Skip to main content

IT and Data in Nephrology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Primer on Nephrology
  • 2011 Accesses

Abstract

Over the last 10–15 years, healthcare has undergone a significant digital transformation with increasing use of electronic medical records, healthcare information systems, and handheld, wearable, and smart devices. Consequently, many data sources exist digitally – including socio-demographics, medical insurance claims, and procedural billing data in addition to clinical information – yet remain largely underutilized. This diverse wealth of healthcare data offers the potential for optimizing efficient healthcare delivery, directing health policymakers and service commissioners, setting the national research agenda, and improving patient-centred outcomes. This chapter summarizes the current state of play of big data collection, synthesis, and practical applications within nephrology, along with the challenges, risks, and future opportunities it presents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ahn S, et al. The impact of chronic disease self-management programs: healthcare savings through a community-based intervention. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:1141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ancker JS, et al. Patient activation and use of an electronic patient portal. Inform Health Soc Care. 2015;40(3):254–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bellomo R, et al. Acute renal failure - definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: the second international consensus conference of the acute dialysis quality initiative (ADQI) group. Crit Care Soc Crit Care Med. 2004;8(4):R204–12.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bodenheimer T, et al. Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. JAMA. 2002;288(19):2469–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Colbert GB, et al. The social media revolution in nephrology education. Kidney Int Rep. 2018;3(3):519–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Couser WG, et al. The contribution of chronic kidney disease to the global burden of major noncommunicable diseases. Kidney Int. 2011;80(12):1258–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Farnan JM, et al. Online medical professionalism: patient and public relationships: policy statement from the American College of Physicians and the Federation of State Medical Boards. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(8):620–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Graham-Brown MPM, Oates T. Social media in medicine: a game changer? Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation: Official Publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association. 2017;32(11):1806–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hibbard JH, et al. Development of the patient activation measure (PAM): conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers. Health Serv Res. 2004;39(4 Pt 1):1005–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Horne KL, Selby NM. Recent developments in electronic alerts for acute kidney injury. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2015;21(6):479–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. James MT, et al. Weekend hospital admission, acute kidney injury, and mortality. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;21(5):845–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim LG, et al. How do primary care doctors in England and Wales code and manage people with chronic kidney disease? Results from the National Chronic Kidney Disease Audit. Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation: Official Publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association. 2018;33(8):1373–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kolhe NV, et al. Impact of compliance with a care bundle on acute kidney injury outcomes: a prospective observational study. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0132279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lorig K, et al. Online diabetes self-management program: a randomized study. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(6):1275–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. de Lusignan S, et al. Audit-based education lowers systolic blood pressure in chronic kidney disease: the quality improvement in CKD (QICKD) trial results. Kidney Int. 2013;84(3):609–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mehta RL, et al. Acute kidney injury network: report of an initiative to improve outcomes in acute kidney injury. Crit Care Soc Crit Care Med. 2007;11(2):R31.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rayner HC, et al. Does community-wide chronic kidney disease management improve patient outcomes? Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation: Official Publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association. 2014;29(3):644–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sawhney S, et al. Acute kidney injury-how does automated detection perform? Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation: Official Publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association. 2015;30(11):1853–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Selby NM, et al. Design and rationale of “tackling acute kidney injury”, a multicentre quality improvement study. Nephron. 2016;134(3):200–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Selby NM, Kolhe NV. Care bundles for acute kidney injury: do they work? Nephron. 2016;134(3):195–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wilson FP, et al. Automated, electronic alerts for acute kidney injury: a single-blind, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;385(9981):1966–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wouters OJ, et al. Early chronic kidney disease: diagnosis, management and models of care. Nature reviews. Nephrology. 2015;11(8):491–502.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zimbudzi E, et al. Factors associated with patient activation in an Australian population with comorbid diabetes and chronic kidney disease: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2017;7(10):e017695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Oates, T. (2022). IT and Data in Nephrology. In: Harber, M. (eds) Primer on Nephrology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76419-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76419-7_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-76418-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-76419-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics