Skip to main content

The Gender Inequality Index Through the Prism of Social Innovation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Modern Indices for International Economic Diplomacy

Abstract

Gender equality is a central issue of the global agenda. Initially included as one of the main goals of the Millennium Development Summit in 2000 and now championed as a fundamental human right in the 2016 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), gender equality has a direct beneficial effect on the economic status of women, a reason in itself to achieve gender parity. Additionally, gender equality is believed to empower women and contribute to overall economic growth and development (World Bank, 2012).

To track progress towards the goal of gender equality, the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) developed the Gender Inequality Index (GII) in 2010. The GII measures gender inequalities through five indicators across three important aspects of human development: reproductive health, empowerment and economic status. To better depict differences in the distribution of achievements between women and men, the GII is built on the same framework as the Human Development Index. Thus, the GII measures the human development costs of gender inequality.

The GII informs action at local, national and international levels. Disaggregation of the GII into its sub-components allows public, private and non-profit bodies to take concrete steps and channel resources to improve the situation of women. In this chapter, we highlight the special role of social innovation in tackling the issue of gender inequality. For each sub-component of the GII, examples are given that illustrate to power of social innovation to reduce gender inequalities through three mechanisms: (1) resources, (2) attitudes, and (3) power. These mechanisms are sometimes formed through the bottom-up approaches of individual entrepreneurs. Other times, changes to long-standing gender biases rely on the coordinated actions of international donor agencies and local NGOs or national initiatives that fundamentally change institutional structures. In short, we observe that a litany of approaches is required from both practitioners and policy-makers to achieve the 2030 SDG goal of gender equality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aakar. (2019). Aakar website. Retrieved September 4, 2019, from https://aakarinnovations.com/

  • Andersson, N., Paredes-Solís, S., & Milne, D. (2012). Prevalence and risk factors for forced or coerced sex among school-going youth: National cross-sectional studies in 10 southern African countries in 2003 and 2007. British Medical Journal Open, 2(2), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardhan, K., & Klasen, S. (1999). UNDP’s gender-related indices: A critical review. World Development, 27(6), 985–1010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardhan, K., & Klasen, S. (2000). On UNDP’s revisions to the Gender-Related Development Index. Journal of Human Development, 1(2), 191–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benería, L., & Permanyer, I. (2010). The measurement of socio-economic gender inequality revisited. Development and Change, 41(3), 375–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanc, A. K., Tsui, A. O., Croft, T. N., & Trevitt, J. L. (2009). Patterns and trends in adolescents’ contraceptive use and discontinuation in developing countries and comparisons with adult women. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 35(2), 63–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cann, O. (2018, December 18). 108 years: Wait for gender equality gets longer as women’s share of workforce, politics drops. World Economic Forum. Retrieved September 4, 2019, from https://www.weforum.org/press/2018/12/108-years-wait-for-gender-equality-gets-longer-as-women-s-share-of-workforce-politics-drops/

  • Carius, A., Ivleva, D., Pohl, B., Ruttinger, L., Schaller, S., Tanszler, D., & Vivekananda. (2018). A foreign policy perspective on the SDGs: Climate diplomacy brief. Retrieved September 11, 2019, from https://www.adelphi.de/en/publication/foreign-policy-perspective-sustainable-development-goals

  • Concern Worldwide. (2016). Essential Newborn Care Corps: Evaluation of program to rebrand traditional birth attendants as health promoters in Sierra Leone. Concern Worldwide. Retrieved September 4, 2019, from https://www.concern.net/insights/essential-newborn-care-corps

  • Dasra, Kiawah Trust, & USAID. (2014). Spot on! Improving menstrual health and hygiene in India. Retrieved September 4, 2019, from https://www.dasra.org/resource/improving-menstrual-health-and-hygiene

  • Dijkstra, A. G. (2002). Revisiting UNDP’s GDI and GEM: Towards an alternative. Social Indicators Research, 57(3), 301–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, A. G. (2006). Towards a fresh start in measuring gender equality: A contribution to the debate. Journal of Human Development, 7(2), 275–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, A. G., & Hanmer, L. C. (2000). Measuring socio-economic gender inequality: Toward an alternative to the UNDP Gender-Related Development Index. Feminist Economics, 6(2), 41–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duflo, E. (2012). Women empowerment and economic development. Journal of Economic Literature, 50(4), 1051–1079.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duhaček, D., Brankovic, B., & Mirazic, M. (2019). Women’s rights in Western Balkans. European Parliament. Retrieved September 4, 2019, from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2019/608852/IPOL_STU(2019)608852_EN.pdf

  • Gaye, A., Klugman, J., Kovacevic, M., Twigg, S., & Zambrano, E. (2010). Measuring key disparities in human development: The gender inequality index. Human Development Research Paper 2010/46. United Nations Development Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glowork. (2019). Glowork website. Retrieved September 4, 2019, from https://www.glowork.net/

  • Gómez, A. M., Speizer, I. S., Reynolds, H., Murray, N., & Beauvais, H. (2008). Age differences at sexual debut and subsequent reproductive health: Is there a link? Reproductive Health, 5(1), 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzales, C., Jain-Chandra, S., Kochhar, K., Newiak, M., & Zeinullayev, T. (2015). Catalyst for change: Empowering women and tackling income inequality. IMF Staff Discussion Note, SDN 15/20. IMF.

    Google Scholar 

  • iRelaunch. (2019). iRelaunch website. Retrieved September 4, 2019, from https://www.irelaunch.com/

  • Klasen, S. (2006). UNDP’s gender-related measures: Some conceptual problems and possible solutions. Journal of Human Development, 7(2), 243–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klasen, S., & Schüler, D. (2011). Reforming the gender-related index and the gender empowerment measure: Implementing some specific proposals. Feminist Economics, 17(1), 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilyanova, V. (2018). Women in the Western Balkans: Gender equality in the EU accession process. European Parliamentary Research Service. Retrieved September 4, 2019, from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=EPRS_BRI(2018)625139

  • Mason, H. (2016, May 26). Making strides to improve maternal health in Sierra Leone. UNICEF Newsline. Retrieved September 4, 2019, from https://www.unicef.org/infobycountry/sierraleone_91206.html

  • Moore, M. L., Tjornbo, O., Enfors, E., Knapp, C., Hodbod, J., Baggio, J. A., Norstrom, A., Olsson, P., & Biggs, D. (2014). Studying the complexity of change: Toward an analytical framework for understanding deliberate social-ecological transformations. Ecology and Society, 19(4), 54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, N., Winfrey, W., Chatterji, M., Moreland, S., Dougherty, L., & Okonofua, F. (2006). Factors related to induced abortion among young women in Edo State, Nigeria. Studies in Family Planning, 37(4), 251–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, A., & Murdock, A. (Eds.). (2012). Social innovation: Blurring boundaries to reconfigure markets. Palgrave Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230367098

  • OECD. (2019). SIGI 2019 global report: Transforming challenges into opportunities, social institutions and gender index. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/bc56d212-en

  • Permanyer, I. (2013). A critical assessment of the UNDP’s gender inequality index. Feminist Economics, 19(2), 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phills, J. A., Deiglmeier, K., & Miller, D. T. (2008). Rediscovering social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 6(4), 34–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saner, R., & Yiu, L. (2003). International economic diplomacy: Mutations in post-modern times. Discussion Papers in Diplomacy, 84, 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santhya, K. G., Ram, U., Acharya, R., Jejeebhoy, S. J., Ram, F., & Singh, A. (2010). Associations between early marriage and young women’s marital and reproductive health outcomes: Evidence from India. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 36(3), 132–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schüler, D. (2006). The uses and misuses of the Gender-Related Development Index and Gender Empowerment Measure: A review of the literature. Journal of Human Development, 7(2), 161–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommer, M. (2010). Where the education system and women’s bodies collide: The social and health impact of girls’ experiences of menstruation and schooling in Tanzania. Journal of Adolescence, 33(4), 521–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, Y., & Ji, C.-Y. (2010). Sexual intercourse and high-risk sexual behaviours among a national sample of urban adolescents in China. Journal of Public Health, 32(3), 312–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C. (2017). A life of its own an assessment of the 16 days of activism against gender-based violence campaign. Center for Women’s Global Leadership. Retrieved September 4, 2019, from https://16dayscampaign.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/16-Days-Campaign-Assessment.pdf

  • UN General Assembly. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015. A/RES/70/1. United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. (2014). World investment report 2014: Investing in the SDGs: An action plan. Retrieved September 9, 2019, from https://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/wir2014_en.pdf

  • UNDP. (2014). Promoting gender equality in electoral assistance: Lessons learned in comparative perspective: Country report for Bolivia. Retrieved September 4, 2019, from https://www.undp.org/content/dam/undp/library/Democratic%20Governance/Electoral%20Systems%20and%20Processes/2122-UNDP-GE-bolivia.pdf

  • UNDP. (2019). Gender Inequality Index (GII). Retrieved September 4, 2019, from http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/gender-inequality-index-gii

  • UNESCO. (2014). Puberty education & menstrual hygiene management. Good Policy and Practice in Health Education Booklet 9. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Retrieved September 4, 2019, from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000226792

  • UNICEF. (2008). Progress for children: A report card on maternal mortality. United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Staveren, I. (2013). To measure is to know? A comparative analysis of gender indices. Review of Social Economy, 71(3), 339–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Wijk, J., Zietsma, C., Dorado, S., de Bakker, F. G., & Martí, I. (2019). Social innovation: Integrating micro, meso, and macro level insights from institutional theory. Business & Society, 58(5), 887–918.

    Google Scholar 

  • WEF. (2018). The global gender gap report 2018. World Economic Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2012). World development report 2012: Gender equality and development. World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2019). World Bank country and lending groups. Retrieved September 12, 2019, from https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519-world-bank-country-and-lending-groups

  • Young, F. (2016, November 17). The slow road to progress: Why is Sierra Leone’s maternal mortality rate so high? Financial Times. Retrieved September 4, 2019, from https://www.ft.com/content/8205b21e-7b44-11e6-ae24-f193b105145e

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick Reichert .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Reichert, P., Farber, V. (2022). The Gender Inequality Index Through the Prism of Social Innovation. In: Charles, V., Emrouznejad, A. (eds) Modern Indices for International Economic Diplomacy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84535-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84535-3_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-84534-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-84535-3

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics