Skip to main content

First Literacies: Art, Creativity, Play, Constructive Meaning-Making

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Literacy in the Arts

Abstract

In this chapter art and play are considered children’s ‘first languages’, and therefore are placed at the centre of a curriculum for young children. Through art and play, children represent thought and action, which underpins their later understanding of the ‘second languages’ of reading, writing and numbering. Key issues such as image-making, graphic action, imagination, narrative, empathetic engagement and internalised thought are analysed as evidence of children’s construction of knowledge through art and play. Symbol making is the essence of being human. In children’s art and play, their symbol use captures their sensory modes in emotional and embodied ways, as children know their worlds and their place. The chapter addresses how children’s creation, manipulation and meaning making through engaged interaction with art materials are precursors to learning to read and write and, as first languages, should not be discarded nor replaced. The notion of creativity is explored in relation to pedagogical approaches. In a climate of testing regimes that emphasise ‘academic’ achievements, teachers are encouraged to not lose sight of imagination, pretence, constructive meaning making, holistic teaching and being a co-player and co-artist.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    On Entry assessment – identifying essential literacy and numeracy skills; NAPLAN – National Assessment Program – Literacy and Numeracy.

  2. 2.

    International results in Mathematics and Reading. For more on this, see http://timss.bc.edu/

References

  • Abbs, P. (2003). Against the flow: Education, the arts and post-modern culture. London: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adoniou, M. (2013). Drawing to support writing development in English language learners. Language and Education, 27(3), 261–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, M. L. (2003). Embodied cognition: A field guide. Artificial Intelligence, 149, 91–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anning, A., & Ring, K. (2004). Making sense of children’s drawings. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, C. (2010). Understanding schemas and emotions in early childhood. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Athey, C. (1990). Extending thought in young children: A parent teacher partnership. London: Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banaji, S. (2011). Mapping the rhetorics of creativity. In J. Sefton-Green, P. Thomson, K. Jones, & L. Bresler (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of creative learning (pp. 36–44). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, M. (2005). Drawing as a unique mental development tool for young children: Interpersonal and intrapersonal dialogues. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 6(1), 80–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckham, J. (1994). Teacher’s understanding of children’s drawing. In E. Aubrey (Ed.), The role of subject knowledge in the early years of schooling. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. (1996). Being there. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claxton, G. (2002). Building learning power. London: TLO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comerford Boyes, L., & Reid, I. (2005). What are the benefits for pupils participating in arts activities? The view from the research literature. Research in Education Manchester, 73(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craft, A. (2000). Teaching creativity: Philosophy and practice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dourish, P. (2001). Where the action is: The foundations of embodied interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, A. (2013). Rewriting the basics. Literacy learning in children’s cultures. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmiston, B. (2008). Forming ethical identities in early childhood play. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, E. (1998). Does experience in the arts boost academic achievement? Art Education, 51(1), 7–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flemming, M. (2011). Learning in and through the arts. In J. Sefton-Green, P. Thomson, K. Jones, & L. Bresler (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of creative learning (pp. 177–185). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class: And how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedberg, D., & Gallese, V. (2007). Motion, emotion and empathy in esthetic experience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(5), 197–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N. (1969/1976). Languages of art. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N. (1984). Of mind and other matters. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harland, J., Kinder, K., Lord, P., Stoot, A., Schagen, I., & Haynes, J. with Cusworth, L., & White, R. (2000). Arts education in secondary schools: Effects and effectiveness. Slough, UK: NFER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerlan, A. (2011). Arts in schools as a change model: Education for the arts and aesthetic experience. In J. Sefton-Green, P. Thomson, K. Jones, & L. Bresler (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of creative learning (pp. 119–128). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, L. (2008). Communication and transformation through collaboration: Rethinking drawing activities in early childhood. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 9(4), 307–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. (1997). Before writing: Rethinking the paths to literacy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. (2011). English for an era of instability: Aesthetics, ethics, creativity and design. In J. Sefton-Green, P. Thomson, K. Jones, & L. Bresler (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of creative learning (pp. 211–216). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langland-Hassan, P. (2011). A puzzle about visualization. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 10, 145–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lankshear, C., & Knoble, M. (2003). New literacies: Changing knowledge and classroom learning. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubart, T. (1999). Creativity across culture. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, A. (2010). Will the Australian curriculum up the intellectual ante in primary classrooms? Curriculum Perspectives, 30(3), 59–64. Australian Curriculum Studies Association Incorporated (ACSA).

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCrea, C. (2013). Teacher, researcher and artist: Thinking about documentary practices. In F. McArdle & G. Boldt (Eds.), Young children, pedagogy and the arts: Ways of seeing (pp. 50–70). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsunobu, K. (2007). Japanese perspectives and research on the body. In L. Bresler (Ed.), The international handbook of research in arts education. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsunobu, K. (2011). Pedagogy of imitation and repetition. In J. Sefton-Green, P. Thomson, K. Jones, & L. Bresler (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of creative learning (pp. 45–53). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, J. (2004). The art of infancy. In A. Kindler, E. Eisner, & M. Day (Eds.), Learning in the visual arts: Handbook of research and policy in art education (pp. 253–298). Vancouver, Canada: University of British Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, J. (2006). Very young children’s development in moviemaking. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 13(2), 130–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McArdle, F. (2008). The arts and staying cool. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 9(4), 365–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McArdle, F. A. (2012). New maps of learning for quality art education: What pre-service teachers should learn and be able to do. Australian Educational Researcher AER, 39(1), 91–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McArdle, F., & Tan, J. (2012). Art as language: An investigation of the learning needs of young African refugee migrant students in urban Australia. In A. Yeung, E. Brown, & C. Lee (Eds.), Communication and language surmounting the barriers to cross-cultural understanding (pp. 211–232). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (2002). The phenomenology of perception. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murao, T. (2003). Suzuki mesoddo “kira kira boshi hensokyoku” ni miru “kata kara no gakushu” nit suite [Learning through kata in Twinkle Twinkle Little Star Variations in the Suzuki violin method]. Gendai no esupuri, 428, 165–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negus, K., & Pickering, M. (2004). Creativity, communication and cultural value. London/Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picasso, P. (1965). In F. Gilot and C. Lake (Eds.), Vivre avec Picasso. Paris: Le Livre de poche.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pink, D. (2006). A whole new mind: Why right-brainers will rule the future. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russ, S. (2003). Play and creativity: Developmental issues. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47(3), 291–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton-Smith, B. (1997). The ambiguity of play. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, R. quoted in Edmonds, F. with Clarke, M. (2009). ‘Sort of Like Reading a Map’: A community report on the survival of South-East Australian aboriginal art since 1834. Darwin: Cooperative Research Centre for Aboriginal Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1931/1994). Imagination and creativity in the adolescent. In R. Van der Veer & J. Valsinger (Eds.), The Vygotsky reader. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1934/1987). Thinking and speaking: The problem and the approach. Retrieved April 29, 2003 from www.marxist.org/archive/vygotsky/works/words/lev1.htm

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). The pre-history of the development of written language. In L. S. Vygotsky & R. W. Rieber (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygtosky. Vol. IV: The history of the development of higher mental functions (pp. 131–148). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1999). The teaching about emotions. Historical-psychological studies. In R. Reiber (Ed.; M. J. Hall, Trans.). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky (Vol. 6: Scientific legacy, pp. 71–235). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, R. (2000). Creativity and beyond: Cultures, values and change. New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. (2007). Art, visual culture, and child/adult collaborative images: Recognizing the other-than author(s). Visual Arts Research, 33(2/65), child art after modernism, 6–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winner, E., & Hetland, L. (2000). The arts in education: Evaluating the evidence for a causal link. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 34(3–4), 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, E., & Hall, E. (2011). Drawings as spaces for intellectual play. International Journal of Early Years Education, 19(3–4), 267–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. (2005, September). Children’s multimodal meaning-making through drawing and storytelling (16 pp). Teachers College Record. http://www.tcrecord.org

  • Wright, S. (2007). Young children’s meaning-making through drawing and ‘telling’: Analogies to filmic textual features. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 32(4), 37–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. (2010). Understanding creativity in early childhood: Meaning-making and children’s drawings. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. (2011). Meaning, mediation and mythology. In D. Faulkner & E. Coates (Eds.), Exploring children’s creative narratives (pp. 157–176). Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. (2014). The voice of art: Understanding children’s graphic-narrative-embodied communication. In D. Machin (Ed.), Visual communication (pp. 515–534). Frankfurt: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Felicity McArdle .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McArdle, F., Wright, S.K. (2014). First Literacies: Art, Creativity, Play, Constructive Meaning-Making. In: Barton, G. (eds) Literacy in the Arts. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04846-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics