Skip to main content

Against the Grain: Indian Women Negotiate Land, Labour and Livelihoods in the New Millennium

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 319 Accesses

Part of the book series: Gender, Development and Social Change ((GDSC))

Abstract

Indian women are positioned at a critical juncture in the second decade of the twenty-first century. The new opportunities of a liberalised, growing economy has produced uneven effects for women, leading to some gains but overall the persistence, and in some cases even deepening, of gender disadvantages. The chapters in this book articulate the multiple modalities of women working ‘against the grain’ of patriarchal values, ideologies, practices and institutions in order to secure land, labour and livelihoods. This introductory chapter signals the need for three important directional shifts in interventions and analyses. First, we argue for a shift in the conceptualisation of the informal sector, given that the majority of India’s workforce, particularly women, are located within it. Second, we place social reproduction at the centre of our thinking about the informal sector, challenge the assumption of it as an invisible, ‘given’ responsibility of women and eschew the artificial binary between production and social reproduction. Third, the insights of these chapters suggest that considerations of intersectionality and gendered social relations should be integral to land, labour and livelihood strategies.

The editors gratefully acknowledge funding support by the University of Melbourne, Australia (from the International Research and Research Training Fund and the Faculty of Arts Publication Subsidy Grant) and by the Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai, which has made this volume possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In India the informal sector is generally defined as consisting of all unincorporated private enterprises (including agricultural activities) owned by individuals or households with fewer than ten workers (see NCEUS, 2008).

  2. 2.

    Dalit is the preferred political identification of groups labelled ‘scheduled caste’ by the government.

  3. 3.

    Adivasi is the preferred political identification of groups labelled ‘scheduled tribe’ by the government.

  4. 4.

    In Muslim personal law, mehr is a mandatory payment in the form of money or possessions paid by the groom’s family to the bride at the time of marriage, which legally becomes her property.

  5. 5.

    Home-based work includes productive work conducted: by workers within their homes; by those who own their own enterprises, or who work for a family-owned enterprise; or those who undertake paid work for external employers.

References

  • Abraham, V. 2013. Missing Labour or Consistent ‘De-feminisation’? Economic and Political Weekly XLVIII(31): 99–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal, B. 1994. A Field of One’s Own: Gender and Land Rights in South Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agarwala, R. 2008. Reshaping the Social Contract: Emerging Relations Between the State and Informal Labour in India. Theory and Society 37: 375–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AMRC. 2015. Learning from Marginalised Workers: strategies for organizing and negotiating among workers in the informal sector. Asia Monitoring Resource Centre, March 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, K. 2011. Disowning Dependence: Single Women’s Collective Struggle for Independence and Land Rights in North-Western India. Feminist Review 98: 136–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boris, E., and R. Parrẽnas, eds. 2010. Intimate Labors: Cultures, Technologies, and the Politics of Care. Stanford: Stanford Social Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centre for Women’s Development Studies. 2012. Gender and Migration: Negotiating Rights. A Women’s Movement Perspective (Key Findings). New Delhi: CWDS, IDRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarti, U. 2003. Gendering Caste: Through a Feminist Lens. Calcutta: Stree: An imprint of Bhatkal and Sen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekhar, C., and J. Ghosh. 2011. Latest NSSO Employment Trends. Business Line, July 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, U., R. Murgai, and M. Rama. 2015. Employment Outcomes along the Rural-Urban Gradation. Economic and Political Weekly 50(26 and 27): 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Combahee River Collective. 1979. The Combahee River Collective Statement. In Capitalist Patriarchy and the Case for Socialist Feminism, ed. Z. R. Eisenstein, 362–372. New York and London: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. 1989. Demarginalising the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Anti-Discrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum 140: 139–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Datta, N. 2006. “Joint Titling - A Win-Win Policy? Gender and Property Rights in Urban Informal Settlements in Chandigarh, India.” Feminist Economics, 12(1 – 2), January/April 2006: 271–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deininger, K.W., A. Goyal, and H.K. Nagarajan. 2013. Women’s Inheritance Rights and Intergenerational Transmission of Resources in India. Journal of Human Resources 1: 114–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Editorial. 2015. Social Sector Spending—2015-16. Economic and Political Weekly 50(16): 7–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gothoskar, S. 2013. “This Chay Is Bitter: Exploitative Relations in the Tea Industry.” Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. XLVII no 50: 33–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guha-Banerjee, S. 2008. Space Relations of Capital and Significance of New Economic Enclaves: SEZs in India. Economic and Political Weekly 43(47): 51–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Committee of the Netherlands and SOMO. 2014. Flawed Fabrics: The Abuse of Girls and Women Workers in the South Indian Textile Industry. The Netherlands: ICN and SOMO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain, D., and N. Banerjee. 1985. Tyranny of the Household: Investigative Essays on Women’s Work. Delhi: Shakti Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, M. E. 2013. The Problem of Women’s Labour: Some Autobiographical Perspectives. Indian Journal of Gender Studies 20(2): 177–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——— 2014. Sex Ratios and Sex Selection in India: History and the Present. In The Handbook of Gender in South Asia, ed. Leela Fernandes, 291–304. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 2015. Intersectionality: Rejection or Critical Dialogue? Economic and Political Weekly 50(33): 72–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabeer, N, R. Sudarshan, and K. Milward, eds. 2013. Organizing Women Workers in the Informal Economy: Beyond the Weapons of the Weak, Feminism and Development. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kannan, K.P. 2009. Dualism, Informality and Social Inequality: An Informal Economy Perspective of the Challenge of Inclusive Development in India. Indian Journal of Labour Economics 52(1): 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 2014. Interrogating Inclusive Growth: Poverty and Inequality in India. New York, London and New Delhi: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapadia, K. 2002. The Violence of Development: The Politics of Identity, Gender and Social Inequalities in India. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapur, D., and P. Nangia. 2015. Social Protection in India: A Welfare State Sans Public Goods? India Review 14(1): 73–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karnik, A., and M. Lalvani. 2016. Lacking in Substance. Economic and Political Weekly 51(16): 32–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelkar, G. 2011. “Gender and productive assets: Implications for women’s economic security and productivity.” Economic and Political Weekly, XLVI (23): 59–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———2014. “The Fog of Entitlement: Women’s Inheritance and Land Rights.” Economic and Political Weekly, Vol XIIX no 33: 51–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnaraj, M. 1990. Women’s Work in Indian Census: Beginnings of Change. Economic and Political Weekly 1(December): 2663–2672.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———2007. Gender, Food Security and Rural Livelihoods. Kolkata: Stree.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahoti, R., Suchitra J.Y., and H. Swaminathan. 2016. Not in Her Name: Women’s Property Ownership in India. Economic and Political Weekly LI(5): 17–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, M., and R. Kaur. 2013. Signs of Change? Sex Ratio Imbalance and Shifting Social Practices in Northern India. Economic and Political Weekly XLVIII(35): 45–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerche, J. 2011. “Agrarian Crisis and Agrarian Questions in India.” Journal of Agrarian Change, 11(1): 104–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levien, M. 2015. Gender and Land Grabs in Comparative Perspective. In Gender Equality and Sustainable Development, ed. Melissa Leach, 105–132. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majumdar, M. 2003. From Land Reforms to Land Markets: A Redistributive Shift in West Bengal. Economic and Political Weekly 38(49): 5147–5149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazumdar, I., and N. Neetha. 2011. Gender Dimensions: Employment Trends in India, 1993-94 to 2009-10. Economic and Political Weekly 46(43): 118–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Commission for Enterprises in the Unorganised Sector (NCEUS). 2008. Report on Conditions of Work and Promotion of Livelihoods in the Unorganised Sector. New Delhi: Academic Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neetha, N. 2014. Crisis in Female Employment: Analysis across Social Groups. Economic and Political Weekly 49(47): 50–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niaz, N.S., and Z. Soman. 2015. Muslim Women’s Views on Muslim Personal Law. Economic and Political Weekly 50(51): 83–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, T. and Raju, S. 2014. “Gendered Labour in India Diversified or Confined?” Economic and Political Weekly, Vol XLIX no 29: 197–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radhakrishna, R. 2015. Well-being, Inequality, Poverty and Pathways Out of Poverty in India. Economic and Political Weekly L(41): 59–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajan, S.I., S. Srinivasan, and A. Bedi. 2015. Coming Back to Normal? Census 2011 and Sex Ratios in India. Economic and Political Weekly L(52): 33–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, N. 2008. Good women do not inherit Land: Politics of Land and Gender in India. Social Science Press and Orient Blackswan, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, D.N and Mishra, S. (eds) 2009. Agrarian Crisis in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahni, Rohini, V. Kalyan Shankar, and Hemant Apte, eds. 2008. Prostitution and Beyond: An Analysis of Sex Work in India. New Delhi: Sage Publications India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, S. 2008. Gender and Class: Women in Indian Industry, 1890-1990. Modern Asian Studies 42(1): 75–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, S. 2015. Between Daughter Deficit and Development Deficit: Situation of Unmarried Men in a South Indian Community. Economic and Political Weekly L(38): 61–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, N. and Srivastava, R. 2010. “Women, Work and Employment Outcomes in Rural India.” Economic and Political Weekly, XLV(28): 49–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sud, N. 2007. From Land to the Tiller to Land Liberalization: The Political Economy of Gujarat’s Shifting Land Policy. Modern Asian Studies 41(3): 603–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suri, K.C. 2006. Political Economy of Agrarian Distress. Economic and Political Weekly 41(16): 1523–1529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unni, Jeemol. 1999. ‘‘Property Rights for Women: Case for Joint Titles to Agricultural Land and Urban Housing.’’ Economic and Political Weekly, 22 – May 8: 52–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vepa, S. 2009. Bearing the Brunt: Impact of Rural Distress on Women. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 2015. The State of Social Safety Nets 2015. Washington D.C: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zacharias, A. and Vakulabharanam, V. 2011. “Caste Stratification and Wealth Inequality in India.” World Development Vol. 39, No. 10: 1820–1833.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gopal, M., Ruthven, O., Fernandez, B. (2016). Against the Grain: Indian Women Negotiate Land, Labour and Livelihoods in the New Millennium. In: Land, Labour and Livelihoods. Gender, Development and Social Change. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40865-1_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics