Abstract
The position of the plane strain (PS) point in the stress space depends on the choice of the yield locus. Using non-quadratic yield loci the curvature and therefore the location of PS are determined by the yield locus exponent. On the contrary, the Vegter yield locus offers the opportunity to define exactly the position of PS. Currently, to use this freedom cost-expensive experiments have to be conducted or the position is roughly approximated. In this work, a new method is described to determine the two stress components of the plane strain point for the aluminum alloy AA6016-T4. The time-dependent strain distributions of Nakazima experiments recorded by an optical measurement system are used to conduct a reverse fitting of the PS point. Different strategies of determining the PS point using this new method are compared.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barlat F et al (2003) Plane stress yield function for aluminum alloy sheets - part 1: theory. Int J Plast 19(9):1297–1319
Logan RW, Hosford WF (1980) Upper-bound anisotropic yield locus calculations assuming 〈111〉-pencil glide. Int J Mech Sci 22(7):419–430
Hippke H, Hirsiger S, Rudow F, Berisha B, Hora P (2019) Optimized prediction of strain distribution with crystal plasticity supported definition of yielding direction. In: 12th Forming Technology Forum, Herrsching am Ammersee, Germany. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-00377565
Hirsiger S, Berisha B, Hippke H, Hora P (2019) Predicting plastic strain anisotropy of AA6016-T4 and DC05 by multiobjective parameter calibration of crystal plasticity models and coupling strategies with macroscopic models. In: Proceedings of COMPLAS 2019. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000386362
Vegter H, Van Den Boogaard AH (2006) A plane stress yield function for anisotropic sheet material by interpolation of biaxial stress states. Int J Plast 22(3):557–580
Raemy C (2018) Novel constitutive models for capturing anisotropy, tension-compression asymmetry, and anisotropic hardening of titanium. PhD thesis, ETH Zurich
Vegter H, ten Horn C, Abspoel M (2009) The Corus-Vegter Lite material model: simplifying advanced material modelling. Int J Mater Form 2(SUPPL. 1):511–514
Gorji M, Berisha B, Hora P, Barlat F (2016) Modeling of localization and fracture phenomena in strain and stress space for sheet metal forming. Int J Mater Form 9(5):573–584
Hora P, Barth K (2019) Impact of advanced measurement methods on the development and setup of new (complex) constitutive models. In: 12th Forming Technology Forum, Herrsching am Ammersee, Germany
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society
About this paper
Cite this paper
Barth, K., Berisha, B., Hora, P. (2022). Time-Dependent Method for the Inverse Evaluation of Yield Locus Using Nakazima Experiments. In: Inal, K., Levesque, J., Worswick, M., Butcher, C. (eds) NUMISHEET 2022. The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06212-4_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06212-4_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-06211-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-06212-4
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)