Abstract
Often, we wish to let parties alter or undo a contract that has been made. Toward this end, contract law has developed a set of traditional tools for altering and undoing contracts. Unfortunately, these tools often fail when applied to smart contracts. It is therefore necessary to define a new set of standards for the altering and undoing of smart contracts. These standards might ensure that the tools we use to alter and undo smart contracts achieve their original (contract law) goals when applied to this new technology. This paper develops such a set of standards and, then, to prove their worth as a framework, applies to them to an existing smart contract platform (Ethereum).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Posner, R.: Economic Analysis of Law. Little Brown and Co., Boston (1986)
Szabo, N.: Smart Contracts: Building Blocks for Digital Markets (1996)
Juels, A., Kosba, A., Shi, E.: The Ring of Gyges: Investigating the Future of Criminal Smart Contracts (2015)
Szabo, N.: Smart Contracts (1994)
Szabo, N.: The Idea of Smart Contracts (1997)
Buterin, V.: Ethereum White Paper (2014)
Posner, R.: Let us never blame a contract breaker. Mich. Law Rev. 107, 1360 (2009)
Black, H.C.: Black’s Law Dictionary, p. 1025 (1910)
Black, H.C.: A Treatise on the Rescission of Contracts and Cancellation of Written Instruments, vol. 1 (1916)
Koford, H.S.: Recessions at law and in equity. Calif. Law Rev. 36, 608 (1948)
Atlas Trucking v. City of Lompoc, S224878, 2015 Cal. LEXIS 2165 (Sup. Ct. Cal., 15 April 2015)
Great American Ins. v. General Builders, 934 p. 2d 257, 262 n. 6 (Nev. 1997)
Corbin, A.L.: Corbin on Contracts, vol. 5A (1964)
Russell, I.S.: Reinventing the deal: a sequential approach to analyzing claims for enforcement of modified sales contracts. Fla. Law Rev. 53, 51 (2001)
DeMichele, M.L., Bales, R.A.: Unilateral-modification provisions in employment arbitration agreements. Hofstra Employ. Law J. 24, 64 (2006)
Carey v. 24 Hour Fitness, USA, Inc., 669 F.3d 202 (5th Cir. 2012)
Christine, C.: Contracts as bilateral commitments: a new perspective on contract modification. J. Legal Stud. 26, 204 (1997)
Hillman, R.A.: A study of uniform commercial code methodology: contract modification under article two. N. C. Law Rev. 59, 339 (1981)
Williston, S., Lord, R.: Williston on Contracts (1992)
Moffett, Hodgkins & Clarke Co. v. Rochester, 178 U.S. 373, 385 (1900)
Link v. Kroenke, 909 S.W.2d 740, 745 (Mo. App. W.D. 1995)
Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Co., 350 F.2d 445, 449 (D.C. Cir. 1965)
The Great Chain of Being Sure About Things. The Economist (2015)
Marino, B.: https://medium.com/@ConsenSys/unpacking-the-term-smart-contract-e63238f7db65
Delmolino, K., Arnett, M., Kosba, A., Miller, A., Shi, E.: Step by Step Towards Creating a Safe Smart Contract: Lessons and Insights from a Cryptocurrency Lab (2015)
Wood, G.: https://github.com/ethereum/wiki/wiki/Solidity,-Docs-and-ABI
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Marino, B., Juels, A. (2016). Setting Standards for Altering and Undoing Smart Contracts. In: Alferes, J., Bertossi, L., Governatori, G., Fodor, P., Roman, D. (eds) Rule Technologies. Research, Tools, and Applications. RuleML 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9718. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42019-6_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42019-6_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42018-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42019-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)