Abstract
Stiff structures made of elastic bodies and linkages consisting of rigid bodies are studied for centuries. Compliant mechanisms that straddle these two are extensively researched only in the last two decades, barring a few insightful results before that. The question addressed in this note is simple: Are compliant mechanisms really different from stiff structures and rigid-body linkages? If so, how much and in what ways? By discussing the fundamental concepts in structures and linkages, it is argued here that compliant mechanisms are as much similar to stiff structures and rigid-body linkages as they are different from them. Similarities and differences among the three categories of engineering solid entities are delineated from the viewpoints of function, mobility, analysis, synthesis, materials, fabrication, scaling, and balancing. It is noted here that the contrast among the three mainly arises due to viewing them from the continuum or discrete perspectives.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Howell, L.L.: Compliant Mechanisms. John Wiley, New York (2001)
Moulton, T., Ananthasuresh, G.K.: Design and Manufacture of Electro-Thermal-Compliant Micro Devices. Sensors and Actuators A 90, 38–48 (2001)
Midha, A., Norton, T.W., Howell, L.L.: On the Nomenclature, Classification, and Abstractions of Compliant Mechanisms. ASME J. Mech. Des. 116, 270–279 (1994)
Motro, R.: Tensegrity: Structural Systems for the Future. Elsevier, New York (2003)
Bosscher, P., Riechel, A.T., Ebert-Uphoff, I.: Wrench-Feasible Workspace Generation for cable-Driven Robots. IEEE Trans. Robotics 22(5), 890–902 (2006)
Ingber, D.E.: Tensegrity-based Mechanosensing from Macro and Micro. Progress in BioPhy. and Mol. Bio. 97, 163–179 (2008)
Erdman, A.G., Sandor, G.N., Kota, S.: Mechanism Design: Analysis and Synthesis, vol. 1. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River (2001)
Calladine, C.R.: Buckminster Fuller’s ‘Tensegrity’ Structures and Clerk Maxwell’s Rules for the Construction of Stiff Frames. Int. J. Solids and Struc. 14, 161–172 (1978)
Fowler, P.W., Guest, S.D.: A Symmetry Extension of Maxwell’s Rule for Rigidity of Frames. Int. J. Solids and Struc. 37, 1793–1804 (2000)
Murphy, M.D., Midha, A., Howell, L.L.: On the Mobility of Compliant Mechanisms. In: Proc. 1994 ASME Mechanisms Conference, Minneapolis, USA, September 11-14. DE-vol. 71, pp. 475–479 (1994)
Ananthasuresh, G.K., Howell, L.L.: Case Studies and a Note on the Degrees of Freedom in Compliant Mechanisms. In: ASME Mechanisms Conference, Irvine, USA, August 18-22, Paper No. 96-DETC/MECH-1217 (1996)
Ashby, M.F., Hugh, S., Cebon, D.: Materials: Engineering, Science, processing, and Design. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2007)
Paros, J.M., Weisbord, L.: How to Design Flexural hinges? Machine Design, 151–156 (November 25, 1965)
Bruns, R.H., Crossley, F.R.E.: Kinetostatic Synthesis of Flexible Link Mechanisms. ASME Paper no. 68-Mech-36 (1968)
Howell, L.L., Midha, A.: Parametric Deflection Approximations for End-loaded, Large-deflection Beams in Compliant Mechanisms. ASME J. Mech. Des. 117(1), 156–165 (1995)
Hegde, S., Ananthasuresh, G.K.: Design of Single-Input-Single-Output Compliant Mechanisms for Practical Applications Using Selection Maps. ASME J. Mech. Des. 132, 08107-1–08107-8 (2010)
Hegde, S., Ananthasuresh, G.K.: A Spring-Mass-Lever Model, Stiffness, and Inertia Maps for Single-Input-Single-Output Compliant Mechanisms. Mech. Mach. Theory (2012) (in press)
Bendsoe, M.P., Sigmund, O.: Topology Optimization: Theory, Methods, and Applications. Springer, Berlin (2003)
Howell, L.L., Midha, A.: A Loop-Closure Theory for the Analysis and Synthesis of Compliant Mechanisms. ASME J. Mech. Des. 118(1), 121–125 (1994)
Ananthasuresh, G.K.: A New Design Paradigm for Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems and Investigations on Compliant Mechanism Synthesis. PhD Thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA (1994)
Frecker, M., Ananthasuresh, G.K., Nishiwaki, S., et al.: Topological Synthesis of Compliant Mechanisms using Multicriteria Optimization. ASME J. Mech. Des. 119(2), 238–245 (1997)
Sigmund, O.: On the Design of Compliant Mechanisms using Topology Optimization. Mech. of Struc. and Mach. 25(4), 495–526 (1997)
Deepak, S.R., Dinesh, M., Sahu, D., Ananthasuresh, G.K.: A Comprative Study of the Formulations and Benchmark Problems for the Topology Optimization of Compliant Mechanisms. ASME J. Mech. Rob. 1(1), 20–27 (2008)
Yin, L., Ananthasuresh, G.K.: Design of Distributed Compliant Mechanisms. Mech. based Des. of Struc. 31(2), 151–179 (2003)
Bruyneel, M., Duysinx, P.: Note on Topology Optimization of Continuum Structures Including Self Weight. Struc. Multidisc Optim. 29, 245–256 (2005)
Barnett, R.L.: Minimum-weight Design of Beams for Deflection. J. Eng. Mech. Div. EM 1, 75–109 (1961)
Ananthasuresh, G.K., Howell, L.L.: Mechanical Design of Compliant Microsystems: A perspective and Prospects. ASME J. Mech. Des. 127(4), 736–738 (2005)
Deepak, S.R., Ananthasuresh, G.K.: Perfect Static Balance of Linkages by Addition of Springs but not Auxiliary Bodies. ASME J. Mech. and Rob. 4, 021104-1–021104-12 (2012)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ananthasuresh, G.K. (2013). How Far are Compliant Mechanisms from Rigid-body Mechanisms and Stiff Structures?. In: Kumar, V., Schmiedeler, J., Sreenivasan, S., Su, HJ. (eds) Advances in Mechanisms, Robotics and Design Education and Research. Mechanisms and Machine Science, vol 14. Springer, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00398-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00398-6_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-00397-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-00398-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)