Abstract
Breast cancers are a major cause of mortality in females, on a par with lung and colon cancers. One topic in this chapter are the causes of breast cancer, environmental risk factors as well as genetic predisposition, conferred by high-risk mutations in hereditary cancer syndromes, like hereditary breast and ovarian cancer caused by germline mutations in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes, and by prevalent low-risk genetic variants. Therapy of breast cancer has been substantially advanced by subtyping based on molecular characteristics and by consequentially targeted therapies, providing a paradigm for other carcinomas. Breast cancer molecular subtypes differ in gene expression patterns, genetic alterations, cellular origin, prognosis, and response to specific therapies. Hormone receptor-positive tumors retain expression of the Estrogen receptor α and express markers of luminal mammary epithelial cells. They remain dependent on estrogens for growth and survival and can be treated by anti-estrogenic therapies, with differences between luminal A and luminal B cancers. HER2+ breast cancers are driven by gene amplification and overexpression of ERBB2. These cancers respond well to targeted therapy employing specific antibodies and tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Breast cancers lacking hormone receptors and ERBB2 overexpression are classified as triple-negative. Within this heterogeneous group, basal-type cancers have the highest frequency of TP53 and BRCA1 mutations. Triple-negative breast cancers are treated by cytotoxic chemotherapy, with PARP inhibitors as an additional option in cancers with mutations in HRR genes. Finally, invasive lobular mammary carcinomas are distinguished by loss of E-Cadherin and a diffuse-type growth pattern.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
See Box 5.2 for cervical carcinoma, a frequent cancer in females in some other regions of the world.
- 2.
In Western countries, menopause currently occurs in almost all women between the age of 45 and 55.
- 3.
Variants in risk genes for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer are cataloged and classified by several research consortia, see www.esmo.org
- 4.
Subtyping of breast cancers may be further detailed by also considering patterns of chromosomal changes, in addition to gene expression and mutation data. Such classifications, such as METABRIC, require however integration of data from different technology platforms and are therefore difficult to implement broadly in clinical practice.
- 5.
Remarkably, even though only a fraction of the cancer cells may express the Estrogen receptor. The cut-off in histological diagnostics is 1% of the cells positive.
- 6.
And may further depend on the relative expression of ERβ, which has different binding affinities for tamoxifen and other SERMs.
- 7.
Protac stands for “proteolysis targeting chimera”; these molecules consist of two parts one binding to the target the other to a ubiquitin ligase, connected by a linker. They are mostly in clinical trials or under development at the time of writing.
- 8.
Often resulting in separated structures within the cell. The assemblies are therefore characterized as “phase transitions” and may contain (noncoding) RNAs as well as proteins.
- 9.
A compound similar to cisplatin with generally better tolerable adverse effects.
Further Reading
Breast tumors. 5th edition IARC Press; 2019
Angeli D et al (2020) Genetic predisposition to breast and ovarian cancers: how many and which genes to test. Int J Mol Sci 21:1128
Arora S et al (2022) U.S. FDA drug approvals for breast cancer: a decade in review. Clin Cancer Res 28:1072–1086
Arteaga CL, Engelman JA (2014) ERBB receptors: from oncogene discovery to basic science to mechanism-based cancer therapeutics. Cancer Cell 25:282–303
Brown JS et al (2017) Targeting DNA repair in cancer: beyond PARP inhibitors. Cancer Disc 7:20–37
Calaf GM et al (2020) Endocrine disruptors from the environment affecting breast cancer. Oncol Lett 20:19–32
Casimiro S et al (2021) The roadmap of RANKL/RANK pathway in cancer. Cell 10:1978
Ciriello G et al (2015) Comprehensive molecular portraits of invasive lobular breast cancer. Cell 163:506–519
Cristea S, Polyak K (2018) Dissecting the mammary gland one cell at a time. Nat Commun 26:2473
Dhiman VK et al (2018) Nuclear receptors in cancer – uncovering new and evolving roles through genomic analysis. Nat Rev. Genet 19:160–174
Farcas AM et al (2021) Genome-wide estrogen receptor activity in breast cancer. Endocrinology 162:1–15
Fu NY et al (2020) Stem cells and the differentiation hierarchy in mammary gland development. Physiol Rev 100:489–523
Grimm SL et al (2016) Progesterone receptor signaling mechanisms. J Mol Biol 428:3831–3849
Haikala HM, Jänne PA (2021) Thirty years of HER3: from basic biology to therapeutic interventions. Clin Cancer Res 27:3528–3539
Honma N et al (2021) Carcinogenesis of triple-negative breast cancer and sex steroid hormones. Cancers 13:2588
Hudis CA (2007) Trastuzumab – mechanism of action and use in clinical practice. NEJM 357:39–51
Jordan VC (2004) Selective estrogen receptor modulation: concepts and consequences in cancer. Cancer Cell 5:207–213
Katzenellenbogen BS, Katzenellenbogen JA (2002) Defining the “S” in SERMs. Science 295:2380–2381
Krais JJ, Johnson N (2020) BRCA1 mutations in cancer: coordinating deficiencies in homologous recombination with tumorigenesis. Cancer Res 80:4601–4609
Lord CJ, Ashworth A (2017) PARP inhibitors: synthetic lethality in the clinic. Science 355:1152–1158
Mal R et al (2020) Estrogen receptor beta (ERβ): a ligand activated tumor suppressor. Front Oncol 10:587386
Martin EM et al (2021) The estrogen receptor/GATA3/FOXA1 transcriptional network: lessons learned from breast cancer. Curr Opin Struct Biol 71:65–70
Meric-Bernstam F et al (2018) Advances in HER2-targeted therapy: novel agents and opportunities beyond breast and gastric cancer. Clin Cancer Res 25:2033–2041
Mishra R et al (2017) Genomic alterations of ERBB receptors in cancer: clinical implications. Oncotarget 8:114371
Moasser MM (2022) Inactivating amplified HER2: challenges, dilemmas, and future directions. Cancer Res 82:2811–2820
Pedroza DA et al (2020) Classical and non-classical progesterone signaling in breast cancers. Cancers 12:2440
Perou CM et al (2000) Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 406:747–752
Polak P et al (2017) A mutational signature reveals alterations underlying deficient homologous recombination repair in breast cancer. Nat Genet 49:1476–1486
Pommier Y et al (2016) Laying a trap to kill cancer cells: PARP inhibitors and their mechanisms of action. Sci Transl Med 8:362ps17
Proietti CJ et al (2018) Revisiting progesterone receptor (PR) actions in breast cancer: insight into PR repressive functions. Steroids 133:75–81
Roy R et al (2012) BRCA1 and BRCA2: different roles in a common pathway of genome protection. Nat Rev. Cancer 12:68–78
Rusidzé M et al (2021) Estrogen receptor-α signaling in post-natal mammary development and breast cancers. Cell Mol Life Sci 78:5681–5705
Rusness HG et al (2017) Breast cancer molecular stratification – from intrinsic subtypes to integrative clusters. Am J Pathol 187:2152–2162
Savage KI et al (2014) BRCA1 deficiency exacerbates estrogen-induced DNA damage and genomic instability. Cancer Res 74:2773–2784
Setton J et al (2021) Synthetic lethality in cancer therapeutics: the next generation. Cancer Disc. 11:1626–1635
Siegel PM, Muller WJ (2010) Transcription factor regulatory networks in mammary epithelial development and tumorigenesis. Oncogene 29:2753–2759
Silver DP, Livingston DM (2012) Mechanisms of BRCA1 tumor suppression. Cancer Disc 2:679–684
Takaoka M, Miki Y (2018) BRCA1 gene: function and deficiency. Int J Clin Oncol 23:36–44
Turnbull C et al (2018) Cancer genetics, precision prevention and a call to action. Nat Genet 50:1212–1218
van de Vijver MJ et al (2002) A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer. NEJM 347:1999–2009
Venkitaram AR (2014) Cancer suppression by the chromosome custodians, BRCA1 and BRCA2. Science 343:1470–1475
Waks AG, Winer EP (2019) Breast cancer treatment – a review. JAMA 321:288–300
Witus SR et al (2022) BRCA1/BARD1 is a nucleosome reader and writer. Trends Biochem Sci 47:582–595
Yanes T et al (2020) Clinical applications of polygenic breast cancer risk: a critical review and perspectives of an emerging field. Breast Cancer Res 22:21
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schulz, W.A. (2023). Breast Cancer. In: Molecular Biology of Human Cancers. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16286-2_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16286-2_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-16285-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-16286-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)