Skip to main content

The Mechanics of Interaction in Early Childhood STEAM

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Embedding STEAM in Early Childhood Education and Care

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the mechanics of interaction that enable children to participate in STEAM learning. The chapter provides insights from conversation analysis about the sequences of knowledge-in-interaction, and the types of questions and responses that extend learning opportunities. The what outlines the practices of talk-in-interaction that reveal young children’s understanding. The why highlights these practices as a useful professional resource for teachers and a helpful guide to parents, providing evidence-based content for ongoing reflection. The how illustrates these practices in action, showing how children’s and adults’ actions in the moment-by-moment work of early learning facilitate different types of outcomes. Examples from mathematics and science learning with children aged between two and six years from studies conducted in early childhood education settings in three different countries illustrate how responsivity and the teacher’s ability to build on the immediately prior actions can lead to concept development. The chapter encourages teachers and parents to reflect on the interactional practices that make STEAM accessible, engaging and enabling for children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Church, A., & Bateman, A. (2019). Children’s right to participate: How can teachers extend child-initiated learning sequences. International Journal of Early Childhood, 51(3), 265–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohrssen, C., & Church, A. (2017). The ‘how’ of high quality child-educator interactions in play-based mathematics. In A. Bateman & A. Church (Eds.), Children’s knowledge-in-interaction: studies in conversation analysis. Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohrssen, C., Church, A., & Tayler, C. (2014a). Purposeful pauses: Teacher talk during early childhood mathematics activities. International Journal of Early Years Education, 22(2), 169–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohrssen, C., Church, A., & Tayler, C. (2014b). Pausing for learning. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 39(4), 95–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohrssen, C., de Quadros-Wander, B., Page, J., & Klarin, S. (2017). Between the big trees: A project-based approach to investigating shape and spatial thinking in a kindergarten program. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 42(1), 94–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR) for the Council of Australian Governments. (2009). Belonging, being and becoming: The early years learning framework for Australia. Canberra, ACT: Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durden, T., & Dangel, D. R. (2008). Teacher-involved conversations with young children during small group activity. Early Years, 28(3), 251–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enfield, N. J. (2017). How we talk: The inner workings of conversation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enfield, N. J., & Sidnell, J. (2017). The concept of action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Filipi, A. (2009). Toddler and parent interaction: the organization of gaze, pointing and vocalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, R. (2019). Classroom interaction research: The state of the art. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 52(3), 212–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedge, K., & Cohrssen, C. (2019). Between the red and yellow windows: A fine-grained focus on supporting children’s spatial thinking during play. SAGE Open, 9(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019829551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoey, E. M., DeLiema, D., Chen, R. S. Y., & Flood, V. (2018). Imitation in children’s locomotor play. Research on Children and Social Interaction, 2(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houen, S., Danby, S., Farrell, A., & Thorpe, K. (2016). ‘I wonder what you know…’: Teachers designing requests for factual information. Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 68–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (1998). Conversation analysis: Principles, practices and applications. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G.H. Lerner (Ed.) Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, (pp.13–31). Amsterdam / Philadelphia, John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidwell, M. (2011). Epistemics and embodiment in the interactions of very young children. In T. Stivers, L. Mondada, & J. Steensig (Eds.), The morality of knowledge in conversation (pp. 257–284). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • La Paro, B., Hamre, K., Locasale-Crouch, J., Pianta, R., Bryant, D., Early, D., et al. (2009). Quality in kindergarten classrooms: Observational evidence for the need to increase children’s learning opportunities in early education classrooms. Early Education and Development, 20(4), 657–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Land, T. J., Tyminski, A. M., & Drake, C. (2019). Examining aspects of teachers’ posing of problems in response to children’s mathematical thinking. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 22(4), 331–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y.-A. (2007). Third turn position in teacher talk: Contingency and the work of teaching. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 180–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margutti, P. (2007). “Are you human beings?” Order and knowledge construction through questioning in primary classroom interaction. Linguistics and Education, 17(4), 313–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, S. (2004). Teacher–child conversation in the preschool classroom. Early Childhood Education Journal, 31(4), 227–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, I. (2015). Or-PREFACED third turn self-repairs in student questions. Linguistics and Education, 31(1), 101–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pianta, R. C., La Paro, K. M., & Hamre, B. K. (2008). Classroom Assessment Scoring System™: Manual K-3. Paul H Brookes Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, M. (1986). Wait time: Slowing down may be a way of speeding up! Journal of Teacher Education, 37, 43–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, M. (1987). Using wait time to stimulate inquiry. In W. Wilen (Ed.), Questions, questioning techniques, and effective teaching (pp. 95–106). Washington, DC: National Education Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H. (1984). Notes on methodology. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 21–27). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8, 289–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siraj, I., & Asani, R. (2015). The role of sustained shared thinking, play and metacognition in young children’s learning’. In S. Robson & S. Quinn (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of young children’s thinking and understanding. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siraj, I., Kingston, D., & Melhuish, E. (2015). Assessing quality: Sustained shared thinking and emotional well-being (SSTEW) rating scale. London: Trentham Books & UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siraj-Blatchford, I., & Manni, L. (2008). “Would you like to tidy up now?” An analysis of adult questioning in the English foundation stage. Early Years, 28(1), 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stivers, T., & Rossano, F. (2010). Mobilizing response. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43(1), 3–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokoe, E. (2011) Simulated interaction and communication skills training: The ‘Conversation Analytic Roleplay Method’. In Antaki, C.E. (Ed.) Applied conversation analysis: Changing institutional practices (pp. 119–139). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylva, K., Melhuish, E., Sammons, P., Siraj-Blatchford, I., & Taggart, B. (2010). Early childhood matters: Evidence from the effective pre-school and primary education project. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tayler, C. (2016). Reforming Australian early childhood education and care provision (2009–2015). Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 41(2), 27–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring classroom discourse: language in action. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, S., & Li, L. (2013). Conversations as space for learning. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 23(2), 247–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, E. and de Vries, E. (2009) Young Australian Indigenous students’ engagement with numeracy: Actions that assist to bridge the gap, Australian Journal of Education, 53(2), Article 4.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amelia Church .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Transcription Conventions

Appendix: Transcription Conventions

The transcription conventions used in this article follow the original work of Sacks et al. (1974).

  • .   falling intonation

  • ,   slightly rising or continuing intonation

  • ?   rising intonation

  • ¿   intonation that rises more than a comma but less than a question mark

  • ::   lengthened syllable

  • ↓   sharp fall in pitch

  • ↑   sharp rise in pitch

  • Bold    emphasis

  • CAP   increased volume

  • []   overlapping talk

  • ()   unintelligible stretch

  • (0.5)   length of silence in tenths of a second

  • <   increase in tempo, rushed stretch of talk

  • < >   slower tempo

  • hh   audible outbreath

  • .hh   audible inbreath

  • [°]   talk that is quieter than the surrounding talk

  • $   spoken while smiling

  • (())   description of accompanying behaviour

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Church, A., Cohrssen, C. (2021). The Mechanics of Interaction in Early Childhood STEAM. In: Cohrssen, C., Garvis, S. (eds) Embedding STEAM in Early Childhood Education and Care. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65624-9_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65624-9_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-65623-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-65624-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics