Abstract
Higher Education magazines have echoed the rapid spread of MOOCs in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) since 2012. In their pages, MOOC related articles are proliferating. The focus of such articles has often been the disruptive nature as well as the survival of this new form of open online education, especially the first years. However, there is also a great deal of mentions of how internal stakeholders in HEIs perceive the advent of MOOCs. These perceptions are the object of analysis in this article. Using the Content Analysis (CA) method, MOOC related sources in three Higher Education magazines during 2014 have been analysed against a set of key themes. These themes have been established by combining data from two previous studies: a Content Analysis of MOOC related academic literature, and a set of interviews to internal stakeholders using grounded theory. As the findings indicate, in 2014 the main concerns of internal stakeholders have been the new teaching practices and new work dynamics resulting from the incorporation of MOOCs in their working routines. It is argued that educational media no longer focuses on the debate of the future of MOOCs. Rather, the debate is on how MOOCs should be best implemented from a practitioner’s perspective.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bulfin, S., Pangrazio, L., Selwyn, N.: Making “MOOCs”: the construction of a new digital higher education within news media discourse. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning (2014). http://bit.ly/1AYkD3r
Kolowich, S.: The year media stopped caring about MOOCs. The Chronicle of Higher Education (2014). http://bit.ly/1jFIeeV
Pappano, L.: The year of the MOOC. N. Y. Times 2(12), 2012 (2012)
Downes, S.: Measuring MOOC Media (2014). http://bit.ly/1DGWvmc
Hollands, F.M., Thirthali, D.: MOOCs: expectations and reality. Full report, New York, USA (May 2014). http://bit.ly/1sLBfoH
Kolowich, S.: The MOOC “revolution” may not be as disruptive as some had imagined. The Chronicle of Higher Education (2013). http://bit.ly/1vlHWTH
University of Edinburgh: MOOCs @ Edinburgh 2013– Report # 1, Edinburgh, p. 42 (2013). http://www.era.lib.ed.ac.uk/handle/1842/6683
Ithaka S + R: Interim Report: A Collaborative Effort to Test MOOCs and Other Online Learning Platforms on Campuses of the University System of Maryland (2013). http://bit.ly/17AB5up
University of London: MOOC Report 2013 (2013). http://bit.ly/1qaMvGY
Voss, B.D.: Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs): A Primer for University and College Board Members (2013). http://bit.ly/1EdSO8j
Yuan, L., Powell, S.: MOOCs and Open Education: Implications for Higher Education. CETIS, Bolton (2013). http://bit.ly/1AYlWzn
Liyanagunawardena, T.R., Adams, A.A., Williams, S.A.: MOOCs: a systematic study of the published literature 2008–2012. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning (2013). http://bit.ly/1vlI85o
Yousef, A.M.F., Amine, M., Schroeder, U., Wosnitza, M., Jakobs, H.: MOOCs a review of the state-of-the-art. In: CSEDU, pp. 9–20 (2014)
BIS (Department of Business, Innovation and Skills): The maturing of the MOOC: literature review of massive open online courses and other forms of online distance learning (2013). http://bit.ly/1c9qvv0
León, M.: Reactions on the emergence of MOOCs in higher education reactions on the emergence of MOOCs (2013). http://bit.ly/1ztBu9C in Higher Education
White, S.: Exploring stakeholder perspectives on the development of MOOCs in higher education a case study of the University of Southampton. M.Sc Dissertation (2014). http://bit.ly/1FDNJaZ
Daniel, J.: Making sense of MOOCs: musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. J. Interact. Media Educ. 3 (2012). http://bit.ly/19KGOzt
Krippendorff, K.: Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Sage, Washington (2012)
Herring, S.C.: Web content analysis: expanding the paradigm. International Handbook of Internet Research, pp. 233–249. Springer, The Netherlands (2010)
FutureLearn: About (2014). https://www.futurelearn.com/about
Chapleo, C., Sims, C.: Stakeholder analysis in higher education. Perspectives 14(1), 12–20 (2010)
Cho, J., Lee, E.: Reducing confusion about grounded theory and qualitative content analysis: similarities and differences. Qual. Rep. 19(64), 1–20 (2014)
Levander, C.: It’s all about assets. Inside Higher Education (2014). http://bit.ly/1nbGejR
Talbert, R.: Making screencasts: the pedagogical framework. The Chronicle of Higher Education (2014). http://bit.ly/1DGYmr6
Dulin, S.: Impacts of MOOCs on higher education. Inside Higher Education (2014). http://bit.ly/1nA2vYA
Straumsheim, C.: All things in modulation. Inside Higher Education (2014). http://bit.ly/1sFk9tJ
Straumsheim, C.: Profit or progress? Inside Higher Education (2014). http://bit.ly/187FshT
Kim, J.: 6 Big Takeaways from the edX Global Forum. Inside Higher Education (2014). http://bit.ly/1r1cxUX
Straumsheim, C.: Data, Data Everywhere. Inside Higher Education (2014). http://bit.ly/1z5xScV
Parr, C.: Making MOOCs social is the next challenge. Times Higher Education (2014). http://bit.ly/1xk6Vq8
Schulman, K., Selzter, M., Herzlinger, R.: Spurring Innovation in healthcare using MOOCS. Inside Higher Education (2014). https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/higher-ed-beta/spurring-innovation-healthcare-using-moocs
Straumsheim, C.: A platform for all purposes. Inside Higher Education (2014). http://bit.ly/1pN6OQK
Kim, J.: Saltatory. Inside Higher Education (2014). http://bit.ly/1LjJJuu
Eshleman, K.: Are MOOCs working for us? Inside Higher Education (2014). http://bit.ly/1BJXLq0
Kim, J.: Here Come the data scientists. Inside Higher Education (2014c). http://bit.ly/Vxh425
Kolowich, S.: Competing MOOC providers expand into new territory—and each other’s. Chronicle Higher Education (2014). http://bit.ly/1vP3gff
Tyson, C.: From MOOC to shining MOOC. Inside Higher Education (2014). http://bit.ly/1vlJ1uL
Waters, A.: Top Ed-Tech Trends of 2013: MOOCs and Anti-MOOCs (2013). http://bit.ly/1jG6CgI
Bates, T.: Look back in anger? A review of online learning in 2013 (2013). http://bit.ly/1c9qvv0
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Urrutia, M.L., White, S., White, S. (2016). MOOCs in Higher Education Magazines: A Content Analysis of Internal Stakeholder Perspectives. In: Zvacek, S., Restivo, M., Uhomoibhi, J., Helfert, M. (eds) Computer Supported Education. CSEDU 2015. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 583. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29585-5_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29585-5_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29584-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29585-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)