Skip to main content

Improving Heuristics On-the-fly for Effective Search in Plan Space

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1365 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9324))

Abstract

The design of domain independent heuristic functions often brings up experimental evidence that different heuristics perform well in different domains. A promising approach is to monitor and reduce the error associated with a given heuristic function even as the planner solves a problem. We extend this single-step-error adaptation to heuristic functions from Partial Order Causal Link (POCL) planning. The goal is to allow a partial order planner to observe the effective average-step-error during search. The preliminary evaluation shows that our approach improves the informativeness of the state-of-the-art heuristics. Our planner solves more problems by using the improved heuristics as compared to when it uses current heuristics in the selected domains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arfaee, S.J., Zilles, S., Holte, R.C.: Learning heuristic functions for large state spaces. Artificial Intelligence 175(16), 2075–2098 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bercher, P., Biundo, S.: Encoding partial plans for heuristic search. In: Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Knowledge Engineering for Planning and Scheduling (KEPS 2013), pp. 11–15. Citeseer (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bercher, P., Geier, T., Biundo, S.: Using state-based planning heuristics for partial-order causal-link planning. In: Timm, I.J., Thimm, M. (eds.) KI 2013. LNCS, vol. 8077, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Blum, A.L., Furst, M.L.: Fast planning through planning graph analysis. Artificial Intelligence 90(1), 281–300 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Bonet, B., Geffner, H.: Planning as heuristic search. Artificial Intelligence 129(1), 5–33 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Bonet, B., Loerincs, G., Geffner, H.: A robust and fast action selection mechanism for planning. In: AAAI/IAAI. pp. 714–719 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Haslum, P., Geffner, H.: Admissible heuristics for optimal planning. In: AIPS, pp. 140–149. Citeseer (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hoffmann, J.: FF: The fast-forward planning system. AI Magazine 22(3), 57 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jesús Virseda, J., Borrajo, D., Alcázar, V.: Learning heuristic functions for cost-based planning. Planning and Learning, 6 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Joslin, D., Pollack, M.E.: Least-cost flaw repair: A plan refinement strategy for partial-order planning (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  11. McAllester, D., Rosenblatt, D.: Systematic nonlinear planning (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  12. McDermott, D.: Using regression-match graphs to control search in planning. Artificial Intelligence 109(1), 111–159 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Nguyen, X., Kambhampati, S.: Extracting effective and admissible state space heuristics from the planning graph. In: AAAI/IAAI, pp. 798–805 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nguyen, X., Kambhampati, S.: Reviving partial order planning. In: IJCAI, vol. 1, pp. 459–464 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Penberthy, J.S., Weld, D.S.: UCPOP: A sound, complete, partial order planner for ADL, pp. 103–114. Morgan Kaufmann (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Samadi, M., Felner, A., Schaeffer, J.: Learning from multiple heuristics. In: AAAI, pp. 357–362 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schattenberg, B.: Hybrid Planning And Scheduling. Ph.D. thesis, Ulm University, Institute of Artificial Intelligence (2009). URN: urn:nbn:de:bsz:289-vts-68953

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schubert, L., Gerevini, A.: Accelerating partial order planners by improving plan and goal choices. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, pp. 442–450. IEEE (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Thayer, J.T., Dionne, A.J., Ruml, W.: Learning inadmissible heuristics during search. In: ICAPS (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Weld, D.S.: AAAI-10 classic paper award: Systematic nonlinear planning a commentary. AI Magazine 32(1), 101 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Younes, H.L., Simmons, R.G.: On the role of ground actions in refinement planning. In: AIPS, pp. 54–62 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Younes, H.L., Simmons, R.G.: Versatile Heuristic Partial Order Planner. J. Artif. Intell. Res. (JAIR) 20, 405–430 (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shashank Shekhar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Shekhar, S., Khemani, D. (2015). Improving Heuristics On-the-fly for Effective Search in Plan Space. In: Hölldobler, S., , Peñaloza, R., Rudolph, S. (eds) KI 2015: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. KI 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9324. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24489-1_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24489-1_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24488-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24489-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics