Skip to main content

MOOCs in Higher Education Magazines: A Content Analysis of Internal Stakeholder Perspectives

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computer Supported Education (CSEDU 2015)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 583))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Higher Education magazines have echoed the rapid spread of MOOCs in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) since 2012. In their pages, MOOC related articles are proliferating. The focus of such articles has often been the disruptive nature as well as the survival of this new form of open online education, especially the first years. However, there is also a great deal of mentions of how internal stakeholders in HEIs perceive the advent of MOOCs. These perceptions are the object of analysis in this article. Using the Content Analysis (CA) method, MOOC related sources in three Higher Education magazines during 2014 have been analysed against a set of key themes. These themes have been established by combining data from two previous studies: a Content Analysis of MOOC related academic literature, and a set of interviews to internal stakeholders using grounded theory. As the findings indicate, in 2014 the main concerns of internal stakeholders have been the new teaching practices and new work dynamics resulting from the incorporation of MOOCs in their working routines. It is argued that educational media no longer focuses on the debate of the future of MOOCs. Rather, the debate is on how MOOCs should be best implemented from a practitioner’s perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bulfin, S., Pangrazio, L., Selwyn, N.: Making “MOOCs”: the construction of a new digital higher education within news media discourse. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning (2014). http://bit.ly/1AYkD3r

  2. Kolowich, S.: The year media stopped caring about MOOCs. The Chronicle of Higher Education (2014). http://bit.ly/1jFIeeV

  3. Pappano, L.: The year of the MOOC. N. Y. Times 2(12), 2012 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Downes, S.: Measuring MOOC Media (2014). http://bit.ly/1DGWvmc

  5. Hollands, F.M., Thirthali, D.: MOOCs: expectations and reality. Full report, New York, USA (May 2014). http://bit.ly/1sLBfoH

  6. Kolowich, S.: The MOOC “revolution” may not be as disruptive as some had imagined. The Chronicle of Higher Education (2013). http://bit.ly/1vlHWTH

  7. University of Edinburgh: MOOCs @ Edinburgh 2013– Report # 1, Edinburgh, p. 42 (2013). http://www.era.lib.ed.ac.uk/handle/1842/6683

  8. Ithaka S + R: Interim Report: A Collaborative Effort to Test MOOCs and Other Online Learning Platforms on Campuses of the University System of Maryland (2013). http://bit.ly/17AB5up

  9. University of London: MOOC Report 2013 (2013). http://bit.ly/1qaMvGY

  10. Voss, B.D.: Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs): A Primer for University and College Board Members (2013). http://bit.ly/1EdSO8j

  11. Yuan, L., Powell, S.: MOOCs and Open Education: Implications for Higher Education. CETIS, Bolton (2013). http://bit.ly/1AYlWzn

    Google Scholar 

  12. Liyanagunawardena, T.R., Adams, A.A., Williams, S.A.: MOOCs: a systematic study of the published literature 2008–2012. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning (2013). http://bit.ly/1vlI85o

  13. Yousef, A.M.F., Amine, M., Schroeder, U., Wosnitza, M., Jakobs, H.: MOOCs a review of the state-of-the-art. In: CSEDU, pp. 9–20 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. BIS (Department of Business, Innovation and Skills): The maturing of the MOOC: literature review of massive open online courses and other forms of online distance learning (2013). http://bit.ly/1c9qvv0

  15. León, M.: Reactions on the emergence of MOOCs in higher education reactions on the emergence of MOOCs (2013). http://bit.ly/1ztBu9C in Higher Education

  16. White, S.: Exploring stakeholder perspectives on the development of MOOCs in higher education a case study of the University of Southampton. M.Sc Dissertation (2014). http://bit.ly/1FDNJaZ

  17. Daniel, J.: Making sense of MOOCs: musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. J. Interact. Media Educ. 3 (2012). http://bit.ly/19KGOzt

  18. Krippendorff, K.: Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Sage, Washington (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Herring, S.C.: Web content analysis: expanding the paradigm. International Handbook of Internet Research, pp. 233–249. Springer, The Netherlands (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. FutureLearn: About (2014). https://www.futurelearn.com/about

  21. Chapleo, C., Sims, C.: Stakeholder analysis in higher education. Perspectives 14(1), 12–20 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cho, J., Lee, E.: Reducing confusion about grounded theory and qualitative content analysis: similarities and differences. Qual. Rep. 19(64), 1–20 (2014)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Levander, C.: It’s all about assets. Inside Higher Education (2014). http://bit.ly/1nbGejR

  24. Talbert, R.: Making screencasts: the pedagogical framework. The Chronicle of Higher Education (2014). http://bit.ly/1DGYmr6

  25. Dulin, S.: Impacts of MOOCs on higher education. Inside Higher Education (2014). http://bit.ly/1nA2vYA

  26. Straumsheim, C.: All things in modulation. Inside Higher Education (2014). http://bit.ly/1sFk9tJ

  27. Straumsheim, C.: Profit or progress? Inside Higher Education (2014). http://bit.ly/187FshT

  28. Kim, J.: 6 Big Takeaways from the edX Global Forum. Inside Higher Education (2014). http://bit.ly/1r1cxUX

  29. Straumsheim, C.: Data, Data Everywhere. Inside Higher Education (2014). http://bit.ly/1z5xScV

  30. Parr, C.: Making MOOCs social is the next challenge. Times Higher Education (2014). http://bit.ly/1xk6Vq8

  31. Schulman, K., Selzter, M., Herzlinger, R.: Spurring Innovation in healthcare using MOOCS. Inside Higher Education (2014). https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/higher-ed-beta/spurring-innovation-healthcare-using-moocs

  32. Straumsheim, C.: A platform for all purposes. Inside Higher Education (2014). http://bit.ly/1pN6OQK

  33. Kim, J.: Saltatory. Inside Higher Education (2014). http://bit.ly/1LjJJuu

  34. Eshleman, K.: Are MOOCs working for us? Inside Higher Education (2014). http://bit.ly/1BJXLq0

  35. Kim, J.: Here Come the data scientists. Inside Higher Education (2014c). http://bit.ly/Vxh425

  36. Kolowich, S.: Competing MOOC providers expand into new territory—and each other’s. Chronicle Higher Education (2014). http://bit.ly/1vP3gff

  37. Tyson, C.: From MOOC to shining MOOC. Inside Higher Education (2014). http://bit.ly/1vlJ1uL

  38. Waters, A.: Top Ed-Tech Trends of 2013: MOOCs and Anti-MOOCs (2013). http://bit.ly/1jG6CgI

  39. Bates, T.: Look back in anger? A review of online learning in 2013 (2013). http://bit.ly/1c9qvv0

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuel León Urrutia .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Urrutia, M.L., White, S., White, S. (2016). MOOCs in Higher Education Magazines: A Content Analysis of Internal Stakeholder Perspectives. In: Zvacek, S., Restivo, M., Uhomoibhi, J., Helfert, M. (eds) Computer Supported Education. CSEDU 2015. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 583. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29585-5_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29585-5_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29584-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29585-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics