Skip to main content

How to Redesign Government Processes for Proactive Public Services?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Electronic Government (EGOV 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12850))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Proactive government is a promising approach to user-friendly public services. By acting proactively instead of reacting, governments reduce the interaction effort of a public service for the user and, in doing so, increase its user-friendliness. However, implementing such proactive services in practice is challenging and requires the redesign of the according processes. For example, the data that currently is provided by the user, now has to be collected by someone else. The goal of this paper is to identify reoccurring challenges in the redesign of processes for proactive public services and to develop strategies to overcome them. We analyse business processes from nine public services and conduct ten expert interviews with practitioners. We synthesis the reoccurring challenges into three implementation dimensions and present three implementation strategies. The implementation dimensions inform the feasibility of proactive services in practice and the strategies can be used by practitioners to streamline their efforts to provide user-friendly public services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Jansen, A., Ølnes, S.: The nature of public e-services and their quality dimensions. Gov. Inf. Q. 33, 647–657 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.08.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. European Council: Tallinn Ministerial Declaration on eGovernment. https://ec.europa.eu/cefdigital/wiki/cefdigital/wiki/display/CEFDIGITAL/2017/10/12/Tallinn+Ministerial+Declaration+on+eGovernment

  3. Scholta, H., Mertens, W., Kowalkiewicz, M., Becker, J.: From one-stop shop to no-stop shop: an e-government stage model. Gov. Inf. Q. 36, 11–26 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.11.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. e-Estonia Briefing Centre: All Estonian public e-services to function “invisibly”. https://e-estonia.com/all-estonian-public-e-services-to-function-invisibly/. Accessed 16 Mar 2020

  5. Linders, D., Liao, C.Z.-P., Wang, C.-M.: Proactive e-Governance: flipping the service delivery model from pull to push in Taiwan. Gov. Inf. Q. 35, 68–76 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.08.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brüggemeier, M.: Auf dem Weg zur No-Stop-Verwaltung. Verwaltung Manage. 16, 93–101 (2010). https://doi.org/10.5771/0947-9856-2010-2-93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bundeskanzleramt Österreich: Antragslose Familienbeihilfe bei Geburt eines Kindes: Frauen, Familien und Jugend im Bundeskanzleramt. https://www.frauen-familien-jugend.bka.gv.at/familie/finanzielle-unterstuetzungen/familienbeihilfe0/antrag-familienbeihilfe.html. Accessed 16 Feb 2021

  8. Kuhn, P., Balta, D.: Service quality through government proactivity: the concept of non-interaction. In: Viale Pereira, G., et al. (eds.) EGOV 2020. LNCS, vol. 12219, pp. 82–95. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57599-1_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Scholta, H., Lindgren, I.: The long and winding road of digital public services—one next step: proactivity. In: ICIS 2019 Proceedings (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kuhn, P., Balta, D., Krcmar, H.: Was sind Herausforderungen proaktiver Verwaltungsleistungen in Deutschland? In: Wirtschaftsinformatik 2020 Proceedings (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sirendi, R., Taveter, K.: Bringing service design thinking into the public sector to create proactive and user-friendly public services. In: Nah, F.-H.-H., Tan, C.-H. (eds.) HCIBGO 2016. LNCS, vol. 9752, pp. 221–230. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39399-5_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Schuppan, T., Koehl, S.: One stop government: stalled vision or a matter of design? – empirical findings from social services in Germany. In: Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2017 (HICSS-50) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vestues, K., Mikalsen, M., Monteiro, E.: Using digital platforms to promote a service-oriented logic in public sector organizations: a case study. Presented at the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2021). https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2021.269

  14. Hughes, M.: Business Process Redesign in Implementing E-Governement in Ireland. Presented at the January 1 (2006). https://doi.org/10.4018/9781591407898.ch022

  15. Niehaves, B., Plattfaut, R., Becker, J.: Business process management capabilities in local governments: a multi-method study. Gov. Inf. Q. 30, 217–225 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jurisch, M.C., Ikas, C., Wolf, P., Krcmar, H.: Key differences of private and public sector business process change. e-Service J. 9, 3–27 (2013). https://doi.org/10.2979/eservicej.9.1.3

  17. Krcmar, H. (ed.) Informationsmanagement, pp. 85–111. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45863-1_4

  18. Christin Jurisch, M., Palka, W., Wolf, P., Krcmar, H.: Which capabilities matter for successful business process change? Bus. Process Manage. J. 20, 47–67 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-11-2012-0125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hammer, M., Champy, J.: Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution. HarperBusiness, New York (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Olbrich, S., Simon, C.: Process Modelling towards e-Government–Visualisation and Semantic Modelling of Legal Regulations as Executable Process Sets (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kasemsap, K.: The roles of business process modeling and business process reengineering in E-government. In: Handbook of Research on Innovations in Information Retrieval, Analysis, and Management, pp. 401–430. IGI Global (2015). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8833-9.ch015

  22. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in information systems research. Manage. Inf. Syst. Q. 28, 75 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Boell, S., Cecez-Kecmanovic, D.: A hermeneutic approach for conducting literature reviews and literature searches. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 34 (2014). https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.03412

  24. FITKO (Föderale IT-Kooperation): Föderales Informationsmanagement (FIM). https://fimportal.de/. Accessed 25 May 2021

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Kuhn .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kuhn, P., Buchinger, M., Balta, D. (2021). How to Redesign Government Processes for Proactive Public Services?. In: Scholl, H.J., Gil-Garcia, J.R., Janssen, M., Kalampokis, E., Lindgren, I., Rodríguez Bolívar, M.P. (eds) Electronic Government. EGOV 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12850. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84789-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84789-0_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-84788-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-84789-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics