Skip to main content

Improved Graph Methods for Table Layout Understanding

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Document Analysis and Recognition – ICDAR 2021 (ICDAR 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 12822))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Recently, there have been significant advances in document layout analysis and, particularly, in the recognition and understanding of tables and other structured documents in handwritten historical texts. In this work, a series of improvements over current techniques based on graph neural networks are proposed, which considerably improve state-of-the-art results. In addition, a two-pass approach is also proposed where two graph neural networks are sequentially used to provide further substantial improvements of more than 12 F-measure points in some tasks. The code developed for this work will be published to facilitate the reproduction of the results and possible improvements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://github.com/JoseRPrietoF/TableUnderstanding_ICDAR21

References

  1. Adiga, D., Bhat, S., Shah, M., Vyeth, V.: Table structure recognition based on cell relationship, a bottom-up approach. In: International Conference Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, (RANLP 2019), pp. 1–8 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Agarwal, M., Mondal, A., Jawahar, C.V.: CDeC-net: composite deformable cascade network for table detection in document images. arXiv, pp. 9491–9498 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ares Oliveira, S., Seguin, B., Kaplan, F.: DhSegment: a generic deep-learning approach for document segmentation. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition, ICFHR, pp. 7–12 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Clinchant, S., Dejean, H., Meunier, J.L., Lang, E.M., Kleber, F.: Comparing machine learning approaches for table recognition in historical register books. In: Proceedings - 13th IAPR International Workshop on Document Analysis Systems, DAS 2018, pp. 133–138 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dejean, H., Meunier, J.L.: Table rows segmentation. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, ICDAR, pp. 461–466 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gao, L., et al.: ICDAR 2019 competition on table detection and recognition (cTDaR). In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, ICDAR, pp. 1510–1515 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gilani, A., Qasim, S.R., Malik, I., Shafait, F.: Table detection using deep learning. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, ICDAR 1, pp. 771–776 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Glorot, X., Bengio, Y.: Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 9, 249–256 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Grüning, T., Leifert, G., Strauß, T., Michael, J., Labahn, R.: A two-stage method for text line detection in historical documents. Int. J. Doc. Anal. Recogn. 22(3), 285–302 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kingma, D.P., Ba, J.L.: Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. In: 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2015 - Conference Track Proceedings (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Paliwal, S.S., Vishwanath, D., Rahul, R., Sharma, M., Vig, L.: TableNet: deep learning model for end-to-end table detection and tabular data extraction from scanned document images. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, ICDAR, pp. 128–133 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Prasad, A., Dejean, H., Meunier, J.L.: Versatile layout understanding via conjugate graph. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, ICDAR, pp. 287–294 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Prieto, J.R., Bosch, V., Vidal, E., Stutzmann, D., Hamel, S.: Text content based layout analysis. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition, ICFHR, pp. 258–263 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Qasim, S.R., Mahmood, H., Shafait, F.: Rethinking table recognition using graph neural networks. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, ICDAR, pp. 142–147 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Quirós, L.: Multi-task handwritten document layout analysis, pp. 1–23 (2018). http://arxiv.org/abs/1806.08852

  16. Riba, P., Dutta, A., Goldmann, L., Fornes, A., Ramos, O., Llados, J.: Table detection in invoice documents by graph neural networks. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, ICDAR, pp. 122–127 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Siddiqui, S.A., Fateh, I.A., Rizvi, S.T.R., Dengel, A., Ahmed, S.: DeepTabStR: deep learning based table structure recognition. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, ICDAR, pp. 1403–1409 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tensmeyer, C., Morariu, V.I., Price, B., Cohen, S., Martinez, T.: Deep splitting and merging for table structure decomposition. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, ICDAR, pp. 114–121 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wang, Y., Sun, Y., Liu, Z., Sarma, S.E., Bronstein, M.M., Solomon, J.M.: Dynamic graph CNN for learning on point clouds. ACM Trans. Graph. 38(5) (2019). Article 146. https://doi.org/10.1145/3326362

  20. Zhang, M., Chen, Y.: Link prediction based on graph neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, NeurIPS, pp. 5171–5181. Curran Associates Inc., Montreal (2018). https://doi.org/10.5555/3327345.3327423

Download references

Acknowledgments

Work partially supported by the Universitat Politècnica de València under grant FPI-I/SP20190010 (Spain). Work partially supported by the BBVA Foundation through the 2018–2019 Digital Humanities research grant “HistWeather – Dos Siglos de Datos Climáticos” and also supported by the Generalitat Valenciana under the EU- FEDER Comunitat Valenciana 2014–2020 grant ”Sistemas de fabricación inteligente para la industria 4.0”, by Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades project DocTIUM (Ref. RTI2018-095645-B-C22) and by Generalitat Valenciana under project DeepPattern (PROMETEO/2019/121)

Computing resources were provided by the EU-FEDER Comunitat Valenciana 2014–2020 grant IDIFEDER/2018/025.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jose Ramón Prieto .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Prieto, J.R., Vidal, E. (2021). Improved Graph Methods for Table Layout Understanding. In: Lladós, J., Lopresti, D., Uchida, S. (eds) Document Analysis and Recognition – ICDAR 2021. ICDAR 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12822. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86331-9_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86331-9_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-86330-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-86331-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics