Abstract
In the 1980s’ the Arctic was defined among others as a homeland of Indigenous peoples vis-à-vis a land for discovery, a storehouse of resource vis-à-vis a nature reserve, a military theater of the Cold War vis-à-vis a ‘Zone of Peace’. Indeed, the region was under a global nuclear war threat, the final destination of long-range pollution, and followed from this a special target for peace movements’ campaigns and environmental awakening. At the 2020s, the Arctic is with a wicked problem consisted of growing risks of climate change and environmental degradation due to global warming, pollution and collapse of biodiversity, as well as globalized due to growing interests by Arctic stakeholders and new actors from outside the region. Among new images, narratives and visions of the global Arctic are an environmental linchpin for, and a ‘climate archive’ of, the planet, and an exceptional ‘political space’ in world politics characterized by “high geopolitical stability and constructive cooperation”. This chapter draws up a holistic picture on a state of the post-Cold War Arctic, and the significant geopolitical changes behind and followed from the shift from the Cold War to the 2020s. It discusses and analyzes the changing dynamics of main themes / trends of Arctic geopolitics and governance, as well as common interests of the Arctic states and Indigenous peoples, and special Arctic features which made possible to restructure Arctic geopolitics and governance towards stability and cooperation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
ACIA. (2004). Impacts of a warming Arctic: Arctic climate impact assessment (ACIA Overview Report. Summary). Cambridge University Press.
AHDR. (2004). Arctic human development report 2004. Akureyri & Reykjavik, Iceland: Stefansson Arctic Institute.
AMAP. (1997). Arctic pollution issues: A state of the Arctic environment report. Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP): Oslo. https://www.amap.no/documents/doc/arctic-pollution-issues-a-state-of-the-arctic-environment-report/67.
Archer, C. (1989). Western responses to the Murmansk initiative. Defence Studies Centre, Centre Piece, 14.
Armstrong, T., Rogers, G., & Rowley, G. (1978). The circumpolar North. A political and economic geography of the Arctic and Sub-Arctic. Cambridge: Methuen & Ltd. London.
Doel, R. E. (2009). What’s the place of the physical environmental sciences in environmental history? Revue d’histoire modern et contemporaine [English language version], 56(4), 137–164.
Greenpeace. (1989). Nuclear Free Seas. (mimeo).
Heininen, L. (Ed.). (1990). Arctic environmental problems (Occasional Papers No. 41). Tampere: Tampere Peace Research Institute.
Heininen, L. (1992). The conflict of interests between the environment and military strategy in Northern waters and the Arctic. In J. Käkönen (Ed.), Perspectives on environmental conflict and international politics (pp. 55–71). London & New York: Pinter Publishers.
Heininen, L. (1999). Euroopan pohjoinen 1990-luvulla. Moniulotteisten ja ristiriitaisten intressien alue. In Acta Universitatis Lapponiensis 21 – Arctic Centre reports 30. Rovaniemi: Lapin yliopisto.
Heininen, L. (2004). Circumpolar international relations and geopolitics (AHDR (Arctic Human Development Report) 2004) (pp. 207–225). Akureyri: Stefansson Arctic Institute.
Heininen, L. (2018). “Arctic geopolitics from classical to critical approach – Importance of immaterial factors.” Geography, Environment, Sustainability, 11(1), 171–186. PEEX Special Issue. Ed. by S. Chalov. https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2018-11-1-1771-186
Heininen, L. (2020). Before climate change, ‘nuclear safety’ was there – A retrospective study and lessons-learned of changing security premises in the Arctic. In L. Heininen & H. Exner-Pirot (Eds.), Climate change and Arctic security. Searching for a paradigm shift (pp. 107–129). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan/Palgrave Pivot.
Heininen, L., & Exner-Pirot, H. (Eds.). (2020). Climate change and Arctic security. Searching for a paradigm shift. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, Palgrave Pivot.
Heininen, L., & Finger, M. (2017). The ‘Global Arctic’ as a new geopolitical context and method. Journal of Borderlands Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2017.1315605.
Heininen, L., Everett, K., Padrtova, B., & Reissell, A. (2019). Arctic policies and strategies – Analysis, synthesis, and trends. Helsinki: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) & Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland. https://doi.org/10.22022/AFI/11-2019.16175. http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/16175/.
Henrikson, A. (1975). The map as an “idea”: The role of cartographic imagery during the second world war. The American Cartographer, 2(1), 19–53.
Hettne, B. (1994). The new regionalism: Implications for development and peace. In Hettne B. – A. Inotoi: The new regionalism (pp. 1–49). Forssa: WIDER.
Hoogenson, G., & Hodgson, K. K. (2019). ‘Arctic exceptionalism’ or ‘comprehensive security’? Understanding security in the Arctic. In L. Heininen, H. Exner-Pirot, & Barnes (Eds.), The Arctic yearbook 2019 – “Redefining Arctic security” (pp. 218–230). Iceland: Thematic Network on Geopolitics and Security of University of the Arctic and Arctic Portal. On-line – http://www.arcticyearbook.com.
ICC. (2010). Inuit Arctic Policy. Inuit Circumpolar Council (ICC). https://iccalaska.org/wp-icc/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Inuit-Arctic-Policy-June02_FINAL.pdf
Ilulissat Declaration. (2008). Arctic Ocean Conference, Ilulissat, Greenland, 27–29 May 2008.
Irwin, A. (1993). Arctic benefits of cold war thaw. The Time Higher.
Keil, K., & Knecht, S. (Eds.). (2017). Governing Arctic change. Global perspectives. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Konyshev, V., & Sergunin, A. (2014). Is Russia a revisionist military power in the Arctic? Defense & Security Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1080/14751798.2014.948276.
Luzczuk, M. (2016). Military cooperation and enhanced Arctic security in the context of climate change and growing global interest in the Arctic. In L. Heininen (Ed.), Future security of the global Arctic: State policy, economic security and climate (p. 3554). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mitrany, D. (1966). A working peace system. Chicago.
Newsweek, March 17, 2017.
Ottawa Declaration. (1996). On the Establishment of the Arctic Council, September 19, 1996, Ottawa, Canada. (mimeo).
Palosaari, T. (2019). The Arctic paradox (and how to solve it.) oil, gas and climate ethics in the Arctic. In M. Finger & L. Heininen (Eds.), The global Arctic handbook (pp. 141–152). Cham: Springer. Online: https://www.springer.com/gb/book/9783319919942.
Pravda. (1987). Speech by Mikhail Gorbachev at a formal meeting in Murmansk on October 1, 1987. No. 138, October 5, 1987.
President of the Russian Federation. (2020). Basics of the State policy of the Russian Federation in the Arctic for the Period till 2035. Approved by the Decree of the President (No. 164), March 5, 2020. (unofficial translation) (mimeo).
Soroos, M. S. (1990). Arctic Haze: A case study in regime formation. Prepared for the Arctic Cooperation Project directed by G. Osherenko and O. Young, Dartmouth College. August. (mimeo).
Southcott, C. (2010). History of globalization in the circumpolar world. In L. Heininen & C. Southcott (Eds.), Globalization and the circumpolar north (pp. 23–55). Fairbanks: University of Alaska Press.
Steinberg, P. E., Tasch, J., Gerhardt, H., Keul, A., & Nyman, A. E. (2015). Contesting the Arctic. Politics and imaginaries in the circumpolar North. London: I.B. Tauris Publishers.
The Fairbanks Declaration. (2017). On the occasion of the tenth ministerial meeting of the Arctic Council. https://oaarchive.arctic-council.org/handle/11374/1910
The GlobalArctic Project. (2014). (mimeo).
The Reykjavik Declaration. (2021). On the occasion of the twelfth ministerial meeting of the Arctic Council. https://oaarchive.arctic-council.org/bitstream/handle/11374/2600/2021%20Reykjavik%20Declaration%2020-5-2021.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
The Rovaniemi Joint Ministerial Statement. (2019). Arctic Council. https://arctic-council.org/images/PDF_attachments/Rovaniemi_Joint_Ministerial_Statement_2019_Signed.pdf
The Sámi Arctic Strategy. (2019). The Sámi Arctic strategy/Sami Arktalas Aigumusat/Samisk Strategi for Arktiske saker. Securing enduring influence for the Sami people in the Arctic through partnerships, education and advocacy. Saami Council, September 2019. http://www.saamicouncil.net/fileadmin/user_upload/Documents/Eara_dokumeanttat/FINAL_Saami-Arctic-Strategy_with_attachment.pdf
Young, O. (1992). Arctic politics. Conflict and cooperation in the circumpolar North. University Hanover, NH: Press of New England.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Heininen, L. (2022). The Post-Cold War Arctic. In: Finger, M., Rekvig, G. (eds) Global Arctic. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81253-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81253-9_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-81252-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-81253-9
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)