Skip to main content

Communications for Complex Systems Governance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Complex System Governance

Part of the book series: Topics in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality ((TSRQ,volume 40))

  • 515 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter will expose the role, nature, and definitions associated with the Communication Mechanisms related to Complex System Governance (CSG). The need and utilization of CSG have been identified and explained in the previous chapters; however, the purpose and role of the Communication Mechanisms will be addressed here. The exploration of the Communication Mechanisms will start with the conceptual foundation of Communications and move on to the nature, structure, and interactions of Communication Mechanisms with influences. This understanding of the conceptual and practical basis will then be followed for the practitioner with vignettes and scenarios to demonstrate the importance of Communications Mechanisms, how to interpret limitations on understanding of their function and the complexities that they attempt to model. Finally, there will be several exercises that can be used to enable the practitioner to identify missing mechanisms or make improvements to current practices in their organization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Jackson MC (2003) Systems thinking: creative holism for managers. Wiley, Chichester, p 378

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication, part 2. Bell Syst Tech J 27(4):623–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Katz E (1957) The two-step flow of communication: an up-to-date report on an hypothesis. Public Opinion Q 21(1):61–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ackoff RL (1958) Towards a behavioral theory of communication. Manage Sci 4(3):218–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hage J, Aiken M, Marrett CB (1971) Organization structure and communications. Am Sociol Rev 860–871

    Google Scholar 

  6. Baskin O, Bruno SJ (1977) A transactional systems model of communication: implications for transactional analysis. J Bus Commun 15(1):65–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dervin (1993) Verbing communication: mandate for disciplinary invention

    Google Scholar 

  8. Losee R (1999) Communication defined as complementary informative processes. J Inf, Commun Library Sci 5(3):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  9. Craig RT (1999) Communication theory as a field. Commun Theory 9(2):119–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Keating CB, Katina PF, Bradley JM (2014) Complex system governance: concept, challenges, and emerging research. Int J Syst Syst Eng 5(3):263–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Beer S (1979) The heart of enterprise, vol 2. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  12. Keating CB (2015) Complex system governance: theory to practice challenges for system of systems engineering. In: 2015 10th system of systems engineering conference (SoSE). IEEE, pp 226–231

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nyström CA (2006) Design rules for intranets according to the viable system model. Systemic Pract Action Res 19(6):523–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Keating CB, Katina PF, Bradley JM (2015) Challenges for developing complex system governance. In: IIE annual conference. proceedings. Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers (IISE), p 2943

    Google Scholar 

  15. Beer S (1981) Brain of the firm

    Google Scholar 

  16. Beer S (1984) The viable system model: its provenance, development, methodology and pathology. J Oper Res Soc 7–25

    Google Scholar 

  17. Espejo R, Harnden R (eds) (1989) The viable system model: interpretations and applications of Stafford Beer’s VSM. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  18. Flood RL, Jackson MC (1991) Creative problem solving: total systems intervention, vol 831397533. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  19. Keating CB (2000) A systems-based methodology for structural analysis of health care operations. J Manage Med 14(3/4):179–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Beer S (1985) Diagnosing the System for Organizations. Oxford: England: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  21. Keating CB, Morin M (2001) An approach for systems analysis of patient care operations. J Nurs Adm 31(7/8):355–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wiener N (1949) Cybernetics. Philos Sci 16(2)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Beer S (1966) Decision and control: the meaning of operational research and management cybernetics

    Google Scholar 

  24. Keating CB (2014) Metasystem governance reference model (MGRM) for complex systems, National Centers for System of Systems Engineering

    Google Scholar 

  25. Weaver W (1953) Recent contributions to the mathematical theory of communication. ETC: A Rev General Semantics 261–281

    Google Scholar 

  26. Beer S (1974) Designing freedom. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sennett R (2010) The architecture of cooperation (video: see 18:30 – 30:00). Harvard Graduate School of Design. Retrieved 7 December 2016

    Google Scholar 

  28. O’Grady W (2009) An alternate management control framework: the viable system model (VSM). In: Submitted to Auckland regional accounting conference

    Google Scholar 

  29. Katina PF (2015) Systems theory-based construct for identifying metasystem pathologies for complex system governance (Ph.D.). Old Dominion University, United States—Virginia. http://search.proquest.com.proxy.lib.odu.edu/docview/1717329758/abstract/29A520C8C0A744A2PQ/2

  30. Reissberg A (2010) A cybernetic approach to hurricane hazard management on O’ahu, Hawai‘i. In: Proceedings of the 54th annual meeting of the ISSS-2010, vol 54, no 1. Waterloo, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  31. Beer S (1985) Diagnosing the system for organizations. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England

    Google Scholar 

  32. Espejo R (2015) The cybernetics of self-organisation. Kybernetes, vol 44, no 6/7

    Google Scholar 

  33. Holten R, Rosenkranz C (2011) Designing viable social systems: the role of linguistic communication for self-organization. Kybernetes 40(3/4):559–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Adams KM, Hester PT, Bradley JM, Meyers TJ, Keating CB (2014) Systems theory as the foundation for understanding systems. Syst Eng 17(1):112–123

    Google Scholar 

  35. Whitney K, Bradley JM, Baugh DE, Chesterman CW (2015) Systems theory as a foundation for governance of complex systems. Int J Syst Syst Eng 6(1–2):15–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Espejo R, Schuhmann W, Schwaninger M, Bilello U (1996) Organizational transformation and learning: a cybernetic approach to management. Wiley, p 350

    Google Scholar 

  37. Herring CE (2002) Viable software: the Intelligent control paradigm for adaptable and adaptive architecture

    Google Scholar 

  38. Khuong LN, Harindranath G, Dyerson R (2014) Understanding knowledge management software-organisation misalignments from an institutional perspective: a case study of a global IT-management consultancy firm. Int J Inf Manage 34(2):226–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Mohamad B, Bakar HA, Halim H, Ismail AR (2014) Corporate communication management (CCM) and organisational performance: a review of the current literature, conceptual model and research propositions. Procedia-Soc Behav Sci 155:115–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Regev G, Alexander IF, Wegmann A (2005) Modelling the regulative role of business processes with use and misuse cases. Bus Process Manage J 11(6):695–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Pérez Ríos J (2010) Models of organizational cybernetics for diagnosis and design. Kybernetes 39(9/10):1529–1550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Calida BY (2013) System governance analysis of complex systems

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles W. Chesterman Jr. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chesterman, C.W. (2022). Communications for Complex Systems Governance. In: Keating, C.B., Katina, P.F., Chesterman Jr., C.W., Pyne, J.C. (eds) Complex System Governance. Topics in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, vol 40. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93852-9_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93852-9_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-93851-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-93852-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics