9 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2014.11645699

  23. Khare, A., Labrecque, L.I., Asare, A.K.: The assimilative and contrastive effects of word-of-mouth volume: an experimental examination of online consumer ratings. J. Retail. 87(1), 111–126 (2011).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2011.01.005

  24. Kuo, Y.F., Hu, T.L., Yang, S.C.: Effects of inertia and satisfaction in female online shoppers on repeat-purchase intention: the moderating roles of word-of-mouth and alternative attraction. Manag. Serv. Qual. Int. J. 23(3), 168–187 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1108/09604521311312219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Saleem, M.A., Zahra, S., Yaseen, A.: Impact of service quality and trust on repurchase intentions–the case of Pakistan airline industry. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 29(5), 1136–1159 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1108/apjml-10-2016-0192

  26. Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of innovations: an overview. In: Anderson, J.G., Jay, S.J. (eds.) Use and Impact of Computers in Clinical Medicine, pp. 113–131. Springer, New York (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8674-2_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Bhatt, A., Bhatt, S.: Factors affecting customers adoption of mobile banking services. J. Internet Bank. Commerc. 21(1) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Upadhyay, P., Jahanyan, S.: Analyzing user perspective on the factors affecting use intention of mobile based transfer payment. Internet Res. 26(1), 38–56 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-05-2014-0143

  29. Sivathanu, B.: Adoption of digital payment systems in the era of demonetization in India: an empirical study. J. Sci. Technol. Policy Manag. 10(1), 143–171 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-07-2017-0033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., Warshaw, P.R.: User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag. Sci. 35(8), 982–1003 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982

  31. Laukkanen, T., Cruz, P.: What determines mobile banking non-adoption? In: Proceedings of Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference 2010. ANZMAC, Christchurch (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Laukkanen, T., Kiviniemi, V.: The role of information in mobile banking resistance. Int. J. Bank Mark. 28(5), 372–388 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1108/02652321011064890

  33. Laukkanen, T.: Consumer adoption versus rejection decisions in seemingly similar service innovations: the case of the Internet and mobile banking. J. Bus. Res. 69(7), 2432–2439 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.01.013

  34. Kuisma, T., Laukkanen, T., Hiltunen, M.: Mapping the reasons for resistance to Internet banking: a means-end approach. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 27(2), 75–85 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2006.08.006

  35. Martins, C., Oliveira, T., Popovič, A.: Understanding the Internet banking adoption: a unified theory of acceptance and use of technology and perceived risk application. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 34(1), 1–13 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.06.002

  36. Heinonen, K.: Reconceptualizing customer perceived value: the value of time and place. Manag. Serv. Qual. Int. J. (2004). https://doi.org/10.1108/09604520410528626

  37. Laukkanen, T., Sinkkonen, S., Laukkanen, P.: Communication strategies to overcome functional and psychological resistance to Internet banking. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 29(2), 111–118 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2008.05.008

  38. Liébana-Cabanillas, F., Lara-Rubio, J.: Predictive and explanatory modeling regarding adoption of mobile payment systems. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 120, 32–40 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.04.002

  39. Luo, X., Lee, C.P., Mattila, M., Liu, L.: An exploratory study of mobile banking services resistance. Int. J. Mob. Commun. 10(4), 366–385 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmc.2012.048136

  40. Park, M., Jun, J., Park, H.: Understanding mobile payment service continuous use intention: an expectation-confirmation model and inertia. Qual. Innov. Prosperity 21(3), 78 (2017). https://doi.org/10.12776/qip.v21i3.983

  41. Low, K.H.: Factor affecting consumer resistance to Paypal mobile payment adoption: a study of generation X consumers. Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman (2017). http://eprints.utar.edu.my/2427/1/Thesis_(PayPal).pdf

  42. Chang, Y., Wong, S.F., Libaque-Saenz, C.F., Lee, H.: The role of privacy policy on consumers’ perceived privacy. Gov. Inf. Q. 35(3), 445–459 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.04.002

  43. De Kerviler, G., Demoulin, N.T., Zidda, P.: Adoption of in-store mobile payment: are perceived risk and convenience the only drivers? J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 31, 334–344 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.04.011

  44. Bailey, A.A., Pentina, I., Mishra, A.S., Ben Mimoun, M.S.: Mobile payments adoption by US consumers: an extended TAM. Int. J. Retail Distrib. Manag. 45(6), 626–640 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1108/ijrdm-08-2016-0144

  45. Cruz, P., Barretto Filgueiras Neto, L., Munoz-Gallego, P., Laukkanen, T.: Mobile banking rollout in emerging markets: evidence from Brazil. Int. J. Bank Mark. 28(5), 342–371 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1108/02652321011064881

  46. Hsu, C.L., Lu, H.P., Hsu, H.H.: Adoption of the mobile internet: an empirical study of multimedia message service (MMS). Omega 35(6), 715–726 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2006.03.005

  47. Khanra, S., Joseph, R.P., Ruparel, N.: Dynamism of an e-government network in delivering public services. In: Academy of Management Global Proceedings Slovenia 2019, p. 376. Academy of Management, New York (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Liu, Y.: Consumer protection in mobile payments in China: a critical analysis of Alipay’s service agreement. Comput. Law Secur. Rev. 31(5), 1–10 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2015.05.009

  49. Oliveira, T., Thomas, M., Baptista, G., Campos, F.: Mobile payment: understanding the determinants of customer adoption and intention to recommend the technology. Comput. Hum. Behav. 61, 404–414 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.030

  50. Arndt, J.: Word-of-mouth advertising and of informal communication. In: Cox, F. (ed.) Risk Taking and Information Handling in Consumer Behaviour, pp. 188–239. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Anderson, E.W.: Customer satisfaction and word of mouth. J. Serv. Res. 1(1), 5–17 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1177/109467059800100102

  52. Khanra, S., Joseph, R.P.: Adoption of e-governance: the mediating role of language proficiency and digital divide in an emerging market context. Transforming Gov. People Process Policy 13(2), 122–142 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1108/tg-12-2018-0076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Lock, A.C.: Impact of brand knowledge on brand trust in private higher education institutions: how do word of mouth sources intervene’. Sarjana 31(2), 13–32 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Ishida, K., Slevitch, L., Siamionava, K.: The effects of traditional and electronic word-of-mouth on destination image: a case of vacation tourists visiting Branson, Missouri. Adm. Sci. 6(4), 12 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci6040012

  55. Jalilvand, M.R., Samiei, N., Dini, B., Manzari, P.Y.: Examining the structural relationships of electronic word of mouth, destination image, tourist attitude toward destination and travel intention: an integrated approach. J. Destination Mark. Manag. 1(1), 134–143 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2012

  56. Khanra, S., Joseph, R.P.: Adoption and diffusion of e-government services: the impact of demography and service quality. In: De Baguma, R., Janowski, T. (eds.) The 10th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance 2017, pp. 602–605. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3047273.3047301

  57. Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R.: Multivariate Data Analysis a Global Perspective, 7th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F.: Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 18(1), 39–50 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104

  59. Farrell, A.M.: Insufficient discriminant validity: a comment on Bove, Pervan, Beatty, and Shiu (2009). J. Bus. Res. 63(3), 324–327 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.05.003

  60. Bouwman, H., Carlsson, C., Molina-Castillo, F.J., Walden, P.: Barriers and drivers in the adoption of current and future mobile services in Finland. Telemat. Inform. 24(2), 145–160 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2006.08.001

  61. Rahman, M.M.: Barriers to M-commerce adoption in developing countries-a qualitative study among the stakeholders of Bangladesh. Int. Technol. Manag. Rev. 3(2), 80–91 (2013). https://doi.org/10.2991/itmr.2013.3.2.2

  62. Suki, N.M.: Factors affecting third generation (3G) mobile service acceptance: evidence from Malaysia. J. Internet Bank. Commerc. 16(1), 1–12 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  63. Khanra, S., Joseph, R.P.: E-governance maturity models: a meta-ethnographic study. Int. Technol. Manag. Rev. 8(1), 1–9 (2019). https://doi.org/10.2991/itmr.b.190417.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. The Quint Report. http://tiny.cc/thequint. Accessed 10 Oct 2020

  65. Firstpost Report. http://tiny.cc/madanapalle. Accessed 10 Oct 2020

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sayantan Khanra .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Khanra, S., Joseph, R.P., Dhir, A., Kaur, P. (2020). Antecedents of the Barriers Toward the Adoption of Unified Payment Interface. In: Sharma, S.K., Dwivedi, Y.K., Metri, B., Rana, N.P. (eds) Re-imagining Diffusion and Adoption of Information Technology and Systems: A Continuing Conversation. TDIT 2020. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 618. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64861-9_53

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64861-9_53

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-64860-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-64861-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics