Skip to main content

Lean Six Sigma Supply Chain Case Study: Aircraft Shipment Improvement in a Pharmaceutical Company

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Sustainable and Competitive Manufacturing Systems

Abstract

Distribution is an important activity in the integrated supply-chain management for pharmaceutical products, especially when these goods have to travel long distances from manufacturing facilities to the consumer markets. This paper presents the case of a pharmaceutical company in which the quality assurance and the management teams set an objective of reducing their distribution costs to less than 0.16 Euros per unit. The quality assurance (QA) team has decided to optimize sample shipments as a high priority in order to reduce costs. The methodology used in this study was supported through a series of experiments using a Lean Six Sigma approach that implemented the Define Measure Analyze Improve Control (DMAIC) phases. The QA team analyzed the previous state of sample shipments and then suggested improvements based on an optimized process. The results showed a set of non-value added activities specifically in transportation, motion, waiting, defects, and the sub-utilization of people. Based on Lean tools, the improvements achieved a 26 % reduction in the cycle time spent and no complaints from customers have been reported since implementation of the new process. In addition, a control plan was also developed to track shipments and maintain open and close communication with the customer. Finally, the resulting processes that have been implementation have a significant impact on reducing distribution costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The QP is responsible for releasing the product to the European market.

References

  1. Jayant A, Gupta P, Garg SK (2009) An integrated approach for performance improvement in supply chain: a case of manufacturing unit. Int J Bus Insights Transform 3(1):62–73

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rossetti CL, Handfield R, Dooley K (2011) Forces, trends, and decisions in pharmaceutical supply chain management. Int J Phys Distrib Logistics Manag 41(6):601–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shang J, Yildirim T, Tadikamalla P, Mittal V, Brown L (2009) Distribution network redesign for marketing competitiveness. J Mark 73(2):146–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Huehn-Brown W, Murray S (2010) Are companies continuously improving their supply chain? Eng Manag J 22(4):3–10

    Google Scholar 

  5. Blanchard D (2012) Lean Six Sigma keeps cardinal’s supply chain healthy. Industry Week/IW 261(10):54

    Google Scholar 

  6. World Health Organization (2010) Good distribution practices for pharmaceutical products. Annex 5, WHO technical report series, no 957

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pande P, Neuman R, Cavanagh R (2000) The Six Sigma way: how GE Motorola and other top companies are honing their performance. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Picard D (2002) The black belt memory jogger: a pocket guide for Six Sigma success. GOAL/QPC and Six Sigma Academy, USA

    Google Scholar 

  9. Narahari Y, Viswanadham N, Bhattacharya R (2000) Design of synchronized supply chains: a Six Sigma tolerancing approach. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, ICRA ’00, 2 Apr 24–28, pp 1151–1156

    Google Scholar 

  10. McCarthy B, Stauffer R (2001) Enhancing Six Sigma through simulation with IGRAFX process for Six Sigma. In: Proceedings of the 2001 winter simulation conference, pp 1241–1247

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jacobsen J (2007) Siemens VDO optimizes processes using Six Sigma. American Society for Quality, USA, pp 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fine E (2000) Choosing the right SPC tools for quality problems. Ind Pain Powder Mag 11(00):28–30

    Google Scholar 

  13. Womack JP, Jones D, Ross D (1990) The machine that changed the world. Rawson Associates, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lummus RR, Vokurka RJ, Rodeghiero B (2006) Improving quality through value stream mapping: a case study of a physician’s clinic. Total Qual Manag 17(8):1063–1075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Connaughton S (2008) Lean manufacturing. Lean Manufacturing Research Starters Business, Toyota

    Google Scholar 

  16. Narasimhan R, Swink M, Kim SW (2006) Disentangling leanness and agility: an empirical investigation. J Oper Manage 24(5):440–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Doolen TL, Hacker ME (2005) A review of lean assessment in organizations: an exploratory study of lean practices by electronics manufacturers. J Manuf Syst 24(1):55–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Abdulmalek FA, Rajgopal J (2007) Analyzing the benefits of lean manufacturing and value stream mapping via simulation: a process sector case study. Int J Prod Econ 107(1):223–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Vinodh SS, Chintha K (2011) Application of fuzzy QFD for enabling leanness in a manufacturing organisation. Int J Prod Res 49(6):1627–1644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pharmaceutical Technology’s QPEC (2008) Quality and process excellence conference, VA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  21. Houborg C, Lundbeck H (2010) Implementing a successful lean programme: where do you begin? Pharm Technol Eur 22(9):52–57

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lai HJ, Wu HH (2011) A case study of applying Kano’s model and ANOVA Technique in evaluating service quality. Inf Technol J 10:89–97

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Crosby P (1979) Quality is free: the art of making quality certain. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  24. http://asq.org/learn-about-quality/lean/overview/value-stream-mapping.html

  25. Tapping D, Luyster T, Shhuker T (2002) Value stream management. Productivity Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luis Rocha-Lona .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rocha-Lona, L., Alvarez-Reyes, S.E., Eldridge, S., Garza-Reyes, J.A., Kumar, V. (2013). Lean Six Sigma Supply Chain Case Study: Aircraft Shipment Improvement in a Pharmaceutical Company. In: Azevedo, A. (eds) Advances in Sustainable and Competitive Manufacturing Systems. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00557-7_119

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00557-7_119

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-00556-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-00557-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics