Abstract
The growing recognition that gender inequalities shape health inequities is contributing to the development and strengthening of gender transformative approaches (GTA) in public health. Many of these approaches attempt to integrate considerations of intersectionality, including sex and gender-based analysis plus (SGBA+) in the Canadian context. The inclusion of intersectionality within current GTAs represents progress in advancing gender equality and health equity; however, they do not yet reflect the true potential of intersectionality to transform public health. Arguably, the interplay of the full range of complex factors and influencing forces and structures of power that underpin health inequities is not adequately accounted for. Doing this requires moving beyond a primal focus on sex and gender (and most often women) as well as binary and outdated notions of gender. It requires understanding inequities as not being restricted to gender but as inseparable from other factors such as class, race/ethnicity, sexuality, immigration status, geography, and ability – without any presumption of ranking. As such, what is needed is a more robust intersectionality-informed analysis and concrete action to understand experiences of health inequities, who is at disproportionate risk, the differences between groups of people at disproportionate risk, and how appropriate population health responses can be crafted and respond to social groups most at risk. Only then can the ultimate goal of GTA – to transform power inequities – be fully realized.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
The term “gender-transformative approach” was first coined by Gupta (2000) in relation to addressing HIV/AIDS and has gained particular traction in global health and development (Ruane-McAteer et al., 2019). It is important to note that gender-transformative approaches (GTA) to improve health come from a wide variety of disciplines, including public health, global health, psychology, social work, and epidemiology. Given this, a number of different disciplinary frameworks shape specific gender-transformative approaches and interventions (Dworkin & Barker, 2019). Given the scope of this chapter, we offer a review of general trends related to public health-focused GTA models and frameworks in relation to intersectionality, rather than a comprehensive analysis of gender-transformative approaches, models, or interventions.
- 2.
The IBPA Framework has been recognized as a promising health equity tool (e.g. Buettgen et al., 2018; Heard et al., 2020; Mendell et al., 2012; Palència et al., 2014; NCCHPP, 2015) and has been taken up across a wide array of health-relevant fields including violence, mental health and substance use, HIV/AIDS policy, Indigenous policies, and the representation of diverse women in STEM fields. Despite increased recognition that intersectionality-informed approaches are necessary to capture the complexity of people’s lives, they have not yet permeated the field of public health.
References
Annandale, E., & Hunt, K. (Eds.). (2000). Gender inequalities in health. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Bowleg, L. (2012). The problem with the phrase women and minorities: Intersectionality—An important theoretical framework for public health. American Journal of Public Health, 102(7), 1267–1273.
Buettgen, A., Hardie, S., Wicklund, E., Jean-François, K. M., & Alimi, S. (2018). Understanding the intersectional forms of discrimination impacting persons with disabilities. Ottawa: Government of Canada’s Social Development Partnerships Program – Disability Component. Canadian Centre on Disability Studies.
Bunjun, B. (2010). Feminist organizations and intersectionality: Contesting hegemonic feminism. Atlantis, 34(2), 115–126.
Centre of Excellence for Women’s Health [CEWH]. (2020). Framework for gender transformative health promotion. In Gender transformative health promotion course. Retrieved from http://bccewh.bc.ca/webinars-and-courses/courses/gender-transformative-health-promotion-course/unit-1-what-is-gender-transformative-health-promotion/framework-for-gender-transformative-health-promotion/
Chan, C. D., Steen, S., Howard, L. C., & Ali, A. I. (2019). Disentangling the complexities of queer theory and intersectionality theory: Research paradigms and insights for social justice. In Research methods for social justice and equity in education (pp. 59–70). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Collins, P. H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge.
Collins, P. H., & Bilge, S. (2016). Intersectionality. John Wiley & Sons.
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241.
Darmstadt, G. L., Heise, L., Gupta, G. R., Henry, S., Cislaghi, B., Greene, M. E., et al. (2019). Why now for a series on gender equality, norms, and health? The Lancet, 393(10189), 2374–2377.
Dworkin, S. L., & Barker, G. (2019). Gender-transformative approaches to engaging men in reducing gender-based violence: A response to Brush & Miller’s “Trouble in Paradigm”. Violence Against Women, 25(14), 1657–1671.
Dworkin, S. L., Fleming, P. J., & Colvin, C. J. (2015). The promises and limitations of gender-transformative health programming with men: Critical reflections from the field. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 17(sup2), 128–143.
EuroHealthNet. (2017). Making the link: Gender equality and health. Policy Préci. Retrieved from https://eurohealthnet.eu/sites/eurohealthnet.eu/files/publications/PP_Gender_Digital%20Version.pdf
Fehrenbacher, A., & Patel, D. (2020). Translating the theory of intersectionality into quantitative and mixed methods for empirical gender transformative research on health. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 22(sup1), 145–160.
Fleming, P. J., Lee, J. G., & Dworkin, S. L. (2014). “Real men don’t”: Constructions of masculinity and inadvertent harm in public health interventions. American Journal of Public Health, 104(6), 1029–1035.
George, A. S., Amin, A., de Abreu Lopes, C. M., & Ravindran, T. S. (2020). Structural determinants of gender inequality: Why they matter for adolescent girls’ sexual and reproductive health. BMJ, 368, L6985. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l6985
Gkiouleka, A., Huijts, T., Beckfield, J., & Bambra, C. (2018). Understanding the micro and macro politics of health: Inequalities, intersectionality & institutions-A research agenda. Social Science & Medicine, 200, 92–98.
Greaves, L., Pederson, A., & Poole, N. (Eds.). (2014). Making it better: Gender transformative health promotion. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press.
Grzanka, P., & Grzanka, P. R. (2018). Intersectionality: A foundations and frontiers reader. Routledge.
Gupta, G. R. (2000). Gender, sexuality, and HIV/AIDS: The what, the why, and the how. Washington, D.C.: International Center for Research on Women (ICRW).
Hancock, A. M. (2016). Intersectionality: An intellectual history. Oxford University Press.
Hankivsky, O. (2014). Intersectionality 101. The Institute for Intersectionality Research & Policy, SFU.
Hankivsky, O., & Christoffersen, A. (2008). Intersectionality and the determinants of health: A Canadian perspective. Critical Public Health, 18(3), 271–283.
Hankivsky, O., Doyal, L., Einstein, G., Kelly, U., Shim, J., Weber, L., & Repta, R. (2017). The odd couple: Using biomedical and intersectional approaches to address health inequities. Global Health Action, 10(sup2), 1326686. https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2017.1326686
Hankivsky, O., Grace, D., Hunting, G., Ferlatte, O., Clark, N., Fridkin, A., & Laviolette, T. (2012). Intersectionality-based policy analysis. In An intersectionality-based policy analysis framework (pp. 33–45). Vancouver, BC: Institute for Intersectionality Research & Policy, SFU.
Hawkes, S., Allotey, P., Sy Elhadj, A., Clark, J., & Horton, R. (2020). The Lancet Commission on Gender and Global Health. Comment. The Lancet, 396, 521–522. Retrieved from https://www.thelancet.com/action/showPdf?pii=S0140-6736%2820%2931547-6
Hawkes, S., & Buse, K. (2013). Gender and global health: Evidence, policy, and inconvenient truths. The Lancet, 381(9879), 1783–1787.
Heard, E., Fitzgerald, L., Wigginton, B., & Mutch, A. (2020). Applying intersectionality theory in health promotion research and practice. Health Promotion International, 35(4), 866–876. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daz080
Heise, L., Greene, M. E., Opper, N., Stavropoulou, M., Harper, C., Nascimento, M., et al. (2019). Gender inequality and restrictive gender norms: Framing the challenges to health. The Lancet, 393(10189), 2440–2454.
Hillenbrand, E., Karim, N., Mohanraj, P., & Wu, D. (2015). Measuring gender-transformative change: A review of literature and promising practices. Care USA Working Paper. Retrieved from https://care.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/working_paper_aas_gt_change_measurement_fa_lowres.pdf
Horgan, S. A., Chen, S. P., Tuininga, T., & Stuart, H. (2020). Taking a closer look at gender-transformative health promotion programming as a vehicle for addressing gender-based inequities in health and care. Global Health Promotion, 27(3), 92–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757975919864109
Kapilashrami, A., & Hankivsky, O. (2018). Intersectionality and why it matters to global health. The Lancet, 391(10140), 2589–2591.
Kapilashrami, A., Hill, S., & Meer, N. (2015). What can health inequalities researchers learn from an intersectionality perspective? Understanding social dynamics with an inter-categorical approach? Social Theory & Health, 13(3–4), 288–307.
Krieger, N. (2014). Discrimination and health inequities. International Journal of Health Services, 44(4), 643–710.
Martinez, E., & Wu, D. (2009). CARE SII women’s empowerment framework summary sheet. Atlanta: CARE International.
Mendell, A., Dyck, L., Ndumbe-Eyoh, S., & Morisson, V. (2012). Tools and approaches for assessing and supporting public health action on the social determinants of health and health equity. NCCDH & NCCHPP. Retrieved from http://www.ncchpp.ca/docs/Equity_Tools_NCCDH-NCCHPP.pdf
Morgan, M. (2014). Measuring gender transformative change. In CGIAR Research Program on Aquatic Agricultural Systems (Program Brief: AAS-2014-41). Penang, Malaysia. Retrieved from https://www.worldfishcenter.org/content/measuring-gender-transformative-change
National Collaborating Centre for Healthy Public Policy [NCCHPP]. (2015). Health inequalities and intersectionality. Retrieved from http://www.ncchpp.ca/docs/2015_Ineg_Ineq_Intersectionnalite_En.pdf
Palència, L., Malmusi, D., & Borrell, C. (2014). SOPHIE: Evaluating the impact of structural policies on health inequalities and their social determinants and fostering change. In Incorporating intersectionality in evaluation of policy impacts on health equity: A quick guide. Retrieved from http://www.sophie-project.eu/pdf/Guide_intersectionality_SOPHIE.pdf
Pederson, A., Greaves, L., & Poole, N. (2014). Gender-transformative health promotion for women: A framework for action. Health Promotion International, 30(1), 140–150.
Peretz, T., Lehrer, J., & Dworkin, S. L. (2020). Impacts of Men’s gender-transformative personal narratives: A qualitative evaluation of the Men’s story project. Men and Masculinities, 23(1), 104–126.
Plan International. (2019). Our gender transformative approach: Tackling the root causes of gender inequality. Retrieved from https://plan-international.org/eu/blog-alex-munive-gender-transformative-approach
Rolleri, L. A. (2014). Gender transformative programming in adolescent reproductive and sexual health: Definitions, strategies, and resources. New York: ACT for Youth Center of Excellence, Bronfenbrenner Center for Translational Research. Retrieved from http://www.actforyouth.net/resources/pm/pm_gender4_0114.pdf
Rosenthal, L. (2016). Incorporating intersectionality into psychology: An opportunity to promote social justice and equity. American Psychologist, 71(6), 474.
Roth, J. (2018). Feminism otherwise: Intersectionality beyond Occidentalism. InterDisciplines, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.4119/indi-1047
Rottach, E., Schuler, S. R., & Hardee, K. (2009). Gender perspectives improve reproductive health outcomes: New evidence. Population Reference Bureau. Retrieved from http://www.igwg.org/igwg_media/genderperspectives.pdf
Ruane-McAteer, E., Amin, A., Hanratty, J., Lynn, F., van Willenswaard, K. C., Reid, E., et al. (2019). Interventions addressing men, masculinities and gender equality in sexual and reproductive health and rights: An evidence and gap map and systematic review of reviews. BMJ Global Health, 4(5), e001634.
Rutgers. (2018). Rutger’s Gender Transformative Approach Toolkit. Retrieved from https://www.rutgers.international/sites/rutgersorg/files/PDF/GTA%20Factsheet.pdf
Rutgers. (2020). Gender transformative approach. Rutgers, For Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights. Retrieved from https://www.rutgers.international/GTA
Sen, G., & Östlin, P. (2007). Unequal, unfair, ineffective and inefficient gender inequity in health: Why it exists and how we can change it. Final Report to the WHO Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/social_determinants/resources/csdh_media/wgekn_final_report_07.pdf?ua=1
Standing Committee on the Status of Women [SCSW]. (2016). Implementing gender-based analysis plus in the Government of Canada. Report of the Standing Committee on the Status of Women. Retrieved from https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Committee/421/FEWO/Reports/RP8355396/feworp04/feworp04-e.pdf
Status of Women Canada. (2018). Government of Canada’s Approach: GBA+. Retrieved from https://cfc-swc.gc.ca/gba-acs/approach-approche-en.html
Stinson, J., Wolfson, L., & Poole, N. (2020). Technology-based substance use interventions: Opportunities for gender-transformative health promotion. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(3), 992.
Thomas, J. C., Sage, M., Dillenberg, J., & Guillory, V. J. (2002). A code of ethics for public health. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 1057–1059.
Trickett, E. J., Beehler, S., Deutsch, C., Green, L. W., Hawe, P., McLeroy, K., et al. (2011). Advancing the science of community-level interventions. American Journal of Public Health, 101(8), 1410–1419.
UN Women. (2020). Counted and visible: Global conference on the measurement of gender equality, leave no one behind and intersecting inequalities. Concept Note. Retrieved from https://data.unwomen.org/sites/default/files/inline-files/Global%20Conference%20on%20Intersectionality%20-%20Concept%20note.pdf
Valdes, F. (1997). Foreword: Poised at the cusp: LatCrit theory outsider jurisprudence and Latina/o self-empowerment. Harvard Latinx Law Review, 2, 1.
Van Herk, K. A., Smith, D., & Andrew, C. (2011). Identity matters: Aboriginal mothers’ experiences of accessing health care. Contemporary Nurse, 37(1), 57–68.
World Health Organization [WHO]. (2011). Gender mainstreaming for health managers: A practical approach – Participant’s notes. Geneva: WHO.
World Health Organization [WHO]. (2020). TDR intersectional gender research strategy: Building the science of solutions for all. Geneva: WHO. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/332288/9789240005068-eng.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hankivsky, O., Hunting, G. (2021). Gender-Transformative Public Health Approaches. In: Gahagan, J., Bryson, M.K. (eds) Sex- and Gender-Based Analysis in Public Health. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71929-6_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71929-6_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-71928-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-71929-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)