Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) cadastres are often described as the 3D digital representation of real property rights, restrictions, and responsibilities (legal objects). They can also contain physical counterparts (physical objects) of legal objects such as buildings and utility networks, on, above or under the surface. Implementation of 3D cadastres requires many elements such as existing 3D property registration laws, appropriate 3D data acquisition methods, 3D spatial database management systems, and functional 3D visualisation platforms. In addition, an appropriate 3D cadastral data model can also play a key role to ensure successful development of the 3D cadastre. Many jurisdictions have defined their own cadastral data models. However, none of them can fully support the requirements of 3D cadastres. This paper aims to explore the theories and concepts of the most common existing cadastral data models and investigate how they manage 3D legal and physical data. The result of this research can be used by cadastral data modellers to improve existing or develop new cadastral data models to support the requirements of 3D cadastres.
Keywords
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aien, A. (2012). 3D cadastral data model: A foundation for developing a national land information infrastructure. In A. Rajabifard, I. Williamson, & M. Kalantari (Eds.), A national infrastructure for managing land information—research snapshot (pp. 116–121). Melbourne: The University of Melbourne.
Aien A. (2013). 3D cadastral data modelling. PhD Dissertation, Department of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne.
Aien, A., Rajabifard, A., Kalantari, M., Williamson, I.P. (2011). Aspects of 3D cadastre—A case study in Victoria. In: FIG Working Week 2011, Marrakech, Morocco. FIG.
Aien, A., Kalantari, M., Rajabifard, A., Williamson, I., & Bennett, R. (2013a). Utilising data modelling to understand the structure of 3D cadastres. Journal of Spatial Science, 58(2), 215–234.
Aien, A., Kalantari, M., Rajabifard, A., williamson, I., & Wallace, J. (2013b). Towards integration of 3D legal and physical objects in cadastral data models. Land Use Policy, 35, 140–154.
Aien, A., Rajabifard, A., Kalantari, M., & Shojaei, D. (2015). Integrating legal and physical dimensions of urban environments. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 4(3), 1442–1479.
Cumerford, N. (2010). The ICSM ePlan protocol, its development, evolution and implementation. In: FIG Congress 2010, Sydney, Australia, April 11–16, 2010. FIG.
DERM. (2011). Registrar of titles directions for the preparation of plans. Brisbane: Department of Environment and Resource Management.
ePlan (2010) ePlan Model version 1.0. ePlan. ICSM, Sydney, Australia.
ePlanQueensland. (2010). ePlan Protocol-Queensland LandXML Mapping- Version 0.1. Spatial Information- Spatial and Scientific Systems. Department of Environment and Resource Management,.
ePlanVictoria. (2010). ePlan Victoria-CIF Specification version 1.0. Electronic Plans of Subdivision. Victorian Government Department of Sustainability and Environment, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
FGDC. (1996). Cadastral Data Content Standard for the National Spatial Data Infrastructure- Version 1.1. NSDI, Standards Working Group, Standards Reference Model.
Godard, J.P. (2004). Urban underground space and benefits of going underground. Paper presented at the World Tunnel Congress 2004 and 30th ITA General Assembly, Singapore.
Henssen, J. (1995). Basic principles of the main cadastral systems in the world. In: Seminar Modern Cadastres and Cadastral Innovations, Delft, The Netherlands. In Proceedings of the One Day Seminar held during the Annual Meeting of Commission 7, Cadastre and Rural Land Management (pp. 5−12). The International Federation of Surveyors (FIG).
ICSM. (2008). ICSM Harmonised Data Model, Version 2. ICSM.
ISO19107. (2005). Geographic Information-Spatial Schema. Standards Australia. AS/NZS ISO.
ISO19152. (2012). ISO 19152. International Standard, Geographic Information—Land administration domain model (LADM). Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.
Kalantari, M., Rajabifard, A., Wallace, J., & Williamson, I. P. (2008). Spatially referenced legal property objects. Land Use Policy, 25(2), 173–183.
Kalantari, M., Lester, C., Boyle, D.R., Coupar, N. (2009). Towards eLand Administration—electronic plans of subdivision in Victoria. In: Baldock, B. O. P., Bruce, D., Burdett, M., Corcoran, P. (eds) Proceedings of the Surveying & Spatial Sciences Institute Biennial International Conference, Adelaide 2009 (pp. 155−162). Surveying & Spatial Sciences Institute.
Kolbe, T. H. (2009). Representing and exchanging 3D city models with CityGML. In J. Lee & S. Zlatanova (Eds.), 3D geo-information sciences. Berlin: Springer.
Lee, J., & Koh, J. H. (2007). A conceptual data model for a 3D cadastre in Korea. Korean Journal of Geomatics, 25(6–1), 1–10.
Mohammadi, H., Rajabifard, A., & Williamson, I. P. (2010). Development of an interoperable tool to facilitate spatial data integration in the context of SDI. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 24(4), 487–505.
Navratil, G. (2009). Cadastral boundaries: benefits of complexity.
Nv, Meyer. (2004). GIS and land records: the ArcGIS parcel data model. Redlands, CA, U.S.: ESRI Press.
Nv, Meyer, Oppmann, S., Grise, S., & Hewitt, W. (2001). ArcGIS parcel data model version 1. Redlands, CA: Esri.
Oosterom, Pv, (2010). FIG joint commission 3 and 7 working group on 3D-Cadastres—Work plan 2010–2014. http://www.gdmc.nl/3DCadastres/.
Park, S., Lee, J., Li, H. –S. (2010). Data model for 3D cadastre in Korea. Paper presented at the 2010 Second International Conference on Advanced geographic information Systems, Applications, and Services, St. Maarten, The Netherlands.
Pouliot, J., Vasseur, M., Boubehrezh, A. (2011). Spatial representation of condominium/co-ownership: comparison of Quebec and French cadastral system based on LADM specifications. In: P. V. Oosterom, E. Fendel, J. E. Stoter, A. Streilein (Eds) 2nd International Workshop on 3D Cadastres Proceeding, Delft, The Netherlands (pp 271−290). FIG.
Steudler, D. (2005). Swiss cadastral core data model- experiences of the last 15 years. Computers, environment and urban systems, 30(5), 600–613.
Stoter, J. E. (2004). 3D Cadastre. Delft: Delft University of Technology.
Stoter, J. E, Oosterom, P. v. (2006). 3D cadastre in an international context: legal, organizational, and technological aspects. Taylor & Francis.
Zlatanova, S., & Lee, J. (2008). A 3D data model and topological analyses for emergency response in urban areas. In J. Lee & S. Zlatanova (Eds.), Geospatial information technology for emergency response. Francis: Taylor.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to acknowledge the support of the Australian Research Council Linkage Project (LP110200178) on Land and Property information in 3D, its industry partners and the members of the Centre for Spatial Data Infrastructures and Land Administration in the Department of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, in the preparation of this paper and the associated research. However, the views expressed in the paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of these groups.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Aien, A., Rajabifard, A., Kalantari, M., Williamson, I. (2017). Review and Assessment of Current Cadastral Data Models for 3D Cadastral Applications. In: Abdul-Rahman, A. (eds) Advances in 3D Geoinformation. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25691-7_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25691-7_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25689-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25691-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)