Skip to main content

WRF-Chem Model Sensitivity Analysis to Chemical Mechanism Choice

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Air Pollution Modeling and its Application XXIII

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Complexity ((SPCOM))

  • 1102 Accesses

Abstract

A comparison between two WRF-Chem simulations has been performed in the framework of the AQMEII modeling initiative for the calendar year 2010. Model configurations shared the same physics options, but different chemical parameterizations were selected. The first run adopted RADM2-MADE/SORGAM chemical mechanisms, whereas the second one employed the CBMZ-MOSAIC chemical option. Comparisons between two simulations show that CMBZ is higher than RADM2 for gas concentrations. On the contrary, MADE-SORGAM reproduces higher aerosol values than MOSAIC, especially over land. The same behaviour is observed in comparison against ground – based measurements. Both simulations underestimate observed values of NOx and PM2.5.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Zhang Y, Wen X-Y, Jang CJ (2010) Simulating chemistry – aerosol – cloud –radiation – climate feedbacks over the continental U.S. Using the online-coupled weather research forecasting model with chemistry (WRF/Chem). Atmos Environ 44:3568–3582. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.05.056

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Solazzo E et al (2012) Operational model evaluation for particulate matter in Europe and North America in the context of AQMEII. Atmos Environ 53:75–92. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.02.045

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hong S-Y, Noh Y, Dudhia J (2006) A new vertical diffusion package with an explicit treatment of entrainment processes. Mon Weather Rev 134:2318–2341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen F, Dudhia J (2001) Coupling an advanced land surface–hydrology model with the Penn state–NCAR MM5 modeling system. Part I: model implementation and sensitivity. Mon Weather Rev 129:569–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Morrison H, Thompson G, Tatarskii V (2009) Impact of cloud micrpohysics on the development of trailing stratiform precipitation in a simulated squall line: comparison of one- and two-moment schemes. Mon Weather Rev 137:991–1007. doi:10.1175/2008MWR2556.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Iacono MJ, Delamere JS, Mlawer EJ, Shephard MW, Clough SA, Collins WD (2008) Radiative forcing by long-lived greenhouse gases: calculations with the AER radiative transfer models. J Geophys Res 113, D13103. doi:10.1029/2008JD009944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Grell GA, Devenyi D (2002) A generalized approach to parameterizing convection combining ensemble and data assimilation techniques. Geophys Res Lett 29(14):1693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Stockwell WR, Middleton P, Chang JS, Tang X (1990) The second generation regional acid deposition model chemical mechanism for regional air quality modeling. J Geophys Res 95:16343–16367

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ackermann IJ, Hass H, Memmesheimer M, Ebel A, Binkowski FS, Shankar U (1998) Modal aerosol dynamics model for Europe: development and first applications. Atmos Environ 32(17):2981–2999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Schell B, Ackermann IJ, Hass H, Binkowski FS, Ebel A (2001) Modeling the formation of secondary organic aerosol within a comprehensive air quality model system. J Geophys Res 106:28275–28293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Zaveri RA, Peters LK (1999) A new lumped structure photochemical mechanism for large-scale applications. J Geophys Res 104(D23):30,387–30,415

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zaveri R, Easter RC, Fast JD, Peters LK (2008) Model for Simulating Aerosol Interactions and Chemistry (MOSAIC). J Geophys Res 113, D13204. doi:10.1029/2007JD008782

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

RSE contribution to this work has been financed by the Research Fund for the Italian Electrical System under the Contract Agreement between RSE S.p.A. and the Ministry of Economic Development – General Directorate for Nuclear Energy, Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency in compliance with the Decree of March 8, 2006. The Centre of Excellence for Space Sciences and Technologies SPACE-SI is an operation partly financed by the European Union, European Regional Development Fund and Republic of Slovenia, Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Sport and Culture.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Balzarini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Balzarini, A., Honzak, L., Pirovano, G., Riva, G.M., Zabkar, R. (2014). WRF-Chem Model Sensitivity Analysis to Chemical Mechanism Choice. In: Steyn, D., Mathur, R. (eds) Air Pollution Modeling and its Application XXIII. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04379-1_92

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics