Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Ethical Dimensions of Virtual Reality

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Virtual Reality, Empathy and Ethics

  • 605 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter discusses the ways in which cultural and epistemic fears over virtual objects and environments emerged in the early 1980s as the fear of covert artificial reality was posed in literature and film. Though the promise of VR as a fully immersive alternative reality was let down by the lack of computing power to achieve such a vision, ethical concerns increasingly focused upon the way in which virtual objects have begun to bleed into our public life through phenomena such as ‘deep fake’ videos and chatbots, which when used maliciously threaten personal privacy, dignity, political security and public trust in the norms and institutions of democratic governance. The cghapter then examines the potentially negative behavioural impacts of VR upon human-agent and human-computer interactions (in terms of privacy, health, behaviour and well-being) and questions whether VR can be employed to stimulate prosocial and morally beneficial behaviours amongst users and their online and offline social networks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, B., & Tracey, K. (2001). Digital living: The impact (or otherwise) of the Internet on everyday life. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 456–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C. A., Shibuya, A., Ihori, N., Swing, E. L., Bushman, B., Sakamoto, A., Rothstein, H. R., & Saleem, M. (2010). Violent video game effects on aggression, empathy, and prosocial behavior in Eastern and Western countries: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 136(2), 151–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aromaa, S., & Väänänen, K. (2016). Suitability of virtual prototypes to support human factors/ergonomics evaluation during the design. Applied Ergonomics, 56, 11–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arriaga, P., Esteves, F., Carneiro, P., & Monteiro, M. B. (2006). Violent computer games and their effects on state hostility and physiological arousal. Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression, 32(2), 146–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, J. (1992). Virtual reality, art, and entertainment. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 1(1), 133–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beardon, C. (1992). The ethics of virtual reality. Intelligent Tutoring Media, 3(1), 23–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagat, K. K., Liou, W.-K., & Chang, C.-Y. (2016). A cost-effective interactive 3D virtual reality system applied to military live firing training. Virtual Reality, 20(2), 127–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biocca, F., & Levy, M. R. (2013). Communication in the age of virtual reality. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blackall, M. (2020). Channel 4 under fire for deepfake Queen’s Christmas message The Guardian, Available: Guardian Media Group. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2020/dec/24/channel-4-under-fire-for-deepfake-queen-christmas-message

  • Brey, P. (1999). The ethics of representation and action in virtual reality. Ethics and Information Technology, 1(1), 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesney, R., & Keats Citron, D. (2018). Deep fakes: A looming challenge for privacy, democracy, and national security. In 107 California Law Review (2019), F.U.o.T.L., Public Law Research Paper No. 692; U of Maryland Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2018–21. (ed.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cogburn, J., & Silcox, M. (2014). Against brain-in-a-vatism: On the value of virtual reality. Philosophy & Technology, 27(4), 561–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLisi, M., Vaughn, M. G., Gentile, D. A., Anderson, C. A., & Shook, J. J. (2013). Violent video games, delinquency, and youth violence: New evidence. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 11(2), 132–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrow, R., & Iacovides, I. (2014). Gaming and the limits of digital embodiment. Philosophy & Technology, 27(2), 221–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, P. J. (2001). A further analysis of the ethics of representation in virtual reality: Multi-user environments. Ethics and Information Technology, 3(2), 113–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freina, L., & Ott, M. (2015). A literature review on immersive virtual reality in education: State of the art and perspectives. eLearning & Software for Education, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentile, D. A., Anderson, C. A., Yukawa, S., Ihori, N., Saleem, M., Ming, L. K., Shibuya, A., Liau, A. K., Khoo, A., & Bushman, B. J. (2009). The effects of prosocial video games on prosocial behaviors: International evidence from correlational, longitudinal, and experimental studies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(6), 752–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glantz, K., Durlach, N. I., Barnett, R. C., & Aviles, W. A. (1996). Virtual reality (VR) for psychotherapy: From the physical to the social environment. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 33(3), 464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greitemeyer, T., & Osswald, S. (2010). Effects of prosocial video games on prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2), 211–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, S. (2011). The moral landscape: How science can determine human values. Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, D. (2018). Deepfakes: False pornography is here and the law cannot protect you. Duke Law & Technology Review, 17(1), 99–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1999). Time-space compression and the postmodern condition. Modernity: Critical Concepts, 4, 98–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasen, R. L. (2019). Deep fakes, bots, and siloed justices: American election law in a post-truth world, Irvine CA: UC Irvine School of Law Research Paper No. 2019–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedberg, J., & Alexander, S. (1994). Virtual reality in education: Defining researchable issues. Educational Media International, 31(4), 214–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isaak, J., & Hanna, M. J. (2018). User data privacy: Facebook, Cambridge Analytica, and privacy protection. Computer, 51(8), 56–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonathan, P. J. Y., Fung, C. C., & Wong, K. W. (2009). Devious chatbots-interactive malware with a plot. In J.-H. Kim, S. S. Ge, P. Vadakkepat, J. Norbert, A. A. Manum, K. Sadasivan Puthusserypady, U. Rückert, J. Sitte, U. Witkowski, R. Nakatsu, T. Braun, J. Baltes, J. R. Anderson, C.-C. Wong, I. Verner, & D. Ahlgren (Eds.), Progress in robotics. FIRA 2009. Communications in computer and information science, vol 44 (pp. 110–118). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2009). The fairyland of second life: Virtual social worlds and how to use them. Business Horizons, 52(6), 563–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilteni, K., Groten, R., & Slater, M. (2012). The sense of embodiment in virtual reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 21(4), 373–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klinger, E., Bouchard, S., Légeron, P., Roy, S., Lauer, F., Chemin, I., & Nugues, P. (2005). Virtual reality therapy versus cognitive behavior therapy for social phobia: A preliminary controlled study. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 8(1), 76–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, M. W. (1993). An easy entry artificial reality. In A. Wexelblat (Ed.), Virtual reality: Applications and explorations (pp. 147–161). Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, M. W., Gionfriddo, T., & Hinrichsen, K. (n.d.). VIDEOPLACE—An artificial reality. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin: ACM, 35–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laterza, V. (2018). Cambridge Analytica, independent research and the national interest. Anthropology Today, 34(3), 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lévy, P. (1998). Becoming virtual: Reality in the digital age. Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindley, S. E., Le Couteur, J., & Berthouze, N. L. (n.d.). Stirring up experience through movement in game play: Effects on engagement and social behaviour. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: ACM, 511–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luppicini, R. (Ed.). (2010). Technoethics and the evolving knowledge society: Ethical issues in technological design, research, development, and innovation. IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackay, T., Ewing, M., Newton, F., & Windisch, L. (2009). The effect of product placement in computer games on brand attitude and recall. International Journal of Advertising, 28(3), 423–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madary, M., & Metzinger, T. K. (2016). Real virtuality: A code of ethical conduct. recommendations for good scientific practice and the consumers of VR-technology. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magda, R. M. R. (2001). Transmodernity, neotribalism and postpolitics. Interlitteraria, 6(6), 9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. (1992). Politics and space/time. New Left Review, 196, 65–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mujber, T. S., Szecsi, T., & Hashmi, M. S. (2004). Virtual reality applications in manufacturing process simulation. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 155, 1834–1838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neff, G., & Nagy, P. (2016). Automation, algorithms, and politics| talking to Bots: Symbiotic agency and the case of Tay. International Journal of Communication, 10, 4915–4931.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brolcháin, F., Jacquemard, T., Monaghan, D., O’Connor, N., Novitzky, P., & Gordijn, B. (2016). The convergence of virtual reality and social networks: Threats to privacy and autonomy. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(1), 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orr, T. J., Mallet, L., & Margolis, K. A. (2009). Enhanced fire escape training for mine workers using virtual reality simulation. Mining Engineering, 61(11), 41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, A. S., Cooper, A. R., Griew, P., & Jago, R. (2010). Children’s screen viewing is related to psychological difficulties irrespective of physical activity. Pediatrics, 126(5), e1011–e1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, M. T. (1995). Interpersonal communication and virtual reality: Mediating interpersonal relationships. In F. Biocca & M. R. Levy (Eds.), Communication in the age of virtual reality (pp. 277–299). Laurence Erlbaum and Associates Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persily, N. (2017). The 2016 US Election: Can democracy survive the internet? Journal of Democracy, 28(2), 63–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pujol, L. (2004). Archaeology, museums and virtual reality. Digithum, 6, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauterberg, M. (2004). Positive effects of entertainment technology on human behaviour. Building the information society. Springer, pp. 51–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzo, A. S., Lange, B., Suma, E. A., & Bolas, M. (2011). Virtual reality and interactive digital game technology: New tools to address obesity and diabetes. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 5(2), 256–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robins, K., & Webster, F. (2003). Times of the technoculture: From the information society to the virtual life. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schechtman, M. (2012). The story of my (second) life: Virtual worlds and narrative identity. Philosophy & Technology, 25(3), 329–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, R., Heather, N., & Lee, R. M. (1998). The sacred and the virtual: Religion in multi-user virtual reality. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4(2). JCMC425, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1998.tb00092.x

  • Schultheis, M. T., & Rizzo, A. A. (2001). The application of virtual reality technology in rehabilitation. Rehabilitation Psychology, 46(3), 296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwienhorst, K. (2002). Why virtual, why environments? Implementing virtual reality concepts in computer-assisted language learning. Simulation & Gaming, 33(2), 196–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidel, R. J., & Chatelier, P. R. (2013). Virtual reality, training’s future?: Perspectives on virtual reality and related emerging technologies. Springer Science & Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, N. E., Gallagher, A. G., Roman, S. A., O’brien, M. K., Bansal, V. K., Andersen, D. K., & Satava, R. M. (2002). Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: Results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Annals of Surgery, 236(4), 458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S., Lomash, H., & Bawa, S. (2015). Who regulates ethics in the virtual world? Science and Engineering Ethics, 21(1), 19–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, B., & Judkins, P. (1992). Glimpses of heaven, visions of hell: Virtual reality and its implications. Hodder & Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiegel, J. S. (2018). The ethics of virtual reality technology: Social hazards and public policy recommendations. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(5), 1537–1550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steuer, J. (1994). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communication, 42(4), 73–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strikwerda, L. (2015). Present and future instances of virtual rape in light of three categories of legal philosophical theories on rape. Philosophy & Technology, 28(4), 491–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7(3), 321–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbeek, P.-P. (2006). Materializing morality: Design ethics and technological mediation. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 31(3), 361–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbeek, P.-P. (2011). Moralizing technology: Understanding and designing the morality of things. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wankel, C., & Malleck, S. (2010). Exploring new ethical issues in the virtual worlds of the twenty-first century. In C. Wankel & S. Malleck (Eds.), Emerging ethical issues of life in virtual worlds (pp. 1–14). Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, K. (2018). Social networks, the 2016 US presidential election, and Kantian ethics: Applying the categorical imperative to Cambridge Analytica’s behavioral microtargeting. Journal of Media Ethics, 33(3), 133–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weston, A. (2000). A 21st century ethical toolbox. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wethington, H., Pan, L., & Sherry, B. (2013). The association of screen time, television in the bedroom, and obesity among school-aged youth: 2007 National Survey of Children’s Health. Journal of School Health, 83(8), 573–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilbur, S. P. (2013). An archaeology of cyberspaces: Virtuality, community, identity. In D. Porter (Ed.), Internet culture (pp. 5–22). Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. R. (1996). Effects of participating in virtual environments a review of current knowledge. Safety Science, 23(1), 39–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfendale, J. (2007). My avatar, my self: Virtual harm and attachment. Ethics and Information Technology, 9(2), 111–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yee, N., Bailenson, J. N., Urbanek, M., Chang, F., & Merget, D. (2007). The unbearable likeness of being digital: The persistence of nonverbal social norms in online virtual environments. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10(1), 115–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Social Sciences, Humanities & Law, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK

    Matthew Cotton

Authors
  1. Matthew Cotton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew Cotton .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cotton, M. (2021). The Ethical Dimensions of Virtual Reality. In: Virtual Reality, Empathy and Ethics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72907-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation