Skip to main content

Additive Manufacturing: A Trans-disciplinary Experience

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-11-12/ge-printing-engine-fuel-nozzles-propels-6-billion-market

  2. 2.

    http://grabcad.com/challenges/ge-jet-engine-bracket-challenge

  3. 3.

    http://www.astm.org/COMMIT/SUBCOMMIT/F4205.htm

  4. 4.

    http://www.idef.com/idef0.htm

  5. 5.

    It is important to realize that the exact nature of these interactions is not specified in the model.

  6. 6.

    http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/research/news/3Dratchet_wrench/

  7. 7.

    http://www.whitehouse.gov/nation-of-makers

  8. 8.

    Similar to Design for Manufacturing (DFM), Design for Additive Manufacturing (DFAM) can provide a more complete design solution.

References

  1. Bourell, D. L., Leu, M. C., & Rosen, D. W. (2009). Roadmap for additive manufacturing: Identifying the future of freeform processing. Austin: The University of Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lipson, H., & Kurman, M. (2013). Fabricated: The new world of 3D printing. Indianapolis, IN: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  3. International Organization for Standardization, ASTM International. (2015). ISO/ASTM 52900:2015 Additive manufacturing—General principles—Terminology.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lackner, K. S., & Wendt, C. H. (1995). Exponential growth of large self-reproducing machine systems. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 21(10), 55–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bass, T. (1995). Robot, build thyself. Discover.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sells, E., Smith, Z., Bailard, S., et al. (2009). RepRap: The replicating rapid prototyper: Maximizing customizability by breeding the means of production. In F. T. Piller & M. M. Tseng (Eds.), Handbook of research in mass customization and personalization. New Jersey: World Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Economist. (2012). The new maker rules. Economist Newspaper.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Horn, T. J., & Harrysson, O. L. (2012). Overview of current additive manufacturing technologies and selected applications. Science Progress, 95(3), 255–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ford, S. L. (2014). Additive manufacturing technology: Potential implications for US manufacturing competitiveness. Journal of International Commerce and Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Markillie, P. (2012). A third industrial revolution: Special report manufacturing and innovation. Economist Newspaper.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Friedman, T. L. (2013). When complexity is free. The New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gibson, I., Rosen, D. W., & Stucker, B. (2010). Additive manufacturing technologies. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. NIST. (2013). Measurement science roadmap for metal-based additive manufacturing. National Institute of Standards and Technology. http://www.nist.gov/el/isd/upload/NISTAdd_Mfg_Report_FINAL-2.pdf

  14. Frazier, W. (2010, August). Digital manufacturing of metallic components: Vision and roadmap. Solid Free Form Fabrication Proceedings, Austin, TX, pp. 9–11.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hadorn, G. H., Hoffmann-Riem, H., Biber-Klemm, S., Grossenbacher-Mansuy, W., et al. (2008). Handbook of transdisciplinary research. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Frazier, W. (2014). Metal additive manufacturing: A review. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 23(6), 1917–1928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Raghavan, A., et al. (2013). Heat transfer and fluid flow in additive manufacturing. Journal of Laser Applications, 25(5), 052006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Brice, C. A. (2011). Unintended consequences: How qualification constrains innovation. In Proceedings of the 1st World Congress on Integrated Computational Materials Engineering (ICME). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cooke, A., & Slotwinski, J. (2012). Properties of metal powders for additive manufacturing: A review of the state of the art of metal powder property testing. US Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Slotwinski, J., & Moylan, S. (2014). Applicability of existing materials testing standards for additive manufacturing materials NISTIR 8005. Gaithersburg, MD: NIST Technical Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Slotwinski, J. A., et al. (2014). Application of physical and chemical characterization techniques to metallic powders. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1581(1), 1184–1190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Slotwinski, J., & Moylan, S. (2014). Metals-based additive manufacturing: Metrology needs and standardization efforts. In Proceedings of the 2014 ASPE Spring Topical MeetingDimensional Accuracy and Surface Finish in Additive Manufacturing, Berkeley, CA, pp. 11–12.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Slotwinski, J. (2014). Additive manufacturing: Overview and NDE challenges. In 40th Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation: Incorporating the 10th International Conference on Barkhausen Noise and Micromagnetic Testing, AIP Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Herderick, E. (2011). Additive manufacturing of metals: A review. Materials Science and Technology, 1413–1425.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kim, D. B., Witherell, P., Lipman, R., et al. (2015). Streamlining the additive manufacturing digital spectrum: A systems approach. Additive Manufacturing, 5, 20–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Moylan, S., & Slotwinski, J. (2014). Assessment of guidelines for conducting round robin studies in additive manufacturing. In Proceedings of the 2014 ASPE Spring Topical Meeting—Dimensional Accuracy and Surface Finish in Additive Manufacturing, Berkeley, CA, pp. 82–85.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Calvert, P. (2001). Inkjet printing for materials and devices. Chemistry of Materials, 13(10), 3299–3305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sun, K., et al. (2013). 3D printing of interdigitated Li‐Ion microbattery architectures. Advanced Materials, 25(33), 4539–4543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gross, B. C., et al. (2014). Evaluation of 3D printing and its potential impact on biotechnology and the chemical sciences. Analytical Chemistry, 86(7), 3240–3253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Vayre, B., Vignat, F., & Villeneuve, F. (2012). Metallic additive manufacturing: State-of-the-art review and prospects. Mechanics and Industry, 13(2), 89–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. ISO 10303-238. (2007). Industrial automation systems and integration—Product data representation and exchange—Part 238: Application protocol: Application interpreted model for computerized numerical controllers. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization (ISO).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Beuth, J., et al. (2013). Process mapping for qualification across multiple direct metal additive manufacturing processes. In SFF Symposium.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Gockel, J., & Beuth, J. (2013). Understanding Ti-6Al-4V microstructure control in additive manufacturing via process maps. In Solid Freeform Fabrication Proceedings.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Soylemez, E., Beuth, J. L., & Taminger, K. (2013). Controlling melt pool dimensions over a wide range of material deposition rates in electron beam additive manufacturing. In Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium. Solid Freeform Fabrication Proceedings, Proc., Austin, TX, pp. 571–581.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Fox, J., & Beuth, J. (2013). Process mapping of transient melt pool response in wire feed e-beam additive manufacturing of Ti-6Al-4V. Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Yadoitsev, I. (2009). Selective laser melting—Direct manufacturing of 3D-objects by selective laser melting of metal powders. Germany: Lambert Academic Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Strohm, P., et al. (2011). 2.5-controlling laser material processing with real-time algorithms on cellular neural networks. Proceedings OPTO, 2011, 60–65.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Craeghs, T., Bechmann, F., Berumen, S., et al. (2010). Feedback control of layerwise laser melting using optical sensors. Laser Assisted Net Shape Engineering 6, Proceedings of the Lane 2010, Part 2, 5, 505–514.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Witherell, P., et al. (2014). Toward metamodels for composable and reusable additive manufacturing process models. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 136(6), 061025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Mazumder, J., & Song, L. (2010). Advances in direct metal deposition. In S. Hinduja & L. Li (Eds.), Proceedings of the 36th international MATADOR conference (pp. 447–450). London: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  41. Song, L., & Mazumder, J. (2011). Feedback control of melt pool temperature during laser cladding process. Control Systems Technology, IEEE Transactions on, 19(6), 1349–1356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Song, L., et al. (2012). Control of melt pool temperature and deposition height during direct metal deposition process. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 58(1–4), 247–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Moylan, S., Slotwinski, J., Cooke, A., et al. (2012). Proposal for a standardized test artifact for additive manufacturing machines and processes. In Proceedings of the 2012 Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Murr, L. E., et al. (2012). Next generation orthopaedic implants by additive manufacturing using electron beam melting. International Journal of Biomaterials, 2012, 14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Heinl, P., et al. (2008). Cellular Ti–6Al–4V structures with interconnected macro porosity for bone implants fabricated by selective electron beam melting. Acta Biomaterialia, 4(5), 1536–1544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Ryan, G., Pandit, A., & Apatsidis, D. P. (2006). Fabrication methods of porous metals for use in orthopaedic applications. Biomaterials, 27(13), 2651–2670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Universe, M. (2015). Adamantium. Retrieved from http://marvel.com/universe/Adamantium

  48. Knight, M. (2014). 3-D printing is revolutionizing surgery. Chicago: Crain’s Chicago Business.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Rengier, F., et al. (2010). 3D printing based on imaging data: Review of medical applications. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 5(4), 335–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Bibb, R., Eggbeer, D., & Evans, P. (2010). Rapid prototyping technologies in soft tissue facial prosthetics: Current state of the art. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 16(2), 130–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Terdiman, D. (2010, March 5). 3D printing changing prosthetics forever. CNET. Retrieved from http://www.cnet.com/news/3d-printing-changing-prosthetics-forever/

  52. Strub, J. R., Rekow, E. D., & Witkowski, S. (2006). Computer-aided design and fabrication of dental restorations: Current systems and future possibilities. The Journal of the American Dental Association, 137(9), 1289–1296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. van Noort, R. (2012). The future of dental devices is digital. Dental Materials, 28(1), 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. King, L. (2013). 3-D printing—The death of the dental lab? Retrieved from http://www.dentistryiq.com/articles/2013/08/3-d-printing-the-death-of-the-dental-lab.html

  55. Melchels, F. P., et al. (2012). Additive manufacturing of tissues and organs. Progress in Polymer Science, 37(8), 1079–1104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Mironov, V., et al. (2003). Organ printing: Computer-aided jet-based 3D tissue engineering. TRENDS in Biotechnology, 21(4), 157–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Murphy, S. V., & Atala, A. (2014). 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nature Biotechnology, 32(8), 773–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Cranny, A., et al. (2005). Thick-film force and slip sensors for a prosthetic hand. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 123, 162–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Majidi, C. (2014). Soft robotics: A perspective—Current trends and prospects for the future. Soft Robotics, 1(1), 5–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. NIST. (2015). NIST additive manufacturing. Retrieved from http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/factsheet/additive-manufacturing.cfm

  61. Taylor, A., & Unver, E. (2014). 3D printing-media hype or manufacturing reality: Textiles surface fashion product architecture. Textiles Society Lecture, 17th February 2014. Huddersfield UK: Textile Centre of Excellence.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Flaherty, J. (2014). This dress is made from 3-D printed plastic, but flows like fabric. Retrieved from http://www.wired.com/2014/12/dress-made-3-d-printed-plastic-flows-like-fabric/

  63. McCann, J., & Bryson, D. (2009). Smart clothes and wearable technology. Burlington: Elsevier.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  64. Wannarumon, S., & Bohez, E. L. (2004). Rapid prototyping and tooling technology in jewelry CAD. Computer-Aided Design and Applications, 1(1–4), 569–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Periard, D., Schaal, N., Schaal, M., et al. (2007). Printing food. In Proceedings of the 18th Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Willett, M. (2014). This is the best 3D food printer we’ve seen yet—And it makes stunning desserts. Business Insider.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Birtchnell, T., & Urry, J. (2013). 3D, SF and the future. Futures, 50, 25–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Prisco, J. (2014). ‘Foodini’ machine lets you print edible burgers, pizza, chocolate. Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/2014/11/06/tech/innovation/foodini-machine-print-food/

  69. Wolhers, T. (2013). Wohlers report 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Gaereminck, R. (2011). Strategic alliances: Making a difference one warfighter at a time. DTIC Document.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Zimmerman, B. A., & Allen, E. E., III. (2013). Analysis of the potential impact of additive manufacturing on Army logistics. Monterey, CA: Naval Postgraduate School.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Pettus, E. L. (2013). Building a competitive edge with additive manufacturing (Doctoral dissertation). Air War College, Air University.

    Google Scholar 

  73. (2014). This 3D printable R/C Car Truggy is testing the limits of 3D printing. Retrieved from http://www.3ders.org/articles/20140910-truggy-car-a-3d-printable-rc-car-that-is-testing-the-limits-of-3d-printing.html

  74. Krassenstein, E. (2014). The openrailway project launches: Bringing 3D printing & railroad modeling together for hobbyists. Retrieved from http://3dprint.com/24721/open-railway-project-3d/

  75. Golson, J. A. (2014). Military-grade drone that can be printed anywhere. Retrieved from http://www.wired.com/2014/09/military-grade-drone-can-printed-anywhere/

  76. Anderson, C. (2010). The new industrial revolution. Wired Magazine 18, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Humphries, M. (2012). Mineways lets you export Minecraft models for 3D printing. Retrieved from http://www.geek.com/games/mineways-lets-you-export-minecraft-models-for-3d-printing-1454333/

  78. Mylopoulos, J., et al. (1990). Telos: Representing knowledge about information systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 8(4), 325–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Piateski, G., & Frawley, W. (1991). Knowledge discovery in databases. Menlo Park, CA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Liu, A. (2004). The laws of cool: Knowledge work and the culture of information (552 pages). University of Chicago Press. ISBN-10: 0226486990 and ISBN-13: 978-0226486994.

    Google Scholar 

  81. OMG Systems Modeling Language (OMG SysML™) Version 1.4 (OMG Document Number: formal/2015-06-03). http://www.omg.org/spec/SysML/1.4/

  82. Johnson, T., et al. (2012). Integrating models and simulations of continuous dynamics into SysML. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 12(1), 011002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Spivak, D. I. (2014). Category theory for the sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Witherell, P., Krishnamurty, S., Grosse, I.R., et al. (2008). FIDOE: A framework for intelligent distributed ontologies in Engineering. In 2008 ASME IDETC/CIE Conferences, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Witherell, P. (2009). Semantic methods for intelligent distributed design environments. Amherst, MA: Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Massachusetts Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  86. D’Alessio, A., Witherell, P., & Rachuri, S. (2012). Modeling gaps and overlaps of sustainability standards. In D. A. Dornfeld & B. S. Linke (Eds.), Leveraging technology for a sustainable world (pp. 443–448). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  87. Witherell, P., et al. (2010). Improved knowledge management through first-order logic in engineering design ontologies. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 24(2), 245–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Williamson, K., Healy, M., & Barker, R. (2001). Industrial applications of software synthesis via category theory—Case studies using Specware. Automated Software Engineering, 8(1), 7–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Tse, T. H. (2009). A unifying framework for structured analysis and design models: An approach using initial algebra semantics and category theory (Vol. 11). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Osborne, C. (2014). 3D printing: Don’t believe all the hype. Retrieved from http://www.zdnet.com/article/3d-printing-dont-believe-all-the-hype/

  91. Mims, C. (2012). Why 3-D printing will go the way of virtual reality. Retrieved from http://www.technologyreview.com/view/426702/why-3-d-printing-will-go-the-way-of-virtual-reality/

  92. Banker, S. (2014). 3D printing’s ability to transform supply chains is years away. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/stevebanker/2014/02/26/3d-printings-ability-to-transform-supply-chains-is-years-away/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Witherell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Witherell, P., Lu, Y., Jones, A. (2017). Additive Manufacturing: A Trans-disciplinary Experience. In: Kahlen, J., Flumerfelt, S., Alves, A. (eds) Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38756-7_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics