Abstract
Populism is argued to represent a serious challenge to established, mainstream parties as well as the democratic project underpinning the European Union. Increased support for populist ideas led to concerns of a fragmented parliament. Finding just under a quarter of all Facebook posts by parties contained some populist rhetoric, we argue while populist parties may not dominate the new parliament but populist ideas have gained purchase across the spectrum. The combination of populist rhetoric with mobilisation appeals and calls for interaction suggests populist posts better exploit the affordances of the platform suggesting European politics may be taking a somewhat populist turn particularly in terms of increased scepticism towards elites.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Regional parties in Italy and Spain were excluded from the sample. The date of the election day slightly differed in Ireland and the UK.
References
Alonso-Muñoz, L., & Casero-Ripollés, A. (2018). Communication of European populist leaders on Twitter: Agenda Setting and the “More Is Less” effect. El profesional de la información, 27(6), 1699–2407.
Bakker, R., Hooghe, L., Jolly, S., Marks, G., Polk, J., Rovny, J., Steenbergen, M., & Vachudova, M. A. (2020). 2019 Chapel Hill Expert Survey. Version 2019.1 Available at: chesdata.eu. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Bracciale, R., & Martella, A. (2017). Define the populist political communication style: The case of Italian political leaders on Twitter. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1310–1329.
Ceccobelli, D., Quaranta, M., & Valeriani, A. (2020). Citizens’ engagement with popularization and with populist actors on Facebook: A study on 52 leaders in 18 western democracies. European Journal of Communication, 35(5), 435–452. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323120909292.
de Vreese, C. H., Esser, F., Aalberg, T., Reinemann, C., & Stanyer, J. (2018). Populism as an expression of political communication content and style: A new perspective. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23(4), 423–438.
Eibl, O., & Gregor, M. (Eds.). (2019). Thirty years of political campaigning in Central and Eastern Europe. Springer Nature.
Elchardus, M., & Spruyt, B. (2016). Populism, persistent republicanism and declinism: An empirical analysis of populism as a thin ideology. Government and Opposition, 51(1), 111–133.
Engesser, S., Ernst, N., Esser, F., & Büchel, F. (2017). Populism and social media: How politicians spread a fragmented ideology. Information, Communication & Society, 20(8), 1109–1126.
Ernst, N., Engesser, S., Büchel, F., Blassnig, S., & Esser, F. (2017). Extreme parties and populism: An analysis of Facebook and Twitter across six countries. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1347–1364.
Giridharadas, A. (2019, November 22). How America’s elites lost their grip. Time Magazine. https://time.com/5735384/capitalism-reckoning-elitism-in-america-2019/
Grabbe, H., & Groot, N. (2014). Populism in the European Parliament: What implications for the open society? The International Spectator, 49(4), 33–46.
Groshek, J., & Koc-Michalska, K. (2017). Helping populism win? Social media use, filter bubbles, and support for populist presidential candidates in the 2016 US election campaign. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1389–1407.
Hughes, C. (2019). It’s the EU immigrants stupid! UKIP’s core-issue and populist rhetoric on the road to Brexit. European Journal of Communication, 34(3), 248–266.
Jagers, J., & Walgrave, S. (2007). Populism as political communication style. European Journal of Political Research, 46(3), 319–345.
Marchlewska, M., Cichocka, A., Panayiotou, O., Castellanos, K., & Batayneh, J. (2018). Populism as identity politics: Perceived in-group disadvantage, collective narcissism, and support for populism. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(2), 151–162.
Maurer, P., & Diehl, T. (2020). What kind of populism? Tone and targets in the Twitter discourse of French and American presidential candidates. European Journal of Communication, 35(5), 453–468. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323120909288.
Mazzoleni, G., & Bracciale, R. (2018). Socially mediated populism: The communicative strategies of political leaders on Facebook. Palgrave Communications, 4(1), 1–10.
McDonnell, D., & Werner, A. (2020). International populism: The radical right in the European Parliament. Oxford University Press.
Mouffe, C. (2018). For a left populism. Verso.
Mudde, C. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government and opposition, 39(4), 541–563.
Mudde, C. (2014). The far right and the European elections. Current History, 113(761), 98–103.
Reinemann, C., Aalberg, T., Esser, F., Strömbäck, J., & de Vreese, C. H. (2016). Populist political communication: Toward a model of its causes, forms, and effects. In T. Aalberg, F. Esser, C. Reinemann, J. Stromback, & C. De Vreese (Eds.), Populist political communication in Europe (pp. 22–36). Routledge.
Stanley, B. (2008). The thin ideology of populism. Journal of Political Ideologies, 13(1), 95–110.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lilleker, D.G., Balaban, D.C. (2021). Populism on Facebook. In: Haßler, J., Magin, M., Russmann, U., Fenoll, V. (eds) Campaigning on Facebook in the 2019 European Parliament Election. Political Campaigning and Communication. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73851-8_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73851-8_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-73850-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-73851-8
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)