Skip to main content

How Far are Compliant Mechanisms from Rigid-body Mechanisms and Stiff Structures?

  • Chapter
Advances in Mechanisms, Robotics and Design Education and Research

Part of the book series: Mechanisms and Machine Science ((Mechan. Machine Science,volume 14))

Abstract

Stiff structures made of elastic bodies and linkages consisting of rigid bodies are studied for centuries. Compliant mechanisms that straddle these two are extensively researched only in the last two decades, barring a few insightful results before that. The question addressed in this note is simple: Are compliant mechanisms really different from stiff structures and rigid-body linkages? If so, how much and in what ways? By discussing the fundamental concepts in structures and linkages, it is argued here that compliant mechanisms are as much similar to stiff structures and rigid-body linkages as they are different from them. Similarities and differences among the three categories of engineering solid entities are delineated from the viewpoints of function, mobility, analysis, synthesis, materials, fabrication, scaling, and balancing. It is noted here that the contrast among the three mainly arises due to viewing them from the continuum or discrete perspectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Howell, L.L.: Compliant Mechanisms. John Wiley, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Moulton, T., Ananthasuresh, G.K.: Design and Manufacture of Electro-Thermal-Compliant Micro Devices. Sensors and Actuators A 90, 38–48 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Midha, A., Norton, T.W., Howell, L.L.: On the Nomenclature, Classification, and Abstractions of Compliant Mechanisms. ASME J. Mech. Des. 116, 270–279 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Motro, R.: Tensegrity: Structural Systems for the Future. Elsevier, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bosscher, P., Riechel, A.T., Ebert-Uphoff, I.: Wrench-Feasible Workspace Generation for cable-Driven Robots. IEEE Trans. Robotics 22(5), 890–902 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ingber, D.E.: Tensegrity-based Mechanosensing from Macro and Micro. Progress in BioPhy. and Mol. Bio. 97, 163–179 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Erdman, A.G., Sandor, G.N., Kota, S.: Mechanism Design: Analysis and Synthesis, vol. 1. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Calladine, C.R.: Buckminster Fuller’s ‘Tensegrity’ Structures and Clerk Maxwell’s Rules for the Construction of Stiff Frames. Int. J. Solids and Struc. 14, 161–172 (1978)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Fowler, P.W., Guest, S.D.: A Symmetry Extension of Maxwell’s Rule for Rigidity of Frames. Int. J. Solids and Struc. 37, 1793–1804 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Murphy, M.D., Midha, A., Howell, L.L.: On the Mobility of Compliant Mechanisms. In: Proc. 1994 ASME Mechanisms Conference, Minneapolis, USA, September 11-14. DE-vol. 71, pp. 475–479 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ananthasuresh, G.K., Howell, L.L.: Case Studies and a Note on the Degrees of Freedom in Compliant Mechanisms. In: ASME Mechanisms Conference, Irvine, USA, August 18-22, Paper No. 96-DETC/MECH-1217 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ashby, M.F., Hugh, S., Cebon, D.: Materials: Engineering, Science, processing, and Design. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Paros, J.M., Weisbord, L.: How to Design Flexural hinges? Machine Design, 151–156 (November 25, 1965)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bruns, R.H., Crossley, F.R.E.: Kinetostatic Synthesis of Flexible Link Mechanisms. ASME Paper no. 68-Mech-36 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Howell, L.L., Midha, A.: Parametric Deflection Approximations for End-loaded, Large-deflection Beams in Compliant Mechanisms. ASME J. Mech. Des. 117(1), 156–165 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hegde, S., Ananthasuresh, G.K.: Design of Single-Input-Single-Output Compliant Mechanisms for Practical Applications Using Selection Maps. ASME J. Mech. Des. 132, 08107-1–08107-8 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hegde, S., Ananthasuresh, G.K.: A Spring-Mass-Lever Model, Stiffness, and Inertia Maps for Single-Input-Single-Output Compliant Mechanisms. Mech. Mach. Theory (2012) (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bendsoe, M.P., Sigmund, O.: Topology Optimization: Theory, Methods, and Applications. Springer, Berlin (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Howell, L.L., Midha, A.: A Loop-Closure Theory for the Analysis and Synthesis of Compliant Mechanisms. ASME J. Mech. Des. 118(1), 121–125 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ananthasuresh, G.K.: A New Design Paradigm for Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems and Investigations on Compliant Mechanism Synthesis. PhD Thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Frecker, M., Ananthasuresh, G.K., Nishiwaki, S., et al.: Topological Synthesis of Compliant Mechanisms using Multicriteria Optimization. ASME J. Mech. Des. 119(2), 238–245 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sigmund, O.: On the Design of Compliant Mechanisms using Topology Optimization. Mech. of Struc. and Mach. 25(4), 495–526 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Deepak, S.R., Dinesh, M., Sahu, D., Ananthasuresh, G.K.: A Comprative Study of the Formulations and Benchmark Problems for the Topology Optimization of Compliant Mechanisms. ASME J. Mech. Rob. 1(1), 20–27 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yin, L., Ananthasuresh, G.K.: Design of Distributed Compliant Mechanisms. Mech. based Des. of Struc. 31(2), 151–179 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bruyneel, M., Duysinx, P.: Note on Topology Optimization of Continuum Structures Including Self Weight. Struc. Multidisc Optim. 29, 245–256 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Barnett, R.L.: Minimum-weight Design of Beams for Deflection. J. Eng. Mech. Div. EM 1, 75–109 (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ananthasuresh, G.K., Howell, L.L.: Mechanical Design of Compliant Microsystems: A perspective and Prospects. ASME J. Mech. Des. 127(4), 736–738 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Deepak, S.R., Ananthasuresh, G.K.: Perfect Static Balance of Linkages by Addition of Springs but not Auxiliary Bodies. ASME J. Mech. and Rob. 4, 021104-1–021104-12 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. K. Ananthasuresh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ananthasuresh, G.K. (2013). How Far are Compliant Mechanisms from Rigid-body Mechanisms and Stiff Structures?. In: Kumar, V., Schmiedeler, J., Sreenivasan, S., Su, HJ. (eds) Advances in Mechanisms, Robotics and Design Education and Research. Mechanisms and Machine Science, vol 14. Springer, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00398-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00398-6_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-00397-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-00398-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics