Abstract
In this chapter formative assessment is defined as a process of providing information to teachers to focus instruction on the improvement of student learning outcomes. The Department of Education in the Philippines in 2012 started the implementation of a new curriculum within a new structure which extended the education system from a Grade 1â10 to a Kâ12 structure to bring it into line with the developed world. A significant part of the curriculum reform is an assessment framework that includes formative approaches to assessment. The goal of the policy on formative assessment is to help teachers recognise relevant intervention practices that will improve student learning outcomes. An observation study of the link between assessment and teaching in a sample of 61 classroom lessons identified baseline practices and ways in which the emerging policy of the Department of Education in the Philippines could be promulgated. The observation study focused on classroom organisation, teacher instructional and assessment strategies, lesson structure, resources used by teachers, and student involvement in class work, as well as both formal and informal assessment practices. The observations were documented in a series of narratives aimed at identifying variation between teachers within grade level and disciplines. It emerged that a lesson structure which lingers from the previous curricular approach may be both the major inhibiting factor regarding formative use of assessment data and the most obvious opportunity for change.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arora, A., Foy, P., Martin, M. O., & Mullis, I. V. S. (Eds.) (2009). TIMSS and PIRLS advanced 2008 technical report. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
Black, P. J., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the Black Box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappa, October 1â13.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5â31.
DepEd. (2011). Five-year information and communication technology for Education Strategic Plan (DepEd ICT4E Strategic Plan). Manila: Department of Education, Republic of the Philippines.
DepEd. (2012). Guidelines on the assessment and rating of learning outcomes under the K to 12 basic education curriculum (DepEd Order No 73, s. 2012). Manila: Department of Education, Republic of the Philippines.
Glaser, R. (1981). The future of testing: A research agenda for cognitive psychology and psychometrics. American Psychologist, 36, 923â936.
Griffin, P. (2007). The comfort of competence and the uncertainty of assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 33, 87â99.
Griffin, P., & Care, E. (2014). Assessment is for teaching. In P. Griffin (Ed.), Assessment for teaching. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
Griffin, P., Nguyen, T. K. C., Gillis, S., & Mai, T. T. (2006). An empirical analysis of primary teacher standards in Vietnam. Planning and Changing, 37(1& 2), 71â92.
Heritage, M. (2008). Learning progressions: Supporting instruction and formative assessment. Washington DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
Heritage, M. (2010). Formative assessment and next generation assessment systems: Are we losing an opportunity?. Washington DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
Hutchinson, D., Francis, M., & Griffin, P. (2014). Developmental teaching and assessment. In P. Griffin (Ed.), Assessment for teaching. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
Kahl, S. (2005). Where in the world are formative tests? Right under your nose! Education Week, 25(4), 11.
Lewin, K. (1947). Resolving social conflicts: Selected papers on group dynamics. New York: Harper & Brothers.
Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Neilson & Lydiche.
Sadler, D. R. (1998). Formative assessment: revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 77â84.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Zuzovsky, R. (2013). What works where? The relationship between instructional variables and schoolsâ mean scores in mathematics and science in low-, medium-, and high-achieving countries. Large-scale Assessments in Education, 1(2), 1â19.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
Âİ 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Griffin, P., Cagasan, L., Care, E., Vista, A., Nava, F. (2016). Formative Assessment Policy and Its Enactment in the Philippines. In: Laveault, D., Allal, L. (eds) Assessment for Learning: Meeting the Challenge of Implementation. The Enabling Power of Assessment, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39211-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39211-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39209-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39211-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)