Abstract
Children’s gestures have been proposed to contain important cues and clues to their science ideas that may not be revealed in speech or written language. New and innovative research has begun to explore the way that these gestures can be used to inform on how children’s ideas for science concepts change. Such research is firmly embedded in a constructivist perspective (Driver R et al. Educ Res 23(7):5–12, 1994), which has a strong background of research exploring ‘alternative frameworks’ (Driver R, Bell, B, SSR 67:443–455, 1986) and proposals for the identification and understanding of the underlying mechanisms that support such conceptual change dynamics (Vosniadou S, International handbook of research on conceptual change. Routledge, Oxon, 2008). Typically, conceptual change literature accesses children’s knowledge largely through verbal reports (e.g. Primary SPACE Projects 1990–1994). Whilst these approaches have been successful in revealing what children know, this bias towards language at the expense of other forms of communication may prevent a comprehensive understanding of knowledge growth (Goldin-Meadows S, Child Dev 71(1):231–239, 2000). This chapter discusses a recent study which explored the gestures that children used during discussions of their ideas about electricity and revealed that gestures can be categorised according to content (as highlighted in a pilot study by Callinan (Sharp JG, Prim Sci 120(Nov/Dec):29–31, 2011) and that the content of gestures can reveal elements of knowledge that is not verbalised in speech.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D., & Hanesian, H. (1978). Educational psychology: A cognitive view (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc.
Bell, P. (1991). Electricity and magnetism. Preston: Topical Resources.
Callinan, C., & Sharp, J. G. (2011). Stuck for words. Primary Science, 120(Nov/Dec), 29–31.
Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cosgrove, M., & Osborne, R. (1985). Lesson frameworks for changing children’s ideas. In R. Osborne & P. Freyberg (Eds.), Learning in science: The implications of Children’s science. Auckland: Heinemann.
Crowder, E. M., & Newman, D. (1993). Telling what they know: The role of gesture and language in children’s scientific explanations. Pragmatics and Cognition, 1, 341–376.
diSessa, A. A. (1988). Knowledge in pieces. In G. Forman & P. B. Pufall (Eds.), Constructivism in the computer age (pp. 49–70). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishing.
Dole, J. A., & Sinatra, G. M. (1998). Reconceptualizing change in the cognitive construction of knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 33(2/3), 109–128.
Driver, R., & Bell, B. (1986). Students’ thinking and the learning of science: A constructivist view. SSR, 67, 443–455.
Driver, R., & Easley, J. (1978). Pupils and paradigms: A review of literature related to conceptual development in adolescent science students. Studies in Science Education, 5, 61–84.
Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5–12.
Finkelstein, N. (2005). Learning physics in context: A study of student learning about electricity and magnetism. International Journal of Science Education, 27(10), 1187–1209.
Glauert, E. B. (2009). How young children understand electric circuits: Prediction, explanation and exploration. International Journal of Science Education, 31(8), 1025–1047.
Goldin-Meadows, S. (2000). Beyond words: The importance of gesture to researchers and learners. Child Development, 71(1), 231–239.
Goldin-Meadows, S., Alibali, M. W., & Church, R. B. (1993). Transitions in concept acquisition: Using the hand to read the mind. Psychological Review, 100(2), 279–297.
Karmilloff-Smith, A. (1996). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Ogborn, J., & Tsatsarelis, C. (2001). Multimodal teaching and learning: Rhetorics of the science classroom. London: Continuum.
Krippendorff, K. (2012). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. London: Sage.
Limon, M., & Mason, L. (2002). Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Osborne, R. (1981). Children’s ideas about electric circuits. New Zealand Science Teacher, 29, 12–19.
Osborne, R. (1983). Towards modifying children’s ideas about electric circuits. Research in Science and Technology Education, 1(1), 73–82.
Osborne, R., & Freyberg, P. (1985). Learning in science: The implications of children’s science. Auckland: Heinemann Publishers.
Osborne, J., Black, P., Smith, M., & Meadows, J. (1991). Electricity. Primary SPACE project research report. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 167–199.
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227.
Roth, W. M., & Lawless, D. (2002). Scientific investigations, metaphorical gestures, and the emergence of abstract scientific concepts. Learning and Instruction, 12, 285–304.
Rumelhart, D. E., & Norman, D. A. (1978). Accretion, tuning and restructuring: Three modes of learning. In J. W. Cotton & R. L. Klatzky (Eds.), Semantic factors in cognition (pp. 37–53). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishing.
Sharp, J. G., & Kuerbis, P. (2006). Children’s ideas about the solar system and the chaos in learning science. Science Education, 90(1), 124–147.
Shipstone, D. (1985). Electricity in simple circuits. In R. Driver, E. Guesne, & A. Tiberghien (Eds.), Children’s ideas in science (pp. 33–51). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Solomon, J. (1985). The pupils’ view of electricity. European Journal of Science Education, 7(3), 281–294.
Vosniadou, S. (2008). International handbook of research on conceptual change. Oxon: Routledge.
Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1987). Theories of knowledge restructuring in development. Review of Educational Psychology, 57(1), 51–67.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a PhD scholarship from Bishop Grosseteste University, Lincoln, UK; the author wishes to thank supervisor Professor John Sharp for his valuable support and constructive feedback throughout the project. Furthermore, the author is extremely grateful to all of the participating schools, head teachers, teachers, TAs and children who generously gave their time and made this project possible.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Callinan, C.J. (2016). Talking About Electricity: The Importance of Hearing Gestures As Well As Words. In: Papadouris, N., Hadjigeorgiou, A., Constantinou, C. (eds) Insights from Research in Science Teaching and Learning. Contributions from Science Education Research, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20074-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20074-3_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20073-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20074-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)