Skip to main content

Roots of Identity, Canopy of Collision: Re-Visioning Trees as an Evolving National Symbol Within the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Environmental History in the Making

Part of the book series: Environmental History ((ENVHIS,volume 7))

Abstract

Jewish immigrants settling Israel/Palestine since the end of the nineteenth century, with the objective of creating a national Jewish state, have strongly identified with trees. They perceived the planting of trees as an act of making the barren wilderness come to life and also as a symbol for planting themselves as permanent beings in their homeland from which they had been uprooted thousands of years ago. In a process of structured identity based on hierarchical binaries, they perceived the Palestinians as the opposite of themselves – neglectful of the land and lacking strong ties to it. In the ensuing and ongoing Israeli/Palestinian conflict trees have become signifiers of progress as well as of dispossession, weapons in the escalating cycle of planting and uprooting. In this article I show that environmental policies have been co-opted and used by the State of Israel to further marginalize the Palestinians and take over lands, in what can be termed nationalistic/ethnic environmentalism or “Green” nationalism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See also in the city of Jerusalem: Braverman 2009, p. 61.

  2. 2.

    See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_September_Organization.

  3. 3.

    The construction of the desert and the settlement as opposing symbols was clearly influenced by European views of the Orient (Said 1995).

  4. 4.

    Pines have become associated with the Zionist project of conquering and afforesting the Promised Land (Braverman 2009).

  5. 5.

    http://www.kkl.org.il/eng/forestry-and-ecology/afforestation-in-israel/retrieved 27.11.14.

  6. 6.

    Director of JNF Land and Forestry from 1932 to 1972.

  7. 7.

    A 1920 League of Nations’ Interim Report on the Civil Administration of Palestine http://unispal.un.org/UNISPAL.NSF/0/349B02280A930813052565E90048ED1C retrieved January 2015.

  8. 8.

    Settled in 1937, on the western shore of the Sea of Galilee, on land purchased by the Palestine Jewish Colonization Association.

  9. 9.

    Most of the lands bought for Jewish agricultural settlements had been cultivated by tenant farmers who were uprooted. Further uprooting occurred in the wake of the 1948 war.

  10. 10.

    See more examples: In children’s books for example, springs of water created a swamp in mourning of the Jewish exile, only to become sources of life again upon the return of the Zionist pioneers and clumps of soil “jumped” into the revolving blades of the plough to aid in the hard toil (Zrubavel 2008, 206). The Israeli writer Meir Shalev reminisces about the Zionist political categorization of nature into enemies of Zionism (the Malaria bearing mosquito and various pests such as rodents, insects and weeds) and friends (the enemies’ predators). He tells of teachers who instructed their students: “when you go outdoors and encounter a plant or an animal, ask it: ‘are you with us or against us?’” (Shalev 1996, 32).

  11. 11.

    Erasure of Palestinian presence and culture was also achieved by the actions of a governmental Names Commission (with Weitz as a member), appointed by Ben Gurion in 1949. Its task was erasing all Arabic names appearing in Mandatory maps and replacing them with Hebrew names, thus creating a Hebrew national map (Benvenisti 2000; Azaryahu and Golan 2001).

  12. 12.

    For further discussion see Braverman 2009, Chapter 1.

  13. 13.

    More on using trees for guaranteeing control over land, see Weitz (1970), Cohen (1993).

  14. 14.

    The establishments of many homesteads was actively aided by government ministries and organizations such as the JNF and the Jewish Agency, even though they did not obtain the appropriate building permits (Rinat 2007, 2009).

  15. 15.

    In 1999 the Society for the Protection of Nature together with Adam Teva V’din, Israel Union for Environmental Defense, appealed to the Israeli Supreme Court to stop the construction of homesteads, because of the fragmentation of open spaces, damage to local flora and fauna due to domestic animals and the introduction of invasive species, wasteful use of land and the need for new infrastructure etc. Their appeal was rejected.

  16. 16.

    The majority of Mizrachi Jews immigrated into Israel, mostly from Arab and north African countries, after the state of Israel was established.

  17. 17.

    Ashkenazi Jews immigrated to Palestine/Israel mostly from eastern and central Europe since the end of the nineteenth century and are considered the founders of the state.

  18. 18.

    In the occupied West Bank, the Palestinians are under military rule.

  19. 19.

    This is not a unique case. According to the plan for the separation wall, the village of al Walaja will remain on the Palestinian side while its water springs and unique traditional agricultural terraces will be on the Israeli side, to be declared a National Park for the recreation and pleasure of Israelis. See https://www.facebook.com/FriendsOfAlWalaja.

  20. 20.

    Palestinians are motivated to plant olive trees also because the Israeli authorities make it increasingly harder for them to hold on to their lands if they are not cultivated intensively. Trees serve as a marker for cultivation. See Braverman 2009, p. 172–177.

  21. 21.

    Information about the systematic takeover of Palestinian water springs by Israeli settlers in the occupied west bank can be found in the report “How Dispossession Happens” in the site of the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs http://www.ochaopt.org/documents/ocha_opt_springs_report_march_2012_english.pdf.

  22. 22.

    In chapter 5 of his award winning book Palestinian Walks, the Palestinian writer and lawyer Raja Shehadeh tells how he monitored the Israeli military government declaration of nature reserves in the West Bank. At first he was pleased that these areas would be protected. However, the hope that these reserves were for the benefit of the Palestinians were dashed when in 1996 Palestinians were prohibited from entering all nature reserves in area C.

  23. 23.

    Annexed to Israel following the 1967 war. The annexation is internationally controversial.

  24. 24.

    Retrieved December 25, 2014 http://bimkom.org/eng/from-public-to-national-national-parks-in-east-jerusalem/ ”, issued by Bimkom – Planners for Planning Rights 2012.

  25. 25.

    Palestinians are not just passive victims, however, they do not have at their disposal a powerful army and powerful organizations with state power behind them. According to a U.N. report 7,500 olive trees have been destroyed by Jewish settlers in the West Bank since the beginning of the occupation. In addition tens of thousands of olive trees have been uprooted during the construction of the separation wall, and in a few more years about a million trees will be caught in the no-go zone between it and the 1967 Armistice Line. http://latitude.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/11/13/the-plight-of-the-palestinian-olive-tree/. For a detailed account of Palestinian protest measures and the pitting of the pine against the olive tree see Braverman 2009.

  26. 26.

    http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/saplings-serve-as-weapons-in-battle-for-west-bank-land-1.412054. Retrieved January 2015.

Bibliography

  • Algazi G (2010) From Gir forest to Umm Hiran: notes on colonial nature and its protectors. Theory Crit 37:232–253. (Hebrew)

    Google Scholar 

  • Azaryahu M, Golan A (2001) (Re)naming the landscape: the formation of the Hebrew map of Israel 1949–1960. J Hist Geogr 27(2):178–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardenstein CB (1998) Threads of memory and discourses of rootedness: of trees, oranges, and the prickly-pear cactus in Israel/Palestine. Edebiyat 8(1):1–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Gal Y, Shamai S (1983) The swamps of the Jezreel valley – legend and reality. Katedra 72:163–179. (Hebrew)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Itzhak H (1999) The unknown variable hidden underground and the Zionist idea rhetoric of place in an Israeli Kibbutz and cultural interpretation. J Am Folk 112(446):497–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benvenisti M (2000) Sacred landscape – the buried history of the holy land since 1948. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Bimkom – Planners for Planning Rights (2012) From public to national – national parks in East Jerusalem. Available from http://bimkom.org/eng/from-public-to-national-national-parks-in-east-jerusalem/ [January 2015]

  • Braverman I (2009) Planted flags: trees, land, and law in Israel/Palestine. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton S, Opotow S (2003) Introduction. In: Clayton S, Opotow S (eds) Identity and the natural environment – the psychological significance of nature. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen SE (1993) The politics of planting: Israeli-Palestinian competition for control of land in the Jerusalem periphery. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • de-Shalit A (1995) From the political to the objective: the dialectics of Zionism and the environment. Environ Polit 4(1):70–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de-Shalit A, Talias M (1994) Green or blue and white? Environmental controversies in Israel. Environ Polit 3(2):273–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egoz S, Merhav R (2008) Nature, nation, native, Nakbah: landscape narratives in Israel’s national parks. Landsc Values Archit Plan

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman G, Kedar S (2004) From arab land to ‘Israeli Lands’: the legal dispossession of the Palestinians displaces by Israel in the wake of 1948. Environ Plan D Soc Space 22:809–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geisler ME (2005) Introduction: what are national symbols and what do they do to us. In: Geisler ME (ed) National symbols fractured identities – contesting the national narrative. Middlebury College Press, Vermont, pp XIII–XLII

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorney E (2007) (Un)natural selection: the drainage of the hula wetlands, an ecofeminist reading. Int Fem J Polit 9:465–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasson N (2012) Title of a plan for a National Park to replace Arab structures: didn’t know, didn’t understand. Ha’aretz 13 November. Available from: http://www.haaretz.co.il/news/education/1.1863634 [January 2015, Hebrew]

  • Hasson N (2013) NPA admits: the purpose of the national park in East Jerusalem is for the prevention of building. Ha’aretz, 30 September. Available from: http://www.haaretz.co.il/news/politics/.premium-1.2128643 [January 2015, Hebrew]

  • Hever H (2000) Mapping literary spaces: territory and violence in Israeli literature. In: Silberstein LJ (ed) Mapping Jewish identities. NY University Press, New York/London, pp 201–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadman N (2008) Erased from space and consciousness: depopulated Palestinian villages in the Israeli-Zionist discourse. November Books, Jerusalem. (Hebrew)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell WJT (ed) (1994) Landscape and power. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris B (2004) The birth of the Palestinian refugee problem, 1947–1949. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann B (2009) Land and desire in early Zionism. Am Oved, Tel Aviv. (Hebrew)

    Google Scholar 

  • Noach H (2009) The existent and the non-existent villages – the unrecognized bedouin villages in the Negev. Pardes, Haifa. (Hebrew)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ophir A (2000) The identity of the victims and the victims of identity: a critique of Zionist ideology for a post-Zionist age. In: Silberstein L (ed) Mapping Jewish identities. NY University Press, New York, pp 174–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Orenstein D, Groner E, Lihod O, Muithui WL, Krukowski H, Arnon O, Tal A (2009) The ecological impacts of homestead settlements in the Negev: final report. The Blaustein Institute for Desert Research, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, The Faculty of Architecture and Town Planning, The Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Submitted to: The Israel Ministry of Environmental Protection, Jerusalem Nov (2009). Available from: http://www.sviva.gov.il/InfoServices/ReservoirInfo/DocLib4/R0201-R0300/R0288.pdf [January 2015]

  • Ortner SB (1973) On key symbols. Am Anthropol 75:1338–1346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plumwood V (1993) Feminism and the mastery of nature. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Randeria S (2006) Global designs and local lifeworlds: colonial legacies of conservation, disenfranchisement and environmental governance in postcolonial India. Interv Int J Postcolonial Stud 8(1):12–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Rinat Z (2007) The government decided to advance isolated homesteads in the Negev and Galilee. Ha’aretz, 15 July. (Hebrew)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rinat Z (2009) Homesteads in the Negev: making the desert bloom or construction criminals? TheMarker. 19 June (Hebrew)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rinat Z (2014) Nature sciences: this year the NPA is 50 years old. Ha’aretz. 20 November, p 13

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotem G, Bouskila A, Rothschild A (2014) Ecological effects of afforestation in the Northern Negev. Society for the Protection of Nature in Israel. Available from: http://www.teva.org.il/_Uploads/dbsAttachedFiles/forestration_northern_NegevSPNI_Eng_finalMay2014.pdf [Jan 2015]

  • Said E (1995) Orientalism. Penguin Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Schama S (1995) Landscape and Memory. Alfred A. Knopf, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnell I (1997) Nature and environment in the socialist-Zionist pioneers perceptions: a sense of desolation. Ecumene 4(1):69–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Shalev M (1996) Mainly about love. Am Oved, Tel Aviv. (Hebrew)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamir R (1996) Suspended in space: Bedouins under the law of Israel. Law Soc Rev 30(2):231–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shehadeh R (2008) Palestinian walks: forays into a vanishing landscape. Scribner, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiva V (1990) Development as a new project of western patriarchy. In: Diamond I, Orenstein GF (eds) Reweaving the world: the emergence of ecofeminism. Sierra Club Books, San Francisco, pp 189–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Tal A (2013) All the trees of the forest: Israel’s woodlands from the bible to the present. Yale University Press, New Haven/London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Temple S (2011) Forestation and its discontents: the invention of an uncertain landscape in Southwestern France, 1850-present. Environ Hist 17(1):13–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ufaz A (2003) Nature and landscape in the Pioneers’ discourse – the motif of the grove – actuality and symbol. Motar 11:29–34. (Hebrew)

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren K (2000) Ecofeminist philosophy – a western perspective on what It is and why it matters. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, New York/Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitz Y (1950) The struggle for the Land. Tversky, Tel Aviv (Hebrew)

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitz Y (1970) The forest and forestation in Israel. Massada, Ramat-Gan. (Hebrew)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yehoshua AB (1971) Facing the forests. In: Three days and a child (trans: Arad M, Owen P). London, pp 131–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Yiftachel O (1995) The dark side of modernism: planning as control of an ethnic minority. In: Watson S, Gibson K (eds) Postmodern cities and spaces. Blackwell, Cambridge, pp 216–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Yiftachel O (1999) Ethnocracy: the politics of judaizing Israel/Palestine. Constellations 6(3):364–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yiftachel O (2006) Ethnocracy: land and identity politics in Israel/Palestine. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Zangwill I (1920). The Voice of Jerusalem. William Heinemann, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Zechner J (2011) Politicized timber: the German forest and the nature of the nation 1800–1945. Brock Rev 11(2):19–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Zrubavel Y (1996) The forest as a national icon: literature, politics, and the archeology of memory. Israel Stud 1(1):60–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Zrubavel Y (2008) Desert and settlement – space metaphors and symbolic landscapes in the yishuv and early Israeli culture. In: Brauch J, Lipphardt A, Nocke A (eds) Jewish topographies: visions of space, traditions of place. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 201–222

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edna Gorney .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gorney, E. (2017). Roots of Identity, Canopy of Collision: Re-Visioning Trees as an Evolving National Symbol Within the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. In: Joanaz de Melo, C., Vaz, E., Costa Pinto, L. (eds) Environmental History in the Making. Environmental History, vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41139-2_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics