Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Crime, Harm and Justice: The Utopia of Harm and Realising Justice in a ‘Good Society’

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Social Harm

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Victims and Victimology ((PSVV))

Abstract

The effectiveness of criminal justice systems for realising justice either in theory or practice, as well as their role in perpetuating and legitimating injustice have long been questioned by critical scholars. These concerns have also animated the search for alternative approaches to imagining and realising justice. This chapter explores the role of criminal justice systems in producing a particular and limited notion of justice, derived from the standpoint of white, socially and economically powerful males living in the western liberal democracies of the Global North, which, in practice, serve to embody and legitimise injustice. It explores approaches that have sought to either reform criminal justice or abolish it, but argues that both tactics often fail to tackle the problems inherent within criminal justice and, at worst, legitimise them. Instead, drawing on utopian theory, this chapter explores the potential of the social harm perspective for transcending the status quo and reimagining justice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ashworth, A. (2002). Sentencing. In M. Maguire, R. Morgan, & R. Reiner (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Criminology (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, E., & Scott, D (Eds.). (2016). Non-penal Real Utopias [Foundation volume]. Justice, Power and Resistance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beresford, S. (2018) What About Me? The Impact on Children When Mothers Are Involved in the Criminal Justice System. The Prison Reform Trust. Available at: http://www.prisonreformtrust.org.uk/portals/0/documents/what%20about%20me.pdf. Accessed: 15 September 2020.

  • Burnett, J. (2009). Racism and the State: Authoritarianism and Coercion. In R. Coleman, J. Sim, S. Tombs, & D. Whyte (Eds.), State Power Crime. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlen, P. (Ed.). (2002). Women and Punishment: The Struggle for Justice. Cullompton; Portland: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, N. (1977). Conflicts as Property. The British Journal of Criminology,17(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christie, N. (1981). Limits to Pain. Oxford: Martin Robertson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, R., Sim, J., Tombs, S., & Whyte, D. (Eds.). (2009). State Power Crime. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, K., & Jones, H. ([2007] 2012). Surviving Victimhood: The Impact of Feminist Campaigns. In S. Walklate (Ed.), Handbook of Victims and Victimology. Routledge Handbooks Online.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copson, L. (2013). Towards a Utopian Criminology. In M. Malloch & B. Munro (Eds.), Crime, Critique and Utopia. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copson, L. (2014). Penal Populism and the Problem of Mass Incarceration: The Promise of Utopian Thinking. The Good Society,23(1), 55–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copson, L. (2016a). Realistic Utopianism and Alternatives to Imprisonment: The Ideology of Crime and the Utopia of Harm. Justice, Power and Resistance, Foundation Volume, 73–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copson, L. (2016b). After Penal Populism: Punishment, Democracy and Utopian Method. In A. Dzur, I. Loader, & R. Sparks (Eds.), Democratic Theory and Mass Incarceration. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copson, L. (2018). Beyond ‘Criminology vs. Zemiology’: Reconciling Crime with Social Harm. In A. Boukli & J. K Kotzé (Eds.), Zemiology: Reconnecting Crime and Social Harm. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copson, L. (2021). Beyond Criminology: Taking Harm Seriously. In F. Gordon & D. Newman (Eds.), Leading Works in Social Justice. Abingdon, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copson, L., & Boukli, A. (2020). Queer Utopias and Queer Criminology. Criminology & Criminal Justice,20(5), 510–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyle, M. (2016). Penal Abolition as the End of Criminal Behavior. Journal of Social Justice,6, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyle, M. (2018). Transgression and Standard Theories: Contributions Toward Penal Abolition. Critical Criminology,26(3), 325–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coyle, M., & Schept, J. (2018). Penal Abolition Praxis. Critical Criminology,26(3), 319–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corston, J. (2007). The Corston Report. London: Home Office. Available at: https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130206102659/http:/www.justice.gov.uk/publications/docs/corston-report-march-2007.pdf. Accessed: 31 July 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crewe, B. (2011). Depth, Weight, Tightness: Revisiting the Pains of Imprisonment. Punishment & Society,13(5), 509–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunneen, C., & Tauri, J. (2019). Indigenous Peoples, Criminology, and Criminal Justice. Annual Review of Criminology,2(1), 359–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cusick, L. (2006). Widening the Harm Reduction Agenda: From Drug Use to Sex Work. International Journal of Drug Policy,17(1), 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekker, S., & Breakey, H. (2016). ‘Just Culture’: Improving Safety by Achieving Substantive, Procedural and Restorative Justice. Safety Science,85(2016), 187–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorling, D. (2004). Prime Suspect: Murder in Britain. In P. Hillyard, C. Pantazis, S. Tombs, & D. Gordon (Eds.), Beyond Criminology: Taking Harm Seriously. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorling, D. (2008). Commentary: The Politics and Economics of Murder. Environment and Planning A,40(2), 255–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devakumar, D., Selvarajah, S., Shannon, G., Muraya, K., Lasoye, S., Corona, S., et al. (2020). Racism, the Public Health Crisis We Can No Longer Ignore. The Lancet,395(10242), e112–e113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dignan, J. ([2007] 2012). The Victim in Restorative Justice. In S. Walklate (Ed.), Handbook of Victims and Victimology. Routledge Handbooks Online.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. ([1976] 1980). Two Lecturers. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977. Harlow: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genders, E., & Players, E. (1987). Women in Prison: The Treatment, the Control and the Experience. In P. Carlen & A. Worral (Eds.), Gender, Crime and Justice. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greife, M., & Maume, M. (2020). Do Companies Pay the Price for Environmental Crimes? Consequences of Criminal Penalties on Corporate Offenders. Crime, Law and Social Change,73(3), 337–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S., Critcher, C., Jefferson, T., Clarke, J., & Roberts, B. (1978). Policing the Crisis: Mugging, the State, and Law and Order. London; Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2000). Spaces of Hope. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, S., & Milovanovic, D. (2000). Constitutive Criminology: Origins, Core Concepts, and Evaluation. Social Justice,27(2), 268–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillyard, P., & Tombs, S. (2007). From ‘Crime’ to Social Harm? Crime, Law and Social Change,48(1–2), 9–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillyard, P., Pantazis, C., Tombs, S., & Gordon, D. (Eds.). (2004). Beyond Criminology: Taking Harm Seriously. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, B. (2006). Beyond White Man’s Justice: Race, Gender and Justice in Late Modernity. Theoretical Criminology,10(1), 29–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulsman, L. (1991). The Abolitionist Case: Alternative Crime Policies. Israel Law Review, 25(3–4), 681–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, N., Ashton, M., Lenton, S., Mitcheson, L., Nelles, B., & Stimson, G. (2003). A Review of the Evidence-Base for Harm Reduction Approaches to Drug Use. London: Forward Thinking on Drugs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Race Relations. (2020). Criminal Justice System Statistics. Available at: http://www.irr.org.uk/research/statistics/criminal-justice/. Accessed: 29 July 2020.

  • Jewkes, Y. (2005). Men Behind Bars: “Doing” Masculinity as an Adaptation to Imprisonment. Men and Masculinities,8(1), 44–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JUSTICIA European Rights Network. (2018). Disparities in Criminal Justice Systems for Individuals of Different Ethnic, Racial, and National Background in the European Union: A Comparative Report of the Scoping Study. Available at: http://eujusticia.net/images/uploads/pdf/Justicia_Network_Disparities_in_Criminal_Justice_Comparative_Report_2018-1.pdf. Accessed: 29 July 2020.

  • Levitas, R. (1990). The Concept of Utopia. New York: Philip Allen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitas, R. (2001). Against Work: A Utopian Incursion into Social Policy. Critical Social Policy,21(4), 449–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitas, R. (2007). The Imaginary Reconstitution of Society: Utopia as Method. In T. Moylan & R. Baccolini (Eds.), Utopia Method Vision: The Use Value of Social Dreaming. Bern: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitas, R. (2017). Where There Is No Vision, the People Perish: A Utopian Ethic for a Transformed Future. Centre for the Understanding of Sustainable Prosperity. Available at: http://www.cusp.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/05-Ruth-Levitas-Essay-online.pdf. Accessed: 31 July 2020.

  • Longazel, J., Berman, J., & Fleury-Steiner, B. (2016). The Pains of Immigrant Imprisonment. Sociology Compass,10(11), 989–998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macpherson, W. (1999). The Stephen Lawrence Inquiry. London: The Stationery Office. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/277111/4262.pdf. Accessed: 15 September 2020.

  • Malloch, M., & McIvor, G. (2011). Women and Community Sentences. Criminology & Criminal Justice,11(4), 325–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malloch, M., & Munro, B. (Eds.). (2013). Crime, Critique and Utopia. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim, K. ([1936] 1960). Ideology and Utopia. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marlatt, G. (1996). Harm Reduction: Come as You Are. Addictive Behaviors,21(6), 779–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, R. (2014). Realist Criminology. Basingstoke; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathiesen, T. (1986). The Politics of Abolition. Contemporary Crises,10(1), 81–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayor of London. (2017). The London Knife Crime Strategy. London: Greater London Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pantazis, C., & Pemberton, S. (2009). From the ‘Old’ to the ‘New’ Suspect Community: Examining the Impacts of Recent UK Counter-Terrorist Legislation. The British Journal of Criminology,49(5), 646–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, F. (1976). Crimes of the Powerful: Marxism, Crime and Deviance. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pemberton, S. (2004). A Theory of Moral Indifference: Understanding the Production of Harm by Capitalist Society. In P. Hillyard, C. Pantazis, S. Tombs, & D. Gordon (Eds.), Beyond Criminology: Taking Harm Seriously. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pemberton, A. (2020). A Theory of Injustice and Victims’ Participation in Criminal Processes. In J. Tapley & P. Davies (Eds.), Victimology: Research, Policy and Activism. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phoenix, J. (2008). ASBOS and Working Women: A New Revolving Door? In P. Squires (Ed.), ASBO Nation: The Criminalisation of Nuisance. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quilter, J., & Hogg, R. (2018). The Hidden Punitiveness of Fines. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy,7(3), 9–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rekart, M. L. (2005). Sex-Work Harm Reduction. The Lancet,366(9503), 2123–2134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiman, J., & Leighton, P. (2016). The Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get Prison: Ideology, Class, and Criminal Justice (11th ed.). Abingdon, New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ruggiero, V. (2011). An Abolitionist View of Restorative Justice. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice,39(2), 100–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, M., & Ward, T. (2015). Prison Abolition in the UK: They Dare Not Speak Its Name? Social Justice,41(3), 107–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, A., & Jones, I. ([2007] 2012). The Victim in Court. In S. Walklate (Ed.), Handbook of Victims and Victimology. Routledge Handbooks Online.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D. (2007). New Labour, New Legitimacy? The ‘Making Punishment Work’ Agenda and the Limits of Penal Reform. In R. Roberts & W. McMahon (Eds.), Social Justice and Criminal Justice. London: Centre for Crime and Justice Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D. (2013). Visualising an Abolitionist Real Utopia: Principles, Policy and Praxis. In M. Malloch & B. Munro (Eds.), Crime, Critique and Utopia. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D., & Gosling, H. (2016a). Before Prison, Instead of Prison, Better Than Prison: Therapeutic Communities as an Abolitionist Real Utopia? International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy,5(1), 52–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D., & Gosling, H. (2016b). Otherwise Than Prisons, Not Prisons Otherwise: Therapeutic Communities as a Non-Penal Real Utopia. Justice, Power and Resistance, Foundation Volume, 170–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scottish Government. (2012). Commission on Women Offenders: Final Report. Available at: https://www2.gov.scot/Topics/archive/reviews/commissiononwomenoffenders/finalreport-2012. Accessed: 31 July 2020.

  • Scottish Government. (n.d.). Crime Prevention: Violence Including Knife Crime. Available at: https://www.gov.scot/policies/crime-prevention-and-reduction/violence-knife-crime/. Accessed: 31 July 2020.

  • Shaw, M., Tunstall, H., & Dorling, D. (2005). Increasing Inequalities in Risk of Murder in Britain: Trends in the Demographic and Spatial Distribution of Murder, 1981-2000. Health and Place,11(1), 45–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, M. (2020, June 12). ‘Long Overdue’: Lawmakers Declare Racism a Public Health Emergency. The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/society/2020/jun/12/racism-public-health-black-brown-coronavirus. Accessed: 15 July 2020.

  • SSCJR. (2019). Impact of Punishment: Families of People in Prison. Available at: https://www.sccjr.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/11-Impact-of-punishment-prisoners-families.pdf. Accessed: 15 September 2020.

  • Strang, H., & Sherman, L. (2003). Repairing the Harm: Victims and Restorative Justice. Utah Law Review,2003(1), 15–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, E. (1945). Is “White Collar Crime” Crime? American Sociological Review,10(2), 132–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, E. ([1949] 1983). White Collar Crime: The Uncut Version. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, G. (1958). The Society of Captives. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Sentencing Project. (2018, March). Report of The Sentencing Project to the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Contemporary Forms of Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia, and Related Intolerance: Regarding Racial Disparities in the United States Criminal Justice System. Available at: https://www.sentencingproject.org/publications/un-report-on-racial-disparities/. Accessed: 29 July 2020.

  • Tombs, S. (2007). ‘Violence’, Safety Crimes and Criminology. The British Journal of Criminology,47(4), 531–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tombs, S., & Whyte, D. (2015). The Corporate Criminal: Why Corporations Must Be Abolished. Abingdon, New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, C., & Quick, O. (2010). Lacey, Wells and Quick Reconstructing Criminal Law: Text and Materials (4th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Walklate, S. (2008). What is to be Done About Violence Against Women? Gender, Violence, Cosmopolitanism and the Law. The British Journal of Criminology,48(1), 39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warr, J. (2016). The Deprivation of Certitude, Legitimacy and Hope: Foreign National Prisoners and the Pains of Imprisonment. Criminology & Criminal Justice,16(3), 301–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerhuis, D., Walters, R., & Wyatt, T. (Eds.). (2013). Emerging Issues in Green Criminology:Exploring Power, Justice and Harm. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO/Europe. (2020). Violence and Injuries. Available at: https://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/disease-prevention/violence-and-injuries/violence-and-injuries. Accessed: 15 July 2020.

  • Whyte, D. (2019). ‘Death to the Corporation’: A Modest Proposal. Socialist Register 2019: A World Turned Upside Down? 55, 289–304.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Open University, Milton Keynes, UK

    Lynne Copson

Authors
  1. Lynne Copson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lynne Copson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Social Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

    Pamela Davies

  2. Department of Sociology, Anthropology & Criminology, Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti, MI, USA

    Paul Leighton

  3. Department of Social Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

    Tanya Wyatt

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Copson, L. (2021). Crime, Harm and Justice: The Utopia of Harm and Realising Justice in a ‘Good Society’. In: Davies, P., Leighton, P., Wyatt, T. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Social Harm. Palgrave Studies in Victims and Victimology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72408-5_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72408-5_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-72407-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-72408-5

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation