Abstract
This chapter focuses on the mechanics of interaction that enable children to participate in STEAM learning. The chapter provides insights from conversation analysis about the sequences of knowledge-in-interaction, and the types of questions and responses that extend learning opportunities. The what outlines the practices of talk-in-interaction that reveal young children’s understanding. The why highlights these practices as a useful professional resource for teachers and a helpful guide to parents, providing evidence-based content for ongoing reflection. The how illustrates these practices in action, showing how children’s and adults’ actions in the moment-by-moment work of early learning facilitate different types of outcomes. Examples from mathematics and science learning with children aged between two and six years from studies conducted in early childhood education settings in three different countries illustrate how responsivity and the teacher’s ability to build on the immediately prior actions can lead to concept development. The chapter encourages teachers and parents to reflect on the interactional practices that make STEAM accessible, engaging and enabling for children.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Church, A., & Bateman, A. (2019). Children’s right to participate: How can teachers extend child-initiated learning sequences. International Journal of Early Childhood, 51(3), 265–281.
Cohrssen, C., & Church, A. (2017). The ‘how’ of high quality child-educator interactions in play-based mathematics. In A. Bateman & A. Church (Eds.), Children’s knowledge-in-interaction: studies in conversation analysis. Singapore: Springer.
Cohrssen, C., Church, A., & Tayler, C. (2014a). Purposeful pauses: Teacher talk during early childhood mathematics activities. International Journal of Early Years Education, 22(2), 169–183.
Cohrssen, C., Church, A., & Tayler, C. (2014b). Pausing for learning. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 39(4), 95–102.
Cohrssen, C., de Quadros-Wander, B., Page, J., & Klarin, S. (2017). Between the big trees: A project-based approach to investigating shape and spatial thinking in a kindergarten program. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 42(1), 94–104.
Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR) for the Council of Australian Governments. (2009). Belonging, being and becoming: The early years learning framework for Australia. Canberra, ACT: Commonwealth of Australia.
Durden, T., & Dangel, D. R. (2008). Teacher-involved conversations with young children during small group activity. Early Years, 28(3), 251–266.
Enfield, N. J. (2017). How we talk: The inner workings of conversation. New York: Basic Books.
Enfield, N. J., & Sidnell, J. (2017). The concept of action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Filipi, A. (2009). Toddler and parent interaction: the organization of gaze, pointing and vocalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gardner, R. (2019). Classroom interaction research: The state of the art. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 52(3), 212–226.
Hedge, K., & Cohrssen, C. (2019). Between the red and yellow windows: A fine-grained focus on supporting children’s spatial thinking during play. SAGE Open, 9(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019829551
Hoey, E. M., DeLiema, D., Chen, R. S. Y., & Flood, V. (2018). Imitation in children’s locomotor play. Research on Children and Social Interaction, 2(1), 1–24.
Houen, S., Danby, S., Farrell, A., & Thorpe, K. (2016). ‘I wonder what you know…’: Teachers designing requests for factual information. Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 68–78.
Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (1998). Conversation analysis: Principles, practices and applications. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G.H. Lerner (Ed.) Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, (pp.13–31). Amsterdam / Philadelphia, John Benjamins.
Kidwell, M. (2011). Epistemics and embodiment in the interactions of very young children. In T. Stivers, L. Mondada, & J. Steensig (Eds.), The morality of knowledge in conversation (pp. 257–284). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
La Paro, B., Hamre, K., Locasale-Crouch, J., Pianta, R., Bryant, D., Early, D., et al. (2009). Quality in kindergarten classrooms: Observational evidence for the need to increase children’s learning opportunities in early education classrooms. Early Education and Development, 20(4), 657–692.
Land, T. J., Tyminski, A. M., & Drake, C. (2019). Examining aspects of teachers’ posing of problems in response to children’s mathematical thinking. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 22(4), 331–353.
Lee, Y.-A. (2007). Third turn position in teacher talk: Contingency and the work of teaching. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 180–206.
Margutti, P. (2007). “Are you human beings?” Order and knowledge construction through questioning in primary classroom interaction. Linguistics and Education, 17(4), 313–346.
Massey, S. (2004). Teacher–child conversation in the preschool classroom. Early Childhood Education Journal, 31(4), 227–231.
Park, I. (2015). Or-PREFACED third turn self-repairs in student questions. Linguistics and Education, 31(1), 101–114.
Pianta, R. C., La Paro, K. M., & Hamre, B. K. (2008). Classroom Assessment Scoring System™: Manual K-3. Paul H Brookes Publishing.
Rowe, M. (1986). Wait time: Slowing down may be a way of speeding up! Journal of Teacher Education, 37, 43–50.
Rowe, M. (1987). Using wait time to stimulate inquiry. In W. Wilen (Ed.), Questions, questioning techniques, and effective teaching (pp. 95–106). Washington, DC: National Education Association.
Sacks, H. (1984). Notes on methodology. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 21–27). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.
Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8, 289–327.
Siraj, I., & Asani, R. (2015). The role of sustained shared thinking, play and metacognition in young children’s learning’. In S. Robson & S. Quinn (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of young children’s thinking and understanding. London: Routledge.
Siraj, I., Kingston, D., & Melhuish, E. (2015). Assessing quality: Sustained shared thinking and emotional well-being (SSTEW) rating scale. London: Trentham Books & UCL Press.
Siraj-Blatchford, I., & Manni, L. (2008). “Would you like to tidy up now?” An analysis of adult questioning in the English foundation stage. Early Years, 28(1), 5–22.
Stivers, T., & Rossano, F. (2010). Mobilizing response. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43(1), 3–31.
Stokoe, E. (2011) Simulated interaction and communication skills training: The ‘Conversation Analytic Roleplay Method’. In Antaki, C.E. (Ed.) Applied conversation analysis: Changing institutional practices (pp. 119–139). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
Sylva, K., Melhuish, E., Sammons, P., Siraj-Blatchford, I., & Taggart, B. (2010). Early childhood matters: Evidence from the effective pre-school and primary education project. London: Routledge.
Tayler, C. (2016). Reforming Australian early childhood education and care provision (2009–2015). Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 41(2), 27–31.
Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring classroom discourse: language in action. London: Routledge.
Walsh, S., & Li, L. (2013). Conversations as space for learning. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 23(2), 247–266.
Warren, E. and de Vries, E. (2009) Young Australian Indigenous students’ engagement with numeracy: Actions that assist to bridge the gap, Australian Journal of Education, 53(2), Article 4.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix: Transcription Conventions
Appendix: Transcription Conventions
The transcription conventions used in this article follow the original work of Sacks et al. (1974).
-
. falling intonation
-
, slightly rising or continuing intonation
-
? rising intonation
-
¿ intonation that rises more than a comma but less than a question mark
-
:: lengthened syllable
-
↓ sharp fall in pitch
-
↑ sharp rise in pitch
-
Bold emphasis
-
CAP increased volume
-
[] overlapping talk
-
() unintelligible stretch
-
(0.5) length of silence in tenths of a second
-
< increase in tempo, rushed stretch of talk
-
< > slower tempo
-
hh audible outbreath
-
.hh audible inbreath
-
[°] talk that is quieter than the surrounding talk
-
$ spoken while smiling
-
(()) description of accompanying behaviour
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Church, A., Cohrssen, C. (2021). The Mechanics of Interaction in Early Childhood STEAM. In: Cohrssen, C., Garvis, S. (eds) Embedding STEAM in Early Childhood Education and Care. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65624-9_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65624-9_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-65623-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-65624-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)