Abstract
The acquisition of a business software solution is a very strategic project for companies. It is a process that involves many stakeholders, internal and external ones, and last for a couple months. The aim of our study is to develop a decision support tool for the evaluation of different Manufacturing Execution System (MES) solution alternatives for a company operating in the steel industry. The tool is based on a Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) method called PAPRIKA. The competing solutions/suppliers were evaluated based on criteria related to the different solution functionalities, market references, Industry Expertise, Ease of Use and Ease of Integration. In order to make the process much convenient for the company subject to our case study, we used a software solution that implemented PAPRIKA. The ranking of the different competing solutions was provided and different criteria weights were calculated. Moreover, the performance of each solution against each criterion has also been demonstrated.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
References
Akabane, G.K., Souza, C.P., Paulo, S., Marins, F.A.S.: Contributions of MES (Manufacturing Execution System) to improve manufacturing competitive priorities. Indep. J. Manag. Prod. 6(10) (2015). https://doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v6i2.233
Arica, E., Powell, D.J.: Status and future of manufacturing execution systems. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), Singapore, pp. 2000–2004. IEEE (2017)
Bhole, G.P.: Multi criteria decision making (MCDM) methods and its applications. IJRASET 6, 899–915 (2018). https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2018.5145
Chen, K.Y.: Performance measurement of implementing manufacturing execution system. In: Materials Science Forum, vol. 505–507, pp. 1117–1122 (2006)
Franzosa, R.: Magic quadrant for manufacturing execution systems. 35 (2017). https://www.gartner.com/en/documents/3833664/magic-quadrant-for-manufacturing-execution-systems
Hansen, P., Ombler, F.: A new method for scoring additive multi-attribute value models using pairwise rankings of alternatives. J. Multi-Crit. Decis. Anal. 15, 87–107 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.428
Kolios, A., Mytilinou, V., Lozano-Minguez, E., Salonitis, K.: A comparative study of multiple-criteria decision-making methods under stochastic inputs. Energies 9, 566 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3390/en9070566
Mahmoud, M.I., Ammar, H.H., Hamdy, M.M., Eissa, M.H.: Production operation management using manufacturing execution systems (MES). In: 2015 11th International Computer Engineering Conference (ICENCO), Cairo, Egypt, pp. 111–116. IEEE (2015)
Mustajoki, J., Marttunen, M.: Comparison of multi-criteria decision analytical software for supporting environmental planning processes, Environ. Model. Softw. 93, 78–91 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.02.026
Ratkevicius, D., Ratkevicius, C., Skyrius, R.: ERP selection criteria: Theoretical and practical views. Ekonomika 91, 20 (2012). https://doi.org/10.15388/Ekon.2012.0.893
Rosner, D., Meyuhas, A.: The Best MES Selection Process & Benchmark Survey for a Semiconductor Fab Case Study. 4 (2012)
Senvar, O., Tuzkaya, G., Kahraman, C.: Multi criteria supplier selection using fuzzy PROMETHEE method. In: Kahraman, C., Öztayşi, B. (eds.) Supply Chain Management Under Fuzziness. SFSC, vol. 313, pp. 21–34. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53939-8_2
Teknomo, K.: Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Tutorial (2006). https://people.revoledu.com/kardi/tutorial/AHP
Thokala, P., et al.: Multiple criteria decision analysis for health care decision making—an introduction: report 1 of the ISPOR MCDA emerging good practices task force. Value Health 19, 1–13 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2015.12.003
Velasquez, M., Hester, P.T.: An analysis of multi-criteria decision-making methods. Int. J. Oper. Res. 10, 56–66 (2013)
Wang, Q.F., Hong, C.Y.: MES system selection decision-making approach for automobile parts manufacturing enterprises. AMR 108–111, 736–740 (2010). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.108-111.736
Yücel, M.G., Görener, A.: Decision Making for Company Acquisition by ELECTRE Method (2016). http://excelingtech.co.uk/
Zhaoxu, S., Min, H.: Multi-criteria decision making based on PROMETHEE method. In: 2010 International Conference on Computing, Control and Industrial Engineering, Wuhan, China, pp. 416–418. IEEE (2010)
Introduction to multiple attribute decision-making (MADM) methods. In: Decision Making in the Manufacturing Environment. SSAM, pp. 27–41. Springer, London (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-819-7_3
https://www.cgi.com/en/manufacturing/manufacturing-execution-systems
Sevkli, M.: An application of the fuzzy ELECTRE method for supplier selection. Int. J. Prod. Res. 48, 3393–3405 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540902814355
Acknowledgment
The author would like to express his deep gratitude to Mr. Paul Hansen and all 1000minds.com team for their support and assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Aramja, A., Kamach, O. (2022). Decision Support Tool for Manufacturing Execution Systems: Case Study from the Steel Industry. In: Kacprzyk, J., Balas, V.E., Ezziyyani, M. (eds) Advanced Intelligent Systems for Sustainable Development (AI2SD’2020). AI2SD 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1417. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90633-7_35
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90633-7_35
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-90632-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-90633-7
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)