Abstract
Proactive government is a promising approach to user-friendly public services. By acting proactively instead of reacting, governments reduce the interaction effort of a public service for the user and, in doing so, increase its user-friendliness. However, implementing such proactive services in practice is challenging and requires the redesign of the according processes. For example, the data that currently is provided by the user, now has to be collected by someone else. The goal of this paper is to identify reoccurring challenges in the redesign of processes for proactive public services and to develop strategies to overcome them. We analyse business processes from nine public services and conduct ten expert interviews with practitioners. We synthesis the reoccurring challenges into three implementation dimensions and present three implementation strategies. The implementation dimensions inform the feasibility of proactive services in practice and the strategies can be used by practitioners to streamline their efforts to provide user-friendly public services.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Jansen, A., Ølnes, S.: The nature of public e-services and their quality dimensions. Gov. Inf. Q. 33, 647–657 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.08.005
European Council: Tallinn Ministerial Declaration on eGovernment. https://ec.europa.eu/cefdigital/wiki/cefdigital/wiki/display/CEFDIGITAL/2017/10/12/Tallinn+Ministerial+Declaration+on+eGovernment
Scholta, H., Mertens, W., Kowalkiewicz, M., Becker, J.: From one-stop shop to no-stop shop: an e-government stage model. Gov. Inf. Q. 36, 11–26 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.11.010
e-Estonia Briefing Centre: All Estonian public e-services to function “invisibly”. https://e-estonia.com/all-estonian-public-e-services-to-function-invisibly/. Accessed 16 Mar 2020
Linders, D., Liao, C.Z.-P., Wang, C.-M.: Proactive e-Governance: flipping the service delivery model from pull to push in Taiwan. Gov. Inf. Q. 35, 68–76 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.08.004
Brüggemeier, M.: Auf dem Weg zur No-Stop-Verwaltung. Verwaltung Manage. 16, 93–101 (2010). https://doi.org/10.5771/0947-9856-2010-2-93
Bundeskanzleramt Österreich: Antragslose Familienbeihilfe bei Geburt eines Kindes: Frauen, Familien und Jugend im Bundeskanzleramt. https://www.frauen-familien-jugend.bka.gv.at/familie/finanzielle-unterstuetzungen/familienbeihilfe0/antrag-familienbeihilfe.html. Accessed 16 Feb 2021
Kuhn, P., Balta, D.: Service quality through government proactivity: the concept of non-interaction. In: Viale Pereira, G., et al. (eds.) EGOV 2020. LNCS, vol. 12219, pp. 82–95. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57599-1_7
Scholta, H., Lindgren, I.: The long and winding road of digital public services—one next step: proactivity. In: ICIS 2019 Proceedings (2019)
Kuhn, P., Balta, D., Krcmar, H.: Was sind Herausforderungen proaktiver Verwaltungsleistungen in Deutschland? In: Wirtschaftsinformatik 2020 Proceedings (2020)
Sirendi, R., Taveter, K.: Bringing service design thinking into the public sector to create proactive and user-friendly public services. In: Nah, F.-H.-H., Tan, C.-H. (eds.) HCIBGO 2016. LNCS, vol. 9752, pp. 221–230. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39399-5_21
Schuppan, T., Koehl, S.: One stop government: stalled vision or a matter of design? – empirical findings from social services in Germany. In: Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2017 (HICSS-50) (2017)
Vestues, K., Mikalsen, M., Monteiro, E.: Using digital platforms to promote a service-oriented logic in public sector organizations: a case study. Presented at the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2021). https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2021.269
Hughes, M.: Business Process Redesign in Implementing E-Governement in Ireland. Presented at the January 1 (2006). https://doi.org/10.4018/9781591407898.ch022
Niehaves, B., Plattfaut, R., Becker, J.: Business process management capabilities in local governments: a multi-method study. Gov. Inf. Q. 30, 217–225 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.03.002
Jurisch, M.C., Ikas, C., Wolf, P., Krcmar, H.: Key differences of private and public sector business process change. e-Service J. 9, 3–27 (2013). https://doi.org/10.2979/eservicej.9.1.3
Krcmar, H. (ed.) Informationsmanagement, pp. 85–111. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45863-1_4
Christin Jurisch, M., Palka, W., Wolf, P., Krcmar, H.: Which capabilities matter for successful business process change? Bus. Process Manage. J. 20, 47–67 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-11-2012-0125
Hammer, M., Champy, J.: Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution. HarperBusiness, New York (1993)
Olbrich, S., Simon, C.: Process Modelling towards e-Government–Visualisation and Semantic Modelling of Legal Regulations as Executable Process Sets (2008)
Kasemsap, K.: The roles of business process modeling and business process reengineering in E-government. In: Handbook of Research on Innovations in Information Retrieval, Analysis, and Management, pp. 401–430. IGI Global (2015). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8833-9.ch015
Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in information systems research. Manage. Inf. Syst. Q. 28, 75 (2004)
Boell, S., Cecez-Kecmanovic, D.: A hermeneutic approach for conducting literature reviews and literature searches. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 34 (2014). https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.03412
FITKO (Föderale IT-Kooperation): Föderales Informationsmanagement (FIM). https://fimportal.de/. Accessed 25 May 2021
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kuhn, P., Buchinger, M., Balta, D. (2021). How to Redesign Government Processes for Proactive Public Services?. In: Scholl, H.J., Gil-Garcia, J.R., Janssen, M., Kalampokis, E., Lindgren, I., Rodríguez Bolívar, M.P. (eds) Electronic Government. EGOV 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12850. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84789-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84789-0_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-84788-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-84789-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)