Skip to main content

Examining the Public’s Desire to Punish Socially Stigmatized Service Workers in Crisis: Can Empathy Buffer Anger?

  • Conference paper
Marketing Challenges in a Turbulent Business Environment

Abstract

Service workers like child protective officers and mental health workers, are perceived overwhelmingly as valuable to society (Le Croy & Stinson, 2004). Yet, perversely, those who undertake these roles are also often socially stigmatized, seen as “dirty” by their communities, because they deal with “tainted” people (Ashforth, Kreiner, Clark, & Fugate, 2007). This dark side of public perception is most evident during crisis events when the media taps into the desire to blame workers for unfortunate occurrences, creating a frenzied environment in which individual accountability is often demanded. The negative portrayal of stigmatized service workers by the media has been linked to increased stress, burnout and employee turnover (see e.g., Gibelman, 2004; Tower, 2000; Zugazaga, Surette, Mendez, & Otto, 2006). For example, a 2008 submission by the Australian Association of Social Workers cites “bad press” as one of a number of key reasons for concern over adequate practitioner staffing in the near future. Further, in 2004 and 2005, after several high profile Child Protective Services (CPS) incidents in Texas triggered sustained negative media coverage, turnover in CPS increased from 29 % in 2004 to 39 % in 2005, continuing its upward trajectory to a high of 45 % in 2007 (Centre for Public Policy Priorities, 2009). This kind of response has profound care quality and economic consequences. Families must re-establish relationships with new workers, and remaining staff are forced temporarily to absorb the cases of those departing. This decreases the attention paid to their own case loads and affects the timeliness of key decisions on safe and stable placements (Social Work Policy Institute, 2010). In addition, staff replacement costs are estimated to be between one third and two thirds of annual salary per worker (Coperthwaite, 2006; Dorch, McCarthy, & Denofrio, 2008). Given the serious implications of media portrayal of stigmatized service workers, it is essential that we gain an understanding of factors that may influence community response to crisis events.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ashforth, B. E., Kreiner, G. E., Clark, M. A., & Fugate, M. (2007). Normalizing dirty work: Managerial tactics for countering occupational taint. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 149–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Association of Social Workers. (2008). Review of the qualifications and training pathways. Department of Child Safety, Queensland. Retrieved July 16, 2012, from http://www.aasw.asn.au/document/item/2228.

  • Batson, D., Chang, J., Orr, R., & Rowland, J. (2002). Empathy, attitudes, and action: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group motivate one to help the group? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1656–1666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C. D., Polycarpou, M. P., Harmon-Jones, E., Imhoff, H. J., Mitchener, E. C., Bednar, L. L., et al. (1997). Empathy and attitudes: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group improve feelings toward the group. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 105–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betancourt, H. (1990). An attribution-empathy model of helping behavior: Behavioral intentions and judgments of help-giving. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 573–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bove, L. L., & Pervan, S. J. (2013). Stigmatized labour: An overlooked service worker’s stress. Australasian Journal of Marketing, 21, 259–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Centre for Public Policy Priorities. (2009). A better understanding of caseworker turnover within child protective services. Retrieved July 14, 2012, from http://www.cppp.org/files/4/364%20DFPS%20workforce.pdf.

  • Coombs, W. T. (2007). Protecting organization reputations during a crisis: The development and application of situational crisis communication theory. Corporate Reputation Review, 10, 163–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coperthwaite, A. (2006). Cost of child welfare caseworker turnover. Working Paper, Child Welfare Training Institute, A Collaborative Agreement Between Maine Department of Health and Human Services and Muskie School of Public Service, University of Southern Maine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorch, E., McCarthy, M. L., & Denofrio, D. (2008). Calculating child welfare separation, replacement, and training costs. Social Work in Public Health, 23, 39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibelman, M. (2004). Television and the public image of social workers: Portrayal or betrayal? Social Work, 49, 331–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, S., Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2007). Feelings and consumer decision making: The appraisal-tendency framework. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17, 158–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen, B. K. (1996). Components of consumer reaction to company-related mishaps: A structural equation model approach. Advances in Consumer Research, 23, 346–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H. J., & Cameron, G. T. (2011). Emotions matter in crisis: The role of anger and sadness in the publics’ response to crisis news framing and corporate crisis response. Communication Research, 38, 826–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Croy, C. W., & Stinson, E. L. (2004). The public’s perception of social work: Is it what we think it is? Social Work, 49, 164–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nabi, R. L. (2003). Exploring the framing effects of emotion. Communication Research, 30, 224–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Social Work Policy Institute. (2010). High caseloads: How do they impact delivery of health and human services? Washington, DC: NASW Research to Practice Brief.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tower, K. (2000). In our own image: Shaping attitudes about social work through television production. Journal of Social Work Education, 36, 575–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B., Perry, R. P., & Magnusson, J. (1988). An attributional analysis of reactions to stigmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 738–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zugazaga, C. B., Surette, R. B., Mendez, M., & Otto, C. W. (2006). Social worker perceptions of the portrayal of the profession in the news and entertainment media: An exploratory study. Journal of Social Work Education, 42, 621–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon J. Pervan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The Academy of Marketing Science

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pervan, S.J., Bove, L.L. (2016). Examining the Public’s Desire to Punish Socially Stigmatized Service Workers in Crisis: Can Empathy Buffer Anger?. In: Groza, M., Ragland, C. (eds) Marketing Challenges in a Turbulent Business Environment. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19428-8_75

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics