Skip to main content

The Giant City-Regions in China’s New Urbanization

  • Chapter

Abstract

This chapter sheds light on the role and type of the giant city-regions, and examines the planning efforts on these city-regions in China. By analyzing policy and planning documents about new urbanization, national spatial planning, city-region and city master plans, the chapter reveals that these urban giants are expected to serve as spatial platforms of China’s national development. There are four basic types categorized by a two by two table featuring both dimensions of spatial extent (i.e., multiple vs single provincial unit involvement) and main forces of formation (i.e., passive outcome vs active intervention). Though planning efforts are discernible at three levels (framework/economic plan, city-group plan, and city master plan), none of the seven giant city-regions have systematic plans at all the levels. Heavy top-down planning approach is questionable for legitimacy and effectiveness. The lack of plans for institutional integration is yet another area that needs serious attention by planners and policy-makers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The term chengshi qun literally means a ‘group of cities’. Chinese urban researchers interpret this term using various translations, such as mega cities, urban agglomerations, urban clusters, interlocking metropolitan areas, and extended metropolitan areas. In this paper, the term ‘giant city-region’ is used interchangeably with chengshi qun in order to earmark its extraordinary scale and its relevance to the terms ‘world city-region’ (Hall 1966) and ‘global city-region’ (Scott et al 2001).

  2. 2.

    This is to contrast with a land focused urbanization which has characterised the Chinese urban development for the past decades.

  3. 3.

    The urban–rural dichotomy describes the inequalities between urban and rural settlements; the urban dichotomy describes the inequalities between rural migrant workers and urbanites in cities.

  4. 4.

    These include fresh air, clean water, and liveable climate (The State Council 2010: 10).

  5. 5.

    In both central and local governments, specialized ministries/departments such as NRDC and the Ministry of Housing and Urban–Rural Construction, are responsible for the plans and their implementation.

  6. 6.

    They are the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC), the Ministry of Land and Resources (MLR), and the Ministry of Housing and Urban–Rural Construction (MHURC). There are national plans endorsed by the State Council for economic development and land-use by NDRC and MLR respectively. MHURC worked on a national system of cities and towns in 2000–2006 but that plan was never endorsed by the State Council. By leading the formulation and approval process of both NPMFA and the new urbanization plan, NDRC is the most powerful planning authority at national level.

  7. 7.

    For example, provinces and cities have formulated local plans for major functional areas that detail the NPMFA. Similarly, local governments formulate local five-year plans which detail the national five-year plans.

  8. 8.

    However, the Pearl River Delta chengshi qun Plan was made in 2005, long before the endorsement of the NPMFA and the new urbanization policy.

  9. 9.

    The plan does not specify which government. In this type of statement it can be interpreted that it applies to all government levels involved.

  10. 10.

    This does not exclude a strong spatial focus in these types of plans, as the Yangtze River Delta plan exhibits. The planning contents and responsible agencies are hot topic in debate about urban planning reform in China. A dedicated analysis is required for further details.

  11. 11.

    The discussion here focuses on economic and spatial planning. Land-use planning which is under the purview of MLR is not examined. It is beyond the scope of this paper to discuss the existing issues relating to the economic, land-use and urban planning, as well as proposals for and against the combination of the three plans. Nevertheless, this chapter shows that geographical scale needs to be considered in the analysis.

References

  • America 2050 (2014) About America 2050. http://www.america2050.org/about.html. Accessed 22 Sept 2014

  • Bryson JM (2004) Why strategic planning is more important than ever. In: Bryson JM (ed) Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations, 3rd edn. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 2–29

    Google Scholar 

  • CAUPD (2005) Regional plan of the Chang-Zhu-Tan city-group 2003–2020. Available in Baidu Wenku. http://wenku.baidu.com. Accessed 22 Sept 2014

  • Cohen RB (1981) The new international division of labor, multinational corporations and urban hierarchy. In: Dear M, Scott AJ (eds) Urbanization and urban planning in capitalist society. Methuen, London, pp 287–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Enright MJ, Scott EE, Chang KM (2005) Regional powerhouse: the Greater Pearl River Delta and the rise of China. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng XY (2014) Building the major functional areas: is this another round of destruction to the property right? http://www.china-review.com/eao.asp?id=26844. Accessed 2 Sept 2014

  • Friedmann J, Wolff G (1982) World city formation: an agenda for research and action. Int J Urban Reg Res 6:309–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottmann J (1961) Megalopolis: the urbanized Northeastern Seaboard of the United States. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall P (1966) The world cities. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall P (2001) Global city regions in the twenty first century. In: Scott A (ed) Global city regions: trends, theory and policy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 59–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison J (2012) Global city-region governance, ten years on. In: Derudder B, Hoyler M, Taylor PJ, Witlox F (eds) International handbook of globalization and world cities. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 309–317

    Google Scholar 

  • HDRC (Hunan Development and Reform Commission) (2008) Regional plan of the Chang-Zhu-Tan city-group 2008–2020. Available in Baidu Wenku. http://wenku.baidu.com. Accessed 22 Sept 2014

  • Head BW (2008) Assessing network-based collaborations: effectiveness for whom? Public Manag Rev 10(6):733–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henton D (2001) Lessons from Silicon Valley: governance in a global city-region. In: Scott A (ed) Global city regions, trends, theory and policy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 391–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunan Provincial Government (2007) Major events about the Chang-Zhu-Tan city-group. www.hunan.gov.cn. Accessed 2 Sept 2014

  • Jonas A, Ward K (2007) An introduction to a debate on city-regions: new geographies of governance, democracy and social reproduction. Int J Urban Reg Res 31:169–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keating M (2001) Governing cities and regions: territorial restructuring in a global age. In: Scott A (ed) Global city regions, trends, theory and policy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 371–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin GCS (2001) Evolving spatial form of urban–rural interaction in the Pearl River Delta, China. Prof Geogr 53:56–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longley PA, Goodchild MF, Maguire DJ, Rhind DW (2011) Geographic information systems and science, 3rd edn. Wiley, Danvers

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord A (2009) Mind the gap. The theory and practice of state rescaling: institutional morphology and the ‘new’ city-regionalism. Space Polity 13:77–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meijers EJ, Burger MJ (2010) Spatial structure and productivity in US metropolitan areas. Environ Plan A 42(6):1383–1402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NDRC (The National Development and Reform Commission) (2008) The framework plan of reform and development for the Pearl River Delta 2008–2020. Document available in Baidu wenku. http://wenku.baidu.com. Accessed 20 Sept 2014

  • Salet W, Thornley A, Kruekels A (eds) (2003) Metropolitan governance and spatial planning. Spon Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott A, Agnew J, Soja E, Storper M (2001) Global city regions. In: Scott A (ed) Global city regions, trends, theory and policy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 11–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen J (2004) Cross-border Urban Governance in Hong Kong: the role of state in a globalizing city-region. Prof Geogr 56(4):530–543

    Google Scholar 

  • The State Council (2010) National plan of major functional areas. PDF version available at http://chinaup.info/2011/06/964.html. Accessed 28 Aug 2014

  • The State Council (2014) The national new urbanization plan 2014–2020. PDF version available at http://www.51baogao.cn. Accessed 28 Aug 2014

  • Thrift N (2002) Performing cultures in the new economy. In: Du Gay P, Pryke M (eds) Cultural economy. Sage, London, pp 201–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang CJ (2014) April 23. Changsha Master Plan revealed: capacity double to the 2003 plan. http://economy.caijing.com.cn/2014-04-23/114125927.html. Accessed 22 Sept 2014

  • Wu DT, Wu ZZ (2011) On the problems in planning and implementing the main functional zones. Renmin luntan, no 24. http://paper.people.com.cn/rmlt/html/2011-08/15/content_924125.htm?div=-1. Accessed 2 Sept 2014

  • Xu XP (2014) Speech in press conference for The National New Urbanization Plan 2014–2020. Voice recording available at http://www.scio.gov.cn/xwfbh/xwbfbh/wqfbh/2014/20140319/. Accessed 18 Sept 2014

  • Zhang KY, Liu Q (2012) Study on challenges and policy problems of implementation of the planning of main functional areas. Xiandai chengshi yanjiu 6:8–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao SXB, Zhang L (2007) Foreign direct investment and the formation of global city-regions in China. Reg Stud 41(7):979–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhongguo xinwen wang (2014) Commentary on China’s new urbanization: new demand for urbanization with unique Chinese characteristics. http://news.dzwww.com/shehuixinwen/201407/t20140716_10661736.htm. Accessed 2 Sept 2014

Download references

Acknowledgements

Part of the contents of this chapter was presented in the 2014 Global Chinese Real Estate Conference in Nanjing, China. The author is grateful to H. Detlef Kammeier, Kevin B. O’Connor, and Bo Qin for their constructive comments on an earlier draft. Ada Chan helped to prepare Figs. 9.5 and 9.6; Jerome Han helped to prepare Fig. 9.3. Yuanyuan Liu assisted to gather several planning policies and documents from Baidu policy bank. Irene Han proofread the draft. All the remaining errors are the author’s.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sun Sheng Han .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Han, S.S. (2015). The Giant City-Regions in China’s New Urbanization. In: Wong, TC., Han, S., Zhang, H. (eds) Population Mobility, Urban Planning and Management in China. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15257-8_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics