Abstract
This chapter is a conceptual piece that examines the assumptions of the age-friendly cities and environments (AFE) phenomenon both in international policy and by drawing on the Australian experience. The age-friendly narrative is discussed, both in terms of a focus on active aging and claims to be ‘for all ages.’ This claim is compared to initiatives around child and dementia friendliness, both to help specify the focus of AFE and to examine the commonalities and differences between these groups when it comes to their access to public space. An argument is developed that examines the assumptive reality of public space and how it excludes certain groups. In many ways, ‘active ageing’ pursues many of the same goals as those that characterize working life, but from the perspective of consumption rather than production. It is therefore less difficult to address the needs of the active ager than to look at children and people living with dementia. The chapter concludes by examining the ways public space affects the performance of identity. We explore how existing assumptions about the negative consequences of public space on identity may be reversed for marginalized age groups, such as people living with dementia. Finally, some of the prerequisites for effective intergenerational interaction are explored through a discussion of props to identity and the meaning of generationally intelligent space.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Note from the editors: for detailed discussions of ‘active ageing’ and ‘age friendly cities,’ see the chapters of Walker, of Kalache and of Moulaert and his colleagues.
- 2.
Note from the editors: in their chapter, Brasher and Winterton present an empirically based critical discussion on the Australian case which completes the present chapter.
References
Alzheimer’s Australia. (2004). Dementia care and the built environment. Position Paper 3, June (Online). Available: https://fightdementia.org.au/sites/default/files/20040600_Nat_NP_3DemCareBuiltEnv.pdf. (Accessed November 21, 2014).
Alzheimer’s Australia. (2013). Dementia friendly societies: The way forward. A report for Alzheimer’s Australia. Paper 31, May (Online). Available: https://fightdementia.org.au/sites/default/files/20130604_NAT_PUB_Paper31DementiaFriendlySocieties.pdf. (Accessed November 21, 2014).
Alzheimer’s Australia. (2014). Dementia care in the acute hospital setting: Issues and strategies. A report for Alzheimer’s Australia. Paper 40, June (Online). Available: https://fightdementia.org.au/sites/default/files/Alzheimers_Australia_Numbered_Publication_40.PDF. (Accessed November 21, 2014).
Alzheimer’s Disease International. (2012). World Alzheimer Report 2012: Overcoming the stigma of dementia. ADI, London (Online). Available: http://www.alz.org/documents_custom/world_report_2012_final.pdf. (Accessed November 21, 2014).
Alzheimer’s Disease International. (2013). Policy Brief for Heads of Government: The Global Impact of Dementia 2013–2050. ADI, London (Online). Available: http://www.alz.co.uk/research/GlobalImpactDementia2013.pdf. (Accessed November 21, 2014).
Anderzhon, J. W., Hughes, D., Judd, S., Kiyota, E., & Wijnties, M. (2012). Design for aging: International case studies of building and program. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.
Arizona State University Herberger Center for Design Excellence. (2005). Livable communities: An evaluation guide. Washington, DC: AARP Public Policy Institute.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2012). Dementia in Australia. Cat. no. AGE 70. Canberra: AIHW (Online). Available: http://www.aihw.gov.au/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=10737422943. (Accessed November 21, 2014).
Baars, J., & Phillipson, C. (2013). Connecting meaning with social structure: Theoretical foundations. In J. Baars, J. Dohmen, A. Grenier, & C. Phillipson (Eds.), Ageing, meaning and social structure: Connecting critical and humanistic gerontology (pp. 11–30). Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
Bartlett, S. (2002). Building better cities with children and youth. Environment and Urbanization, 14(2), 3–10.
Biggs, S. (1999a). The ‘Blurring’ of the Lifecourse: Narrative, memory and the question of authenticity. Journal of Ageing and Identity, 4(4), 209–221.
Biggs, S. (1999b). The mature imagination. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Biggs, S. (2004). Age, gender, narratives and masquerades. Journal of Aging Studies, 18(1), 45–58.
Biggs, S., Carstensen, L., & Hogan, P. (2012). Social capital, lifelong learning and social innovation. In J. R. Beard, S. Biggs, D. E. Bloom, L. P. Fried, P. Hogan, A. Kalache, & S. J. Olshansky (Eds.), Global Population Ageing: Peril or Promise (pp. 39–41). Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum, 2011.
Buffel, T., Phillipson, C., & Scharf, T. (2012). Ageing in urban environments: Developing ‘age-friendly’ cities. Critical Social Policy, 32(4), 597–617.
Caro, F. G., Bass, S. A., & Chen, Y.-P. (1993). Achieving a productive aging society. Westport, Conn: Auburn House.
Carr, A., Kimberley, H., & Biggs, S. (2013). Child-Friendly Cities and Age-Friendly Cities: Discussion paper prepared for Hobsons Bay City Council. Working Paper (in press). Melbourne, VIC: Brotherhood of St Laurence.
Chapman, S. A. (2005). Theorizing about aging well: Constructing a narrative. Canadian Journal of Aging, 24(1), 9–18.
Christensen, P., & O’Brien, M. (2002). Children in the city: Home, neighbourhood and community. London: Routledge.
City of New York. (2010). Active design guidelines. New York: City of New York.
Commonwealth of Australia. (2006). A community for all ages—building the future. Canberra, ACT: Department of Health and Ageing, Commonwealth of Australia.
Council of Australian Governments (COAG). (2009). Investing in the early years—a national early childhood development strategy. Barton, ACT: COAG, Commonwealth of Australia.
Claire, L. (2003). Managing threats to self: Awareness in early stage Alzheimer’s disease. Social Science and Medicine, 57(6), 1017–1029.
Davies, M. (2004). Planet of slums. New Left Review, 26, 5–34.
Davis, S., Byers, S., Nay, R., & Koch, S. (2009). Guiding Design of dementia friendly environments in residential care settings: Considering the lived experience. Dementia, 8(2), 185–203.
Day, K., Carreon, D., & Stump, C. (2000). The therapeutic design of environments for people with dementia: A review of the empirical research. The Gerontologist, 40(4), 397–416.
Debord, G. (1955). Introduction to a critique of urban geography (Online). Available: http://library.nothingness.org/articles/SI/en/display/2. (Accessed November 21, 2014).
Debord, G. (1967). The Society of the Spectacle, translation (1970) by F. Perlman & J. Supak. New York: Black & Red.
Department for Work and Pensions. (2009). Building a society for all ages. Norwich, UK: Department for Work and Pensions, TSO.
District of Saanich. (2014). Age Friendly Cities and the Municipality of Saanich (Online). Available: http://www.saanich.ca/parkrec/community/agefriendly.html. (Accessed November 21, 2014).
Family and Community Development Committee. (2012). Inquiry into opportunities for participation of victorian seniors. East Melbourne, VIC: Parliament House.
Fleming, R., Forbes, I., & Bennett, K. (2003). Adapting the ward for people with dementia. Sydney: NSW Department of Health.
Fredvang, M., & Biggs, S. (2012). The rights of older persons: protection and gaps under human rights law. Social Policy Working Paper no. 16, Brotherhood of St Laurence & Centre for Public Policy, Melbourne, VIC: University of Melbourne.
Freeman, M. (2007). Why it remains important to take children’s rights seriously. International Journal of Children’s Rights, 15, 5–23.
Gehl, J. (2010). Cities for people. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Gilleard, C., & Higgs, O. (2005). Contexts of ageing: Class, cohort and community. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Gleeson, B. (2001). Disability and the open city. Urban Studies, 38(2), 251–265.
Hall, A. (2012). Welcome to Dementiaville: £17 million village in Switzerland will keep sufferers in fake reality. Daily Mail, January 31 (Online). Available: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2094155/Dementiaville–17m-village-Switzerland-sufferers-fake-reality.html. (Accessed November 21, 2014).
Herskovits, E. (1995). Struggling over subjectivity: Debates about the ‘Self’ and Alzheimer’s Disease. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 9(2), 146–164.
Kitwood, T. (1997). Dementia reconsidered: The person comes first. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Kohli, M. (1985). Die Institutionalisierung des Lebenslaufs: Historische Befunde und theoretischeArgumente [The institutionalization of the life course: Historical findings and theoretical arguments]. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 37, 1–29.
Laws, G. (1995). Embodiment and emplacement. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 40(4), 253–280.
Lefebvre, H. (1968). The production of space, translation (1991) by D. Nicholson-Smith. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Lefebvre, H. (1996). Writings of cities, selection, translation and introduction by E. Kofman & E. Lebas. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Lui, C. W., Everingham, J.-A., Warburton, J., Cuthill, M., & Bartlett, H. (2009). What makes a community age-friendly: A review of international literature. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 28(3), 116–121.
Macintyre, S., & Ellaway, A. (2000). Ecological approaches: Rediscovering the role of the physical and social environment. In L. Berkman & I. Kawachi (Eds.), Social epidemiology (pp. 332–348). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Miller, G., & Annesley, A. (2011). Re-positioning age friendly communities: Opportunities to take AFC mainstream. Toronto, Ontario: Canadian Urban Institute.
Moulaert, T., & Biggs, S. (2013). International and European policy on work and retirement: Reinventing critical perspectives on active ageing and mature subjectivity. Human Relations, 66(1), 23–43.
National Association of Area Agencies on Aging. (2007). A blueprint for action: Developing a livable community for all ages. Washington DC: National Association of Area Agencies on Aging and Partners for Livable Communities.
Noyes, J. (2001). Designing for humans. East Sussex, UK: Taylor and Francis Group.
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. (2004). Sustainable cities and the ageing society. London: Brook Lyndhurst Ltd.
Olshansky, S. J., Beard, J. R., & Börsch-Supan, A. (2012). The longevity dividend: Health as an investment. In J. R. Beard, S. Biggs, D. E. Bloom, L. P. Fried, P. Hogan, A. Kalache, & S. J. Olshansky (Eds.), Global population ageing: Peril or promise (pp. 57–60). Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum, 2011.
Paterson, T. (2012). Switzerland’s ‘Dementiaville’ designed to mirror the past. The Independent, January 24 (Online). Available: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/switzerlands-dementiaville-designed-to-mirror-the-past-6293712.html. (Accessed November 21, 2014).
Richard, L., Gauvin, L., Gosselin, C., & Laforest, S. (2009). Staying connected: Neighbourhood correlates of social participation among older adults living in an urban environment in Montréal, Québec. Health Promotion International, 24(1), 46–57.
Riggio, E. (2002). Child friendly cities: Good governance in the best interests of the child. Environment and Urbanization, 14(2), 45–58.
Scharf, T., Phillipson, C., Smith, A., & Kingston, P. (2002). Growing older in socially deprived areas: Social exclusion in later life. London: Help the Aged.
Scharlach, A. E. (2009). Creating ageing-friendly communities. Generations, 33(2), 5–11.
Scharlach, A. E., & Lehning, A. J. (2013). Ageing-friendly communities and social inclusion in the United States of America. Ageing and Society, 33(1), 110–136.
Smith, A. E. (2009). Ageing in urban environments: Place attachment and social exclusion. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.
The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited. (2012). A Summary of the Liveability Ranking and Overview August 2013. The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited (Online). Available: http://www.eiu.com/public/topical_report.aspx?campaignid=Liveability2013. (Accessed November 21, 2014).
Tranter, P., & Sharpe, S. (2007). Children and peak oil: An opportunity in crisis. International Journal of Children’s Rights, 15, 181–197.
UNICEF. (2004). Building Child Friendly Cities: A Framework for Action.UNICEF, International Secretariat for Child Friendly Cities, Florence: Innocenti Research Centre.
UNICEF. (2010). The Children Left Behind: A league table of inequality in child well-being in the world’s rich countries. Innocenti Report Card 9, UNICEF, Florence: Innocenti Research Centre.
UN. (2002). Political Declaration and Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing. Second World Assemble on Ageing, Madrid, Spain. New York: UN (Online). Available: http://www.un.org/en/events/pastevents/pdfs/Madrid_plan.pdf. (Accessed November 21, 2014).
UN. (2014). World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision, Highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/352). Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (Online). Available: http://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/Highlights/WUP2014-Highlights.pdf. (Accessed November 21, 2014).
United Nations Population Fund. (2007). The state of world population 2007. New York: United Nations Population Fund.
van Vliet, W. (2011). Intergenerational cities: A framework for policies and programs. Journal of Intergenerational Relations, 9(4), 348–365.
Wahl, H.-W., & Oswald, F. (2010). Environmental perspectives on ageing. In D. Dannefer & C. Phillipson (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social gerontology (pp. 111–124). London: SAGE Publications.
Walker, A. (2002). A strategy for active ageing. International Social Security Review, 55(1), 121–139.
Walker, A. (2009). Commentary: The emergence and application of active aging in Europe. Journal of Aging and Social Policy, 21(1), 75–93.
Ward, C. (1978). The child in the city. London: The Architectural Press.
Woolcock, G., Gleeson, B., & Randolph, B. (2010). Urban research and child-friendly cities: A new Australian outline. Children’s Geographies, 8(2), 177–192.
WHO. (2002). Active ageing, a policy framework. Geneva: WHO.
WHO. (2007). Global age-friendly cities: A guide. Geneva: WHO.
WHO. (2012). Dementia: a public health priority. Geneva: WHO and ADI (Online). Available: http://www.who.int/mental_health/publications/dementia_report_2012/en/. (Accessed November 21, 2014).
WHO. (2014). WHO Age friendly Environments Programme (Online). Available: http://www.who.int/ageing/age_friendly_cities/en/. (Accessed November 21, 2014).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Biggs, S., Carr, A. (2016). Age Friendliness, Childhood, and Dementia: Toward Generationally Intelligent Environments. In: Moulaert, T., Garon, S. (eds) Age-Friendly Cities and Communities in International Comparison. International Perspectives on Aging. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24031-2_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24031-2_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24029-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24031-2
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)