Skip to main content

Explanation in Multi-Stakeholder Recommendation for Enterprise Decision Support Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advanced Information Systems Engineering Workshops (CAiSE 2021)

Abstract

Business agility requires support from recommendation systems, but explaining recommendations may yield information disclosure. We analyze how to provide explanations in the scenario of Multi-Stakeholder Recommendation where the sensible information of one stakeholder should not be disclosed in the explanation to another stakeholder. Among the several types of explanations analyzed, counterfactual explanations come off best as they allow the system to preserve each stakeholder’s privacy and sensitive information in terms of preferences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abdollahpouri, H., et al.: Beyond personalization: research directions in multistakeholder recommendation (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abdollahpouri, H., et al.: Multistakeholder recommendation: survey and research directions. User Modeling and User-Adap. Inter. 30(1), 127–158 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-019-09256-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Abdollahpouri, H., Burke, R.: Multi-stakeholder recommendation and its connection to multi-sided fairness. In: RMSE@RecSys. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 2440. CEUR-WS.org (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Abdollahpouri, H., Mansoury, M., Burke, R., Mobasher, B.: The unfairness of popularity bias in recommendation. In: RMSE@RecSys. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 2440. CEUR-WS.org (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Abdou, W., Bloch, C., Charlet, D., Spies, F.: Multi-pareto-ranking evolutionary algorithm. In: Hao, J.-K., Middendorf, M. (eds.) EvoCOP 2012. LNCS, vol. 7245, pp. 194–205. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29124-1_17

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Burke, R.D., Abdollahpouri, H., Mobasher, B., Gupta, T.: Towards multi-stakeholder utility evaluation of recommender systems. In: UMAP (Extended Proceedings). CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 1618. CEUR-WS.org (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Castells, P., Hurley, N.J., Vargas, S.: Novelty and diversity in recommender systems. In: Ricci, F., Rokach, L., Shapira, B. (eds.) Recommender Systems Handbook, pp. 881–918. Springer, Boston, MA (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7637-6_26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Celli, A., Marchesi, A., Farina, G., Gatti, N.: No-regret learning dynamics for extensive-form correlated equilibrium. In: NeurIPS (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Eiter, T., Lukasiewicz, T.: Complexity results for structure-based causality. Artif. Intell. 142(1), 53–89 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-3702(02)00271-0

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Gedikli, F., Jannach, D., Ge, M.: How should I explain? A comparison of different explanation types for recommender systems. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 72(4), 367–382 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Halpern, J.Y., Pearl, J.: Causes and explanations: a structural-model approach - part II: explanations. In: IJCAI, pp. 27–34. Morgan Kaufmann (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Herlocker, J.L., Konstan, J.A., Riedl, J.: Explaining collaborative filtering recommendations. In: CSCW, pp. 241–250. ACM (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hilton, D., McClure, J., Slugoski, B.: The course of events: counterfactuals, causal sequences, and explanation (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hofmann, T., Schölkopf, B., Smola, A.J.: Kernel methods in machine learning. Ann. Stat. 36(3), 1171–1220 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Hurley, N., Zhang, M.: Novelty and diversity in top-n recommendation - analysis and evaluation. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. 10(4), 14:1–14:30 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Koren, Y., Bell, R.: Advances in collaborative filtering. In: Ricci, F., Rokach, L., Shapira, B., Kantor, P.B. (eds.) Recommender Systems Handbook, pp. 145–186. Springer, Boston, MA (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85820-3_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Kunaver, M., Porl, T.: Diversity in recommender systems a survey. Knowl.-Based Syst. 123(C), 154–162 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Masthoff, J.: Group recommender systems: combining individual models. In: Ricci, F., Rokach, L., Shapira, B., Kantor, P.B. (eds.) Recommender Systems Handbook, pp. 677–702. Springer, Boston, MA (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85820-3_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. McNee, S.M., Riedl, J., Konstan, J.A.: Being accurate is not enough: how accuracy metrics have hurt recommender systems. In: CHI Extended Abstracts, pp. 1097–1101. ACM (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Miller, T.: Explanation in artificial intelligence: insights from the social sciences. Artif. Intell. 267, 1–38 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Pu, P., Chen, L.: Trust-inspiring explanation interfaces for recommender systems. Knowl.-Based Syst. 20(6), 542–556 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tintarev, N., Masthoff, J.: A survey of explanations in recommender systems. In: ICDE Workshops, pp. 801–810. IEEE Computer Society (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tintarev, N., Masthoff, J.: Explaining recommendations: design and evaluation. In: Ricci, F., Rokach, L., Shapira, B. (eds.) Recommender Systems Handbook, pp. 353–382. Springer, Boston, MA (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7637-6_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Vargas, S.: Novelty and diversity enhancement and evaluation in recommender systems and information retrieval. In: SIGIR, p. 1281. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Vargas, S., Castells, P.: Rank and relevance in novelty and diversity metrics for recommender systems. In: RecSys, pp. 109–116. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Verdeaux, W., Moreau, C., Labroche, N., Marcel, P.: Causality based explanations in multi-stakeholder recommendations. In: EDBT/ICDT Workshops. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 2578. CEUR-WS.org (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Xia, P., Liu, B., Sun, Y., Chen, C.X.: Reciprocal recommendation system for online dating. In: ASONAM, pp. 234–241. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang, Y., Chen, X.: Explainable recommendation: a survey and new perspectives. Found. Trends Inf. Ret. 14(1), 1–101 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudio Pomo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Cornacchia, G., Donini, F.M., Narducci, F., Pomo, C., Ragone, A. (2021). Explanation in Multi-Stakeholder Recommendation for Enterprise Decision Support Systems. In: Polyvyanyy, A., Rinderle-Ma, S. (eds) Advanced Information Systems Engineering Workshops. CAiSE 2021. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 423. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79022-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79022-6_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-79021-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-79022-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics