Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Learning Mathematics by Creative or Imitative Reasoning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Selected Regular Lectures from the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education

Abstract

This paper presents (1a) a research framework for analysing learning difficulties related to rote learning and imitative reasoning, (1b) research insights based on that framework, (2a) a framework for research and design of more efficient learning opportunities through creative reasoning and (2b) some related ongoing research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arbaugh, F., Herbel-Eisenmann, B., Ramirez, N., Knuth, E., Kranendonk, H., & Quander, J. R. (2010). Linking research and practise: The NCTM research agenda conference report. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asiala, M., Brown, A., DeVries, D., Dubinsky, E., Mathews, D., & Thomas, K. (1996). A frame- work for research and curriculum development in undergratduate mathematics education. In A. Schoenfeld, J. Kaput, & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), Research in collegiate mathematics education II, CBMS issues in mathematics education (pp. 1–32). American Mathematical Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balacheff, N. (1990). Towards a problematique for research on mathematics teaching. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(4), 258–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D., & Bass, H. (2003). Making mathematics reasonable in school. In J. Kilpatrick, G. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 27–44). Reston, Va.: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergqvist, E. (2007). Types of reasoning required in university exams in mathematics. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 26, 348–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergqvist, T., & Lithner, J. (2012). Mathematical reasoning in teachers’ presentations. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31, 252–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergqvist, T., Lithner, J., & Sumpter, L. (2008). Upper secondary students task reasoning. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 39, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boesen, J., Lithner, J., & Palm, T. (2010). The mathematical reasoning required by national tests and the reasoning used by students. Educational studies in mathematics, 75, 89–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boesen, J., Helenius, O., Lithner, J., Bergqvist, E., Bergqvist, T., Palm, T., et al. (2012). Developing mathematical competence: From the intended to the enacted curriculum. Submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkhardt, H., & Schoenfeld, A. (2003). Improving educational research: Toward a more useful, more influential, and better-funded enterprise. Educational Researcher, 32, 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., Confrey, J., di Sessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, W. (1988). Work in mathematics classes: The context of students thinking during instruction. Educational Psychologist, 23, 167–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duval, R. (2002). Proof understanding in mathematics: What ways for students? In Proceedings of the 2002 International Conference on Mathematics: Understanding Proving and Proving to Understand (pp. 23–44). Taiwan: National Taiwan Normal University, Department of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gravemeijer, K., & Cobb, P. (2006). Design research from a learning design perspective. In J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 17–51). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert, J. (2003). What research says about the NCTM standards. In J. Kilpatrick, G. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 5–26). Reston, Va.: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert, J., & Carpenter, T. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook for research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 65–97). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert, J., & Lefevre, P. (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: An introductory analysis. In J. Hiebert (Ed.), Conceptual and procedural knowledge (pp. 1–27). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lester, F. (2005). On the theoretical, conceptual, and philosophical foundations for research in mathematics education. Zentralblatt fuer Didaktik der Mathematik, 37(6), 457–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lithner, J. (2000). Mathematical reasoning in school tasks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41(2), 165–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lithner, J. (2003). Students’ mathematical reasoning in university textbook exercises. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52, 29–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lithner, J. (2004). Mathematical reasoning in calculus textbook exercises. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23, 405–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lithner, J. (2008). A research framework for creative and imitative reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(3), 255–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lithner, J. (2011). University mathematics students’ learning difficulties. Education Inquiry, 2(2), 289–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, Va.: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niss, M. (1999). Aspects of the nature and state of research in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 40, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niss, M. (2003). Mathematical competencies and the learning of mathematics: The Danish KOM project. In Third Mediterranean Conference on Mathematics Education, Athens (pp. 115–124).

    Google Scholar 

  • Niss, M. (2007). Reactions on the state and trends in research on mathematics teaching and learning: From here to utopia. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 1293–1312). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niss, M., & Jensen, T. H. (2002). Kompetencer og matematiklaering (competencies and mathematical learning, in Danish): Uddannelsestyrelsens temahaefteserie nr. 18-2002, Undervisningsministeriet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palm, T., Boesen, J., & Lithner, J. (2011). Mathematical reasoning requirements in swedish upper secondary level assessments. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 13, 221–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plomp, T. (2009). Educational design research: An introduction. In T. Plomp & N. Nieveen (Eds.) An introduction to educational design research (pp. 9–36). The Netherlands: SLO Netherlands institute for curriculum development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pólya, G. (1954). Mathematics and plausible reasoning. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton U.P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. (1991). On mathematics as sense-making: An informal attack on the unfortunate divorce of formal and informal mathematics. In J. Voss, D. Perkins, & J. Segal (Eds.), Informal reasoning and education (pp. 311–344). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. (2007). Method. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 69–107). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sierpinska, A. (1996). Understanding in mathematics. Falmer: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, E. (1997). Fostering creativity through instruction rich in mathematical problem solving and problem posing. Zentralblatt fuer Didaktik der Mathematik, 29(3), 75–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skemp, R. (1978). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Arithmetic Teacher, 26(3), 9–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. K., Engle, R. A., Smith, M. S., & Hughes, E. K. (2008). Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: Five practises for helping teachers move beyond show and tell. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10, 313–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tall, D. (1991). Reflections. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking, (pp. 251–259). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tall, D. (1996). Functions and calculus. In A. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & C. Laborde (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (pp. 289–325). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinner, S. (1997). The pseudo-conceptual and the pseudo-analytical thought processes in mathematics learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 34, 97–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wedege, T., & Skott, J. (2006). Changing views and practises? A study of the Kapp-Abel mathematics competition. Trondheim: NTNU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yackel, E., & Hanna, G. (2003). Reasoning and proof. In J. Kilpatrick, G. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 227–236). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 458–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Science and Mathematics Education, Umea University, Umea, Sweden

    Johan Lithner

Authors
  1. Johan Lithner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johan Lithner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea, Republic of (South Korea)

    Sung Je Cho

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lithner, J. (2015). Learning Mathematics by Creative or Imitative Reasoning. In: Cho, S. (eds) Selected Regular Lectures from the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17187-6_28

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation